Will LFJ really do a liable act?
I mean, everyone can put in a false complaint to a provider.
Isn't the provider tha one that is liable bc it denied the service without proof or real justification and they are the ones that should be sued?
not LFJ
He admitted actions that meet the definition of Tortious Interference, specifically Intentional Interference in a contract with the intent to cause damage and/or disruption to a business relationship.
He's admitted to repeatedly harrassing third parties with the intent to cause damage to a business relationship, something that had nothing to do with him and that he had no legal (as everytime he tried to go to the police by his own admission they told him to just stop coming here to read his thread) or moral (as there is no harrassment, the rules and culture of the Forum are vehemently against any form of contact with people discussed here, its not harrassment if he's
choosing to come here and read his thread, where people discuss things
he openly posted himself) justification in involving himself in.
By his own admission he has repeatedly contacted multiple different companies Josh had contracts with with the stated intention of causing those contracts to be broken, purely because
he doesn't agree with them.
He's also arguably commiting a tort in interfering in the ability of True and Honest users of the Forum to access a service they technically paid for.
Aside from being shockingly arrogant in his assumption that he has the right to be some moral arbiter of what (totally legal) websites can exist and what people can say and discuss, that arrogance and urge to gloat means he has now admitted to commiting multiple Tort offenses.
After his smug gloating in the WaPo article and now his foolish admission on LinkedIn, if it was my company and he was constantly contacting everyone who we did business with with the intent to get them to break contracts because "transphobia" I would 100% sue the fucking shit out of him.
It is just immensely arrogant for him to decide that because he objects to the contents of a totally legal website that he has the right to take it upon himself to harrass, threaten and blackmail third parties in the attempt to damage that sites business.
He also freely admitted to being the source and instigator of DDoS attacks which are a fucking felony.
He's not some moral arbiter and he's not above the law.
If one of us decided we objected to Honeycomb.rape's existence and decided to hire ten people to constantly harrass and threaten every single person or business that has connections to Honeycomb with the intention of ruining their business he would be screaming foul play from the rooftops.
What he is doing is no different.