JFG / Jean-Francois Gariepy / jfgariepyneuro / The French Pervert / The Public Space - Warski's Abusive Ex-BF, Racist Streamer, Failed Academic, Potato Masher, Kristi Winter's BFF, Kero Defender

[Illuminati Order Official]

how much space he has in his fridge

Sure, there is a lot of space after he removed her corpse.

 

[Blue Miaplacidus]

This might be late, if so I'll delete, a cursory glance and I didn't see it mentioned.
In the RCMP update they've mentioned they're utilizing the new Missing Persons Act

Spoiler: More detailed information

CHAPTER 2022, c.45
Missing Persons Act
Assented to December 16, 2022
His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, enacts as follows:
DEFINITIONS

Definitions
1The following definitions apply in this Act.

“chief officer” means a chief of police as defined in the Police Act whose police force conducts a missing person investigation or the Commanding Officer of the “J” Division of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police when it conducts a missing person investigation.(agent en chef)
“emergency demand” means an emergency demand for records referred to in section 6.(demande formelle urgente)
“judge” means a judge of the Provincial Court of New Brunswick.(juge)
“Minister” means the Minister of Public Safety and includes any person designated by the Minister to act on the Minister’s behalf.(ministre)
“missing person” means(personne disparue)
(a) a person whose whereabouts are unknown and who has not been in contact with those persons who would likely or normally be in contact with the person, or
(b) a person
(i) whose whereabouts are unknown despite reasonable efforts to locate the person, and
(ii) whose safety and welfare are feared for given the person’s age, physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments or the circumstances surrounding the person’s absence.
“officer” means a police officer as defined in the Police Act or a member of the “J” Division of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police who assists in a missing person investigation conducted by their police force.(agent)
“person at risk” means a missing person who is assessed to be a person at risk in accordance with section 15.(personne à risque)
“police force” means a police force as defined in the Police Act or the “J” Division of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police that conducts a missing person investigation.(corps de police)
“record” means a record as defined in the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. (document)
“record access order” means an order made under section 3.(ordonnance d’accès aux documents)
“search order” means an order made under section 5.(ordonnance de recherche)
“vulnerable person” means(personne vulnérable)
(a) a person for whom a committee or person is appointed under the Infirm Persons Act, or
(b) a person whom the Minister of Social Development puts under protective care under the Family Services Act.
RECORD ACCESS ORDERS
AND SEARCH ORDERS

Application for order
2During the course of a missing person investigation, an officer may apply without notice and in the manner prescribed by regulation to a judge for a record access order or a search order.
Record access order

3(1)A judge may make an order requiring a person to give a police force access to and, if requested, provide the police force with copies of the records referred to in section 4 about a missing person if the judge is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the records
(a) are in the possession or under the control of the person, and
(b) may assist the police force in locating the missing person.
3(2)If the missing person is a minor, a vulnerable person or a person at risk and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the missing person may be in the company of a third party, the judge may make an order requiring a person to give the police force access to and, if requested, provide the police force with copies of the records referred to in section 4 about the third party if the judge is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the records
(a) are in the possession or under the control of the person, and
(b) may assist the police force in locating the missing person.
3(3)In determining whether to issue a record access order under subsection (1) or (2), the judge shall consider any information that suggests that the missing person may not wish to be located, including information that suggests that the missing person has left or is attempting to leave a violent or abusive situation.
3(4)The judge may include a provision in the order requiring a person to provide to the police force an accounting of the efforts made by the person to locate the records that cannot be found.
3(5)The judge may impose any terms and conditions that the judge considers appropriate on the order.

Records that may be subject to record access order
4Access to the following records about a missing person or a third party may be required under a record access order:
(a) the records prescribed by regulation; and
(b) any other record the judge considers appropriate.
Search order – minor, vulnerable person or person at risk

5(1)A judge who is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a missing person who is a minor, a vulnerable person or a person at risk may be located in a premises, including a private dwelling, may make an order authorizing officers to enter, by force if necessary, the premises and search for the missing person.
5(2)The judge may authorize entry between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m. if the judge is satisfied that it is necessary for officers to enter the premises at that time in order to ensure the safety of the missing person.
5(3)The judge may impose any terms and conditions that the judge considers appropriate on the order.
EMERGENCY DEMANDS
Emergency demand

6(1)An officer may serve an emergency demand on a person requiring that person to give access to and, if requested, provide copies of the records prescribed by regulation about a missing person to the officer’s police force if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a missing person is at risk of imminent serious bodily harm or death and
(a) the records are in the possession or under the control of the person who is served with the emergency demand,
(b) the records may assist the police force in locating the missing person, and
(c) immediate access to records is necessary to prevent serious bodily harm to or the death of the missing person or the destruction of the records.
6(2)An emergency demand shall be on a form provided by the Minister.
6(3)The officer who serves an emergency demand on a person shall, as soon as the circumstances permit, file a written report with their chief officer setting out the circumstances in which the emergency demand was made.

Obligation to comply with emergency demand
7A person who is served with an emergency demand shall, as soon as possible,
(a) give the police force access to the records specified in the emergency demand and, if requested, provide the police force with copies of those records, and
(b) if the person is unable to locate a record specified in the emergency demand, provide to the police force an accounting of the efforts made by the person to locate that record.

Application for order
8If a person who is served with an emergency demand under section 6 fails to comply with the emergency demand, the officer may, in the manner prescribed by regulation, apply to a judge for an order requiring the person to comply with the emergency demand.
Order to comply with emergency demand

9(1)A judge may make an order requiring a person to comply with an emergency demand if the judge is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the records specified in the emergency demand
(a) are in the possession or under the control of the person, and
(b) may assist the police force in locating the missing person.
9(2)The judge may impose any terms and conditions that the judge considers appropriate on the order.
Annual report – emergency demands

10(1)On or before March 31 in each year, a police force shall submit to the Minister, on a form provided by the Minister, a report containing the following information:
(a) the number of missing person investigations in which an emergency demand was made during the previous calendar year;
(b) the number of persons who were served with an emergency demand in that year;
(c) a description of the types of records specified in the emergency demands made during that year; and
(d) any other information prescribed by regulation.
10(2)On or before May 31 of each year, the Minister shall make the report available to the public by posting it on the Government of New Brunswick website.
USE AND DISCLOSURE
OF INFORMATION AND RECORDS
Use of information and records

11(1)A police force may use information and records obtained under this Act only for
(a) the purpose of locating a missing person or a use consistent with that purpose, or
(b) a purpose for which the information or records may be disclosed under section 12.
11(2)If a missing person investigation becomes a criminal investigation, this section does not prevent information and records obtained under this Act from being used for the purposes of the criminal investigation.
Disclosure of information and records

12(1)The information and records obtained by a police force under this Act are confidential and may not be disclosed except in accordance with this section.
12(2)The police force may disclose information or records obtained under this Act only as follows:
(a) if the person the information or record is about has consented to the disclosure;
(b) the disclosure is authorized or required by law;
(c) for the purpose of locating a missing person or a use consistent with that purpose;
(d) to the Government of Canada or any of its agencies, the government of a province or territory of Canada or any of its agencies, another law enforcement agency in Canada or a law enforcement agency in a foreign country under an arrangement, written agreement, treaty or legislative authority only to the extent necessary to further a missing person investigation or to coordinate missing person investigations; or
(e) in accordance with subsections (3) to (6).
12(3)For the purposes of furthering its missing person investigation, the police force may disclose the following information to the public in any manner that the chief officer considers appropriate:
(a) the missing person’s name;
(b) the age of the missing person;
(c) a physical description of the missing person;
(d) a photograph of the missing person;
(e) information about any medical conditions of the missing person that may pose a serious or immediate threat to the health of the missing person;
(f) pertinent information about a vehicle;
(g) the location where the missing person was last seen;
(h) the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of the missing person; and
(i) any other information prescribed by regulation.
12(4)The police force may disclose to the public in any manner that the chief officer considers appropriate that the missing person has been located.
12(5)Subject to the regulations, if the missing person is located and the person is a minor, the police force may, without the consent of the minor, disclose information and records obtained under this Act about the minor to a parent or guardian of the minor if, in the opinion of the chief officer, the disclosure will protect the safety of the minor.
12(6)Subject to the regulations, if the missing person is located and the person is a vulnerable person, the police force may, without the consent of the vulnerable person, disclose information and records obtained under this Act about the vulnerable person to a person who belongs to a class of persons prescribed by regulation if, in the opinion of the chief officer, the disclosure will protect the safety of the vulnerable person.
12(7)If the missing person investigation becomes a criminal investigation, this section does not prevent the disclosure of information and records obtained under this Act for the purposes of the criminal investigation.

Legal privilege
13Nothing in this Act compels the disclosure of any information or records that are subject to any type of legal privilege, including solicitor-client privilege.

Other rights
14 This Act does not restrict any authority that a police force would otherwise have to collect information or records.
GENERAL
Person at risk assessment

15(1)An officer may assess whether a missing person is a person at risk.
15(2)In making an assessment under subsection (1), the officer shall consider
(a) whether the missing person is at risk of harm because the missing person
(i) may be likely to provide sexual services for consideration,
(ii) may have been hitchhiking when the missing person went missing,
(iii) may be likely to self-harm,
(iv) may have a substance use disorder,
(v) may require medication, or
(vi) may not be prepared to deal with the weather or the terrain of the location where the missing person may have gone missing, and
(b) any other factor the officer considers relevant.

Court records
16A judge who is satisfied that public access to the records of the Provincial Court of New Brunswick relating to an application or an order made under this Act may interfere with a missing person investigation or endanger the safety of any person may order that the records or any part of them be sealed and kept in a location to which the public has no access.

Offences and penalties
17A person commits an offence punishable under Part 2 of the Provincial Offences Procedure Act as a category H offence if the person
(a) violates or fails to comply with an order made under this Act, or
(b) violates or fails to comply with section 11 or 12.

Conflict
18 If this Act is inconsistent with or in conflict with a provision of the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act or a provision of the Personal Health Information Privacy and Access Act, this Act prevails.

Immunity
19No action, application or other proceeding lies or shall be instituted against a person in relation to anything done or purported to be done in good faith, or in relation to anything omitted in good faith, under this Act by the person.

Service of documents
20An emergency demand that is to be served on a person under this Act may be served and service may be proven in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Provincial Offences Procedure Act.

Administration
21The Minister is responsible for the administration of this Act and may designate one or more persons to act on the Minister’s behalf.

Review of this Act
22Within five years after the commencement of this Act, the Minister shall undertake a review of the operation of this Act, and, once it is complete, the Minister shall conduct a subsequent review within seven years after the completion date and every seven years after that.

Regulations
23The Lieutenant-Governor in Council may make regulations:
(a) governing the procedure that applies for making an application for a search order or a record access order under section 2 or an order requiring a person to comply with an emergency demand under section 8;
(b) prescribing records for the purposes of paragraph 4(a) and subsection 6(1);
(c) prescribing information for the purposes of paragraphs 10(1)(d) and 12(3)(i);
(d) prescribing the factors a chief officer shall consider when deciding whether to disclose information and records under subsection 12(5) or (6);
(e) prescribing classes of persons to whom information and records may be disclosed under subsection 12(6);
(f) respecting the use, retention and disposal of records for the purposes of this Act;
(g) respecting the disclosure of information and records for the purposes of this Act;
(h) defining any word or expression used in but not defined in this Act for the purposes of this Act, the regulations or both; and
(i) respecting any other matter that may be necessary for the proper administration of this Act.
COMMENCEMENT
Commencement
24This Act or any provision of this Act comes into force on a day or days to be fixed by proclamation.
N.B. This Act was proclaimed and came into force March 1, 2023.
N.B. This Act is consolidated to March 1, 2023.

source
Wonder who they plan on demanding information from.
Clearly they also don't believe it to be a case of a woman just running off to live her life and there's a credible reason to obtain information via a court order from people.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

I am watching yesterdays MATI and I saw the Highlight on the front page and read the thread and holy fucking shit.

This guy 100% murdered his wife and watching the interview the guy's face during the "Household Turmoil" question was fantastic.

 

[DYLAN ‘DIELAWN’ VOLK]

What's really horrifying about it is that they are both girls. If he doesn't get locked up God only knows what his plans are for those little ones.

Remember the "Basment Rosechus"? That's my current theory of what his plans are.

 

[WonderWino]

Wonder who they plan on demanding information from.
Clearly they also don't believe it to be a case of a woman just running off to live her life and there's a credible reason to obtain information via a court order from people.

At first I was going to say they're using it to get access to her phone location records but apparently they've already gotten some kind of access to that info given statements they supposedly made. She didn't bring anything else with her supposedly. At least nothing that act would be of any use for, so either it has something to do with checking credit card/bank usage and things of that matter (though you'd think they'd have already done that before now as a first step, before they appealed to the public for help finding her) the only thing I can think of is its in relation to information regarding a person of interest. and we all know who that is

and like you said, if they're jumping onto using that act this quickly and onto the idea its a legit missing person this quickly they don't believe this is someone leaving and deliberately not wanting to be found. That implies they know more than they've made public and certainly more than they've said shit about to JF, or that they have serious suspicions about the likelihood of foul play being involved. Again, we know where that leads already

JF should be shitting his pants right about now. They may as well be holding up a neon sign in front of him that says 'we don't believe your story.' It also fits with his admission the cops are waking him up with questions every day. You don't do that to people who you aren't very suspicious of

 

[Me262PrinceOfTurboJet]

Women like to play with water and they sometimes get it in the electronics? Mama JF destroyed 2 of his laptops playing with water? What!? I know she's retarded, but how fucking retarded is she!? Playing with water? Is this a language barrier thing? I've never met a woman, or any adult for that matter, who plays with water and just normally gets it all over electronics and destroys expensive things like computers.

 

[LeMayonaise]

I was reading his 2016 court case. The guy is completely unhinged. But what I found super funny, was the mother of his first child:

J. Louise Newton
Clinical Social Work/Therapist, MSW, LCSW, SEP (she, her)​

She's a full blown SJW.
"I am a member of WPATH and provide queer and gender expansive competent therapy and evaluations for transgender community members seeking a range of medical interventions."

She's reading books on trannies:

The idea, that JF Gariepy first born son will troon out and sterilize himself is so funny.
I understand why he sued her for custody. What a circus.

His first love was an autistic 19year old from Texas.
Then this crazy purple hair tranny counselor from North Carolina who gave him a son (that he never saw / met). Relationship lasted 6months then she sued him. And the court agreed that HE was the craziest of the 2.
And finally the potato arc.



Video of the estranged wife: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=vlMjmUuveG4
Her tranny counselor page: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapists/j-louise-newton-hillsborough-nc/151106

 

[veritarded]

At first I was going to say they're using it to get access to her phone location records but apparently they've already gotten some kind of access to that info given statements they supposedly made. She didn't bring anything else with her supposedly. At least nothing that act would be of any use for, so either it has something to do with checking credit card/bank usage and things of that matter (though you'd think they'd have already done that before now as a first step, before they appealed to the public for help finding her) the only thing I can think of is its in relation to information regarding a person of interest. and we all know who that is

and like you said, if they're jumping onto using that act this quickly and onto the idea its a legit missing person this quickly they don't believe this is someone leaving and deliberately not wanting to be found. That implies they know more than they've made public and certainly more than they've said shit about to JF, or that they have serious suspicions about the likelihood of foul play being involved. Again, we know where that leads already

JF should be shitting his pants right about now. They may as well be holding up a neon sign in front of him that says 'we don't believe your story.' It also fits with his admission the cops are waking him up with questions every day. You don't do that to people who you aren't very suspicious of

he seems like the type of guy to be put in an interrogation room and still talk, he’s said himself that shutting up and listening to your lawyer is a low IQ move. he’ll gladly talk to police because he thinks he can outsmart them.

also knowing that he represented himself pro se in a previous custody case says it all. he will make the same mistake again and think he can outsmart the legal system. wouldn’t put it past him to tell them where the body is and then spin up a new story

 

[Titty Figurine]

A link to the Crucible stream was already posted but I just barely missed it/MATI and was annoyed at the lack of timestamps and highlights so I shat a list out. It might not be exactly to the second but it's within a couple.

Spoiler: Spoiled for space

1:25 Banter, JF criticizes Andrew for not calling the stream something sensational like "Hudson Bay Butcher"

1:50 "Heard rumors to the effect that you have bashed Mama JF's brains in with a shovel" Nods and laughs

2:30 Acknowleges that he's been scattered on stream for a few weeks thinking about this, refers to it as a case

3:15 "She has gone on a trip and intentionally got rid of anything that can track her"

4:30 Laughing again at "What did that evil JF Gariepy do to her"

5:15 "Of c ourse she's weird, she's the kind of woman willing to have sex with me"

5:38 Begins his timeline of the day he dropped her off

5:58 "She brought lots of joy in my life and I am very thankful"

6:40 She hitchhiked to Quebec in 2021

7:00 Suggests that she has been around the world crossing borders with and without passports, "tricks of survival"

8:12 "Customers" at truck stop

9:18 "In the following two days I knew that she was alive"

Note: This is starting to sound incredibly rehearsed

11:18 Kind of garbles keeping it in the present tense, still says last time ever

12:18 "She is a free woman and she can travel and she is fully aware of the risks"

13:45 "For a week I would need about 55lbs of hiking gear, she was last seen with a knapsack. what was she carrying in terms of survival gear?" Botches the response, a lot less collected than his recounting of dropping her off

16:15 "She could be on a container of bananas"

17:25 "If I was in the investigator's shoes that would sound weird to me" restates JF's story, JF laughing

17:50 "I don't blame the Internet for being mad at you JF, this sounds really fucking suspicious"

19:05 "The police are very smart and did not fall for me being a suspect at all"/"I laid out the same story I laid out on the Internet"

19:36 Rants about Internet mob mentality and bias against men, Andrew looks VERY skeptical at this point. Strangely tangents about how she hasn't been raped

21:21 Andrew gently reminds him that most often in disappearances of women it IS in fact the closest man, JF redirects to crime statistics getting people banned

22:00 "People WAKE UP and check your own bigotry"

22:35 Very animated about due process, pattern recognition has no place in investigation

25:30 "Walk us through why you decided to clean the house, do the plaster work"

26:45 "It's not a case where the police would have a location of murder tied to my cleaning of it", blames trolls

27:18 "Females do crazy stuff, sometimes they play with water, it gets into the electronics" Mama JF has broken two laptops playing with water

28:00 He loves to have so much space in the fridge that he can put his arm in it.

28:15 Interesting stumble over "My wife has gone on a trip and might never come back"

28:47 "I consider myself bound to her forever, dead or alive, with a new boyfriend or not, I will always respect what Mama JF has done in my life"

29:18 "Walk me through the plan of Mama JF" "Well it's hard to get a plan from a hippie", shills his book, a lot of past tense

31:09 "I don't fight because I'm a libertarian"

32:18 "It's normal for someone who doesn't know where their partner is to be nervous" "There are things I know that I will not mention right now", thinks it would throw off the
investigation if he revealed these details because then people would not have called the police?

35:00 "The moment I left her at that gas station I thought it was the case that she could come back two weeks later"

35:50 Shrugs about if he's hoping she will come back and says he is neutral

36:30 When pressed to say that if she were listening she should notify the police so the case can be closed he starts explaining his actions instead. Ends up with "Find an
encrypted way to send you are alive. If you don't want to talk to them I have opened a Proton mail. Send me something only you would know" Andrew now looks suspicious instead of skeptical

38:40 Hopefully discussing how some cases go cold after only a year

39:10 "Are you afraid that she will come out and blame you for this?" Fairly confident no but spirals off about the truth of liberty and privacy rights. Unironic "We live in a society"ing

40:30 The "leaving on a consensual trip" line again

41:50 "To my knowledge she has never travelled back into my direction"

Note: Not sure exactly when it started but he appears a bit flushed

43:00 Leaning into left the country again, dodges if there was a point they would have called the police

45:00 Admits taking advantage of the situation for a bit of self-promotion and shills book

47:35 "She does not have a mind to plan"

50:00 Going on about how much cleaner and better managed his house is again

53:03 "Did you kill Mama JF" "No"

56:45 A bureaucratic member of the government called the police, not family

1:00:00 Judy Tester superchat comes up

1:01:50 "This one comes in and I was kind of wondering this myself, but why do you refer to Mama JF in the past tense?" Extremely quick "Because she has gone from my life" and blames language barrier

1:08:44 Sort of acknowleges children in a roundabout way regarding monogamy, "Need to know that you have not given one of your eggs to another father, that you have not produced other babies"

1:10:51"Mama JF would not want", "Whether she's alive or dead..." "There may have been outcomes that she didn't want to happen"

 

[Working]

This was one of the better episodes of the crucible. After this interview and the water hitting a boil I hope that french faggot has enough sense to self delete and not hurt anyone else. This reminds me too much of Chris Watts.

 

[Ingmar Aspergman]

I always thought that this fucking guy was boring as shit and would skip through anytime he’s mentioned, but now I am completely enraptured holy shit

 

[Terrorist]

Christmas 2023: "You know JF, I never thought I'd like aspic but this is pretty good. What are these little chunks of meat?"

 

[Ban Evader 9000]

I transcribed parts I found interesting. I cut out some lines but I made an effort to quote him accurately. I also bolded a few parts for emphasis. Italics for the interviewer.

She decided to do it in June. Perhaps in a more serious way, perhaps in a more serious way. Perhaps she would come back weeks later, perhaps she will never come back. She was cryptic in leaving. She equipped herself with camping materials and ordered stuff on amazon that allows you to survive in the wild. That kind of stuff.
Mama JF likes to be brought to certain places where she knows she has more chances to get a hitchhike person, and so I brought her exactly at the place which she wanted
So I dropped her there, in front of cameras at a gas station
So I dropped her in front of cameras at a gas station. She was at that gas station, telling me goodbye, equipped for her trip. In the two following days I knew that was was alive. We had some contact and some exchanges.

Spoiler: Transcript, very long

what did you discuss?
The reception wasn't super good and then we tranferred to text
She told me [over text] basically that she would drop her cellphone behind and she would not be reachable
and I made sure that she did not have evil intent against me. Are your new plans dangerous, are you going to attack me in any way? No, don't worry, I am just going away and I will not be reachable and I have a plan.

We now know she was seen in another location than another location than the gas station I left her
That is the last time that we know publicly and that I know and that anyone has ever saw her or communicated with her. Of course during all this I informed her family that she was going toward them. Because I knew she was probably heading west. So I informed the people around here.

Whenabouts was this?
From the very day I dropped her off on June 17th. So they knew about it. The position of her family who loves her very much is that you can't retain a woman against her will. And they have always been clear to me that
they don't want me to beat mama jf, they don't want me to intimidator mama JF. And I've always lived by these principles anyway. We were all agreeing that if Mama JF wants to travel, she can, and that she is a free woman and has a full understanding of the risks.

I go and hike quite a bit myself. For two straight days of hiking, I carry about 35 pounds of equipment which is more than you should but I always prepare for emergencies. If I were going to go out for a week. It'd be about 55-60 pounds. What sort of equipment was Mama JF going into the wilderness with? According to the ... report she was just scene with a regular backpack. What was she carrying in the terms of survival gear?
Well uhh well I know she's been collecting a lot of stuff the kind of things like a stool like sitting around fires, some material for lighting a fire, a knife but looking at the size of her bag as she left uhh I wouldn't think she was going at the point when she left I wouldn't think she was going for extended extended survival in nature. Mama JF when she goes on hitch hiking tricks...trips she uses human society a lot. she will ask for help, she will find new friends, she will receive help and gifts and food we're not talking as far as I know she had no intend of going into the actual forest surviving for extended periods

Mama JF is a urban creature.
yeah so urban survival
Yes.
so one of the keys here though is that if you're gonna cross borders and do this kind of thing that you've expressed is a meme on the internet, 007 Mama JF <haha> that's still going to require things like passports, sets of identification, things like this you'd think authorities could track these things down if she crossed the border so it stands to reason she's probablly still in canada, right?
Uhh you know the investigator told me exactly this and I said "Mama JF is a special case. She has not been uhh she has shown in the past being able to switch countries at time using networks of smuggling uhh when she visited ... north africa when she was observing migrant movement. I believe she had lost her passport and was able to get from country to country without passport. So I said to the investigator, sure, I don't expect her to be outside of canada but I also wouldn't bar it as a hypothesis. As I said in my show she could be in a container of bananas heading toward Peru right now.

You'll basically be pursing a fugitive who has committed no crime. Basically mama jf will hide from you guys and if you wanna have fun finding her, go ahead but you're probably trying and this is my point to the investigator. I get it that you have standards you have to do stuff. You have to unleash the whole cavalry at her no matter what. We don't know, she could be in danger. But most likely you're describing all of these efforts for a party girl who just happens to be hiding very well.

this is uncommon anyway for women to be traveling alone in this day and age, let alone cross country and hidden in banana carts, being smuggled a cross borders 007 style and also killing all of their electronic equipment so that no one can track them, it does sound really suspicious. I almost don't blame the internet for being mad at you. It sounds awful fucking suspicious, right? [shared laughter]
And it's okay that these suspicions double up. The investigators are super professional and they didn't fall for what the trolls of the internet are falling for right now. For the ramzpauls of this world. Ramzpaul is exactly on the line of logic you just laid out here. Oh it's weird, oh you cleaned your house after she left oh it's weird.

Let me tell you, the police man have showed so much more intelligence than these people who I considered friends. Ramzpaul has been a guest on my show before and I didn't expect to be betrayed like this. But teh investigators don't fall for this crap, they are all about facts and they have ways of checking what you say. I remember the first time the [investigator?] interviewed me and he looked at me in the eye and told me "So you're telling me that we're see your car at this date at this hour on this camera" and I said "yes you will"

so they didn't fall for me being a suspect, ever, at any point in the investigation despite me laying out the exact story I laid out on the internet.
If we can use this case because of all the nervousness ... I think we can use this case positively to detect an epistemological error in how the mobs process guilt in our world and how we always go to the man and the closest man is always guilty no matter what. I have people telling me you're still guilty if you didn't kill her, you're guilty of neglect. You're still guilty if you haven't neglected her, you're guilty of not having convinced her to stay. At this point I'm guilty of what? of being a man and having a woman who doesn't want to be with me anymore?
they want me to keep the woman, but then if you keep her you're a kidnapper but if you let her go you're a neglectful husband. I say crap to all this and I say mama JF is a free woman who has demonstrated extreme ability for survival. the chances that you wouldn't get raped through what she's gone through is almost 0. almost 0. and yet she has done it.

and she has never had harm come her way, so I respect her intelligence and her capacity. This is a woman who can play her violin from her box and come play with me on the show while I do an improvised tune she has never heard of. This is a high IQ, extremely capable woman. and personally I always told the investigator I don't think she's in trouble. I still think as of today that she is good.

I think that it's okay for people to inquire if something sounds off. ... I do also understand that while you are correct they shouldn't point directly to the closest man, often times the closest man is responsible for the disappearance if we look at the stats.
What a wonderful computation you just did. Except that it's only allowed against white men. Make that computation against any other category and we'll see what happens to you.
I mean it's just men in general.
well no just because there are statistics that would allow me to say the exact same bigoted thing you just said and I could say it and I would be banned for it. So just check your own bigotry. You guys are all after me and ultimately it's because you hate men.
I mean fair enough, I was just going off of the stats they show when it comes to if a person has been murdered it usually comes from the family
But we don't do accusations of murder in this society based on stats. I could be part of a group of people who murder a lot and I could be the one who doesn't murder and our society has a system of due process, where even if you're a group that commits a lot of murder but we're never going to get you if you haven't done it
From the point of view of an investigator... wouldn't you logically follow that in your investigation?
No, and this probabilistic thinking is what's taking over society like a cancer and we must eliminate it completely.

I saw a twitter post, imagine trying to crucify this guy because his girl leaves and he cleans his house. It seems a little odd that that's the society we live in but it is the society we do live in. But on the other hand, it kind of rings the alarm bells a little bit if there's a missing person you're going through you're thorughly cleaning the house. can you walk us through the process there, why you decided to do all this shortly after mama JF is gone?

the thing is, when you listen to these crime stories on tv, you see a lot of mentions of "he was seen by a neighbor frantically cleaning his car and people have integrated that and think oh my god that is a piece of evidence and they have concluded from my own videos from june around the time I left where I left mama JF at hte gas station they started making the conclusion we have a piece of evidence here. JF mentioned cleaning his house.
but what these people don't realize is that when police processed for the cleaning car or cleaning house, it will often be in relation to place where there has been a murder. in my case the police has already established the last contact of mama JF happened very far from my home after there were no more contacts between me and her. So it's not a case which would have a location of murder that would be tied to my frantic cleaning of it. So I'm afraid that in this case it's just a case of the trolls of the internet improvising themselves investigators and watching through my whole videos and detecting this one detail.

I cleaned my house when mama JF was gone. If you don't understand why, you have probably been single forever. Everyone knows a female has a lot of imprint onto a house. They do a lot of crazy stuff. Sometimes they play with water, sometimes they get into the electronics. Mama JF has broken two of my laptops just playing with water. So when a woman leaves the house, and she has control of the frige, the plates, the placement of all of the tools in the ktichen for years you come back to your home and you look at it and you want to reshape it in the way you want. So I reshape the home when I came back when I come back from dropping off Mama JF. I love a fridge where there's lots of space. I love to have so much space I can put my arm in it and reach for my diet pepsi can that is in the center of it. I couldn't do that with Mama JF and all of her lettuces and carrots and beets.
T/N note: she's in the fridge

Are you and Mama JF married?
well I call her my wife, we are common law spouse. But for paper reasons we didn't have an interest in marrying ourselves but I consider myself tied to her forever and bound to defend her interests forever, dead or alive and with a boyfriend or with a new boyfriend or not I will always respect what mama JF has done in my life and I consider myself a servant of her interests forever. ...
Sometimes she wanted to build castles where communes of hippies could be gathering and living together. It's hard to present as a plan, but that is the mind of mama JF which I respect. So all these things. She was dreaming of a wild life and a crazy life.

were you guys fighting about this in the lead up to the drop off and was there contention about this?
I don't fight because I'm a libertarian and I have so much invested in preserving my good relationship with mama JF that it's not in my interest to fight or pressure or make her feel comfortable. So what she always had from me was I am opposed to this, it's bad, you could get raped, you could get killed, anything could happen to you. But if you want it to happen that way I fully respect this and I'll drop you at the safest place I can.

It's normal to be nervous and there's lots of nervousness in not knowing and imagining the worst scenarios and also the restraint you have to have because there are things I know are in the investigation that I will not mention, cannot mention, because there are things you have to defend peoples' private rights to privacy and if you say them and they're not conclusive yet it could disrupt the investigation because it could throw off a lot of traces of people saying "well if that was established then I'm not going to call the police" and you want everyone to be thirsty to call the police and report the most facts they can

let me tell you, the peacefulness of mama JF in her desire not to hurt me is something that is more tolerable than a lot of other cases that have happened in my life. There's a way in separation I'm sure you know about it in our current world, where woman can destroy the lives of their husband, destroy them financially, they can kidnap the kids they can do anything

The fact that mama JF has decided in this trip in a way that is totally non-hostile to me makes it much more bearable psychologically and I totally respect the way she's done it.
Mama JF has done this before and she can back two weeks later. The moment I left her at this gas station, I thought it was potentially the case she would come back 2 weeks later. Do you trust your instinct? Do you trust what she did last time? At some point as a man you have to say, "I have no control over what this woman does. It could be in 2 weeks from now or 20 years from now. I don't care"

do you expect she will come back?
I act in every day of my life as if she can come back. If she does come back I'll be there, and if she doesn't that is also fine.
Are you... but you're hoping she is, obviously
Well, um, I'm neutral. I don't want her to come back if she doesn't want to come back. I've seen her leave of her own will.
I had to talk about it simply to correct those attacks against me and those lies. I have nothing against you Mama JF and I didn't ask for this investigation to be started. But if you want to clam everyone down, if you want to calm the police and just diminish the tension and the media attention, just find an encrypted way to signal that you are alive. If you don't want to talk to them, I opened a proton mail email you can send me proof in that email, tell me something that only you would know. And that way it would prove that it's you and the police will be reassured. I think that's all they want anyways.
If you don't want to be located or don't want to be found, that's one way we can use to ensure your safety.

Not any of you is entitled to know where Mama JF is. That is the truth of liberty. We are in a society that gives you so much things, it tempts you with a drivers license and you can drive now. Oh but now you're carrying an identity card of the state and tied in the databases. Oh here's a cellphone but now you are gps tracked on every second of your life. We live in a society that has come to expect a demonstration of location for everyone in existence and the fact is principally that is incorrect. The state is not entitled to know where you are. I am not entitled. Yet we have these worried agents of the government of the police because they noticed, despite the fact that me and mama JF's family assessed she is leaving on a consensual trip, some bureaucrat of the government called the police and decided to be worried. But you are not entitled to your worries. You are not entitled to konw where people are, that is a fundamental principle of society which I believe mama JF believes in and I want her to know I haven't broken it. I don't believe that you are entitled to know where she is if she doesn't want to be found.

is there a point where you would have contacted police after x amount of time with no contact?
Given her past behavior, it's totally not out of the question that still as of today mama jf is on a regular trip going with her regular plans. A very close family member was telling me that in the past she's been switching country and not been giving news for months. And so when we were seeing that it is october and she left in june ... 3 to 5 months approximately, that is within the space of what she has done in the past. So that is our choice. So yeah. So so. So we're not super worried to be honest.

Was there a bit of leaning into this for the purposes of self promotion?
T/N note: I can't figure out what the fuck he's saying
Uh no. My position on this is. Take whatever things happen you don't control do you to self promote. Which is what I'm doing here. That will be true whether she's with me or not, whether she has a thousand other boyfriend. Mama jf, and that's the reason she came to me first, believes the revolutionary phenotype must be stopped. So I don't think that she would take off at all that I am talking about the book of the revolution phenotype while also covering the case of her disappearance. If there is one message that mama Jf wanted to yell at the world, it is "reproduce. have babies. do not let the machines take over." ... Mama JF doesn't have the kind of brain that satisfies you with details.

Mama JF knows she can enter a bank that will give her money at the indication of her identity. But Mama JF has decided to go on a trip of self sustainment. She doesn't need credit cards to survive. She has traveled internationally before without any form of food reserve, any form of support, and any form of electronic or reserves of money. And she can do it. She can survive in the wild, she can survive in the city and I am not scared at all in her ability to do that.

Is your household in a bit of turmoil over this?
No, my household is in a beautiful state. I appreciated her contribution to my life so much but she is a disorganized brain and honestly my household is better organized without her and my fridge is cleaner and everything is better managed to my taste as an autistic man who likes order and cleanliness.

If you guys have some questions that aren't troll questions, I will ask him those questions and I'm sure he's happy to answer them but keep them on topic. We're not going to talk about anything too personal when it comes to family, children, that kind of thing. Don't even ask about the superchats asking about that. That was a precondition I'm happy to follow that. Send in whatever you want.

You really started a shitstorm with this, by the way. <smuckles>
I'm so good at being hated. <smuckles back>

jf said she bought a tent but she didn't take it, why?
I didn't say she bought a tent. She bought camping material. I do not thing she brought it. It was a very small backpack. We do have a tent, but I don't think she left with the tent. Our tent is in a wrapped bag and it's pretty big. I don't think she would have had that.

JF, did you kill MamaJF? Yes or no.
No.
Okay, I didn't think so, but that's off the table, right. We got it off the table.

If it's a troll chat I'm not reading. It doesn't do anything. "Why does JF believe what the police are telling him?" asked Daniel Borne for five dollars
I have my own way to verify things, for example when they say that they have last seen her June 19th the article that they put out was describing her clothes. Although I didn't quite remember what her clothes are, by looking at the description I can tell that this is a true sighting of MamaJF. I remember, yes she did leave with a certain jacket like this. So I know that the sighting is real. I can know because the description is totally in line with the way she left.

He says "They may just find her in the streets of montreal." That's a direct possibility.
Absolutely. As I said, maybe she just doesn't want to be found. This whole thing could be a big scare, but just be a reflection of someone who wanted to be free and doesn't want to be found.
You don't have a responsibility to call the police just because someone wants some space, or freedom. Every single person has decided not to call the police until a bureaucrat of the government did it.

If mama JF was mentally ill, would you tell us?
I don't acknowledge that mental illness is a reason to deny basic individual rights including the right of free choice for one's self. And so you tell me if she was mentally ill as a factual question, I do not recognize the preemptive power of psychiatry over rights of individual. As an individual you are free to check out a psychiatric and get services from them. It is not the role of ... imperialistically concere (???) your individual rights. I cannot go around and say "andrew, you're schizophrenic I'm going to take over you and I get your house and I decide what to do with your house". And that's what they did with Brittney Spears. And I fully object morally on any such things as the takeover of adult rights on excuses of psychiatrics diagnoses

[A question is asked about referring to mama JF in the past tense]
In french we do not have this thing where we talk about them in the past it means they are dead. If we talk about my mother is alive, I talk about my mother in french I say "She did that in the past. She was a secretary." It just means it was at the time. It's partly an influence of french and I consider mama JF as gone out in a way that I am not physically tied to her anymore. I still consider myself fully dedicated to her interests.

You didn't answer the question. If she was mentally ill, would you tell us?
There is a false premise to your question that mental illness is a fact. Mental illness is a human judgement, so I will refuse to engage with your question. It is very grave what you are attempting to do. People do not realize how grave it is to talk about mental illness as a fact. Mental illness is a human judgement. A moral one. One that comes with intents to take over the life of someone in their society right now. I will never participate in this ... of deception to start claiming that mental illness is a factual description of anything.

 

[Det. Sipovich]

I don't know why everyone's freaking out like she's ded. JFG clearly said she's at a farm upstate.

Yeah, Robert Picton's farm.

 

[Crunchy Smegma]

When you definitely haven't murdered your wife and have to cover the evidence:


View attachment 5385756

Link to the whole stream - It's from 6/20, so three days after she was last seen and the first ~18 minutes are Momma JF related. I saved a copy just in case but someone who isn't a computer retard can probably get it to be smaller than a gig and a half. He also talks about fleeing to Eastern Europe at one point. Dude really wants to look as guilty as possible.

I can only imagine this is what happened when Momma JF told him that she wanted to leave:

 

[Titty Figurine]

So at the end of the Crucible stream JF mentioned that he was going on Lauren DeLaguna's stream tomorrow. Being unfamiliar I set out to get an idea of her and oh boy this should be a hoot. This retweet crossover is all I need to look forward to the stream.

 

[Victim2988]

I have never seen a stream so devastating for somebody accused of kidnapping/murder. I have been following JF at the beginning of his career and I knew he was a sociopath. A real weirdo with a lot of issues but sometimes telling some truths so I listened to him sometimes until I got bored a few years ago.
When I heard the news about mamaJF I was 50/50 that he did it. Now after listening to him I am 90/10 in favor that he is actually a murderer. All the stream sounds wrong. He talked about her as she is already dead. He's not showing any emotion or compassion at all. He describes his potato as a genius of survivalism like a secret agent - while she was in reality just a housewife with clearly an IQ below 80. JF contredicts himself many times, I remember him telling that nobody even the cameras would notice her and later describing mama as an "oversocial person", the type that can't go unnoticed.
A rookie policeman would have crushed all his arguments in no time. It's also obvious that the police is watching him closely.
I would have never thought we would have a true crime arc in the sektur. Cows and orbiters die all the time but not like this. This can be huge.

 

[veritarded]

would have never thought we would have a true crime arc in the sektur. Cows and orbiters die all the time but not like this. This can be huge.

this means that there’s a chance that they play his interview on the killstream in court, which means that ethan ralph has still been in a court room more than rekeita.

also means that the amount of murderers with a thread on the farms will surpass “suicide victims”

 

[Scarthew]

I read this post when I wasn't logged in and came back to search for it because it is the funniest dang thing. Am I easily amused? Yes. But is this still a great pun? Also yes.

Glad people liked it, that pun is my magnum opus judging by my notifications.

 

[WonderWino]

First off thank you to @Titty Figurine for taking the time to do the timestamps. That was incredibly informative and more than a little concerning

3:15 "She has gone on a trip and intentionally got rid of anything that can track her"

The fact that he keeps reiterating this is exceptionally suspicious in itself. Especially considering nobody would actually do this. Its also a blatant lie twice over considering he both admitted to her bringing a phone with her (which everybody knows can be tracked and is in fact just about the very first thing the cops run a trace on to see if they can find a person in these situations) and claimed she somehow got another one shortly after, for no apparent reason. There is certainly no logical reason to do this, especially given the fact she supposedly left with no money. It sounds like a poorly thought through explanation as to why he couldn't get in contact with her, if not a way of explaining any fuckery he may have done regarding her phone to make her appear to be somewhere she was not

5:58 "She brought lots of joy in my life and I am very thankful"

Yeah, I see that. Very thankful indeed. So thankful in fact you supposedly literally dropped her off at a gas station with no money, no vehicle, no means of survival and left her to fend for herself. and then told nobody about it and never gave it a thought or wondered why she never showed up or contacted anyone, including you after 4 months. If thats how you act toward someone you're thankful for I would really hate to see what you've done to ex's that you hate.

6:40 She hitchhiked to Quebec in 2021

Do we have actual confirmation on the circumstances of this? Thats the height of the covid stuff, when for awhile it was absolute hell to travel to any other province for any reason and completely impossible if you were not carrying documented proof you were vaccinated. Seems like an odd time to be hitchhiking anywhere. That aside, I hate to point out the obvious but the difference here is she kept in touch with people and, you know, came back and didn't disappear off the face of the earth for months. Thats a pretty pertinent difference in my book

7:00 Suggests that she has been around the world crossing borders with and without passports, "tricks of survival"

Thats an incredibly suspicious thing to say under the circumstances. Its the kind of thing you tell the cops when you killed someone after telling them she left of her own accord so when the cops can't locate her you can point to that and say 'gee I guess she is up to her old tricks and must have crossed the border to the US. Oh well, you tried. No point in looking anymore right guys?' Cops aren't stupid. You say shit like that and you instantly set off alarm bells. Especially considering the last place you saw her was a fucking island with no connection to the US border and no reason to think she would do that. You're also risking the RCMP following up on this, notifying border patrol, who notifies the US border patrol, who calls the feds, just in case she or her body turn up in the US. You really don't want to be making this an international thing. You're going to piss off everybody involved and its not going to go over well for you

8:12 "Customers" at truck stop

So now shes a truckstop whore huh. You dropped the mother of your children off who has 'customers' at truckstops, shrugged and said 'oh you crazy potato, you go do you' huh? No, this sounds like another story made up so if the 'she crosses borders alot' doesn't pan out or a body is found somewhere he can say 'gee, she must have gotten a ride from the wrong trucker customer. Those guys are sketchy as fuck serial killers alot of the time, huh officers' and placed the blame on some anonymous serial killer type trucker

9:18 "In the following two days I knew that she was alive"

He keeps saying this yet it really doesn't make any sense. Its also not at all what a normal person would do or say in a situation like this. It would be like dropping your uncle at the gas station and saying 'well I know for sure he was alive a couple days after I left him there but I totally never thought anything of it when I suddenly lost contact with him and haven't heard from him in months. Oh well'

Note: This is starting to sound incredibly rehearsed

That it is, to put it mildly

11:18 Kind of garbles keeping it in the present tense, still says last time ever

He sure does do that alot. Funny he doesn't do this with other people in general

12:18 "She is a free woman and she can travel and she is fully aware of the risks"

That is not a normal thing to say, and shes not a fucking free woman who can run off as she pleases, she has two very young kids at home and supposedly has some legal obligations there requiring her signature and such. She could literally get jailed for abandoning her children for doing things like that and have them taken by CPS. and nobody uses the phrase 'she was aware of the risks' like this unless they know shes doing something seriously dangerous or likely to do them serious harm. It reminds me of that scene from the finale of voyager where the doctor goes to see lieutenant barclay about where janeway is and out of nowhere he starts going back to his old stuttering habit and blurts out that he's sure she can take care of herself. and the doctor loses it and points out that he wouldn't be saying that unless he knew she was doing something dangerous. Same exact energy

13:45 "For a week I would need about 55lbs of hiking gear, she was last seen with a knapsack. what was she carrying in terms of survival gear?" Botches the response, a lot less collected than his recounting of dropping her off

Gee, thats not suspicious at all. He got asked a question he was not expecting, wasn't prepared for and hadn't considered. Doubly suspicious considering you'd think given that she left with so little, he would have a pretty good idea of what she had with her when he supposedly dropped her off. It also illustrates that his other responses come off as prepared and practiced. I hope the police take careful not of that response. Good on this guy for asking that question

16:15 "She could be on a container of bananas"

She could be in a hole in the woods too, or chopped up and taken out with the drywall to the dump

17:25 "If I was in the investigator's shoes that would sound weird to me" restates JF's story, JF laughing

He's really, really not in a situation where he should be finding any of this shit funny and clearly did not take that obvious indication his story isn't believable very well

19:05 "The police are very smart and did not fall for me being a suspect at all"/"I laid out the same story I laid out on the Internet"

You're right JF, they are very smart, they hear bullshit all the time from people making up nonsensical stories. You were a suspect from the moment this started and very likely the prime and only suspect. That you don't realize this says plenty about your lack of intelligence. If you weren't a suspect they wouldn't be asking you questions every morning and waking you up to do it. They're putting pressure on you to see how you respond because they suspect you. If you told them the same story you're telling the internet you can bet your ass they're suspicious as fuck of you and don't believe a word of it any more than we do. He's got some based mama levels of intellectual abnormalities going on here

19:36 Rants about Internet mob mentality and bias against men, Andrew looks VERY skeptical at this point. Strangely tangents about how she hasn't been raped

Because nothing says you're not acting suspiciously like lashing out at everyone and claiming people are suspicious because you're a man and going on bizarre rants about how she totally hasn't been raped. Oh yeah, no red flags in that statement at all. He has absolutely no basis to make a claim like that and if anything should be assuming the opposite considering he's implied shes a literal truckstop whore who hitch hikes across the country. Yeah, no women ever get raped doing that at all

21:21 Andrew gently reminds him that most often in disappearances of women it IS in fact the closest man, JF redirects to crime statistics getting people banned

So the blatantly obvious gets pointed out to him, literal indisputable facts, and his response is to dodge it and go on bizarre rants about getting people banned over crime statistics? This fucker is going to talk his way into prison at this rate

22:00 "People WAKE UP and check your own bigotry"

I can't be the only one who read that and was immediately reminded of lucas werners constant spazzing out and screaming mooooove on! that was years ago and it wasn't illegal! nevermind that I was trying to fuck a teen girl! fucking bigot flatbill trump supporting republicans!

Its fucking uncanny how similar that reaction was. and lucas is guilty as sin of the shit he's been accused of. Probably not a good idea to try to claim your innocence by spazzing out like a literal low IQ mental patient and with a history of criminal behavior, DV and stalking. Just saying

22:35 Very animated about due process, pattern recognition has no place in investigation

Except it does have a pretty big place in any investigation. Especially this one. Remember this is coming from the same guy who minutes earlier talked about her history with truckers, running off across borders and all that, like he was trying to establish a history of previous behavior to prove he totally has nothing to do with anything and she totally does this all the time. The rant about due process sure sounds like he was panicking a bit there. Innocent people usually aren't that sketchy about due process

26:45 "It's not a case where the police would have a location of murder tied to my cleaning of it", blames trolls

.....What? Yeah it really is just that. If you killed somebody there thats exactly what it would be. Hence why he'd have a reason to try to clean up the crime scene, rip the drywall out, bleach and sterilize everything and all that. Its exactly what you'd expect someone who just made a mess of their house after murdering someone would do. Given his weird explanation for it and the timing, and talking like this when asked about it, it doesn't exactly make him look innocent

27:18 "Females do crazy stuff, sometimes they play with water, it gets into the electronics" Mama JF has broken two laptops playing with water

What a bizarre thing to say. Shes not a 3 year old

28:00 He loves to have so much space in the fridge that he can put his arm in it.

What a weird thing to say. He has no reason to make these weird comments about how clean the fridge is yet he's done it multiple times and made bizarre nonsensical statements about it. It legitimately makes me wonder if he really did have body parts of some kind in there. Why else be that obsessive over just that?

28:15 Interesting stumble over "My wife has gone on a trip and might never come back"

Considering the situation that put you in, getting left with two very young kids and requiring her to be there for legal reasons relating to signatures and such by your own admission, you sure don't seem the least bit concerned about that - or her for that matter. or at least you didn't until the police started asking questions. Now why is that exactly?

28:47 "I consider myself bound to her forever, dead or alive, with a new boyfriend or not, I will always respect what Mama JF has done in my life"

So much so that you dropped her off like an animal abuser would do to a dog and took off, never giving it a second thought after she mysteriously stopped contacting you and disappeared. His statements and actions are directly contradictory. and don't think for a second the cops aren't noticing this

29:18 "Walk me through the plan of Mama JF" "Well it's hard to get a plan from a hippie", shills his book, a lot of past tense

Uh huh. Since when do hippies not have plans? Before it was she was going off the grid to live in the woods. Sounds like a plan to me. a profoundly stupid one deserving of a darwin award but still a plan. But now suddenly you have no idea what her plan was. or rather, you don't want to be locked into a story about what she was doing the last time you saw her. This explanation also makes you look even worse - admitting that you now dropped her off with nothing when she had no idea what what she was going to do and no money or resources. Does this dumbshit not understand what negligence is?

31:09 "I don't fight because I'm a libertarian"

Thats not how libertarians work

32:18 "It's normal for someone who doesn't know where their partner is to be nervous" "There are things I know that I will not mention right now", thinks it would throw off the
investigation if he revealed these details because then people would not have called the police?

Wait what...? So you 'know things' you don't want to mention because they might fuck up the investigation? Nigger WHAT? So you just admitted, to someone interviewing you live on the internet, in front of who knows how many witnesses, in a stream the cops no doubt know about and are taking notes to compare with your previous statements and such, that you are deliberately withholding information about a missing person, where you are the prime suspect, who hasn't been seen in months, because you think it would disrupt the investigation? Buddy, just saying that could get you some charges. These people aren't playing around and don't like to be fucked with by retards who think its smart to withhold important information when they're trying to find someone. When they find out about this they're going to have a serious talk with you and you're not going to like how that goes. This is how you end up in cuffs

35:00 "The moment I left her at that gas station I thought it was the case that she could come back two weeks later"

Sounds like a prepared story. Also, she didn't and you didn't hear shit from her for months. Yet somehow you don't seem concerned about that, or the idea that your children may grow up thinking their mother abandoned them to live in the woods and fuck truckers

35:50 Shrugs about if he's hoping she will come back and says he is neutral

Uh huh. You don't care if the mother of your children ever shows up huh. You better hope she does or you're going to have a real fun time with the cops. If she doesn't show up, living or dead you have alot of explaining to do and you will face an investigation and charges for it. Especially given how you've been talking since this started

36:30 When pressed to say that if she were listening she should notify the police so the case can be closed he starts explaining his actions instead. Ends up with "Find an
encrypted way to send you are alive. If you don't want to talk to them I have opened a Proton mail. Send me something only you would know" Andrew now looks suspicious instead of skeptical

She has no reason to do that, especially insisting on doing it secretly and ensuring its encrypted. She should be notifying the police. Period. She literally does not have a choice but to talk to them and a) prove shes alive and b) deal with the shitstorm this has caused. Starting with explaining herself and why she abandoned her children. This isn't a game and the cops have zero sense of humor about this. He's playing stupid games here. This comes off as suspicious and for no other reason other than giving him the opportunity to fabricate evidence of her being alive

38:40 Hopefully discussing how some cases go cold after only a year

Thats an odd thing to bring up all things considered

39:10 "Are you afraid that she will come out and blame you for this?" Fairly confident no but spirals off about the truth of liberty and privacy rights. Unironic "We live in a society"ing

Considering his actions, by his own admission make him directly responsible no matter what has happened to her, thats some seriously egotistical and profoundly stupid confidence he's got going on there

40:30 The "leaving on a consensual trip" line again

He sure does love making a point of repeatedly saying that. You know, the kind of thing guilty people do

41:50 "To my knowledge she has never travelled back into my direction"

You mean the knowledge you shouldn't have and should have no basis to make claims of one way or the other if anything you have said is true?

Note: Not sure exactly when it started but he appears a bit flushed

Gee, I wonder why asking him questions he shouldn't have any problems answering is making him nervous

43:00 Leaning into left the country again, dodges if there was a point they would have called the police

More trying to create a situation he can use as an excuse as to why she isn't found, in a way that can backfire in a rather impressive manner if he wants to play that game

45:00 Admits taking advantage of the situation for a bit of self-promotion and shills book

Sounds pretty sociopathic to me. The mother of my children has disappeared, the police are investigating, i'm getting them showing up at my door acting like i'm a suspect but hey buy my book and how can I use this situation to benefit me

47:35 "She does not have a mind to plan"

First she had a plan, then she didn't have one, now you're saying shes too stupid to form a plan for doing something like this. Not helping your liability and negligence situation here at all by saying things like that

50:00 Going on about how much cleaner and better managed his house is again

Because normal people like to reiterate how they ripped the drywall out, bleached and sterilized the house and how much better it is multiple times in a way that gets more suspicious every time he says it

56:45 A bureaucratic member of the government called the police, not family

What happened to the cops saying it was a concerned citizen? That implies some kind of wrangler or support person. Someone who's job involved some level of interaction with her who got concerned after suddenly not being able to contact her for months. No wonder the cops jumped on it so fast

1:01:50 "This one comes in and I was kind of wondering this myself, but why do you refer to Mama JF in the past tense?" Extremely quick "Because she has gone from my life" and blames language barrier

Language barrier my ass. He has never done this with other people and he has no reason to believe she is gone from his life unless he knows something he shouldn't. He said himself she disappears and then suddenly reappears and shit goes back to normal right? Plus all her stuff is still at home, her vehicle and her kids. At a bare minimum the kids guarantee that if shes alive shes not gone from his life. These are slipups and he knows it. Its very common in these kinds of situations and a huge red flag

1:08:44 Sort of acknowleges children in a roundabout way regarding monogamy, "Need to know that you have not given one of your eggs to another father, that you have not produced other babies"

Such a strange thing to say

1:10:51"Mama JF would not want", "Whether she's alive or dead..." "There may have been outcomes that she didn't want to happen"

Pretty strange and suspicious thing to say

At the risk of repeating myself, that fucker killed her. No fucking way he didn't. He's talking himself into a shitshow he's so going to regret later