Homosexuality is evil.

[I'm Retarded?]

This is how fags have behaved since the dawn of time. When men abandon all shame and without women acting like a brake the male libido goes haywire and you get a doom spiral of degeneracy

it's not a male libido thing, it's a sexual psychology thing. homosexuals are hardly unique in their sexual deviancy, plenty of men debase themselves with women too. not to mention plenty of females debase themselves with men. the undercurrents of socially destructive homosexual behavior are not unique to homosexuals. this formulation you have of men being high-rev sex engines that need to be slowed down by an external female force is retarded feminist indoctrination. men are fully capable of sexual propriety without needing a woman to calm them like they're some kind of fuckin wild gorilla.

Whats the point of these IF's, they are not true. Fags are disproportionately pedophiles, they are not monogamous, average fag fucks more dudes in a year than the average non fag in a lifetime, all without condoms. Piss drinking, shit eating, zoo, you fucking name it. Fagotry is the centerpiece.

it's a rhetorical demonstration to show that the behavioral markers identified with homosexuality, that are here being decried as evil, go beyond that subgroup and point to a deeper social, cultural, ideological issue. if homosexuality is the issue, then why does the homosexual community promote different kinds of fetishes and deviancy that goes beyond the borders of simple male/male intercourse? what do things like BDSM or bug chasing have to do with having sex with men? why is homosexuality often a stepping stone or accessory to other kinds of taboo sexual behavior? think about it. pointing the finger at homosexuality alone is basic.

Oy vey, the "hairy dilemma of how to define evil?" Well bro is murder evil? What about child rape? How can we know?!?!?!! Cuase like, defining evil is totally such a hairy dilemma n sheet, mayne. Maybe nothing is evil and it's all relative???

I mean yeah if you take any bad thing and say "but what if it wasn't bad?" then by definition it's not bad anymore. If blacks had an average IQ of 110 inner cities would still be decent places to live for example. Not really saying much of anything here.

hey man, thanks for your thoughtful and well-reasoned post. I'm glad you came here to contribute to the discussion instead of having your Two Minutes' Hate and screaming at anything that looks like a dissenting opinion. this kind of content is what makes our fair Dodo Orchards a wonderful community to take part in.

 

[gang weeder]

In terms of evolution and species survival.

View attachment 5379469

Although the Earth always has many different cultures and at any given time some large amount of them will have anti-fag norms.

Thus accepting fags isn't really a threat to species survival, but rather gives that culture a big evolutionary disadvantage compared to others which are more properly ordered.

The way this is playing out currently can be seen in how whites are being demographically replaced.

 

[I'm Retarded?]

Homosexual desires stem from demonic temptation. If you give in to them, you can get an iniquity of perversion, allowing a demon to inhabit your body and tempt you even more. Because "perversion" is a broad category, becoming a homosexual opens you up to more and even worse demonic sexual temptations. Once you give in to them enough, they get enough influence over your mind that they can start to read your thoughts and respond, as well as control your physiological arousal. In this way, they can brainwash you into thinking that you really do deep down want to do the things that they are tempting you with. They can also do other things like give you sex dreams. But it really is all fake. Once they are embedded to that extent, it's hard to get rid of them, but it can be done.

But you really don't want to encourage people to embrace demonic sexualities like homosexuality, because they will gradually become possessed as their demon gets more and more control over them, and it will cause them to do other evil things as well. Society shouldn't tolerate it, but it is a curable spiritual sickness. Love the sinner and hate the sin.

this post reads a little schizo or true-believer at first but I find myself agreeing with its spirit. I don't think the demonic possession thing is strictly true (but who fuckin knows), but it's undeniable that embracing deviancy has a continually mutating effect on the types of experiences you seek, which inevitably changes you as a person. in many cases it is quite like planting a little demon inside you that keeps telling you to do worse shit.

 

[The Foxtrot]

this post reads a little schizo or true-believer at first but I find myself agreeing with its spirit. I don't think the demonic possession thing is strictly true (but who fuckin knows), but it's undeniable that embracing deviancy has a continually mutating effect on the types of experiences you seek, which inevitably changes you as a person. in many cases it is quite like planting a little demon inside you that keeps telling you to do worse shit.

Or, put simply, committing lesser evils will lead you to committing greater ones if you don't check yourself.

 

[I'm Retarded?]

Or, put simply, committing lesser evils will lead you to committing greater ones if you don't check yourself.

the evangelicals were the ones who called out the slippery slope before the rest of us saw it. maybe there's something to it.

 

[The Foxtrot]

the evangelicals were the ones who called out the slippery slope before the rest of us saw it. maybe there's something to it.

When the Governor Roy Fucking Cooper bypassed the people's votes and legalized gay marriage against the will of the population, even middle schooler me said "They won't stop here". I knew even back then that they didn't care about any harm they might be doing, they just wanted to have their way and to hell with the consequences.

The leftoids and faggies called it a "fallacy", but I don't see a fallacy, I see wisdom. It's no different from bad behavior in a child, if you don't punish them for sneaking and getting a cookie when they weren't given permission to eat one (a lesser evil), then they will not respect smaller rules and thus never learn how to and why to respect greater rules (thus committing greater evils).

 

[The Luigi Player]

well it will seem more evil once I'm done with ya

 

[I'm Retarded?]

well it will seem more evil once I'm done with ya

 

[Anasa Tristis]

I never would have guessed Western heterosexuals would become so addled and self loathing in the early 21st Century that they'd embrace homo culture and turn it into a trendy and high status thing for themselves. And consider it as perfectly legit to show and teach to children.

 

[ApeBass]

...if you really want it up the ass that bad, you just have to say so. No need for all this masquerade.

 

[Norbert the Tiger]

the evangelicals were the ones who called out the slippery slope before the rest of us saw it. maybe there's something to it.

Not exactly, Robert Bork discusses this phenomenon in the introduction of Sodom and Gomorrha. The concept is called Defining Deviancy Down, aka the Durkheim Constant. He draws largely from an academic paper by the late Senator Patrick Moynihan (an old school democrat) and the writings of Emil Durkheim. If the GOP were not paid to lose shills who were intellectually bankrupt in their own way, they would have been articulate these ideas the way Judge Bork. Most evangelicals just resorted to religious dogma. Those that did talk about this phenomenon were not exactly articulate or convincing.

 

[Michael Wade]

Look good people are capable of being gay, but at the end of the day?

This isn't something to promote or take pride in.

 

[gang weeder]

hey man, thanks for your thoughtful and well-reasoned post. I'm glad you came here to contribute to the discussion instead of having your Two Minutes' Hate and screaming at anything that looks like a dissenting opinion. this kind of content is what makes our fair Dodo Orchards a wonderful community to take part in.

Coming in and saying "well ackchyually defining evil is really hard that's a big problem" = moral relativism = taking a gigantic intellectual shit on whatever topic is at hand. So you started it. I notice that you didn't respond to my point and instead just coped because I didn't make it in a nice enough way to satisfy your delicate sensibilities.

 

[The Last Stand]

"it's a victimless crime"

You literally get all sorts of horrible diseases from committing it.

"Two consenting adults! and they can use a condom"

You can literally use that excuse for all sorts of disgusting actions such as incest and scat fetishism, yet society at large doesn't accept those actions and considers them degenerate and deviant for insulting what we know as normal healthy sexual relations. If society at large can't accept something into it, then that's a sign something is bad.

You sound mad.

Spoiler: An example of a healthy same sex relationship.

Same sex relationships has been around since the 20th century at least, hence this Dietrich/Piaf image from 1950. How on Earth does THAT make you upset other than sheer jealousy?

 

[Executive Petrel]

Faggots are little sneaky fuckers altogether. Even when drunk, the foulest of whamen still have more honor than the average fruit.
They are always horny, feel rejected if you are not gay and will wait for a weak moment to throw you under the bus.
Homosexuality always goes hand in hand with other mental conditions.

 

[The Last Stand]

Look good people are capable of being gay, but at the end of the day?

This isn't something to promote or take pride in.

The way I see it, if straight people don't have to take pride in their sexuality, gay people shouldn't either. I'd figured we'd reach that point in a tolerant society to where we would not NEED to advertise who we're attracted to. People who make their sexuality their ONLY known character trait tells me they're quite insecure with themselves.

 

[I'm Retarded?]

Coming in and saying "well ackchyually defining evil is really hard that's a big problem" = moral relativism = taking a gigantic intellectual shit on whatever topic is at hand. So you started it. I notice that you didn't respond to my point and instead just coped because I didn't make it in a nice enough way to satisfy your delicate sensibilities.

what point is there to respond to? all you did was sperg out like a retard. if you act like a fag, you get treated like a fag. sneed, nigger.

 

[Figger Naggot]

Almost two whole pages without anyone posting this. This place is losing its touch.

 

[Quiet Guy]

@m1ddl3m4rch if you have issues with homosexuality, I suspect transcranial magnetic stimulation could treat it if directed at the correct brain region.

 

[gang weeder]

The way I see it, if straight people don't have to take pride in their sexuality, gay people shouldn't either. I'd figured we'd reach that point in a tolerant society to where we would not NEED to advertise who we're attracted to. People who make their sexuality their ONLY known character trait tells me they're quite insecure with themselves.

This is because gays are different from normal people in lots of other ways besides "just" wanting to fuck other dudes in the ass. And our pattern detection, no matter how much people try to cope about it, is way too good to actually ignore it. Being a fag goes with a higher propensity for all sorts of other degenerate behaviors, especially other forms of sexual deviancy. It's the same way that if someone has committed one violent crime, they are far more likely to commit others, compared to someone who has never been a violent criminal at all.

Even if being gay didn't go along with all kinds of other nasty things, just the fact that the person can't reproduce and thus can't properly invest in the next generation would warrant a different status in society. But at least then maybe we could actually have the ideal of "well just let them be gay and leave them alone."

what point is there to respond to? all you did was sperg out like a retard. if you act like a fag, you get treated like a fag. sneed, nigger.

Seriously. If it's hard to define evil, why do we even have laws in the first place? How do you know that anything is bad and should be disallowed? Do you have an answer, or are you just shitting up the thread with pointless insults?