Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
is it "objective" to take a notorious troll at face value? Is that the "objective" position?

Objectivity definition:
> lack of favoritism toward one side or another : freedom from bias

If Dick Masterson were some other melanated comics book dealer, I guess it would be. Except DICK IS A TROLL. WE ALL KNOW HE'S A TROLL. It isn't "a lack of favoritism" to acknowledge that HE'S A TROLL. Bias is not taking the situation into full account. It would be objective to take the fact that JuJu the Cow is a huge troll into account.

Nick is using a rhetorical trick in order to have the last word, which is so unbelievably faggoty that it's hard to comprehend. He keeps saying "I have no problem with you," but only one party here is angry--and it's not Eric. Why is it that every time he says "I WISH HIM SO MUCH SUCCESS" (which he says about everyone he gets into retarded drama with) I feel like he means the exact opposite.
 
nick is shaking now talking about how eric ruined his show.

all i wanted to do was stream. maybe play a few videos. have a good time. ;whimper;
He's so upset that he can't even watch Drexel nail his wife, how tragic
 
He keeps saying "I have no problem with you," but only one party here is angry--and it's not Eric.
thats the part that stood out to me. if you didnt know who these people were and simply watched how they behaved you would assume nick was the wronged party and eric the impartial observer.

that it was reversed speaks more than any spin nick can try and put on this.
 
Nick conveniently ignores the word “if” when it suits him to instead argue semantics. Reminds me of this, it’s like he is devoid of imagination or the ability to comprehend hypotheticals in the abstract.
IMG_7094.png
 
I just want to reiterate how retarded it is to define "objectivity" as "taking both sides at 100% face value." This would mean that the "objective" thing to do, when on a jury, deliberating over facts, contemplating the known fact that the defendant is a serial liar, is to consider him innocent against all reason...because he said so when he testified. You wouldn't be impartial and objective truth-seekers otherwise!

Actually, the "objective" thing to do is to use reason and common sense to weigh the evidence. That's the whole point.

Rekieta is a smart man. There's no way he could make such a fundamental logic error. Either Josh is right and he just has brain damage, which is what I'd like to believe, or he really is just a huge fucking asshole bad-faith actor who has decided he'd rather be JuJu2.0 than an Internet lawyer.
 
Back