Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 68 17.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 156 40.5%

  • Total voters
    385
The one where Josh literally goes "JUST SAY NIGGERFAGGOT" in relation to Perry taking control of his life and shutting down the streams? How'd he handle that on Youtube?
He starts the stream when Josh is going through all the Halloween art which is after the Perry segment. But the niggers dropped at the Rekieta part are still there, loud and proud.
 
Eric's problem is also your problem because Eric and you both seem to assume that Nick was operating in good faith and not continually redirecting the conversation back to a contrived hypothetical where Eric or his employee(s) look bad.
Make no mistake, I think Nick was purposefully being obtuse when talking with Eric. I feel like he knew what Eric was trying to say, but was simply trying to be a "lawyer" for the sake of it, making the entire exchange insufferable.
 
I feel vindicated for always sneering at Internet law man as a grifter.

What's more surprising is racket's addictive behavior. He's clearly borderline alcoholic.

Borderline? The man has a clip out there saying 'I am not addicted because I drink less than other people I know' and redefines 'addiction' for himself. He does not fulfill his personal definition of 'addicted' so he is not an addict. Genius logic!

So he's a communist now too. The money should go to whoever can sell their product to people who want to buy it. It's not up to some faggot in Minnesota to decide who can buy what.

More cucksent. July: Hey guys I got this comic, want to buy it? Customers: Take our money.

Nobody has to ask for Cuckieta's appproval.

To be clear, this was Dax's opinion. I also do not believe for a moment that it is his true opinion. Dax just wants to create drama for mo ey and attention.
 
wasn't there a time where the minnesota bar was looking to reprimand rekieta because he was going to dox all those trannies who wrote complaints to get him disbarred due to the keffels "on the wall" incident? was that dismissed or is the bar still investigating?
I have a theory that this is still a live issue.

A brief recap - and others, please, correct me if my details are wrong. I'm working from memory.
  1. A few dozen (I forget the number) troons and troon cheerleaders report Rekieta to the Ethics Board re the Duncan stream & Keffals remarks.

  2. At some point later, Schnieder also submits a complaint to the Board. He may have withdrawn it - I forget the details.

  3. Back to the troon issue. Nick gets (private) notice with the names and addresses of the complainants. Tells his audience that it's his free speech right to dox these people but, due to YT rules, he only releases the names.

  4. He then declares that the Ethics Board is in a catch 22 bc if they formerly discipline him, the names of the complainants become public and he'll DEFINITELY dox the complainants at that point.

  5. Months go by. Nick says he's heard nothing and he therefore assumes it's been dismissed by the Board.
EXCEPT - and this is my pet theory - this bill is winding it's way through the MN legislature. Nick's covered it on at least two streams. He's correct is saying that if it's passed, he could be fucked. (Along with any lawyer who expresses bias against "marginalized" groups.):

"The definition of bias crimes would also be expanded to include those committed against a person due to the person’s gender, gender identity, or gender expression, as well as bias against a person who associates with someone in a protected group."


Meanwhile, I believe someone (Balldo's Gate? AnOminous?) said that the Board can sit on these complaints. They don't expire.

TL;DR I believe the Board is sitting on these complaints and may soon be granted backing by this MN law to discipline Rekieta.

Edit: Clarity & spelling + an excerpt from the link.
 
Last edited:
sleep.JPGScreenshot 2023-10-04 at 11-28-25 Rekieta Law on X.png

Rumble WISHES they can get this much enthusiasm from Nick. He didn't stream last night but appeared on twitter at around 1AM his time to defend dick for 2 hours, went to sleep at 3AM ish and then 8 hours later popped back up on twitter at 11AM to immediately defend dick some more for the past half hour. Maybe he just got back from driving his kids to whatever they need and thankfully he didn't drunkenly crash into anything it seems.

Also if Nick thinks he's getting money for these tweets, he's gonna be on twitter full time with the amount of impressions he's getting per tweet.
 
Rumble WISHES they can get this much enthusiasm from Nick. He didn't stream last night but appeared on twitter at around 1AM his time to defend dick for 2 hours, went to sleep at 3AM ish and then 8 hours later popped back up on twitter at 11AM to immediately defend dick some more for the past half hour
This lazy nigger mentions “unexpected date night” as if it’s some circumstance beyond his control. Just tell your supporters you have outright contempt for them and live off your father so you utterly lack a profit motive.

Calling this piece of shit a piece of shit is an insult to pieces of shit. What kind of “man” makes being a completely unreliable, shiftless drunk his entire brand? No wonder his wife only wants to be fucked by men who aren’t Nick and she seeks validation by posting lewds in online chat servers.
 
He then declares that the Ethics Board is in a catch 22 bc if they formerly discipline him, the names of the complainants become public and he'll DEFINITELY dox the complainants at that point.
How does that put the Ethics Board in the Catch-22? "If they discipline me then I'll dox them all!" That sounds like a threat, not a Catch-22.

Pluis I love the logic. "You complained about me and the Ethics Board found your complaints had merit? Yeah well, here's you name and home address so my fans like Still Life can harass you for being right about me!"
 
View attachment 5384729View attachment 5384738

Rumble WISHES they can get this much enthusiasm from Nick. He didn't stream last night but appeared on twitter at around 1AM his time to defend dick for 2 hours, went to sleep at 3AM ish and then 8 hours later popped back up on twitter at 11AM to immediately defend dick some more for the past half hour. Maybe he just got back from driving his kids to whatever they need and thankfully he didn't drunkenly crash into anything it seems.

Also if Nick thinks he's getting money for these tweets, he's gonna be on twitter full time with the amount of impressions he's getting per tweet.
Starting to think he never had narcolepsy, just internet addiction.
 
This lazy nigger mentions “unexpected date night” as if it’s some circumstance beyond his control. Just tell your supporters you have outright contempt for them and live off your father so you utterly lack a profit motive.

Calling this piece of shit a piece of shit is an insult to pieces of shit. What kind of “man” makes being a completely unreliable, shiftless drunk his entire brand? No wonder his wife only wants to be fucked by men who aren’t Nick and she seeks validation by posting lewds in online chat servers.
It's kinda weird to me that this is a family with only one breadmaker but the wife seeming has ZERO respect for his work schedule. It would make much more sense if they live downtown and Nick was chilling around at 9PM when his wife suddenly says she wants to go out...but they don't. They live in the middle of nowhere. Where would you even go for a spontaneous date that lasts past Nick's work hour (11pm stream) in their area? If they went to the city, they would have to have gone there earlier in the evening (like 5PM? 6PM?) That wouldn't be unexpected.
 
View attachment 5384729View attachment 5384738

Rumble WISHES they can get this much enthusiasm from Nick. He didn't stream last night but appeared on twitter at around 1AM his time to defend dick for 2 hours, went to sleep at 3AM ish and then 8 hours later popped back up on twitter at 11AM to immediately defend dick some more for the past half hour. Maybe he just got back from driving his kids to whatever they need and thankfully he didn't drunkenly crash into anything it seems.

Also if Nick thinks he's getting money for these tweets, he's gonna be on twitter full time with the amount of impressions he's getting per tweet.
Somewhere between 1 and 2 AM local, he evidently stopped raging on Twitter for a moment to post a belated 'No show' announcement on LOCALS due to 'Unexpecred date night' that I capped earlier in this thread.

I know he probably did fuck all and just stayed up to fight online enemies, but the meme of him being the raging soyjack in response to his crying wife on their date saying 'Babe! Stop fighting trolls on Twitter and spend time with me' popped hilariously to mind.

How does that put the Ethics Board in the Catch-22? "If they discipline me then I'll dox them all!" That sounds like a threat, not a Catch-22.

Pluis I love the logic. "You complained about me and the Ethics Board found your complaints had merit? Yeah well, here's you name and home address so my fans like Still Life can harass you for being right about me!"
The complaints become part of the public record when the complaint moves forward. As of now, they are confidential records.

The Board would be making them public if they discipline him, not Nicholas.

It's kinda weird to me that this is a family with only one breadmaker but the wife seeming has ZERO respect for his work schedule. It would make much more sense if they live downtown and Nick was chilling around at 9PM when his wife suddenly says she wants to go out...but they don't. They live in the middle of nowhere. Where would you even go for a spontaneous date that lasts past Nick's work hour (11pm stream) in their area? If they went to the city, they would have to have gone there earlier in the evening (like 5PM? 6PM?) That wouldn't be unexpected.
According to him, they hang out while she binges Star Trek and just spend time together.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The complaints become part of the public record when the complaint moves forward. As of now, they are confidential records.

The Board would be making them public if they discipline him, not Nicholas.
Thank you, my reading comprehension failed me on that. Sounds like something the complainants should've considered beforehand then.
 
Borderline? The man has a clip out there saying 'I am not addicted because I drink less than other people I know' and redefines 'addiction' for himself. He does not fulfill his personal definition of 'addicted' so he is not an addict. Genius logic!
Its addict logic.

Every addict justifies their addiction by saying "Its not that bad, others do it worse than me." Every addict fustificies their shitty behavior to themselves. Every addict copes about their downward spiral. Nick needs the help.

Old comment, but what would this actually do to Nick?
Make him seethe in a 7x2 hour long rant about how he's totally a practicing lawyer, NIGGAHH.
 
EXCEPT - and this is my pet theory - this bill is winding it's way through the MN legislature. Nick's covered it on at least two streams. He's correct is saying that if it's passed, he could be fucked. (Along with any lawyer who expresses bias against "marginalized" groups.):

I've read the bill and I don't see that as true. Its a bad bill in various ways, but I don't see any particular content specifically covering attorneys other than:

"commits any offense described in subdivision 2 with intent to influence or otherwise
tamper with a juror or a judicial proceeding or with intent to retaliate against a judicial
officer, as defined in section 609.415, or a prosecutor, defense attorney, or officer of the
court, because of that person's performance of official duties in connection with a judicial
proceeding;"

The OLPR is not a judicial proceeding. The offenses as described as far as I can see are all criminal offenses like assault or damage to property. The OLPR also currently has a set of existing ethical rules that could be used to go after people expressing bias or behaving badly within the context of the legal profession.

I think as others have said, the OLPR is unlikely to go after an attorney for behavior outside of their practice of law. The only serious complaint IMO is the one by Monty's attorney IF (and only if) Nick could have been considered to have been representing himself at the time he made the comments. And even then, he is most likely to be punished with something like taking classes rather than pulling his law license.

Nick's decision to effectively cease practicing law makes him somewhat immune from ethical complaints. The only way that would change is if he does something related to the law that gets alot of local media coverage in the state and makes him an embarassment to the profession. The other path to doom for Nick would probably be to go after the judge in his case. Though that one is less certain because the Judge has all sorts of informal ways to punish someone in the courtroom for acting out.
 
I finished watching black rapper's response. He struggles. But halfway through he....finally... hits the target.

Riley is a gross degenerate who is literally showing up on private property (telling internet lawyer man doesn't know the definition of private property) smelling of garbage and disappointment. If he should do some crazy shit; than black rapper man is legally and, more importantly, morally responsible to his employees.

That's what this is about. Beginning, middle, end.

I'm a business owner, a serious person. Take the clownshow back to Hollywood.
 
That's the sad part in all this imo. Nick Rekieta can do wrong without any real consequences. He won't lose his license to practice law, he won't lose his Rumble deal, he won't be denounced by his peers who are getting hit with the collateral damage, he won't lose his busted up damaged goods wife, he won't lose his core fanbase, and he'll probably still be in largely the same position in a few years.

Eric July has dozens of people relying upon him to make the right moves because even if he does everything right, psychos are now going to clamor for his demise and life ruination for no actual reason. Sure, Dick's ego was bruised, Vito is a jealous obese pedophile, Nick's upset the black men won't give him validation, but those are hardly justifications and no one believes them to be (maybe some retarded sycophantic viewers).

Eric July can't even go out of his way to do a positive with his fortunate position by donating to a charity for children without it being twisted against him. It's sadistic bullying and gaslighting. Nick wishes he could lilbro Eric July just like he did with Montagraph. "You're a stupid nigga and I tried to help you because I'm your only friend but you were too retarded to take my help so now you deserve to take all this undue aggression and you can never respond. YOUR FANS can't even respond or we'll all go after them next!" It's straight up schoolyard bullying mentalities and tactics.

I don't want Rekieta to suffer life ruination, but when he's contributing to ruining Eric July there's this innate desire to see karma work its magic on its own.
 
Last edited:
Back