Race superiority is fucking dumb

You can't be this retarded. (owait im on kiwifags, maybe you can) I read the earlier posts.
Sorry I was trying to communicate in your native language. I guess you’re just linguistically challenged.
 
I figured retards obsessed with trans people could tell the difference between men and women's writing styles but I guess not.
You are incredibly hostile and angry, which is not necessarily a male trait. You're also far too familiar with the site and its users and far too sharply focused on one topic to be a real newfag.
It just looks like you're either some bored dude that wants to test a speedrun to a pink triangle with a sock, or some progressive user that wants to blow off steam without compromising their main with being fully MATI for all to see.
Obviously I can't really know for sure, but it's kinda sad to see socks on a site where you have more freedom to express yourself than on 99% of the web
 
This, unfortunately, is one of those "if you have to ask..." things.


Tranny confirmed.
Too bad it can’t learn to have an acceptable demeanor in this website.

Also I noticed on the profile he managed to turn off profile posts. So I wonder if it was by luck or he just knew how to.
 
You have 0 evidence of that.
You create some of the same arguments which is really telling.
I figured retards obsessed with trans people could tell the difference between men and women's writing styles but I guess not.
It's very easy to switch styles, I've known people who can do both with ease. women posters and men posters. So what a dumb counter.
You can't be this retarded. (owait im on kiwifags, maybe you can) I read the earlier posts.
If you read earlier posts you would know UN Law of genocide (Which applies to all western countries) doesn't just describe forcible genocide or removal it also extends to economic genocide (making it harder for a group to have kids beased on policies/etc.) or flooding (Demographic displacement/demographic replacement) and more.


Why lie about reading previous posts?

Sock or not, it's fruity how you both made the same mistake and continue to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baguette-chan
It isn't, and no one's "imposing" migration.

Forcefully, meaning genocide, wtf else would that mean retard.

You enable and support the genociding races all because you believe they're ALL rapist and going to rape your retard ass. You are the psychopath.
Homey, my black crew is raping white folx, though, you're next....
 
You create some of the same arguments which is really telling.
So are all of you the same idiot? because that's your logic.
It's very easy to switch styles, I've known people who can do both with ease. women posters and men posters. So what a dumb counter.
Well I'm not a chick, so what an even dumber counter
If you read earlier posts you would know UN Law of genocide (Which applies to all western countries) doesn't just describe forcible genocide or removal it also extends to economic genocide (making it harder for a group to have kids beased on policies/etc.) or flooding (Demographic displacement/demographic replacement) and more.
source
 
So are all of you the same idiot? because that's your logic.

Well I'm not a chick, so what an even dumber counter

source
I don't think you get what I said: When you post the exact same way of response (word for word) and in the same grammatical way with the exact same mistakes (word for word) and denials, that's hard to be coincidental.

If I ask you about philosophy and another guy, you can both agree with the same assessment but if your response is word for word the same with no varying observation or presentation it becomes obvious.

No, your counter is dumb because we don't know if you're telling the truth. Women posters can easily fake being men and vice versa.

I literally told you UN Genocide stop being lazy piece of shit we all know you are and look it up:


  1. A mental element: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such"; and
  2. A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively:
    • Killing members of the group
    • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
    • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
    • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
    • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
that makes the crime of genocide so unique. In addition, case law has associated intent with the existence of a State or organizational plan or policy, even if the definition of genocide in international law does not include that element.
Importantly, the victims of genocide are deliberately targeted - not randomly – because of their real or perceived membership of one of the four groups protected under the Convention (which excludes political groups, for example). This means that the target of destruction must be the group, as such, and not its members as individuals. Genocide can also be committed against only a part of the group, as long as that part is identifiable (including within a geographically limited area) and “substantial.”

Notice it does not have to be killing a group outright but setting up laws and legal (indirectly) preventing births or making it harder to have children for that group intentionally.

Western countries are having billions imported flooding them with people who are raising taxes making it harder for normal civilians (White majority) to have kids. While minorities (non-whites) are given free expenditures (House/Food/etc.) on the backs of tax payers (Majority white people)

Also interesting is organizations by non-white people are ticking down the percentage of the white majority populations numbers which is not accidental and also goes to show intent.

Alongside academics claiming whites have no culture, and or news stations saying whites deserve it over and over again, shows it is indeed a genocide against white people with the intent to lower their numbers and remove them in part or whole and to prevent them from having kids or trying to cause damage long term.

Also a great quote:

I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we are going to be part of that transformation which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies the once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.
-Barbra Specter



You're [white people] on the endangered list . And unlike say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won't be any more white people around.
-Tim Wise

When it comes to abolishing the white race, the task is not to win over more whites to oppose "racism" there are "anti racists" enough already to do the job. The task is to gather a minority determined to make it impossible for anyone to be white. It is a strategy of creative provocation, like Wendell Phillips advocated and John Brown carried out.
-Noel Ignatiev


"While all White people and even many POC play a part in perpetuating systemic racism, it is important to recognize the powerful role played by White elites in maintaining this system."

-Misc. Papers from current school districts in the USA.

The only way to end systemic racism would be to end whiteness (AKA: White lives) It's not directly saying it but like the other quotes mentioned an obvious conspiracy theory is afoot pushed by certain groups and academia to end whiteness.


Targeting of white children to claim they are racist. The only wayt to stop racism is to remove racist (AKA: White children) Funny how they don't bring up racial biases in other children. Only a focus on white children. Hmmm...
1695144276240.png



"K-8 school of 430 kids is separating whites in classes where they’re made to feel awful about their “whiteness,” and all the “kids of color” in other rooms where they’re taught to feel proud about their race and are rewarded with treats and other privileges."


There's hours and hours worth of quotes, implication of a conspiracy (not theory) of groups undermining whites and trying to destroy whites in part or whole, trying to make it near impossible for white people to have children or to mentally damage their children with self-hatred.
 
I don't think you get what I said: When you post the exact same way of response (word for word) and in the same grammatical way with the exact same mistakes (word for word) and denials, that's hard to be coincidental.

If I ask you about philosophy and another guy, you can both agree with the same assessment but if your response is word for word the same with no varying observation or presentation it becomes obvious.

No, your counter is dumb because we don't know if you're telling the truth. Women posters can easily fake being men and vice versa.

I literally told you UN Genocide stop being lazy piece of shit we all know you are and look it up:

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml
You just proved I'm not that user because I didn't read your dumbass posts, so if I was that user, I would've known wtf you said earlier. I skimmed through the posts and all I saw was walls of cringe and some fat lady. Learn what the word "exact" means before you use it you mongoloid.

Anyway, you seem to trust the UN as a reliable source, so does the UN by their definition believe that there is a 'white genocide' going on?
 
You just proved I'm not that user because I didn't read your dumbass posts, so if I was that user, I would've known wtf you said earlier. I skimmed through the posts and all I saw was walls of cringe and some fat lady. Learn what the word "exact" means before you use it you mongoloid.

Anyway, you seem to trust the UN as a reliable source, so does the UN by their definition believe that there is a 'white genocide' going on?
Well the UN is pretty fond of allowing genocide.
 
You just proved I'm not that user because I didn't read your dumbass posts, so if I was that user, I would've known wtf you said earlier. I skimmed through the posts and all I saw was walls of cringe and some fat lady. Learn what the word "exact" means before you use it you mongoloid.

Anyway, you seem to trust the UN as a reliable source, so does the UN by their definition believe that there is a 'white genocide' going on?
You wouldn't have read the post even if it was the height of intelligence. The reality is I didn't present my posts claims for YOU, I did it for the audience who may read it.

The UN law on genocide is the official law for all UN countries. The UN barely makes any declarations, for instance China has several human rights violations, yet there is no penalty and China has been made an official UN council representative for human rights which clearly contradicts the same concept.

If the term genocide applies to what is happening then it is a genocide by the very definition of UN Law. (It does)
The same would apply in Africa such as certain leaders singing to crowds of thousands to "Kill the Boer (White farmer)"

That means it is hapening, and one of the steps to genocide is for people to make denials of it even happening, or those pepretraiting it to insist it is not. Similar to nazi's claiming there was no Jewish Genocide (The Holocaust) during WWII. (Note: By official narrative,)
 
You wouldn't have read the post even if it was the height of intelligence. The reality is I didn't present my posts claims for YOU, I did it for the audience who may read it.

The UN law on genocide is the official law for all UN countries. The UN barely makes any declarations, for instance China has several human rights violations, yet there is no penalty and China has been made an official UN council representative for human rights which clearly contradicts the same concept.

If the term genocide applies to what is happening then it is a genocide by the very definition of UN Law. (It does)
The same would apply in Africa such as certain leaders singing to crowds of thousands to "Kill the Boer (White farmer)"

That means it is hapening, and one of the steps to genocide is for people to make denials of it even happening, or those pepretraiting it to insist it is not. Similar to nazi's claiming there was no Jewish Genocide (The Holocaust) during WWII. (Note: By official narrative,)
So then why would you use them as a source?
 
How the fuck does this get 600 replies in 10 days when our site traffic is in the toilet?

You guys need to look at the big picture and stop being so obsessed with phenotypes and melanin count. In the end, it truly doesn't matter.
It’s funny
 
Back