Adam Johnston / YourMovieSucks / YourMovieSucksDOTorg / AnUnkindness - It's hip to fuck dogs.

i mean he was an anti-sjw and liking the barbie movie's take on feminism is like saying you enjoy second wave feminists. its philosophy is so safe
Except the stupid message in that movie is so on-the-nose, that it's only approved by sad white women who also happen to be wine drinking soccermoms
 
In honor of 100 pages, here are my top five (least) favorite quotes about bestiality by Adam (sourced from the Youtube and Reddit screenshots in the OP):

#5. "Being a furfag degenerate definitely initiated the debate in my head over the ethics of bestiality, but I am not a zoophile. I have no interest in sexing real animals."

#4. "I mean, most animals literally just start fucking each other without much concern for if the other one's okay with it, but human beings can touch areas of an animal to see if there is a positive or negative response."

#3. "Have you ever seen the thousands of videos on YouTube and America's Funniest Home Videos where someone falls down and their dog immediately starts humping them? Is the dog not consenting to some form of sexual contact at that point?"

#2. "The reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for having sex with an animal is the same reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for simply owning an animal."

And the classic...

#1. "If a woman belongs in jail because she let her dog hump her vag, then Tom Green and every sperm-collecting farmer in America also belongs in jail. Are you seriously going to even pretend like the animal can tell the difference? Grow up, dude."

Amazing that years later he tried to spin it on stream that he was taken out of context by nefarious entities, and that he was making serious philosophical arguments. Even if he's not a dogfucker, he's definitely enabling them with this rhetoric.
 
My favorite was his implication that The Exorcist was successful because all the stupid Christians thought it was plausible and a realistic depiction "back then."

Ignoring that's been a constant issue for all of motion picture's existence, right up to people believing in the Blair Witch and all the Google searches for Wakanda's location.

He was particularly smug when talking about it too. That and his meltdown over his clip channel being demonetized eroded most of the respect I had for him (as a content creator). I enjoyed his work but his social media posting and general attitude recently (i.e. his EFAP appearance) has been turning me off.
 
In honor of 100 pages, here are my top five (least) favorite quotes about bestiality by Adam (sourced from the Youtube and Reddit screenshots in the OP):

#5. "Being a furfag degenerate definitely initiated the debate in my head over the ethics of bestiality, but I am not a zoophile. I have no interest in sexing real animals."

#4. "I mean, most animals literally just start fucking each other without much concern for if the other one's okay with it, but human beings can touch areas of an animal to see if there is a positive or negative response."

#3. "Have you ever seen the thousands of videos on YouTube and America's Funniest Home Videos where someone falls down and their dog immediately starts humping them? Is the dog not consenting to some form of sexual contact at that point?"

#2. "The reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for having sex with an animal is the same reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for simply owning an animal."

And the classic...

#1. "If a woman belongs in jail because she let her dog hump her vag, then Tom Green and every sperm-collecting farmer in America also belongs in jail. Are you seriously going to even pretend like the animal can tell the difference? Grow up, dude."

Amazing that years later he tried to spin it on stream that he was taken out of context by nefarious entities, and that he was making serious philosophical arguments. Even if he's not a dogfucker, he's definitely enabling them with this rhetoric.
the strawmanning is making me laugh

"we've all that one family dog that used to hump people's legs, so should that be considered sexual assault?" no adam, the difference between an animal in heat and sticking your dick in a poodle is that you're fucking a poodle

"i mean animals fuck each other so why can't I fuck an animal?"

"The reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for having sex with an animal is the same reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for simply owning an animal." no comment lol

"If a woman belongs in jail because she let her dog hump her vag, then Tom Green and every sperm-collecting farmer in America also belongs in jail. Are you seriously going to even pretend like the animal can tell the difference? Grow up, dude." farmers jerking off horses aren't the same as letting a dog eat your vagina out. one is for reproduction and the other is for pleasure

Amazing that years later he tried to spin it on stream that he was taken out of context by nefarious entities
ah yes, what further context is needed for...
"The reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for having sex with an animal is the same reason we shouldn't prosecute someone for simply owning an animal."
 
One of his weakest arguments is "Obviously animals can consent because when people see dogs humping they laugh instead of ripping them apart because they're raping each other!"

He doesn't seem to get that dogs can consent with each other because they're at the same level as opposed to a human. He must know there's a difference between two 4 year olds playing doctor and and an adult diddling a 4 year old. Even if you remove the inter-species aspect, pretty much most animals would be dead before they reached the age of 18, so every animal would be underage! Unless Adam wants to fuck Patti Chandler.

But according to him, it's a false equivalency to compare beastiality to child molestation because there's evidence of mental trauma in child molestation victims.
 
But according to him, it's a false equivalency to compare beastiality to child molestation because there's evidence of mental trauma in child molestation victims.
I'm about 99% sure that dogs who have been forcibly penetrated show signs of anxiety, pain, and distress. Maybe Adam and other animal fuckers think that that's sexy.
 
People like Adam are too far gone mentally. The type of brainpower you could see him exhibiting in that EFAP debate will be the same level he'd display in a serious bestiality debate. He'll probably resort to calling you a conservative right wing Republican qAnon type, much like he called Critical Drinker one of those types as a defense mechanism. Much like he called Kiwi Farms a far right website. Hey, I'm beginning to sense a pattern here.......
 
People like Adam are too far gone mentally. The type of brainpower you could see him exhibiting in that EFAP debate will be the same level he'd display in a serious bestiality debate. He'll probably resort to calling you a conservative right wing Republican qAnon type, much like he called Critical Drinker one of those types as a defense mechanism. Much like he called Kiwi Farms a far right website. Hey, I'm beginning to sense a pattern here.......
"i mean, i'm not a pedophile but i would like to say that children have sex so why the fuck can't i have sex with a child? they can consent with each other, so why not consent with me?"

wonder who else has said similar things

i really hate debating about the ethics of child porn/AOC, animal fucking, and other perverse degenerate shit but seeing people use genuine braindead takes to justify why fucking a dog is okay has managed me to better articulate myself when being anti-abuse against.... well anyone lol... except for pedophiles and zoophiles
 
His signature argument that he continues to repeat in regards to justifying animal fucking is literally Vaush tier. He states that because of the horrors of factory farming and animal breeding that no one has any right to condemn or shame someone who engages in bestiality because its "morally inconsistent" to not allow all of it. Vaush said that CP should be legal because corporations exploit children in other ways when it comes to labor a la finding materials for muh PC parts, so whats the difference?. They argue this weird and nihilistic form of permissiveness to tack on their fucked up paraphilias to the suffering so that they can become normalized and if you disagree with Adam, he will label you as a hypocrite.
 
Last edited:
He states that because of the horrors of factory farming and animal breeding that no one has any right to condemn or shame someone who engages in bestiality because its "morally inconsistent" to not allow all of it. Vaush said that CP should be legal because corporations exploit children in other ways when it comes to labor a la finding materials for muh PC parts, so whats the difference?. They argue this weird and nihilistic form of permissiveness to tack on their fucked up paraphilias to the suffering so that they can become normalized and if you disagree with Adam, he will label you as a hypocrite.
And these are the same people who will accuse you of "whataboutism" if you dare ask them why they think something is wrong but something else isn't
 
"If a woman belongs in jail because she let her dog hump her vag, then Tom Green and every sperm-collecting farmer in America also belongs in jail. Are you seriously going to even pretend like the animal can tell the difference? Grow up, dude." farmers jerking off horses aren't the same as letting a dog eat your vagina out. one is for reproduction and the other is for pleasure
What happens if a furry who's into horses (like a certain reviewer) gets a job jerking them off for a living? He's getting off on it but the job would be done anyway for reproductive purposes.

What do you do in that scenario?
 
His signature argument that he continues to repeat in regards to justifying animal fucking is literally Vaush tier. He states that because of the horrors of factory farming and animal breeding that no one has any right to condemn or shame someone who engages in bestiality because its "morally inconsistent" to not allow all of it. Vaush said that CP should be legal because corporations exploit children in other ways when it comes to labor a la finding materials for muh PC parts, so whats the difference?. They argue this weird and nihilistic form of permissiveness to tack on their fucked up paraphilias to the suffering so that they can become normalized and if you disagree with Adam, he will label you as a hypocrite.
What you have to keep in mind, YMS isn't a vegan or even a vegetarian, the dude eats meat, and he has a whole channel of him eating meat. The only logical conclusion you can make is that he doesn't have an issue with animal rape, or he would become vegan using his logic.

edit: looking at that YMS eats channel, the videos don't even come close to cracking 1k views but he keeps at it
 
Last edited:
His signature argument that he continues to repeat in regards to justifying animal fucking is literally Vaush tier. He states that because of the horrors of factory farming and animal breeding that no one has any right to condemn or shame someone who engages in bestiality because its "morally inconsistent" to not allow all of it. Vaush said that CP should be legal because corporations exploit children in other ways when it comes to labor a la finding materials for muh PC parts, so whats the difference?. They argue this weird and nihilistic form of permissiveness to tack on their fucked up paraphilias to the suffering so that they can become normalized and if you disagree with Adam, he will label you as a hypocrite.
what a very long winded way to out yourself as a degenerate
 
His signature argument that he continues to repeat in regards to justifying animal fucking is literally Vaush tier. He states that because of the horrors of factory farming and animal breeding that no one has any right to condemn or shame someone who engages in bestiality because its "morally inconsistent" to not allow all of it. Vaush said that CP should be legal because corporations exploit children in other ways when it comes to labor a la finding materials for muh PC parts, so whats the difference?. They argue this weird and nihilistic form of permissiveness to tack on their fucked up paraphilias to the suffering so that they can become normalized and if you disagree with Adam, he will label you as a hypocrite.
1695291107907.png
This the end point of moral relativism. If there is no objective morality then eventually it always leads to pedophilia and bestiality must be okay. Consent is all that can dictate morality.

It's always shocking this is the hill they'd prefer to die upon but then again these people believe in Marx's concept of history. Namely that it always trends in a single direction and that they will be seen as pioneers of the new morality. They unironically think bestiality and pedophilia will become mainstream positions in the future and want to get ahead of it.
 
Last edited:
Back