Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[Kalsarikännit]

@Dyn is the @Nykysnottrans person you’re talking about in the man hate thread the same person as @Woodchipper? The “schizo over-analysis” videos make it sound like it, and would explain why the latter got banned so quickly.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

I hear some stupid whores where I'm at trash talking about their fellow female friends behind their back because of their outfits.

For crying out loud, femoids really do secretly all hate each other.

 

[AskeDead]

Bitches be shoppin'

 

[ChaosReignsOnSomeSaturday]

I'm sitting here chillin' in a general area of my college. Then like 4 chicks come in and start doing cartwheels and shit before getting on all their individual laptops while talking loudly.

But if at any time I look in their direction I'm a creep, but I just keep on my phone I'm also a creep. So my only correct option is to leave the area I was in before them.

Many such cases.

 

[By Boogity!]

I hear some stupid whores where I'm at trash talking about their fellow female friends behind their back because of their outfits.

For crying out loud, femoids really do secretly all hate each other.

This is the crux of any argument women will ever put forward about the things they do.
"Well if I don't do my makeup and dress this way the MEN will have something to say about it!" Not realizing, somehow, that literally the only thoughts that will be wasted on that sort of thing will be thought by other women.
I only pay attention to specifics like that on women I care about. I will compliment my mother/sister/female family members, but otherwise it is most wise to say nothing, think nothing, and notice nothing. You only stand to lose.

 

[Null]

Not technically right but not wrong either

75% ~ 90% of sex offenses against children are committed by men.
x% of child sex offenses by women are against boys.
y% of child sex offenses by men are against boys.
x% > %y

This does does not mean that more boys are molested by women than men. It means that a higher percentage of female victims are boys.

x% of 10%~25% is going to be less than y% of 75%~90% in almost all situations except with the most extreme disparities between the genders in victim demographic, which is not the case.

In fact, with this information, I'm still right. I said 90% of child sex offenses are by men and half of them are gay. They said it's 75%~90%, but "women were more likely to abuse boys". Okay, so if women abused boys 60% of the time, then that's still true.

Men commit 90% of child sex offenses and half of them are gay.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

Can confirm.

Null is a man and touched my bunghole behind an Arby's in 1992

 

[decline]

75% ~ 90% of sex offenses against children are committed by men.

No. It's not becoming true because you repeat it over and over.

 

[Null]

No. It's not becoming true because you repeat it over and over.

did you even read the fucking post I am replying to you fucking imbecile

 

[PHILLIP BANKS]

75% ~ 90% of sex offenses against children are committed by men.
x% of child sex offenses by women are against boys.
y% of child sex offenses by men are against boys.
x% > %y

This does does not mean that more boys are molested by women than men. It means that a higher percentage of female victims are boys.

x% of 10%~25% is going to be less than y% of 75%~90% in almost all situations except with the most extreme disparities between the genders in victim demographic, which is not the case.

In fact, with this information, I'm still right. I said 90% of child sex offenses are by men and half of them are gay. They said it's 75%~90%, but "women were more likely to abuse boys". Okay, so if women abused boys 60% of the time, then that's still true.

Men commit 90% of child sex offenses and half of them are gay.

I first of all thank you to give my argument some time as I know you are a busy

And now my counter point,
There is a gross misrepresentation and non reports of female pedophilia. This is because the judiciary just does puts women off the hook and don't even put them in the sex offender list. This is seen time after time, when school teachers abuse their students and get away with a smug prisonshot and lighter jail sentence. After 4 or 5 years, all records except of her being jailed for statuary rape remains, the woman is not even added in the sex offender registry.
Even if 90% abusers are men, women are no angels and with power can also be dangerous. This has been seen again and again.

Also good majority of cases, mothers and females involved don't report and enable or sometimes participate in the abuse. The sky is never black or white but grey sometimes.

 

[By Boogity!]

I think the key takeaway from this is that we really ought to be hating on faggots, since they're the overwhelming majority of child sex predators.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

I think the key takeaway from this is that we really ought to be hating on faggots, since they're the overwhelming majority of child sex predators.

Bingo

Goes the same for the "muh priests" argument when many of the priests who do molest are faggots themselves.

 

[By Boogity!]

Bingo

Goes the same for the "muh priests" argument when many of the priests who do molest are faggots themselves.

The priest argument is bonkers anyway, they pale in comparison to rabbis, and those pale in comparison to the massive levels at which school teachers offend.

 

[decline]

View attachment 5340361

did you even read the fucking post I am replying to you fucking imbecile

Yes. It's dumb propaganda. Quoting something also doesn't make it true.

 

[PHILLIP BANKS]

I think the key takeaway from this is that we really ought to be hating on faggots, since they're the overwhelming majority of child sex predators.

All I am saying that men are usually not the beast that media promotes them to be and neither women are angels. There is a mis representation and again its the mothers who take children to drag book readings where there is a chance for them to get abused. There is so many layers, and null either is not inform or wishes to not engage in it.

I have nothing against the guy, I am just saying he is incorrect partially in his statement

 

[By Boogity!]

All I am saying that men are usually not the beast that media promotes them to be and neither women are angels. There is a mis representation and again its the mothers who take children to drag book readings where there is a chance for them to get abused.

I refuse to believe that a woman would be a faggot enabler and put her own kids at risk and/or turn a blind eye for social gain. How dare you suggest such a thing.

 

[Kalsarikännit]

The priest argument is bonkers anyway, they pale in comparison to rabbis, and those pale in comparison to the massive levels at which school teachers offend.

The “argument” has always been used to bash Christians as opposed to giving a fuck about molested kids. It’s like only caring about carbon pollution in Sweden when India exists.

 

[Null]

Yes. It's dumb propaganda. Quoting something also doesn't make it true.

You are one of the dumbest people on this entire site. Stop tagging me.

 

[PHILLIP BANKS]

I refuse to believe that a woman would be a faggot enabler and put her own kids at risk and/or turn a blind eye for social gain. How dare you suggest such a thing.

THEY DINDU NUFFIN!

 

[Wodanaz]

In my opinion threads that encourage users of the community to hate each other should not be allowed. In the same vein that more restrictive rules for arguments in A&H were imposed, our community cannot stand divided. People should politely disagree and then disengage like adults instead of gathering together with like minded users and promoting chaos. I've had my fun adding fuel to the fire so I'm not blameless, but these threads really do nothing positive for the community in my estimation. I promise not to argue with you for 5 pages if you happen to disagree with me and rate me dumb.