- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Didn't the ukies pinkiepwomise not to conduct offensive operations outside of Ukraine using starlink? I remember something like that, but I don't care enough to go looking.
Anyways, if so, he's perfectly justified to do that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't the ukies pinkiepwomise not to conduct offensive operations outside of Ukraine using starlink? I remember something like that, but I don't care enough to go looking.
I sometimes forget how strong the propaganda machine is. So the US is now at war with Russia (?) and Starlink is a branch of the military (?) and beholden to the commands of a non-allied nation?
They have every single right to retaliate even against Russian civilians inside Moscow, as vengeance for the strikes on their cities.Didn't the ukies pinkiepwomise not to conduct offensive operations outside of Ukraine using starlink? I remember something like that, but I don't care enough to go looking.
Anyways, if so, he's perfectly justified to do that.
Regardless of what you think of Elon's "right" to do so, they agreed not to do what they tried to do with starlink, which is owned by, you guessed it, Elon fuckin Musk.They have every single right to retaliate even against Russian civilians inside Moscow, as vengeance for the strikes on their cities.
Elon does have the right to not want Starlink used for it.
And we have the right to mock the fuck out of him and bully him online. Well not me cause I'm banned, but I do hope he gets fucked with by packs of rabid AIDS ridden homosexual NAFOtards hell bent on puncturing his bussy.
It's what he deserves for thinking that leveling Mariupol is OK, wanting to take Kiev is OK, but sinking the Russian fleet (which is in Crimea, which basically everyone on the planet recognizes as Ukraine's) is a step too far.
Not even the President can just seize private industry, even during a war, and we're not even officially in one. Idiot should look up Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer. Elon can run his business any way he feels like barring some use of martial law to officially seize it under emergency powers, which is not going to happen.I sometimes forget how strong the propaganda machine is. So the US is now at war with Russia (?) and Starlink is a branch of the military (?) and beholden to the commands of a non-allied nation?
Crimea is Ukraine's you spergRegardless of what you think of Elon's "right" to do so, they agreed not to do what they tried to do with starlink, which is owned by, you guessed it, Elon fuckin Musk.
Therefore, your opinion of his right to do so doesn't matter. Pissing upwind ain't gonna change it.
No, it’s China’s you westoidCrimea is Ukraine's you sperg
Elon never should have supported that corrupt shithole anyways. Regardless of who claims Crimea now, the US has nothing to do with it. Neither of them are entitled to help from US citizens or tax dollars, and everything Musk has done should be seen as a gratuity. I'll laugh my ass off if the people he's been supporting for the last year keep calling him a nazi and he just cuts them off completely.Crimea is Ukraine's you sperg
In case it's not clear yet, fucking up the Russian fleet anchored in some Crimean harbor or fooling around in the Black Sea nearby is NOT "inside Russia", it's part of Ukraine that was annexed and is not recognized as being Russia's.
I see zero issues with trying to destroy it. Why would you lmao?
Luckily for Ukraine, East EU and NATO, normies don't make these decisions.the US has nothing to do with it
Elon Musk’s X Corp. sued California over a law requiring social media companies to explain how their content is moderated.
The company that operates the social network that used to be known as Twitter argues the measure, AB 587, interferes with its editorial judgments protected as free speech under the Constitution.
When California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the bill last year, he said it was designed to protect the public by requiring social media companies to reveal their policies on hate speech, disinformation, harassment and extremism on their platforms, and report data on their enforcement of the policies.
But the law’s true intent is “to pressure social media platforms to ‘eliminate’ certain constitutionally protected content viewed by the state as problematic,” according to the complaint.
Advertisers have fled the platform since Musk bought it for $44 billion last year and started making changes, including reinstating formerly banned users and firing content moderators. Musk changed the name to X from Twitter.
During his tenure, the platform has seen a spike in harmful content due to policy changes in content moderation, according to researchers. The self-styled “free-speech absolutist” hired an executive charged with repairing partnerships in the media industry and luring back advertisers.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Last month, a federal judge in California dismissed a previous challenge to the law brought by groups including the National Religious Broadcasters, ruing that the plaintiffs failed to allege an actual danger from the AB 587. The judge gave the groups a chance to revise the complaint.
the fact that not a single soul on this damned earth is willing to abide by Elon’s stupid rebrand never ceases to entertain meThe company that operates the social network that used to be known as Twitter
The man just wants some compensation for becoming a military target. When Russia blows up a bunch of his satellites it's not free to replace them.Elon can run his business any way he feels like
Zelensky had to do a lot of Zoom calls.Like I'm glad Elon told the US gov to piss up a rope, but it's not like having internet would've made any difference in the contest. Did the Ukrainians have some munitions that only worked with high-speed internet? Did they not have cell and radio comms? Did they have some new fangled BFTs and targetting shit that didn't use regular OTH message formats?
I mean sure, they would've been able to pirate a bunch of anime at the front line and that would've helped, but I doubt it would've led to a decisive win.
Yes? Did you read any of the tweets? Ukraine uses remote-controlled sea drones to attack Russian ships. They were hooked up with Starlink but went dead once they left the approved area.Did the Ukrainians have some munitions that only worked with high-speed internet?
I read the Xeets in this thread, but I don't see that one. That's fucking hilarious if true.Yes? Did you read any of the tweets? Ukraine uses remote-controlled sea drones to attack Russian ships. They were hooked up with Starlink but went dead once they left the approved area.
“…to Sevastopol”, which is Ukraine territory. So they wouldn’t be breaking that promise.Didn't the ukies pinkiepwomise not to conduct offensive operations outside of Ukraine using starlink?
Hey genius: Guess what you are and guess what your sperging amounts to?Luckily for Ukraine, East EU and NATO, normies don't make these decisions.