- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
If you are interested in more about the MGM/Disney stuff here is a run down of it.
Seems it was less "owned" and more "contracted."
Seems it was less "owned" and more "contracted."
"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Making the cow orbit your head was a nice touch.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2023
I'm just curious, has anyone ever done MATI Timestamps? I have one prepared but I wanted to know if anyone's actually ever done it before.
BTW: This is what I mean:
0:00 Chapters
1:00 Intro
1:29 Topic #1, etc
BTW: This is what I mean:
0:00 Chapters
1:00 Intro
1:29 Topic #1, etc
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
You missed mutt's law. He mentioned niggers in prison saying 'it ain't gay if he wearin' a dress'.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2020
This didn't go unnoticed. This is the production value we love to see
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
I remember seeing a superchat on Rumble asking where the line was with BossmanJack trolling and I just realized I didn't see it while reading, so I know for sure that Rumble deletes superchats when I previously suspected they kept them in chat history forever.
By Friday I will have a way to collect superchats on my own using SNEED and they will all get read. Really sorry for the superchat problems.
P.S. I can't really stop people from just saying shit in his chat, but I ask you don't brag about doing it on the forum. Ratting in his chat is something I cannot encourage but I know for a fact there's guys outside KF with thousands of accounts made to troll him with.
By Friday I will have a way to collect superchats on my own using SNEED and they will all get read. Really sorry for the superchat problems.
P.S. I can't really stop people from just saying shit in his chat, but I ask you don't brag about doing it on the forum. Ratting in his chat is something I cannot encourage but I know for a fact there's guys outside KF with thousands of accounts made to troll him with.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
I appreciate the manual orbiting of the cow at the end of the stream. Real craftsmanship shows that he really cares. You should find someone to do animated stream starting/ending slides.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
I am really feeling the nigger Drexel fatigue during MATI. He is really gross and super smug which is not fun to hear his voice and when talking to Nick. I know its funny how he's a tranny chaser and getting paranoid about the farms , but the story of the mother and daughter (my intro to him) was not a fun to start with him and he's segment are really long .
Like Josh said about Low Tier God he just another black guy.
Like Josh said about Low Tier God he just another black guy.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
The myth of lesbians having extraordinary high domestic abuse rates is based on ONE study in which lesbians were asked "Have you ever in your life experienced domestic violence by a romantic partner?". It was never asked what the sex of the partner was. A lot of lesbians have dated men in the past before "coming out" and I'd wager a bet that being domestically abused by a man makes you realize you are a lesbian like nothing else.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
Do you have a link to that study? Because the ones I'm finding all make a division between the male and female partners in the abuse. Even the wikipedia article on domestic abuse within lesbian relationships brings up the division between male and female perpetrators with two-thirds of the study having only female perpetrators.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2022
"that's, like, not even gay knowing ... that's gay wisdom.
that man has achieved gay enlightenment,
and he now lives in a philosophical world of homosexuality where all things are possible."
- joshua conner moon
that man has achieved gay enlightenment,
and he now lives in a philosophical world of homosexuality where all things are possible."
- joshua conner moon
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
after the dunking by the internet . Unity backed a little away from the cliff
so extra step added is use VPN on initial installation
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
Is there a better one than the report from 2010? It doesn't get granular enough imo
This is high because "intimate partner violence" includes sexual violence, stalking, physical violence, and psychological aggression.
Name calling could be anywhere from 0%-100% of lesbian-on-lesbian violence as far as this study goes because it doesn't go better into dividing the type of violence by sex of the perpetrator.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
I think that study does a good job of painting the abuse in lesbian relationships.
Following the logic you've presented in the rest of your post should we also remove the psychological aggression from the male perpetrators? Does psychological aggression count as abuse or only when it's coming from a man?
Why does the type of abuse suddenly matter now? For all we know name calling could be anywhere from 0%-100% of violence in heterosexual relationships.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2022
I'll agree that the story of the mother and daughter is "not fun" and say it's really pretty sickening. But the guy needs to eat all the shit that is thrown at him imo. And, I'll go out on a limb here and say that while LTG is not a good MATI segment candidate that he is actually much more fun to listen to and totally different to Drexel
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2023
Drexel is just so unbelievably low-IQ it's astounding. His tweets have the mannerisms of a fucking middle-schooler
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2020
Since Null is a fellow Elon Musk enjoyer, I thought I'd add some context.
I'll spoiler it since it's a bit long.
tl;dr: Musk was gaslit by Russian glowniggers into thwarting Ukrainian offensive operations and now is coping and seething and lying his ass off on twitter, because many people, including members of the US government, think that what he did might be illegal under US law. The only reason why we even know about all this is that Musk's biographer, who is a big Elon fanboy, posted it on Elon's behalf to the Washington Post to advertise for his dick-sucking biography of Musk.
Musk brought this on himself by being a narcissistic retard.
I'll spoiler it since it's a bit long.
tl;dr: Musk was gaslit by Russian glowniggers into thwarting Ukrainian offensive operations and now is coping and seething and lying his ass off on twitter, because many people, including members of the US government, think that what he did might be illegal under US law. The only reason why we even know about all this is that Musk's biographer, who is a big Elon fanboy, posted it on Elon's behalf to the Washington Post to advertise for his dick-sucking biography of Musk.
Musk brought this on himself by being a narcissistic retard.
Musk worked with Ukrainian deputy prime minister Fedorov (and possibly other Ukrainian officials) to coordinate Starlink rollout to Ukraine, which had suffered a breakdown of internet coverage as a result of the Russian attack, to reinstate both civilian and military communication.
Musk then allegedly got a call from the Russian ambassador to the United States (it is possible he had other Russian handlers after this contact was established) who completely bullshitted him that "an attack on Crimea means worldwide nuclear annihilation". Being the moron he is, Musk immediately completely believed it based on their words alone, and, being the narcissistic manchild he is, he didn't get in contact with anyone knowledgeable to get a second opinion, let alone US government officials, he instead personally decided to turn off Starlink in frontline regions in the South, including Kherson where Ukraine conducted a successful counteroffensive at the time, without telling the Ukrainians (he had had no issue at all with military usage before that).
Fedorov contacted him to ask for it to be re-enabled because liberating Ukrainian towns from the brutal Russian occupation is le good, appealing to Musk' self image as a Marvel superhero (according to said biographer Musk rightfully does see himself that way).
Musk agreed to turn it on again, but excluded the seas around Crimea (which is legally part of Ukraine, which is why Ukrainians assumed it was covered again). Musk did not inform the Ukrainians of this exception, which is why an attack on the Russian fleet fizzled out when the drones lost connection. Russian ships cannot get anywhere close to the Ukrainian coast due to Ukrainian coastal missile batteries, so their only use is to launch cruise missiles at civilian targets, which they continue to do to this day thanks to Musk's intervention.
That excerpt also included communication between Musk and Fedorov. Fedorov was not asked whether it was okay to share conversations about Ukrainian military matters with this biographer or the public. Musk just spread them around on his own accord.
Musk notably parroted Russian government talking points to his audience starting around that time period and got interactions on twitter with former Russian president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitri Medvedev, now mostly known for impotently threatening European countries with nuclear annihilation and crying about sanctions being racist against Russians.
Anyway, neither Musk nor his biographer considered the implications of what they wrote and have been running damage control on social media since, claiming they were right all along about averting the threat of nuclear war, and that Musk actually didn't turn anything off, he just didn't turn it on when asked, which directly contradicts his biographer's own claims that Ukrainians were surprised when their drones suddenly lost connection. They since changed their story to the effect that Musk DID turn it off, and indeed DID NOT tell the Ukrainians about it, but it was right to do it anyway because Russians said they'll go total retard war if Crimea is attacked. Crimea was since attacked dozens of times with British and French cruise missiles and Ukrainian drones, and Ukrainian maritime drones hit both Russian military ships and strategically important infrastructure, to absolutely no response by the Russian government (Russian ultranationalists say Kremlin "red lines" are nothing but "brown stripes in underwear"), so their doubling down on this claim is really strange.
Interesting comments from the original WaPo "article":
After this was published, Putin personally said about Musk "As for Elon Musk's private business... He is definitely an outstanding person, this must be recognised... I think this is recognised all over the world. He is an active and talented businessman."
Musk said he is not a traitor, and in fact YOU are a traitor if you call him one.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, demanded a probe into his activities.
Musk then allegedly got a call from the Russian ambassador to the United States (it is possible he had other Russian handlers after this contact was established) who completely bullshitted him that "an attack on Crimea means worldwide nuclear annihilation". Being the moron he is, Musk immediately completely believed it based on their words alone, and, being the narcissistic manchild he is, he didn't get in contact with anyone knowledgeable to get a second opinion, let alone US government officials, he instead personally decided to turn off Starlink in frontline regions in the South, including Kherson where Ukraine conducted a successful counteroffensive at the time, without telling the Ukrainians (he had had no issue at all with military usage before that).
Fedorov contacted him to ask for it to be re-enabled because liberating Ukrainian towns from the brutal Russian occupation is le good, appealing to Musk' self image as a Marvel superhero (according to said biographer Musk rightfully does see himself that way).
Musk agreed to turn it on again, but excluded the seas around Crimea (which is legally part of Ukraine, which is why Ukrainians assumed it was covered again). Musk did not inform the Ukrainians of this exception, which is why an attack on the Russian fleet fizzled out when the drones lost connection. Russian ships cannot get anywhere close to the Ukrainian coast due to Ukrainian coastal missile batteries, so their only use is to launch cruise missiles at civilian targets, which they continue to do to this day thanks to Musk's intervention.
That excerpt also included communication between Musk and Fedorov. Fedorov was not asked whether it was okay to share conversations about Ukrainian military matters with this biographer or the public. Musk just spread them around on his own accord.
Musk notably parroted Russian government talking points to his audience starting around that time period and got interactions on twitter with former Russian president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitri Medvedev, now mostly known for impotently threatening European countries with nuclear annihilation and crying about sanctions being racist against Russians.
Anyway, neither Musk nor his biographer considered the implications of what they wrote and have been running damage control on social media since, claiming they were right all along about averting the threat of nuclear war, and that Musk actually didn't turn anything off, he just didn't turn it on when asked, which directly contradicts his biographer's own claims that Ukrainians were surprised when their drones suddenly lost connection. They since changed their story to the effect that Musk DID turn it off, and indeed DID NOT tell the Ukrainians about it, but it was right to do it anyway because Russians said they'll go total retard war if Crimea is attacked. Crimea was since attacked dozens of times with British and French cruise missiles and Ukrainian drones, and Ukrainian maritime drones hit both Russian military ships and strategically important infrastructure, to absolutely no response by the Russian government (Russian ultranationalists say Kremlin "red lines" are nothing but "brown stripes in underwear"), so their doubling down on this claim is really strange.
Interesting comments from the original WaPo "article":
After this was published, Putin personally said about Musk "As for Elon Musk's private business... He is definitely an outstanding person, this must be recognised... I think this is recognised all over the world. He is an active and talented businessman."
Musk said he is not a traitor, and in fact YOU are a traitor if you call him one.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, demanded a probe into his activities.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2021
>roblox implements a 17+ dating service to their children's game in the midst of a grooming/pedophile crisis on the platform
>minecraft has a DRM-infested sex mod released by a discord tranny
>in the midst of the chaos, at least we can rest easy knowing blockland is untainted
>suddenly, null opens the blockland forums "rape mod" thread
>mfw
blockbros... its over
>minecraft has a DRM-infested sex mod released by a discord tranny
>in the midst of the chaos, at least we can rest easy knowing blockland is untainted
>suddenly, null opens the blockland forums "rape mod" thread
>mfw
blockbros... its over
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
Mad at the Internet 2023-09-12: