Hotel in Minsk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
I'm seeing a lot of posts like this one below about negative experiences with mods when the word "female" is used. The mods really seem to be hiding their true issues with the "women vs. female" thing and why they choose to ban users who say female. They're framing it as though their concern is because female is Andrew Tate inspired "incelspeak" and demeaning to women, who they present themselves as defending in this whole affair. It seems like this framing has been successful too because almost all of the comments are discussing the ban from this specific angle.
The mods keep directing users to another subreddit, /r/menandfemales, to explain their problem with the word. This sub reminds me of one that is similar, /r/pointlesslygendered. Both purport themselves to just be average women advocating for themselves in the gender culture war, in reality it's just troons. If you look at the subreddits their users most overlap with, they're dominated by the troon subs.
We know that Reddit moderators are overwhelming trannies, and even more so for the more popular subs which /r/therewasanattempt falls into with 7m+ users. I suspect that if the mods were using individual accounts rather than this shared mod team one, you'd by able to confirm they're trans viewing their 3 most recent posts. I think this is just them hiding behind women to engage in their war vs. everything normal, in this case with the word "female" which every online troon views as hate speech. Not a dog whistle, but like a criminal offense. Matt Walsh's "What Is A Woman?" documentary and the resulting social commentary was like their very own holocaust.
