US New York City Tells Migrants There’s ‘No Guarantee’ of Finding Help Here - Mayor Eric Adams announced new shelter rules for some asylum seekers, and will begin discouraging migrants at the southern border from coming to New York City.

New York City Tells Migrants There’s ‘No Guarantee’ of Finding Help Here
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Jeffery C. Mays
2023-07-20 02:16:47GMT

nyc01.jpg
More than 90,000 migrants have arrived in New York City since the spring of 2022, and close to 55,000 are still in the city’s care.Credit...Juan Arredondo for The New York Times

New York City will immediately begin discouraging asylum seekers from seeking refuge here, distributing fliers at the southern border that warn migrants there is “no guarantee” they will receive shelter or services, Mayor Eric Adams announced on Wednesday.

The city’s move is a sharp and somewhat unexpected departure from its long-held status as a sanctuary city, and as a place that guarantees a right to shelter.

“We have no more room in the city,” Mr. Adams said during a news conference at City Hall.

As part of the city’s shift in strategy, it will now require single adult migrants to reapply for shelter after 60 days, a move that the mayor said was designed to make room for families with children. Mr. Adams said the city would intensify efforts to help the migrants connect with family, friends or outside networks in order to find alternative housing arrangements.

If alternative housing arrangements are not available, single adult asylum seekers will have to return to the intake center and reapply for housing. It is unclear what would happen if there is not housing available at the intake centers.

Immigrant and housing advocates questioned whether the changes were legal and would lead to increased street homelessness.

“I have worked with thousands of people over the years whose lives were saved because of the right to shelter,” said Craig Hughes, a social worker with Mobilization for Justice, a nonprofit legal services group. “The idea that there’s some imaginary place that people are going to go off to besides city streets is just false.”

More than 90,000 migrants have arrived in the city since the spring of 2022 and close to 55,000 are still in the city’s care. Combined with the city’s existing homeless population, more than 105,800 people are being sheltered by the city, a record.

The city has opened more than 188 sites to house migrants, including 18 humanitarian relief centers. From July 10-16, 2,800 new migrants arrived, according to Anne Williams-Isom, the deputy mayor for health and human services.

Our compassion is infinite,” said Dr. Ted Long, senior vice president at NYC Health + Hospitals, the agency that operates much of the emergency housing for migrants. “Our space is not.”

The fliers, however, do not convey much compassion. Available in English and Spanish, they describe New York City’s high cost of housing, food and transportation. An accompanying illustration shows arrows pointing north from the border to South Dakota, Vermont, Wisconsin and three other states — but not New York.

nyc02.jpg
Brad Lander, the city comptroller, said the announcement undermined the right to shelter and “the defining role of New York as a beacon of promise inscribed at the base of the Statue of Liberty.”Credit...NYC Mayor’s Office

“There is no guarantee we will be able to provide shelter and services to new arrivals,” the flier reads. “Please consider another city as you make your decision about where to settle in the U.S.,” it concludes.

The city, however, remains under a decades-old court order that requires it to provide shelter to anyone who needs a bed.

Brad Lander, the city comptroller, said the announcement undermined the right to shelter and “the defining role of New York as a beacon of promise inscribed at the base of the Statue of Liberty.”

Advocates have called on city officials to make room in the shelter system by more quickly moving those experiencing homelessness from shelter to permanent housing. Mr. Adams and the City Council recently sparred over legislation that would eliminate a rule requiring a 90-day stay in shelter before becoming eligible for a city housing voucher.

The mayor vetoed a package of legislation and temporarily revoked the 90-day rule. The City Council easily overrode the mayor’s veto last week.

“I think that the real solution here is not continuously doing half measures and short cuts,” said Murad Awawdeh, the executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition. “It’s actually doing the work of getting people out of the shelter system and into permanent housing.”

The mayor and city officials continued to criticize the federal government for not providing expedited work authorizations and for not forcing other jurisdictions to help absorb the influx of migrants. The city has estimated that it would spend $4 billion through the next fiscal year to house and feed the asylum seekers.

Mr. Adams said the city has had to shift its strategy as the number of migrants overwhelms the city’s ability to house them.

One strategy has involved sending migrants outside the city, which has sued municipalities that have tried to block those efforts. Mr. Adams also asked a judge to relieve the city of its unique right to shelter obligations.

Hildalyn Colón Hernández, deputy director of New Immigrant Community Empowerment, a nonprofit that supports immigrant workers, said she understood the pressure the city was facing, but that the challenge of finding housing would be extraordinarily difficult for new arrivals who are struggling to learn English, find work and obtain basic documents needed to attain housing.

“Even regular New Yorkers that have been here and have jobs have not been able to get affordable housing,” Ms. Colón Hernández said. “One hundred percent of the migrants who come here will tell you that their priority is to get a job and get out of shelter.”
 
Look at all those black men.
Not a lot of latino women and children I can see. I'm sure they're around somewhere. Maybe they're in the hotels. That's it. Surely.
In fairness, Latino migrants benefit from chain migration and often move in with relatives or friends. What's alarming is all the young, single men who clearly have no support system in this country. Things are going to get real spicy in NYC in the next few years.
I'm pretty sure that there's laws on the books that could be enforced that would solve this problem.
I don't understand why "immigration reform" is required at all.
I disagree. We need a legal solution to all these bullshit asylum claims.
 
"Refugees welcome! Wtf we didn't mean HERE!"
LMFAO, you get what you fucking deserve and I hope Texas sends tens of thousands more your way. Deal with the consequences of your luxury beliefs you retards!
The thing is a lot of these illegals aren't even being bussed in by Abbott or any other Republican governor. According to Abbott in June he sent about 21,000 illegals to liberal cities, about 11k to NYC, Adams is saying they are seeing 10k illegals a month and over 100k this year alone. Peter Santenello did a series of Youtube videos where he rode along with sheriffs in Arizona and Texas and interviewed them about the border situation. Both basically said the people who are coming are just flying into the airport in Mexicali, which the border is less than 4 miles from the airport, they either load up on food and water and walk the distance, or they have hired someone to basically drive them right up to the border. Their clothes, shoes, and backpacks are all clean, they simply just walk up to the border and call 911 over and over again or the federal government has placed emergency boxes around the border where you just hit a button and the border patrol will come and get you within two hours.

In the Arizona video they ran into a group of 7 or 8 Indians(dot not feather) sitting outside the border, one of the border agents pulled up said they called 911 8 or 9 times just so they could get picked up, on them they had an address they were going to in Chicago. Both the Texas and Arizona sheriffs said that this is pretty much the standard, that they all have addresses in the interior of the country they are going to mostly NYC, Chicago, LA, and San Francisco. They said under Trump if they caught a coyote bringing people across the border in Texas or Arizona, the state would lock them up for smuggling through a state crime. When Biden came in they sued the states saying the federal government had sole authority when it came to immigration law. So now the only people who can arrest illegal immigrants are ICE and border patrol and like the sheriffs said, how many border patrol agents are there in Chicago, NYC, or San Francisco?
 

Biden Administration Pushes ‘Remain in Texas’ Policy for Migrants, Forces State to Open Borders​

Link - Archive
By Kyle Becker—September 7, 2023

The Biden administration is considering keeping undocumented migrant families near the Texas border during their asylum screening, restricting their travel within the U.S., according to three U.S. officials who spoke to The LA Times.

The Biden “remain-in-Texas” policy would hinder migrant families crossing the southern border from coming further into the United States. The number of families crossing the southern border reportedly reached a record high last month.

Since 2022, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, has transported thousands of migrants out of his state to cities controlled by Democrats, such as Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C.

Mayors in Democrat-run cities across the country, particularly New York City Mayor Eric Adams, have bridled at the Texas governor’s transmigration tactic to pressure blue states to develop sensible border policies.

Adams recently decried the transmigration tactic, also utilized by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, as ‘destroying’ New York City, despite the city’s purported “sanctuary city” status.

Under the Biden plan, certain migrant families would be compelled to stay in Texas, or possibly other border states, with their locations monitored via GPS tracking devices like ankle bracelets, according to the three officials who were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

These families would undergo an asylum screening process to determine their eligibility to remain in the U.S. and pursue their claims. Officials have discussed collaborating with local organizations to provide housing for these families.

In the event that these families fail their initial screenings, deportation would be more straightforward since they would be in proximity to the border. Arresting migrant families in the interior of the U.S. is typically more logistically challenging due to the complexities of apprehending children and their parents. Historically, deportations of migrant families are fewer compared to those of single adults seeking asylum in the U.S.

“DHS continuously holds policy and operational discussions on how to leverage our authorities to ensure a fair, humane and effective immigration process that efficiently removes those without a lawful basis to stay in the country,” a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said.

If implemented, this plan would expand upon an existing Biden administration program known as Family Expedited Removal Management (FERM), which imposes curfews and GPS monitoring on migrant families traveling to major cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington.

Administration officials had hoped that the FERM program, in combination with videos and news releases highlighting deportations of families, would serve as a deterrent to additional unauthorized border crossings.

However, in July, Border Patrol encountered over 60,000 families crossing the border, constituting nearly half of the total number of border crossers that month. Border Patrol has yet to release the figures for August, but the Washington Post reported last week that it exceeded 91,000, an all-time high.

Since May, families have accounted for a significant portion of the overall increase in border crossings, despite initial expectations that President Biden’s new asylum restrictions would significantly reduce these numbers.

Immigrant advocates have criticized the Biden administration’s treatment of migrant families, arguing that these families lack adequate access to attorneys and sufficient time to prepare their asylum cases.

Robyn Barnard, director of refugee advocacy at Human Rights First, expressed reservations about the “remain-in-Texas” proposal, stating, “People should not be punished for their manner of entry to seek asylum,” she said.

U.S. officials have long urged migrants to enter the country through legal pathways, including scheduling appointments at a port of entry or applying for programs that allow certain migrants to come to the U.S. with a financial sponsor and after passing security checks.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas emphasized the consequences of not using lawful entry routes, stating, “People who do not use available lawful pathways to enter the U.S. now face tougher consequences, including a minimum five-year ban on reentry and potential criminal prosecution.”

“We have no plan to detain families,” Mayorkas said in April. “As I mentioned, we will be employing alternatives to detention, including some innovations in that regard, and we will on a case-by-case basis use enhanced alternatives to detention as warranted.”

However, the administration has refrained from reviving the Trump- and Obama-era practice of detaining migrant families at the border.

Yael Schacher, director for the Americas and Europe at Refugees International and a historian of U.S. immigration, noted that forcing migrant families to remain near the border hasn’t been attempted in decades, stating, “There hasn’t been an attempt to force asylum-seeking families to remain in border towns for 35 years.”

In the late 1980s, the Reagan administration compelled thousands of migrants to apply for asylum near the location where they crossed the South Texas border and receive their decisions there. Officials were explicit at the time that this policy aimed to discourage families from crossing.

Migrants lived in church shelters or established camps in parking lots or abandoned buildings while awaiting their initial asylum interviews.

Local officials were outraged and even attempted to evict federal immigration officials from the office they used to process asylum claims. At one point, a Texas state judge prohibited federal officials from operating their office in the South Texas city of Harlingen.

The Biden policy follows upon the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction on Wednesday ordering Texas to take down river buoy barriers near Eagle Point, Texas by September 15.
 
I hope right wingers fund a lawsuit. Just to force them to do it or end the laws.
The NYS constitution guarantees a right to shelter. It's great-for citizens and legal residents, but there should be an exception for non-citizens without legal residence. You are correct they should be forced to since the policy of the Democrats running the country and NYC is to have open borders. House these illegals on the Upper East Side: in Central Park, in the NYC and Columbia University dorms, at the Plaza Hotel; in other words make the people who push for these policies suffer the consequences of their actions.

The people who support this wacky policy will abandon NYC before they will admit they were wrong. The problem is they will then spread out all over the US.
 
The Biden administration is considering keeping undocumented migrant families near the Texas border during their asylum screening, restricting their travel within the U.S., according to three U.S. officials who spoke to The LA Times.

The Biden “remain-in-Texas” policy would hinder migrant families crossing the southern border from coming further into the United States. The number of families crossing the southern border reportedly reached a record high last month.
The Biden policy follows upon the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction on Wednesday ordering Texas to take down river buoy barriers near Eagle Point, Texas by September 15.
>Texas upholds borders, gets punished
>Texas gives sanctuary cities their precious migrants, also gets punished

Why haven't the Gutless Old Pedophiles moved to impeach Mayorkas yet? That cueball cocksucker blatantly lied to Congress about the border being "secure".
 
Brad Lander, the city comptroller, said the announcement undermined the right to shelter and “the defining role of New York as a beacon of promise inscribed at the base of the Statue of Liberty.”
Somehow I don't think Emma Lazarus envisioned tens of thousands of immigrants (legal or otherwise) arriving by the month in her time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Their idea of "immigration reform" is total open borders, and making Red states carry the burden.

Not just the burden.. but to be overrun by likely new dem voters! Remember and call this shit what it really is! Remember all the smug celebrating of your avg dem prog over the demographic shift in general. (it's not uncommon to hear comments like "I can't wait until white people are no longer a majority" when talking about voting and "wrong" outcomes etc.)


Biden Administration Pushes ‘Remain in Texas’ Policy for Migrants, Forces State to Open Borders​


Fucking evil! See above. Time for Texas to put MGs at their border and stop providing ANY emergency or rescue services to non-legals.

Edit: Wait, the last part confuses me. They are already forcing the border open.. Does this mean a "remain in mexico" type thing where they literally allow them to officially walk in and wait?! WTF!? Combined with a policy that already doesn't force them out when they get denied.. This is open border by any other name/means!
 
Last edited:
N.Y. Lawmakers Sue to Block Migrants From Floyd Bennett Field
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Nicholas Fandos
2023-09-19 21:20:10GMT

A dozen New York lawmakers — including four Democrats and a Republican congresswoman — raced to court on Tuesday to try to block Mayor Eric Adams from opening an emergency shelter for as many as 2,000 migrants at Floyd Bennett Field in Brooklyn.

In a suit filed in State Supreme Court on Staten Island, the lawmakers accused Mr. Adams and Gov. Kathy Hochul of skirting state and federal law meant to protect the national parkland when they reached an agreement last week to lease it from the Biden administration. They asked the court for an immediate injunction, and said they were preparing another, federal suit.

“Clearly, the defendant governor and defendant mayor are seeking to establish this colony of migrants on protected federal lands, without having the light of day expose the illegal and improper aspects of their plans,” the plaintiffs wrote.

The lawsuit opens a new front in an escalating political battle over how New York should handle the crush of migrants arriving from the southwestern border. More than 110,000 asylum seekers have entered the city over the last year, straining its existing network of homeless shelters and its finances.

Mr. Adams and Ms. Hochul, both Democrats, have demanded more help from the Biden administration to try to stem the flow and move migrants out of shelters and into jobs more quickly. But because of a decades-old mandate to house the homeless, they say they have little option but to open a network of emergency shelters across the city.

Republicans have furiously objected. Joann Ariola, a Republican city councilwoman from Queens who was one of the driving forces behind Tuesday’s suit, recently called on fellow Republicans to “fully wage war” on Ms. Hochul and President Biden over their immigration policies. A growing number of Democrats have joined them in protest, albeit substituting concerns about the shelters’ effects on local services, for the more sweeping condemnations of the Republicans.

Responding on Tuesday, Mr. Adams said that the lawmakers had the right to sue, but he argued there were few better sites than Floyd Bennett Field, situated on the Jamaica Bay in southeast Brooklyn, “away from homes,” communities and school. The city finalized a lease on the site on Friday, after months of negotiations with the Biden administration.

“We’re trying to be as the least intrusive as possible to everyday New Yorkers; at the same time be as humane as possible, because we have to show that level of humanitarian aspect of this city,” Mr. Adams told reporters at an event in Manhattan.

He added: “If they don’t want it there, then they can’t get upset when it goes inside their neighborhood and block.”

Avi Small, a spokesman for Ms. Hochul, declined to comment on pending litigation.

The lawsuit portrays the site in starkly different terms, citing concerns about the risk of flooding, environmental degradation and potential impacts on nearby hospitals and emergency responders.

It was brought by a mix of City Council members, state legislators, local residents and one Republican congresswoman, Representative Nicole Malliotakis, who represents Staten Island and parts of Brooklyn. Among the Democrats were City Council members Robert Holden of Queens and Kalman Yeger of Brooklyn, as well as Assembly members Jaime R. Williams of Brooklyn and Stacey Pheffer Amato of Queens.

“It is without a doubt unacceptable, inhumane and cruel to construct a shelter and house migrants in a known flood zone like Floyd Bennett Field,” Ms. Pheffer Amato said in a statement. She said the site “lacks basic infrastructure” and would strain resources in her district.

Though the site is in Brooklyn, the suit was filed in the same Staten Island court where a judge granted a temporary restraining order in August blocking the city from housing migrants at a former school, St. John Villa Academy. The decision was later overturned.

Ms. Malliotakis opposes that shelter as well and has introduced legislation in Washington to prohibit using federal funds to create shelters on United States military bases or federal parkland, including Floyd Bennett Field and Staten Island’s Fort Wadsworth.
 
10 arrested, NYPD cop hurt as protesters block bus of migrants arriving at Staten Island shelter
New York Daily News (archive.ph)
By Josephine Stratman, Thomas Tracy, and Larry McShane
2023-09-20 13:37:52GMT

Ten people were arrested after a protest against housing migrants on Staten Island ended in a violent clash with cops, police said Wednesday.

One demonstrator faced a charge of assaulting a police officer while the other nine were slapped with summonses for disorderly conduct following the Tuesday night confrontation at Father Capodanno Blvd. and Midland Ave. in Midland Beach, cops said.

A busload of asylum seekers were headed to the Island Shores Assisted Living Facility when protesters blocked their path to the former assisted living facility, cops said. Responding officers ordered the demonstrators to move out of the way but some refused, sparking a stand-off before things escalated.

Mayor Adams denounced the demonstrators as unrepresentative of the city’s 8.3 million residents.

“They’ve decided that they want to bang on buses and say things that are just not what we do as city,” Adams told WPIX-TV Wednesday. “We’re all frustrated. We’re all angry. But those who decide they’re going to cross the line, it’s not going to happen. They were wrong to act that way and we’re not going to allow it to happen.”

Cops stepped in and dragged demonstrators from the street, with one officer suffering a knee injury when 48-year-old Vadim Dlyakov, who lives down the block from the assisted living facility, put up a fight, police said.

Dylakov was charged with assaulting a police officer, resisting arrest and obstructing government administration. His arraignment in Staten Island Criminal Court was pending Wednesday. Another eight men and one woman were arrested and released with disorderly conduct summonses that they will have to answer in court at a later date.

“The protests we are seeing in Staten Island represent a vocal minority,” said Murad Awawdeh, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition. “By resorting to blocking arrivals altogether they have reached a new low in their misguided frustrations against asylum seekers … They are not representative of the feelings of the majority of New Yorkers.”

The Tuesday unrest was the latest in a string of protests over migrants and asylum seekers being housed in the outer boroughs.

Protesters have also picketed outside of Gracie Mansion as more than 110,000 migrants have come to New York City over the last several months.

About 10,000 migrants are now arriving each month in the city, creating an untenable burden on the city to shelter and care for them as they get on their feet, Adams said.

Yesenia Mata, executive director of the Staten Island immigration non-profit La Colmena, pointed the finger at local politicians, referring to Borough President Vito Fossella and Rep. Nicole Malliotakis.

“It’s very dangerous, the type of xenophobic messages that come from the elected officials that have been supporting these anti-immigrant rallies,” she said. “This is only going to continue to escalate and we’re just seeing how people are so empowered that they feel they could injure a police officer.”
 
Back