2023 Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

My Earnest Opinions said:
Chomo Joe didn't write a single word of that, his handlers did. Anyway I wonder if the Jews will rig 2024 for us now that Chomo Joe has shown major weakness and endangered our Greatest Ally to the point where they now have their own Pearl Harbor & 9/11
Click to expand...
>These stupid fuckers bankrolled Palestine, so lets make sure that fat cheeto wins this time. At we KNOW he'll pay us our tithe
Oh the hollerin that would cause
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: pikachudidnothingwrong, Lord Xenu, Vecr and 4 others
wtfNeedSignUp said:
About the "USA army dying for Israel" meme, do you really think the Israel army wants any Americans to witness what is going to fall on Gaza? At best there will be some leftover weapon cache being sent. I don't see a ground invasion, trying to rescue hostages will almost certainly end in a bloodbath that isn't worth it.
Click to expand...
they could (and probably should) do a full ground invasion, put gaza under occupation, have it run by military administration, and have mossad glowies and military police smoke out hamas until the organisation is thoroughly dismantled

not sure if they're willing to commit to a high intensity operation like that though, cause it will be costly and involve high casualty numbers
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: pikachudidnothingwrong, Skarlatvoros, Vecr and 5 others
For those asking "why now?" the simplest explanation is that the US has depleted an enormous percentage of its stockpile of smart munitions supplying Ukraine and anything coming down the pipe is essentially spoken for.

It probably doesn't help that the backbone of its strategic airstrike capability was grounded a few weeks ago due to unknown problems.

This is the biggest chance in recent memory for Hamas to make a move while Dad is too busy to come in and drop the hammer. It's still probably done, and they will still probably lose while making things worse for just about everyone, but there's a certain kind of logic to it.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, Mystified & Ancient, Green Man and 24 others
Sithis said:
Why do people keep making these comparisons and asserting 9/11 was an intelligence failure?
Our Intel agencies knew who the terrorists were, trained some of them, and knew their plan ahead of time.
9/11 wasn't a failure for the Intel spooks, if anything it was quite the glowing success.
Click to expand...
Yeah you are correct on that front, though this is if we are sticking by the official glowie narrative. As well you can look at it in terms a little more abstract and maybe this might be the exact situation that also played out in terms of this being a purposeful "intel failure." So I will still keep to the 9/11 comparison because either way its approached it can work both ways.

DumbDude43 said:
if you launch a thousand bottle rockets all at once, they'll overwhelm any defense system by sheer numbers alone
iron dome is (supposedly) high tech and effective, but it's limited in scope and scale (cause it's expensive as fuck)
Click to expand...
I remember the 2021 thread that this same exact thing happened with the night of a thousand bottle rockets, and HAMAS spent over two weeks firing those fuckers for hours on end into Gaza. The Iron Dome worked tremendously effectively and even then was rumored that it was getting beyond its capacity to withhold the amount of barrage at that time, but that was after several days of nonstop rocket barrages. Mind you this was a very miniature number of the actual fired rockets, that effectively crossing into any form of occupied territory. So yes the Iron Dome would lack effectiveness if HAMAS theoretically had enough of their actual rockets successfully enter Israeli airspace to actually hit any ground target of value. Which if the system all together was rendered useless against this current barrage, then there is something in either HAMAS hardware that changed that renders the Iron Dome to be ineffective. Which again if that is the case, then that is a bigger problem than I can imagine. Or else the Iron Dome failed for very sketchy reasons that makes even the glowest of glows light up like Chernobyl. I give the Iron Dome so much credit because of the revelations I had from their anti-ballistics technology from their last major offensive.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: The Foxtrot, Hoplixe, Vecr and 8 others
SwanSwanson said:
WE'RE WINNING! YES! THOSE KIKES ARE GONNA BE EXPELLED FROM PALESTINE FOR GOOD! YEAHH! WOOO!!!
Click to expand...
You’re objectively a tard if you actually think that’s the likely outcome here. If anything, Gaza will get absolutely leveled. Their dollar store rockets don’t stand a chance against an Israeli air strike and that speck of land will be blown to bits. There are no winners in war, and Israel has no mercy.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Alexhypethrow19992, Cowboy Kim, GhastlyGhost and 22 others
Tour of Italy said:
For those asking "why now?" the simplest explanation is that the US has depleted an enormous percentage of its stockpile of smart munitions supplying Ukraine and anything coming down the pipe is essentially spoken for.

It probably doesn't help that the backbone of its strategic airstrike capability was grounded a few weeks ago due to unknown problems.

This is the biggest chance in recent memory for Hamas to make a move while Dad is too busy to come in and drop the hammer. It's still probably done, and they will still probably lose while making things worse for just about everyone, but there's a certain kind of logic to it.
Click to expand...
Israel hasn't given shit to Ukraine, and today is why. It has bombs and shells to last a long time
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: pikachudidnothingwrong, Vecr, Anasa Tristis and 1 other person
IMG_2156.jpeg
 
  • Optimistic
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: fake farts, pikachudidnothingwrong, Altina and 24 others
draggs said:
Israel hasn't given shit to Ukraine, and today is why. It has bombs and shells to last a long time
Click to expand...
Yes, but the US has, and is the worst position to intervene or seriously resupply as they have been in the past 30 years.

That's all I'm saying. You can make an argument that a direct US intervention has never been particularly likely, but I don't think it's a coincidence that an attack has happened now when the odds of a direct intervention are practically zero.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Lord Xenu, Vecr, Cpl. Long Dong Silver and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back