- Joined
- Jul 31, 2020
Like @Ultrapenguin , I mostly agree with you but I think that there's a whole lot more. We talk a lot about Blanchard's typology which breaks the trans population into two populations, but that was created in a very different time where the trans population almost exclusively consisted of people who had received hard-to-get diagnoses from gatekeeping specialists. Now people who would have just occasionally had an errant thought about, "what if I were a man/woman?" or "I wish I were someone else completely different" or "wouldn't that freak the squares out?" have begun actually identifying as trans with the help of negligent doctors.Okay, I’ve been browsing trans articles (pro and anti) for a long time, and I wanna air out my opinions, beliefs, and whatnots so I can get honest criticisms/responses/new information. You’re supposed to look from all angles, you know?
This is where I disagree with you. You don't biologically know that you're a man or woman, it's something that you learn. I don't biologically have a compulsion to wear t-shirts and jeans, these are the clothes that I have access to and which I am socially expected to wear, but if I lived in a society where men wore sun dresses I would wear those without even thinking. I don't biologically feel drawn to he/him pronouns, those are just the pronouns that are used for me because anything else would be confusing. If I lived in some sort of freaky society where I was expected to use bizarre pronouns like "él" I would have not even think of complaining that I needed to use he/him pronouns.I believe there are SOME people who truly do not identify with their birth gender, and have either developed to identify more as the opposite gender, or for some non-understood biological reason they feel disconnected mentally from the sex/gender/whatever
There has never been a good explanation given for the biological or evolutionary origins of gender identities. Why would human beings evolve a part of our brain dedicated to telling us what gender we should be? No other animals seem to have this, it doesn't help us survive as individuals or as a community (even if we accept that gender roles serve a beneficial purpose they are clearly capable of being enforced through other methods as they are in other animals). The only time that gender identity is notable is the 0.1-1% of the population where it apparently goes wrong.
A lot of trans people talk about their genitals not matching their body map, but body maps seem to be learned and not completely innate. If a trans identified male/female person did actually have a female/male brain then we should expect there to be more of an effect than just being dissatisfied with their body. Mind-body dualism is an outdated view of human existence, it's obvious that your body affects your mind, but it's also known that your mind affects your body, including regulation of some hormones. So are we to believe that a trans-identifying male has a male pituitary gland in a female brain in a male body? Like some sort of counter-enclave? It's absolutely absurd and unbelievable.
The only feasible way to justify the claim that transness has biological causes is to say that some people biologically have brain imbalances that make them think that something is wrong and some of them happen to latch onto their gender, but there is no biological cause for the gender component.