Crime One in ten men have carried out sex offences against children, says survey - Edinburgh University’s Childlight unit highlights a ‘public health emergency’ with a rapid increase of child sex abuse online


One in ten British men have carried out sexual offences against children, according to a major survey.

The study involving 1,500 British men was carried out by Edinburgh University’s Childlight unit, a research centre that investigates the risk of sexual exploitation of children and young people, and the University of New South Wales, Australia.

It found that 10.1 per cent of men admitted they had engaged in child sexual offending, either online or offline.

Almost one in twenty (4.8 per cent) of those surveyed said they had had sexual contact with a child when they themselves were aged 18 or older.

The results also showed that 5 per cent of British men had sexual feelings towards children and had acted upon those feelings, while an additional 7 per cent admitted to having sexual feelings towards children but did not act on them.

The findings have raised concerns that there is a “public health emergency” with a rapid increase of child sex abuse online.

Dr Michael Salter, an associate professor at the University of New South Wales and member of Childlight, said the government needed to take immediate action to protect children.

There have been growing concerns about the increase in online child sex abuse. Last year the US-based National Center for Missing & Exploited Children’s CyberTipline received more than 310,000 referrals of suspected incidents of online sexual exploitation of children in the UK.

It is estimated one in four girls and one in five boys have been sexually abused, according to the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse & Neglect (ISPCAN).

Salter said the rise in online child sex offences was part of a global trend over the past two decades, adding that an unregulated online environment was a direct cause of sexual offending against children.

“Sex offenders are using encrypted social media apps at much higher rates than non-offenders. Encrypted apps and privacy services are highly appealing to sex offending. They are in fact a key consumer base for encrypted social media services,” he said.

The Online Safety Bill, which was passed by the House of Lords this week, is designed to protect children online and combat illegal and harmful material.

Salter said such legislation was “very important in terms of holding technology companies accountable and responsible where they provide a conducive environment to the sexual abuse of children”.

He added that the study showed that viewing extreme and deviant online pornography was an indicator of perpetrating child sexual abuse.

“Men who are sexually offending against children are watching a lot more online pornography but also the type of content they are consuming is very deviant,” he said. “It is more likely to be violent. It’s more likely to be forceful. It’s more likely to depict, for example, sex with animals.”

Salter said the findings should be a signal to men who are “consuming a lot of pornography, and are consuming a lot of extreme deviant pornography, that they really need to put their hand up and start to access support services because some of those men are going to pose a risk to children”.

The study was carried out using an anonymised online survey in which men were asked questions about their sexual behaviour. Previous research has shown that when asked questions anonymously participants responded truthfully.

The results of the research come before a meeting of child protection professionals in Edinburgh next week for the ISPCAN Congress, during which they will discuss ideas to reduce child trauma.

Pragathi Tummala, the chief executive of ISPCAN, said: “We have to protect and detect issues wherever children live, go to school, go online, play sports, and everywhere in between when they are vulnerable to harm.”
 
really easy fix to this. Why the hell do children need to be online at all? For schoolwork? When i was in school you did your work on pen and paper. No need for the Internet. LibreOffice Writer and Slides dont need internet,so essays can still be written using local library or school books. Modify COPPA to mandate that only persons 18+ can have social media accounts,add in provisions that fine parents,and throw some jail time in for repeat offenders. Threaten to take kids away if compliance is not done. 99% of kids will be forced offline by parents scared of losing their children

"they can just lie about their age" Okay,why arent the parents supervising to prevent those signups in the first place? Follow the new penalties presented in this hypothetical world where my idea is submitted,approved and pushed into law.
 
Wow, just when they're passing an extremely intrusive internet law based on "think of the children!" there's a survey that says 10 percent of men are paedos? What a coincidence. I don't care if it was anonymous, no actual paedo is going to be stupid enough to admit to it in a survey. This is a psyop by either the government or 4chan, I don't know which would be worse.
 
Define "child". Because I suspect they mean "under 18", and anyone who knows anything about English girls knows damn well that they all start fucking a lot younger than that.
You'd be correct there. The common law doesn't differentiate between children and adolescents like civic law does. The age of consent is 16 IIRC in the UK - but it's also true quite a few girls worldwide start even lower, usually around 14. That's why most European countries have it at 14 or 15. The only countries that don't are Ireland (17 because Common law and Cucktholic influence), Cyprus (17 because of Common law cuckery, Greece has it at 15) and Malta (18 because of common law cuckery and strong Catholic puritanism). I'm personally for setting it at 14 and leaving it there. No lower than that.
 
I’ve seen similar figures before, one in twenty. No elaboration on how these data were collected though.
This is just an ad for the online safety bill thoigh:
Sex offenders are using encrypted social media apps at much higher rates than non-offenders. Encrypted apps and privacy services are highly appealing to sex offending. They are in fact a key consumer base for encrypted social media services,” he said.
Basically, encryption and anonymity is under threat of extinction and that will magically stop nonces. No further police work will be needed.
You will have no privacy and you will be happy. And nobody will actually, genuinely protect children becasue our entire establishment is riddled head to foot with child abusers, and troons who want access
 
Almost one in twenty (4.8 per cent) of those surveyed said they had had sexual contact with a child when they themselves were aged 18 or older.
Oh okay, so 18 year olds dating 16/17 year olds, gotcha.
That's why most European countries have it at 14 or 15. The only countries that don't are Ireland (17 because Common law and Cucktholic influence),
"Those fucking cucktholics, lowering the age of consent and not letting me marry a pristine, untouched 14 year old!"
Even nick the spic didn't go that low lmao.
On a side note, usually the criticism when it comes to catholicism and pedophilia goes the other way, but I find this much more preferable.
 
Oh okay, so 18 year olds dating 16/17 year olds, gotcha.

"Those fucking cucktholics, lowering the age of consent and not letting me marry a pristine, untouched 14 year old!"
Even nick the spic didn't go that low lmao.
On a side note, usually the criticism when it comes to catholicism and pedophilia goes the other way, but I find this much more preferable.
The reason why I call them "Cucktholics" is because they publically push for higher age of consent yet they do the same degenerate shit anyway. That's fucking hypocrisy in my eyes. And no, I'm not one of those people who cares about underage women, nor do I endorse actively chasing after them. The deal is, if you look back low ages of consent were absolutely the legal norm, to the point 14 was seen as one of the higher ones.
The lower age of consent would also be covered by a parental approval system in that you could have sex with a girl under 18 only on the condition her parents gave the approval - it really is that simple. In the case they approved such a relationship - their problem. If not - then the older of the two is prosecuted as a rapist.
 
Read the second post then.
I’m approaching this from the perspective of “premarital sex is unhealthy”. Are kids fucking at that age? Sure. Do they also know they’re not supposed to, but do it anyway? That’s part of the appeal.
(Nonces don’t outgrow this part.)

Awkward horny teenage me, able to legally do such things, would have much older and wiser me paying child support or have contracted something suitably nasty. Awkward horny teenage me needed the thot patrol to not irreversibly screw up his life.

Edit to clarify: Teenagers are developing, to tell a girl (before she becomes a woman) to put out will screw her up something fierce and fuck up her future relationships. Cheapening sex to “just a thing couples do” instead of genuine intimacy is one of the greatest disservices one can do to someone who may one day pair-bond.

(The dog not barking here is the “grooming gang” thing, but those also include drugs and physically harming the victim on top of exploiting a young impressionable innocent girl for carnal pleasure, the only thing she can supposedly offer.)
 
Last edited:
Back