- Joined
- Aug 20, 2022
Note also, in the case of Elliot Rodgers:
"My orchestration of the Day of Retribution is my attempt to do everything, in my power, to destroy everything I cannot have. All of those beautiful girls I’ve desired so much in my life, but can never have because they despise and loathe me, I will destroy. All of those popular people who live hedonistic lives of pleasure, I will destroy, because they never accepted me as one of them. I will kill them all and make them suffer, just as they have made me suffer. It is only fair."
Ethical debates aside, this primarily relates to a divergence of objectives rather than the achievement of said objectives. A relatively small amount of wealth can acquire access to sexual amusements. Mr Rodgers seems more interested in penetrating women with something other than his personal meat stick. I can hardly be held responsible for that. In any event, to do so even in a limited fashion would still require some finite quantity of wealth - and, presumably, the element of surprise.
“The heart wants what it wants. There’s no logic to these things. You meet someone and you fall in love and that’s that.”
-Woody Allen (stolen shamelessly from Emily Dickinson)
Note that very often this means wealthy people are dumped for younger partners, or even different partners. A former governor of California lost a rich and comely wife by sleeping with a relatively homely housekeeper. Mr Allen is presently rogering his adopted daughter. It also means that women bought for money sometimes fall in love with their johns, or even their rapists. So also men sometimes have positive reactions to abusive women, or even crave abuse. The heart wants what it wants, and apparently so also the genitals. Amantes sunt amentes.
In any event, the objective as stated was to achieve some sort of sexual relationship. Whether this relationship would be long lasting or ephemeral was not specified. I suspect you'd have a bad time with a genie.
"My orchestration of the Day of Retribution is my attempt to do everything, in my power, to destroy everything I cannot have. All of those beautiful girls I’ve desired so much in my life, but can never have because they despise and loathe me, I will destroy. All of those popular people who live hedonistic lives of pleasure, I will destroy, because they never accepted me as one of them. I will kill them all and make them suffer, just as they have made me suffer. It is only fair."
Ethical debates aside, this primarily relates to a divergence of objectives rather than the achievement of said objectives. A relatively small amount of wealth can acquire access to sexual amusements. Mr Rodgers seems more interested in penetrating women with something other than his personal meat stick. I can hardly be held responsible for that. In any event, to do so even in a limited fashion would still require some finite quantity of wealth - and, presumably, the element of surprise.
I disagree. From my experience such relationships are quite random. I'm not the only one to have noticed this.If you form a relationship by impressing a woman with money, the second she sees someone with more cash than you or someone with the same amount but better looking than you, you're getting cucked and dumped.
“The heart wants what it wants. There’s no logic to these things. You meet someone and you fall in love and that’s that.”
-Woody Allen (stolen shamelessly from Emily Dickinson)
Note that very often this means wealthy people are dumped for younger partners, or even different partners. A former governor of California lost a rich and comely wife by sleeping with a relatively homely housekeeper. Mr Allen is presently rogering his adopted daughter. It also means that women bought for money sometimes fall in love with their johns, or even their rapists. So also men sometimes have positive reactions to abusive women, or even crave abuse. The heart wants what it wants, and apparently so also the genitals. Amantes sunt amentes.
In any event, the objective as stated was to achieve some sort of sexual relationship. Whether this relationship would be long lasting or ephemeral was not specified. I suspect you'd have a bad time with a genie.