Balldo Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Internet shock jock" not-allowed-to-practice abortionist "lawyer", swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a felonious, copyright cuck. End-stage career failure: normies know.

He has said he likes rail thin borderline unhealthy/maybe unhealthy women for years now, usually when people/he brings up something like the Kim Kardashian's body type, which he says he Dislikes. He considers women with notable hips and/ or Amy amount of stomach to be fat or obese in a lot of cases
So Nick prefers women who look like they never experienced puberty. Perhaps one would say he prefers women shaped like boys. That’s interesting for a lot of reasons.
 
Some thoughts about Nick and porn:

I can think of two things I would be truly disturbed by if I found out my husband was watching
1. Sadism or sexual violence (not talking about light bondage and spanking)
What if it's anime/hentai? Remember they watched that one anime about the dude who went back in time to rape his captors or whatever and they both enjoyed it apparently.
I think the "ruined body" thing is way worse than any of the porn stuff.
 
Rekieta's comments on Nina Infinity's show last night about claims that Russell Brand dated a 16 year old when he was in his 30s:

Nina says that in these circumstances, it depends on "how mature" the 16 year old is. Rekieta replies that "that's the inherent issue with age of consent laws and why they actually vary" between different states and different countries.

Rekieta allows that there at some point the age threshold would get too low and "most of humanity will agree, like, this is a little bit much", such as hypothetical African countries that have age of consent "horrifically low, like around six", He adds that "it's kind of up to societies to set where they are."

Nick says that if you think the age of consent is too low, "it's amazing", you can disapprove of it personally and you don't need to "dip down into it" yourself!

As for Nick, he tries "to avoid, like, getting overly crazy" and "can't fault" fault someone for doing something that is "not outright ridiculous" and is "wholly legal". He would personally not date someone that young. He claims that England has a society where it is acceptable for a thirtysomething to date a 16 year old and that context should be understood.

 
wall.png
 
Rekieta's comments on Nina Infinity's show last night about claims that Russell Brand dated a 16 year old when he was in his 30s:

Nina says that in these circumstances, it depends on "how mature" the 16 year old is. Rekieta replies that "that's the inherent issue with age of consent laws and why they actually vary" between different states and different countries.

Rekieta allows that there at some point the age threshold would get too low and "most of humanity will agree, like, this is a little bit much", such as hypothetical African countries that have age of consent "horrifically low, like around six", He adds that "it's kind of up to societies to set where they are."

Nick says that if you think the age of consent is too low, "it's amazing", you can disapprove of it personally and you don't need to "dip down into it" yourself!

As for Nick, he tries "to avoid, like, getting overly crazy" and "can't fault" fault someone for doing something that is "not outright ridiculous" and is "wholly legal". He would personally not date someone that young. He claims that England has a society where it is acceptable for a thirtysomething to date a 16 year old and that context should be understood.
So what Nick is trying to say is that 'it depends on the child'? Smug chuckle
 
The moderation is super iffy and i have to assume he doesn't have a team of mods on rumble.
He has at least one I know of but he doesn't do shit.
Hey now, CGoody does things!

He... uhhh... errr... well, he pops into @elb's comment section from time to time and tries to convince everybody there they are retarded incels, Nick is making a gorillion dollars a minute, and Monty is going to be living out of a cardboard box by the time Nick assumes his ultimate form.

I mean, NOBODY fucking buys any of it, but you can't say he's not carrying water for the nose. He's got job security. Unlike that BITCH @Kalea who gave back talk. Both her and Elissa should DIE!

No, but seriously, when it comes to Nick's Locals, I'm pretty sure Nick wants that place run like an even more retarded version of Somalia. So CGoody is probably the perfect mod for Nick. Slavishly defends Nick on absolutely everything, and doesn't do shit otherwise.

Rekieta allows that there at some point the age threshold would get too low and "most of humanity will agree, like, this is a little bit much", such as hypothetical African countries that have age of consent "horrifically low, like around six", He adds that "it's kind of up to societies to set where they are."
I will note that when somebody makes the argument on KF that Nick is making here, it NEVER goes well for the person advancing such argument. The most legendary example is probably @BoxerShorts47.

1695342274815.png


Maybe he and Nick could be friends.
 
Last edited:
Nick says that if you think the age of consent is too low, "it's amazing", you can disapprove of it personally and you don't need to "dip down into it" yourself!
"If it's legal then it's okay"
The state by design must be immoral and laws are the bare minimum to keep society functional not moral. Legality and Morality are not related and never should be. But that topic is a bit too high IQ for Nicky.
The age of consent doesn't just exist for trust fund spineless wastrels. I expect the guard at his gated community to keep windowless vans at bay.
The age of consent like most decent laws exist for those in such a poor situation that they have to rely on the state for they have nothing more. Like for example orphans or foster kids. Orphanages are already black holes of misery. Making it so creeps can treat them like brothels with no risk or legal repercussion. Because that's what happens when the age of consent is below that of adulthood. Someone that can afford a shinny phone and some chocolate can just go to his closest orphanage and take advantage of a poor soul already stuck in the darkest pit modern day can provide.
I for now will chose to believe that Nicky is just a hypocrite and he wouldn't allow Vito into his home and is simply parroting those around him to keep up appearances. Or that his brain is too cooked to do real damage.
 
Last edited:
I think she's from Iran or her lineage is from there, some where out in the shit hole middle east is where she hails from.
I thought she was from South America or something? Either way, very unfortunate face. Almost up there with Laura Loomer and MTG imo.
 
He claims that England has a society where it is acceptable for a thirtysomething to date a 16 year old and that context should be understood.
Not having a law against something and actually approving of it are two different things. There are plenty of religious people who disapprove of homosexuality but would not want the government criminally prosecuting it.
 
He's slipping down that slope at record speed.
We're beyond "pull up" at this point. He slammed into the ground, head first, at terminal velocity, a while back. Unfortunately for him, his head is full of so much coom that it has the hardness of tungsten and he's drilling a hole to the center of the Earth now.

Maybe Null is right, and there really is no such thing as "rock bottom."
 
Nina says that in these circumstances, it depends on "how mature" the 16 year old is. Rekieta replies that "that's the inherent issue with age of consent laws and why they actually vary" between different states and different countries.

Rekieta allows that there at some point the age threshold would get too low and "most of humanity will agree, like, this is a little bit much", such as hypothetical African countries that have age of consent "horrifically low, like around six", He adds that "it's kind of up to societies to set where they are."
Nick, come the fuck on man that's the literal #1 lolbertarian talking point and it's always used against libertarians/centrists as a dunk. I kinda hoped things wouldn't reach that point but here we are. Now, my memory can be hazy at the best of times, but I'm almost certain that he admonished that exact type of talking point multiple times in the past. Hell he might have done it in the Cuties talk with Null, should probably go back and watch that again in full. Reminisce on better, simpler times.


We're beyond "pull up" at this point. He slammed into the ground, head first, at terminal velocity, a while back. Unfortunately for him, his head is full of so much coom that it has the hardness of tungsten and he's drilling a hole to the center of the Earth now.

Maybe Null is right, and there really is no such thing as "rock bottom."
I genuinely used to think that rock bottom did exist and that I'd even seen people get to it, or at least close. But if there's one thing watching MATI and looking at/using the Forum more frequently has shown is that there truly is no bottom except when they splatter against the ground. Ralph kept dropping and dropping, no matter how many updrafts slowed the fall he really can't stop, Rekieta wasn't there a few months ago, but with his recent behavior especially going to bat for pedos like he does makes me think he's in free fall with no way to stop. Maybe one day he'll snap out of it, but he'll never reach those heights he once did ever again.
 
Back