David Steel / LazerPig / Ricewynd / Malquistion - Pathological Liar, Reddit Historian, Femboy Thirster, and Vore Connoisseur

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Which, you have to admit, is the big shtick about the A-10, the "HAHAHAHAHA GUN GO BRRRRRRRRRRT" shit. When in reality the biggest selling point of the A-10 is useless in a real conflict and has actually resulted in BLU on BLU. The biggest takeaway is the A-10 would have been an awesome CAS aircraft...in World War 2 or Korea. But in the age it was put into service and especially now, it is a deathtrap that should be retired. Hell, I'd argue that piece of shit should never have entered service.

And he isn't wrong, most of the "A-10 kills" were F-16 kills.
It depends how you use it and how you support it really. Sometimes a bit of BRRRRT is just what you want, not a big bomb. Not to mention we already have them, might as well make the best of them.
 
And because Lasernig doesn't shoot guns, he probably will say recoil is uncontrollable and Bayonets are useless (even though the US Marines told the army to fuck off and kept training on bayonets).
I wish that the SKS in Stalker GAMMA had a bayonet. That thing is a workhorse at range but sometimes you need to inform the local wildlife that they should be dead when they run up on you.
 
It depends how you use it and how you support it really.
AKA as long as it is in airspace where it has no risk of being shot at by anything bigger than a DShK, it's awesome.
Sometimes a bit of BRRRRT is just what you want, not a big bomb.
In which case the GAU-8 is a waste. It is useless against armored vehicles and it's too fucking inaccurate/imprecise for real strafing runs under real combat conditions against a peer/near-peer enemy...and the designers thought that was a good thing, being so inaccurate.
The Soviets had a much better idea with the GSh-30-2 on the Su-25 and its GSh-23 gunpods.
Not to mention we already have them, might as well make the best of them.
Give them to the Ukrainians so the A-10 fancucks can see how fast they get turned into confetti against a real enemy? That they can see that in their wanking over a hypothetical Fulda Gap scenario, they wouldn't be killing a bajillion Soviet tanks, they'd be doing what amounts to Kamikaze attacks before getting shredded by everything from the Tunguska and Shilka to every single different SAM type the Soviets had in operational service.
 
shredded by everything from the Tunguska and Shilka to every single different SAM type the Soviets had in operational service.
Someone hasn't been reading his Burton.
ProbablyUnimportant.jpg
 
Oh boy here we go
AKA as long as it is in airspace where it has no risk of being shot at by anything bigger than a DShK, it's awesome.
It's actually eaten manpads and gotten back home.
In which case the GAU-8 is a waste. It is useless against armored vehicles and it's too fucking inaccurate/imprecise for real strafing runs under real combat conditions against a peer/near-peer enemy...and the designers thought that was a good thing, being so inaccurate.
The Soviets had a much better idea with the GSh-30-2 on the Su-25 and its GSh-23 gunpods.
Itll eat trucks, APC's, IFV's, and general infantry. Also helicopters, which it has a SUPRISING amount of air to air kills on. Anything else is missile territory. You're missing the forest for the trees.
Give them to the Ukrainians so the A-10 fancucks can see how fast they get turned into confetti against a real enemy? That they can see that in their wanking over a hypothetical Fulda Gap scenario, they wouldn't be killing a bajillion Soviet tanks, they'd be doing what amounts to Kamikaze attacks before getting shredded by everything from the Tunguska and Shilka to every single different SAM type the Soviets had in operational service.
They have the full might of the U.S. air force for that. It's called Wild Weasel. They smash the AA, then the A-10 smashes the ground.
Wasn't the original doctrine of the A-10 something like "fly it like you stole it and take as much Russian armor with you as you can"?
Basically, which is why the airforce hates it but the army loves it. It does tons of damage, but in the end, probably gonna die. Lots of rivalry between fighter pilots and A10 pilots
I love that era of aircraft. Camo paint, shit tons of 500 pounders and film grain. It's like the BDU era of planes, aesthetically under rated.
Dude that era was kino. Bombs and bombs galore, swing wings, every aircraft went Mach 2, it was great
 
It's actually eaten manpads and gotten back home.
So have Apaches, that isn't impressive.
Itll eat trucks, APC's, IFV's, and general infantry.
So basically it's doing the same(ish) job as an Apache or Cobra, but worse.
Also helicopters, which it has a SUPRISING amount of air to air kills on. Anything else is missile territory. You're missing the forest for the trees.
I'd need to see a source on that.
They have the full might of the U.S. air force for that. It's called Wild Weasel. They smash the AA, then the A-10 smashes the ground.
And I guess the two branches of the Soviet Air Forces would have just rolled over belly-up and let the USA have its fantasy of complete air dominance, right? Or, you know, the "Wild Weasel" itself gets fucking mauled before it can accomplish its objective because the Soviets made very damned good multilayered SAM defenses?

Shit like this is why A-10 fanboys are insufferable. You see all these exaggerated reports on how the A-10 is this indestructible gun plane that just destroys everything in its path, therefore it would have done awesome against the Soviets...oh and even if the Soviets have SAMs and such, the USAF will just blow them all up lol because MURICA FUCK YEAH!!!!!

It's like you are unable to comprehend that the A-10 does mediocre in COMPLETELY UNCONTESTED AIRSPACE and has quite possibly killed as many allied troops as it has enemy troops, or that the Soviet Union wouldn't have just rolled over and let the USA's best case fantasy play out.
 
So have Apaches, that isn't impressive.

So basically it's doing the same(ish) job as an Apache or Cobra, but worse.

I'd need to see a source on that.

And I guess the two branches of the Soviet Air Forces would have just rolled over belly-up and let the USA have its fantasy of complete air dominance, right? Or, you know, the "Wild Weasel" itself gets fucking mauled before it can accomplish its objective because the Soviets made very damned good multilayered SAM defenses?

Shit like this is why A-10 fanboys are insufferable. You see all these exaggerated reports on how the A-10 is this indestructible gun plane that just destroys everything in its path, therefore it would have done awesome against the Soviets...oh and even if the Soviets have SAMs and such, the USAF will just blow them all up lol because MURICA FUCK YEAH!!!!!

It's like you are unable to comprehend that the A-10 does mediocre in COMPLETELY UNCONTESTED AIRSPACE and has quite possibly killed as many allied troops as it has enemy troops, or that the Soviet Union wouldn't have just rolled over and let the USA's best case fantasy play out.
Brother... chill, it's just a airplane with a big gun.
 
F-111 could be a fascinating story
The stupid youtube shorts thing I can't shut off has finally blessed/cursed me. I got your F-111 video right here. TL;DR: Goaded into answering where the F-111 video is on twitch, a drunk Piggu just says the funny swear words and calls it a day. You expected actual research here?
 
The stupid youtube shorts thing I can't shut off has finally blessed/cursed me. I got your F-111 video right here. TL;DR: Goaded into answering where the F-111 video is on twitch, a drunk Piggu just says the funny swear words and calls it a day. You expected actual research here?
That's his shtick, he's a gay drunk Scot first and foremost who can't help but inject his sexuality and fetishes into every single damned video he releases, and an (using this term loosely) "amateur historian" a far, far, far distant second.
 
The stupid youtube shorts thing I can't shut off has finally blessed/cursed me. I got your F-111 video right here. TL;DR: Goaded into answering where the F-111 video is on twitch, a drunk Piggu just says the funny swear words and calls it a day. You expected actual research here?
This implies LP does actual research for his video topics.

I came up with a drinking game for LP videos, take a shot for the following:

-Anytime LP talks about being gay
-Every time shits on foreign countries for no reason
-Shitty jokes
-Mentions being Scottish
-Mentioning of alcoholism
-Off-topic remarks
-Inaccuracies

I take no responsibility for any booze cruising incidents, liver cirrhosis, brain damage, or other symptoms of alcohol poisoning.
 
This implies LP does actual research for his video topics.

I came up with a drinking game for LP videos, take a shot for the following:

-Anytime LP talks about being gay
-Every time shits on foreign countries for no reason
-Shitty jokes
-Mentions being Scottish
-Mentioning of alcoholism
-Off-topic remarks
-Inaccuracies

I take no responsibility for any booze cruising incidents, liver cirrhosis, brain damage, or other symptoms of alcohol poisoning.
I think, even if you replaced alcohol with soda, you'd still get Type 2 Diabeetus from playing that drinking game.
 
has actually resulted in BLU on BLU
This is not TF2. Also, it's called danger close for a reason.
So have Apaches, that isn't impressive.
Apaches have been forced to land from damage by PKMs.
And I guess the two branches of the Soviet Air Forces would have just rolled over belly-up and let the USA have its fantasy of complete air dominance, right?
The US has the the first, second, and sixth largest air forces on the planet. So, yeah.
Also yes the F-111 is cool
7a28e7ccb5fdead54d400bae754dc7e2.jpg
The F-111 was fat as fuck, supersonic turbofans were still finicky, and swing wings were always a bad idea. The Aardvark was also aesthetic as fuck.
 
It depends how you use it and how you support it really. Sometimes a bit of BRRRRT is just what you want, not a big bomb. Not to mention we already have them, might as well make the best of them.
By the 1980s, Soviet ADA (specifically SPAAGs) made the skies way too deadly for the A-10.

I love that era of aircraft. Camo paint, shit tons of 500 pounders and film grain. It's like the BDU era of planes, aesthetically under rated.
"European One" is the best camo scheme.
1696098184817.png
 
Last edited:
drinking game for LP videos
I'm trying to make fun of LP, not become him.

Anyway, my attempt to give a different perspective on the GAU-8 with out starting a knife fight.
The GAU-8/A and A-10 still have their place in low intensity conflicts and it is entirely down to the BRRRT. Is it practical? Not really. Better options abound for actual effects on target and I myself would love a fleet of modern Skyraiders blanketing ridge lines in napalm and FFARs. But that doesn't take into account the morale effects on.. everyone. I witnessed a few Harrier gun runs in my day. You know how loud 10 tons of metal screaming through the air above your head that low is? At that altitude even the 25mm sounds like it's ripping the sky apart piece by piece. Bad guys obviously died, which could have been accomplished in any number of ways. The difference is everyone for miles around got to see what happens when we finally got a chance to just unleash fury on something. So, I will take that scaled up to an A-10 and the Avenger over a more practical option. Sometimes you just have to let the entire AO know who the fuck is in town and what we'll fucking do to you if you want a stand up fight. JDAMs are cool but things explode in war zones constantly. The BRRT? People remember that.
 
So, according to his post on Twitter, he got a 34 on the rice purity test.


(If someone could please archive this that would be great it is not working on my end).

For reference, I am a normal person who went to University and a few University parties and has been in a few committed relationships over the course of my life, and I got a 47. I asked a friend of mine who was in a Frat, did sports in University, and lived in a Frat house to take this test, and he got 43 (frat parties get the cops called). How the hell do you get a 34?
 
So, according to his post on Twitter, he got a 34 on the rice purity test.


(If someone could please archive this that would be great it is not working on my end).

For reference, I am a normal person who went to University and a few University parties and has been in a few committed relationships over the course of my life, and I got a 47. I asked a friend of mine who was in a Frat, did sports in University, and lived in a Frat house to take this test, and he got 43 (frat parties get the cops called). How the hell do you get a 34?
I mean, look at the questions, and then keep in mind Lazernig is a flamboyantly gay man who used to be a drag queen, has a fetish for femboys, and a crippling addiction to alcohol. I'm surprised he didn't score lower, maybe he was well-behaved (enough) in school and has stayed out of legal trouble?
 
I'm trying to make fun of LP, not become him.
I think being drunk is the only way to watch LP videos without wanting to become deaf and blind.

So, according to his post on Twitter, he got a 34 on the rice purity test.


(If someone could please archive this that would be great it is not working on my end).

For reference, I am a normal person who went to University and a few University parties and has been in a few committed relationships over the course of my life, and I got a 47. I asked a friend of mine who was in a Frat, did sports in University, and lived in a Frat house to take this test, and he got 43 (frat parties get the cops called). How the hell do you get a 34?
Flamboyant homosexual, enough said.

I got an 86, mostly because I was a bit rowdy in middle school.
 
Back