Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Copying and pasting for the lazy:

There is no such thing as a truly safe binder (self.AutiTrans)
submitted 2 hours ago by Feisty_Cattle

I’m kind of tired of people saying that there are 'safe' and 'unsafe' binders out there. All binders are unsafe, it's just some are more unsafe than others (some by a lot). I'm not saying we shouldn't try to get as safe binders as possible, but I'm tired of people acting like safe binding practices aren't harm reduction. Binding is not safe, and following responsible binding practices will not guarantee that you won't have physical harm from binding.
I'm also not saying you shouldn't bind. I bind a lot, more than is recommended, because I need to for my mental health, and most people who bind are in the same position. I could not leave the house if I didn't bind, and while I assume risk by wearing a binder, I need to to be able to function. People seem to forget that binding with a commercial chest binder is a very new practice and has very little research behind it. To my knowledge, there is only one scientific study done into the physical effects of chest binding with a commercial chest binder.
So basically, do what you need to for your mental health. I can't criticise anyone for putting their health at risk by wearing a binder all day every day, because I'm not a hypocrite. However, you need to be aware that you are putting your body at risk by wearing a binder before you start wearing one regularly.
The key thing to keep in mind when binding is to LISTEN TO YOUR BODY. Only you can tell if your body is in pain. Don't wear your binder when you're in pain because you heard that 'rule' that you can bind for 8 hours a day. These rules are kind of made up, and while you should still definitely follow them, be aware that they aren't universal and they aren't medically tested.
 
hook up might have cum in me?

1696701696388.png
I guess we've all been there.
 

> She
> He sucked this person's cock
> This person fucked him in the ass with the penis they were born with
> This person shot sperm into this guy's colon and threw his ass onto the street the moment the post-nut clarity hit
> This guy soiled himself in public because of a stealth cumfart, caused by the person who stuck their penis in his butt and ejaculated in there
> "She could have easily taken it off"


We're hitting tiresome levels that shouldn't even be possible. I'll bet Mr. Shitcum-Stained Pants here considers himself as straight as a geometrical line.
 
Last edited:
The EPIK app is inspiring aging men to create their own totally not autogynephilic shots of themselves as teenage temptresses in crop tops. Today’s example


So nice to see that advanced machine learning can help him realise his dream of being Greta Thunberg’s slightly less autistic sister.

He’s 53. Photos are pre and post FFS

View attachment 5392717View attachment 5392718


link | archive

yesterday creepy shots
I'm guessing these are the pics he'll use to try to catfish some teen boy before he dumps his body in a shallow grave.
 
I found this freak on Kevin Gibes' timeline
View attachment 5395377


Remember that somewhere there is an insurance company that signed this off, and a doctor who said "seems perfectly ethical to me."
Those are likely just a wearable Chinese fake breastplate like Canadian Zcup Shop Teacher's.

The choker/necklace not only hides the Adam's Apple, it covers the seam of the fake chest thing he's wearing
 
Those are likely just a wearable Chinese fake breastplate like Canadian Zcup Shop Teacher's.

The choker/necklace not only hides the Adam's Apple, it covers the seam of the fake chest thing he's wearing
They are. Check the shoulder seam on the mesh top. Thats not a fabric seam its just placed where one would be you can absolutely see the silicone edge.
 
No idea what compelled him to make this face
I hate these glow-downs. You look at the first and think, "okay. There's material. He's got good beard genetics and nothing stands out symmetry-wise. Give him a few months in the gym and a good haircut with regular hygeine and you've got the seeds of a 6-7/10"

And then you remember which thread you're in, and gape wider with each one. Oh ew. Those glasses do nothing for- wait NO. NOT THE PIGTAILS! AAAAAH! THE DOUGHY INHUMAN COMPLEXION! THE FRIGHT-WIG HAIR! THE CREEPY FACES! THE AWFUL CLOTHES! BURN IT! BURN IT!
 
Here is an old one:
When Robie Harris began research on It’s Perfectly Normal, she was told by friends and colleagues, “Don’t write this book. It will ruin your career. You’ll never be published again.”

It was the early 1990s, and the concept of an accessible book about puberty and sex marketed towards kids and tweens was radical. More than 20 years later, it’s still in print — and it’s still radical.

Sex education books are one of several categories being targeted in this latest wave of book bans, especially those that include LGBTQ topics — the anniversary edition of It’s Perfectly Normal was updated to include trans youth. The rhetoric sounds awfully familiar to the book bans of the ’90s, where titles like It’s Perfectly Normal and Heather Has Two Mommies were accused of sexualizing kids and/or turning them gay. LGBTQ books and sex ed books continue to be some of the most popular topics for book challenges, and while the ’90s saw gay authors and teachers being called pedophiles, the new right-wing buzzword is “grooming” — which is only the slightest update to the same accusation.

In the book You Can’t Say That!: Writers for Young People Talk About Censorship, Free Expression, and the Stories They Have to Tell, edited by Leonard S. Marcus, Harris shares some of her experiences writing the book, her collaboration with illustrator Michael Emberley, and the censorship attempts of the title (and its companion book, It’s So Amazing!) over the decades. She talks about how carefully both Emberley and herself considered every aspect of the book, from the text to just how much a blanket should cover in a certain illustration.

She’s gotten accustomed to the book being challenged in schools and libraries, though it never stops being painful, and often reaches out to librarians and teachers with information about the professional reviews and awards it’s received to help arm them in the fight.

At an event, a librarian shared with Harris that It’s Perfectly Normal kept disappearing from the shelves. She replaced it several times, but it kept happening, and it was beyond their budget to keep doing so. Then, one day, they all came back in a backpack with a note: “I took this book because I thought no child or teenager should read it. Then my 14-year-old niece got pregnant, and now I realize that children do need books like this.”

Harris and her sex education books have been accused of a lot of things, but she remains grounded in the knowledge that education is powerful, and that kids deserve access to reliable information about their bodies. “How can we hold back writing about powerful feelings, or not include certain information children crave and have the right to know, simply because we are afraid?”, she wrote in 2012.

The most illustrative story she shared, though, was about a 10-year-girl in Delaware who picked up her book when at the library with her mother. Her mother let her check the book out, and when they came home, she showed her mom the chapter on sexual abuse and said, “This is me.” She was being abused by her father, and it was the first time she’d spoken about it.

The father was convicted, and the judge said, “There were heroes in this case. One was the child, and the other was the book.” Harris wrote in to add that the mother was also a hero in this story, for listening to her daughter, and that the librarian who ordered the book and kept it on open shelves also made this possible.

In the interview with Marcus, Harris said:
I have been called a pornographer, a child abuser — every name in the book, as the saying goes. But whenever I am called one of those names, I think of that ten-year-old girl. I wish we never had to talk with kids about any of these aberrant behaviors. But we have to do so because they already know about them to some extent and because kids have a right to have the accurate information that can keep them healthy and safe. They need to know how to get help to make any abusive behavior stop.
When right-wing groups petition and protest to get sex education books off the shelves of school and public librarians, this is the effect. It stops the most vulnerable people in our society from accessing the tools and language that can help them. It helps to shield and hide abusers. It communicates to children suffering from abuse that they are shameful, and that it’s not safe or polite to speak out about.

Many right-wing “parents’ rights” groups have claimed that they’re asking for a compromise: they just want to move these books to the adult section, or from school libraries into only public libraries, or to keep them behind the counter. But this story wouldn’t have been possible if It’s Perfectly Normal was in the adult nonfiction section or kept behind the desk. The kids who most need these books are the least likely to be able to get to them if they have to jump through hoops to do so.

The timeless book banning cry has been “Think of the children!” Groups pushing to pull sex ed books (and LGBTQ books and books by and about people of color) off the shelves claim they’re doing it protect kids. But ignorance doesn’t protect anyone. Next time you’re choosing between attending a school board meeting or staying home, between speaking out for or against sex ed books in schools, between having a difficult conversation with your kids or putting it off for later, remember that 10-year-old kid in Delaware, and all of the kids suffering in silence. They need your voice to find their own.

To join the fight against censorship and book bans, check out How to Fight Book Bans and Challenges: an Anti-Censorship Toolkit. Stay informed with our weekly Censorship News Round Up, and sign up for the Literary Activism newsletter.
 
I suppose its no surprise the content of the book isn't really included and ofc it had to be updated for trans.

Idk what to say without seeing more. There really is a set of parents who are adamantly opposed to kids who are old enough they might be having sex (and old enough to have real sex ed) knowing what a condom even is. Without seeing one. Much less one on anything. Im not talking about any drawings but simple "they exist. They have sides. And expiration dates..."

Otoh you have shit that really is fucking depraved porn dressed up as "educational" that fucking shouldn't be open access to kids much less in a school library. That fucked up gender queer book parents get tossed out of meetings for reading aloud comes to mind.

At risk of sounding like an idiot....id have to see the damn book or contents involved to say much. That a blanket coverage discussion was needed makes me lean towards "its probably porn and should be banned from schools".

*sigh*
 
Hard to be a True and Honest Man when you cry "I'M PREGNANT" at the first sign that you will have to face the consequences of your actions. Both of them did this! And they got their executions postponed. It's never been super clear if they were lying or telling the truth, since they died or disappeared from the historical record before giving birth.
AFAIK court ordered them both examined and both were pregnant for real, apparently with Jack Rackham's kids. Bonny died in jail, Read gave birth and was released. After that it's unknown what happened to her.
But I get your point, tale as old as time of convicted women attempting to use pregnancy as get out of jail card.

On that note, one main reason I follow this thread is the hilarity whenever TIM gets confronted or becomes angry. Their facade always falls off and they default to using very mannish insults, ur mom and/or just plainly threatening to rape the other party, especially if it's a woman. :story:
 
Back