There Is Light At The End
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2021
That's quite a scary face
Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser
- Thread starter Strine
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
De-filtered, she is beginning to show her age.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2020
The red-faced smoothing filters immediately make me think of one of those latex fidget dolls.
Except for the ears. We still wouldn't be able to see the ears, even without the heejob.
They were both hoigh during the last live. It's always clear with Chantal, and Salah stays off camera, talking more than usual and really hyuck hyucking it up. That's become a tell for him. THEY BOTH ONLY HAVE TO ANSWER TO THEIR GOD, THOUGH!
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2021
She is beyond showing her age, she is showing the age and health of the a 45 year old+ wino.
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2020
The Pizza Company pizza is basically reskinned Pizza Hut. In fact, it was started by some Thais that worked at, or franchised a Pizza Hut back in the late 90's/early 00's. Quality is about what you'd expect from a typical Pizza Hut in North America. They always include a boatload of ketchup, chili powder, and oregano packets when I've had it. If you want good pizza in Bangkok, go with Peppina (Napoli certified) or Vesuvio, not chain restaurant goyslop.
Witch Bitch
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2020
Delete if already posted but did anyone else see this spurg in the Turkey Tom vid comments?
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
Per kilo/per item, same price when it comes to Chantal's knickers.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2015
Watching the McBeeze via Unicorn Pondue.
"It's not really content that, you know, I didn't come here expecting to make tons and tons of views that, you know, it's content that's very different than what my audience is used to...my audience likes to see me miserable, or for drama, raging, whatever, you know--me being a total mess."
This confirms two things for me:
1. Chantal is aware that FFG is doing retro reacts of her livestreams where she gushed about being in love with Nader, instead of taking the bait to review animal abuser content in Thailand.
2. Chantal is bothered by this.
Chantal is tired. She's in excruciating physical pain. She's been limited to Thai-sized food portions, while being stared and ogled at like the freak show she is. She's wasted much-needed money on a trip that hasn't brought in nearly as much viewer revenue as she thought she was going to get (to the point that she is clearly doing feeder content in the pizza parlor video). She's stuck in a hotel room with a man that isn't in love with her, and if that wasn't clear to her before, it sure as shit is now.
She is teetering on the precipice of an absolutely Biblical rage. I'm just curious as to what will finally push her massive bulk over the edge.
She is a big fat slug, crawling on the edge of a straight razor.
EDIT: Punctuation
"It's not really content that, you know, I didn't come here expecting to make tons and tons of views that, you know, it's content that's very different than what my audience is used to...my audience likes to see me miserable, or for drama, raging, whatever, you know--me being a total mess."
This confirms two things for me:
1. Chantal is aware that FFG is doing retro reacts of her livestreams where she gushed about being in love with Nader, instead of taking the bait to review animal abuser content in Thailand.
2. Chantal is bothered by this.
Chantal is tired. She's in excruciating physical pain. She's been limited to Thai-sized food portions, while being stared and ogled at like the freak show she is. She's wasted much-needed money on a trip that hasn't brought in nearly as much viewer revenue as she thought she was going to get (to the point that she is clearly doing feeder content in the pizza parlor video). She's stuck in a hotel room with a man that isn't in love with her, and if that wasn't clear to her before, it sure as shit is now.
She is teetering on the precipice of an absolutely Biblical rage. I'm just curious as to what will finally push her massive bulk over the edge.
She is a big fat slug, crawling on the edge of a straight razor.
EDIT: Punctuation
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
I loved the pizza video. You can tell Chins fuckin' hated it because WHERE WERE THE CHEESE PULLS?! Every time she took a bite, she'd pull the slice away from her mouth expecting a sloppy cheesy mess and it just wasn't there. With every bite the disappointment and resentment showed on her face. AND! Apparently shitty Thai pizza doesn't even come with four or five different cups of dipping sauce so what is the goddamned point of living? A whole restaurant's supply of stale oregano and ground chili packets can only get you so far. If the ketchup had been in a squeezy bottle you know she woulda drained that thing dry. Plus, the way she talked up how fresh and tangy and creamy and garlicky and hot and delicious said pizza was? Sure, Jan.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2021
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2015
Just move that lump from the neck to the thigh and you got it
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
The lump could very well be there, strapped snugly down under that dang hijab. It's like a chest binder but for the face/neck.
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2022
I too wonder if it's possible to do a truly effective overview or series about Chantal. I make no claim the following are original points -- they're not -- but I've been working my way through the haydur nation thread, which has been instructive:
Is a condensed version of Chantal's life/Youtube channel possible? Possibly, but to do it well would require an awful lot of work, which might not make it worthwhile.
One of the big problems I see (e.g., Mr. Snowflake) is starting at the (available) beginning of the channel and pushing forward. Toad McKinley's video, while dated now (and not without its flaws) is still the gold standard in giving a more holistic portrait.
These are the challenges I see:
(1) Your starting reference point (e.g., 'now' with Chantal as a married Muslim woman) will eventually be outdated (Snowflake's starting with channel termination; Toad's -- I believe -- with the last days with Malan). Until Chantal is dead, yours is a work in progress.
(2) Painting Chantal as victim or a villain isn't adding anything (one gripe about Toad was his criticizing Chantal for lashing out at haydurs yet giving them a pass -- I don't like Chantal but don't think she's wrong for calling them hypocrites)
(3) Acknowledging your overview is necessarily superficial (i.e., until she's dead, there can really be no DEFINITIVE statement, if even then)
(4) Accepting your analysis might be wrong anyway, given that Chantal is an unreliable narrator, that there are big gaps in the data, etc.
(5) Not allowing Chantal's life to become a vector for your personality (Toad's and Snowflake's documentaries both suffer from this; most reaction channels I've watched devolve into cults of personality: Pulpy's need to be adorable, FFG as shrieking Angel of Wrath, Charlie Gold as gatekeeper of fatty propriety, Zachary Michael as unsexed "neutral" observer, Yaba as semi-relatable mom, etc.)
(6) Allowing Chantal to be a human and not trivializing her life as a TV program composed of "seasons/arcs/eras" (that is, if you're going to make fun of fat, mentally ill women for being fat, mentally ill women, which you probably are, "I'm just watching my stories," "This is my reality TV," etc., is not the valid excuse you might think it is.
(7) Citing your sources, even if you find them distasteful
(
Avoiding being pulled into haydur nation, whether as a temporary hero or (eventual) enemy, which is probably just a variation on (5)
And, of course, a thorough review of the available materials, as effective condensing is the outcome of the review, not the starting point (again, the major problem I had with Snowflake's doc, as opposed to Toad's).
Given how overwhelming that task would be (e.g., watching all the available videos, trying to track down what you can't find, acknowledging what you can't find, reviewing Kiwi Farms/Reddit/other surviving gossip pages, reaction channel content, etc.), you would need to apply parameters, meaning multiple passes through the available data: this time I'll focus on pre-mukbang makeup videos; next time, the first six months of mukbang content,; compare X against what was being said about X at the time; down the line, I'll compare Y against references to Y later (e.g., water fast(s) vs. keto vs. OMAD)
Particularly when the storytimes begin (2016-2017), you'll need to revisit them in light of later versions (e.g., older "boyfriend" Christian) to see if/how they change (for instance, Shannon's entering the scene and semi-confirming Chantal's storytime(s?) about Christian).
I think it would be quite interesting/informative. Of course, you'll also have to accept:
(1) you're going to be (branded) an obssessive weirdo (true of any niche researcher)
(2) you're going to have to devote a lot of time to this, at least at the beginning (depending on your background knowledge)
(3) without overt editorializing, you're probably not going to get a lot of attention (assuming that's an issue, but who doesn't love a pat on the head?)
(4) you'll probably not be compensated (at least, not immediately, assuming that concerns you)
(5) your work will be lifted by the reaction channels (e.g., Yaba's reacting to Toad's video; I've never bought the argument that talking over an entire video is "transformative," but it would be up to you to take legal action, if that bothers you)
(6) on some dark night of the soul, you will wonder why you did this to begin with
One of the big problems I see (e.g., Mr. Snowflake) is starting at the (available) beginning of the channel and pushing forward. Toad McKinley's video, while dated now (and not without its flaws) is still the gold standard in giving a more holistic portrait.
These are the challenges I see:
(1) Your starting reference point (e.g., 'now' with Chantal as a married Muslim woman) will eventually be outdated (Snowflake's starting with channel termination; Toad's -- I believe -- with the last days with Malan). Until Chantal is dead, yours is a work in progress.
(2) Painting Chantal as victim or a villain isn't adding anything (one gripe about Toad was his criticizing Chantal for lashing out at haydurs yet giving them a pass -- I don't like Chantal but don't think she's wrong for calling them hypocrites)
(3) Acknowledging your overview is necessarily superficial (i.e., until she's dead, there can really be no DEFINITIVE statement, if even then)
(4) Accepting your analysis might be wrong anyway, given that Chantal is an unreliable narrator, that there are big gaps in the data, etc.
(5) Not allowing Chantal's life to become a vector for your personality (Toad's and Snowflake's documentaries both suffer from this; most reaction channels I've watched devolve into cults of personality: Pulpy's need to be adorable, FFG as shrieking Angel of Wrath, Charlie Gold as gatekeeper of fatty propriety, Zachary Michael as unsexed "neutral" observer, Yaba as semi-relatable mom, etc.)
(6) Allowing Chantal to be a human and not trivializing her life as a TV program composed of "seasons/arcs/eras" (that is, if you're going to make fun of fat, mentally ill women for being fat, mentally ill women, which you probably are, "I'm just watching my stories," "This is my reality TV," etc., is not the valid excuse you might think it is.
(7) Citing your sources, even if you find them distasteful
(
Avoiding being pulled into haydur nation, whether as a temporary hero or (eventual) enemy, which is probably just a variation on (5)And, of course, a thorough review of the available materials, as effective condensing is the outcome of the review, not the starting point (again, the major problem I had with Snowflake's doc, as opposed to Toad's).
Given how overwhelming that task would be (e.g., watching all the available videos, trying to track down what you can't find, acknowledging what you can't find, reviewing Kiwi Farms/Reddit/other surviving gossip pages, reaction channel content, etc.), you would need to apply parameters, meaning multiple passes through the available data: this time I'll focus on pre-mukbang makeup videos; next time, the first six months of mukbang content,; compare X against what was being said about X at the time; down the line, I'll compare Y against references to Y later (e.g., water fast(s) vs. keto vs. OMAD)
Particularly when the storytimes begin (2016-2017), you'll need to revisit them in light of later versions (e.g., older "boyfriend" Christian) to see if/how they change (for instance, Shannon's entering the scene and semi-confirming Chantal's storytime(s?) about Christian).
I think it would be quite interesting/informative. Of course, you'll also have to accept:
(1) you're going to be (branded) an obssessive weirdo (true of any niche researcher)
(2) you're going to have to devote a lot of time to this, at least at the beginning (depending on your background knowledge)
(3) without overt editorializing, you're probably not going to get a lot of attention (assuming that's an issue, but who doesn't love a pat on the head?)
(4) you'll probably not be compensated (at least, not immediately, assuming that concerns you)
(5) your work will be lifted by the reaction channels (e.g., Yaba's reacting to Toad's video; I've never bought the argument that talking over an entire video is "transformative," but it would be up to you to take legal action, if that bothers you)
(6) on some dark night of the soul, you will wonder why you did this to begin with
Sorry for the long post, but I find it a really interesting question.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
That is an interesting question. Years ago, I flirted with the idea of compiling a "film" of my own, but decided that would be gay and a waste of time. In the years since, I came to realize that it would be nearly impossible to create an entertaining narrative that captures everything in 2 hours.
But then again, effective and entertaining biographies have been made of people who have led far more complicated lives that she has. However, in a lot of those cases, the subject had to die first before the overarching narrative could become clear.
In Clotso's case, the most likely narrative will be the woman who ate herself to death. There's a lot more to her story than that, but that seems to be the most consistent storyline over the past six years. Will there be a redemption down the line? Not impossible, but very unlikely. There is perhaps a greater chance that she'll do something that eclipses her notoriety for eating though, and that would affect the direction any biography would have to take. As it stands now, there is no ending to the story, which makes for a very unsatisfying biography.
Since we've followed the ins and outs for years, we all can think of dozens of incidents worth revisiting, and cramming them all into a single movie would result in a 50-hour film, or a 25-part series. Even the greatest humans who have ever walked the earth haven't merited anything like that. So, many of the incidents we see as essential would likely have to be glossed over or addressed fleetingly.
I also think her story shouldn't exist in a vacuum. There would need to be context. That includes YouTube culture, fast food culture, her family's culture, and the inputs that resulted in the mess we have now. That can be done, but it would take a lot of finesse.
Essentially, to do this right, you'd need to have a skilled writer to coax out the real story here. Simply editing together endless clips would not work; for the common viewer, she's too infuriatingly aimless to watch.
Toad's documentary came the closest to getting the job done, but it was far from flawless, with long stretches of boring stuff, too much repetition, and mediocre narration. He did about as good a job as could be hoped for, but it really doesn't work as a real film. It is also hopelessly out of date.
Budding filmmakers might do better to find a more interesting subject for a movie; almost anybody walking by on the street probably has had a more interesting life than Chantal has. For those determined to make their names as the biographer who got it right, I really do think you'll need to wait until she croaks.
But then again, effective and entertaining biographies have been made of people who have led far more complicated lives that she has. However, in a lot of those cases, the subject had to die first before the overarching narrative could become clear.
In Clotso's case, the most likely narrative will be the woman who ate herself to death. There's a lot more to her story than that, but that seems to be the most consistent storyline over the past six years. Will there be a redemption down the line? Not impossible, but very unlikely. There is perhaps a greater chance that she'll do something that eclipses her notoriety for eating though, and that would affect the direction any biography would have to take. As it stands now, there is no ending to the story, which makes for a very unsatisfying biography.
Since we've followed the ins and outs for years, we all can think of dozens of incidents worth revisiting, and cramming them all into a single movie would result in a 50-hour film, or a 25-part series. Even the greatest humans who have ever walked the earth haven't merited anything like that. So, many of the incidents we see as essential would likely have to be glossed over or addressed fleetingly.
I also think her story shouldn't exist in a vacuum. There would need to be context. That includes YouTube culture, fast food culture, her family's culture, and the inputs that resulted in the mess we have now. That can be done, but it would take a lot of finesse.
Essentially, to do this right, you'd need to have a skilled writer to coax out the real story here. Simply editing together endless clips would not work; for the common viewer, she's too infuriatingly aimless to watch.
Toad's documentary came the closest to getting the job done, but it was far from flawless, with long stretches of boring stuff, too much repetition, and mediocre narration. He did about as good a job as could be hoped for, but it really doesn't work as a real film. It is also hopelessly out of date.
Budding filmmakers might do better to find a more interesting subject for a movie; almost anybody walking by on the street probably has had a more interesting life than Chantal has. For those determined to make their names as the biographer who got it right, I really do think you'll need to wait until she croaks.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2020
This is the perfect job for Peetz. A 5 (or more) part docu series with some behind the scenes never before heard discussion, pop it on his channel and watch the money flood in. You can do it my dude!
(As could Becky with ALR. *sigh…..)
(As could Becky with ALR. *sigh…..)
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2019
If anyone makes a film about our Queen please invoke your Alan Smithee right.
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2023
No, I missed that comment
. It would have given me nightmares!Well, that's the confirmation we needed (but all knew) she stinks to high heaven. Good thing she comes from the land of pungent fragrance and can cover that festering aroma up with gallons of repackaged Alibaba Beezer spray.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2022
Not even sure that would cover the stench emanating from fatso , she says they are using the hotel laundry but if she is breathing she is lying , she is bone idle and you can bet her stink arrives well before the gunt makes an appearance. Those two poor girls crammed into the seat near her must have had the stink up close , specially when fatso reached up for the air conditioning buttonNo, I missed that comment
Well, that's the confirmation we needed (but all knew) she stinks to high heaven. Good thing she comes from the land of pungent fragrance and can cover that festering aroma up with gallons of repackaged Alibaba Beezer spray.
. Note , the village idiot was not even sat with her, he was recording his blushing bride from at least a seat away.Loving his camera work of her on this trip. He is stupid , but he knows full well what shots of her show fatso at the most disgusting unflattering moments.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Everyone I know that travels does this. It’s just that we know Chantal is lazy and not being thorough about it
Bloody Hell! She knew she was going for a month but still didn’t take out travel insurance.
That’s too much effort, both the research before, and actually carrying her clothes to one then picking them up.
If she didn’t factor laundry costs into the budget, I’m wondering now if she foolishly thought she could buy cheap clothes when she got there. I can’t even imagine a simple sarong being able to wrap around her, let alone being able to find something “modest” that would fit her.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
The sheer number of shots showing Chantal's true size has been the only entertaining feature of this trip, but it's been worth following for that alone.