Imagine literally appealing to the authority of a random guy you know nothing about, concerning a diagnosis for a condition "experts" of the field can barely define, in which said field, "scientists" have a hard time replicating over half of the studies they base their whole pseudo-scientific career on (
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18248).
And from googling, I can't find the original psych evaluation but from the Daily Beast hit-piece no less, this is what it says:
The psychologist found Gariepy to be “very bright, intellectually,” but said he showed a lack of insight and impulse control, a “sense of being treated unfairly, or victimized,” and displayed distorted thoughts suggesting “overt psychosis.”
Even if we take this garbage at face value you can hardly call it "sociopathic tendencies", I'm afraid.