2023 Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

they were able to do it because they all had something to gain from doing it (acquire territory, secure resources, make profits)
it was only possible and profitable back then because niggers in africa were literal stone age cave dwellers, chucking spears and throwing rocks while europeans were shooting cannonballs and rifle bullets. the technology gap was so insane, it was like playing a video game with cheats enabled. they could take over africa and set up whatever they wanted because they were literally untouchable to the locals.

but that is no longer the case. even the most backwards nignog countries today have access to enough technology (firearms and explosives) to be an absolute pain in the ass to any foreign occupying force, which would make any such endeavor very costly and unprofitable. the only places where it could still work are shit like the australian outback where abbos are still in stone age mode, and probably the deep amazonian jungle where there are still tribes that have never contacted civilisation.

you want a scramble for africa 2.0, it would be an insanely expensive and bloody war of conquest, probably impossible to complete successfully unless you want to literally giga-genocide half the continent with nuclear weapons before going in.

and you want a UN mandate in israel/palestine? your UN peacekeeper troops will constantly get ambushed and picked off by guerrilla forces, both muslim and jewish groups will fight your occupation. it's just not worth it.
So, what you're saying is that if the White Man wants to do another Scramble for Africa or just do Colonialism 2.0, he must develop the technology to perform orbital strikes via kinetic bombardment and just drop a few tons of tungsten whenever the locals get uppity?
 
>USSR flag
>Chinese flag
>Mexican flag
>Palestinian flag
Not one white person is that crowd. This convinces me that people who support Palestine are unironically anti-white. How come I only see European people on Twitter and in real life supporting Israel? The only people that I see that support Palestine are all non-whites. Arabs, Africans and Asians. Not a single white person I know hates Israel.
My conclusion is support for Israel = White support for Palestine= brown
Lol the UN is headquartered in New York. :story: Gotta say this is a weird spin on noticing that a Jew run city doesn't have many white people left.
 
regarding if the babies beheaded story is true:

Outlets with direct eyewitnesses that have reported at least 40 babies were killed by Hamas, with some beheaded, in the Kibbutz of Kfar Aza in the south of Israel:
- Local Israeli news I24
- CBS
- CNN
- Times of London
- French news channel LCI
- UK outlet GB News

Media outlet who reported that the IDF hasnt had reports of this is a Turkish outlet called Anadolu
 
Gotta say that I am disappointed that Israel, especially the Kibbutz, didn't have armed security teams or something like an armed
I don't know anything about IDF border defenses, but generally the communities near the Gaza border will have some reservists with weapons living in them. Those guys will get calls when a border crossing is detected, muster up, and confront whatever potential threat is out there. Obviously when the enemy comes in force, that is inadequate.
 
Zerohedge are the only comment sections not utterly infested with bots dick-sucking Iudea. And they ask the right questions, "Why must we die for Israel's borders when we don't have a southern border?"

This is a great learning opportunity, and Solzhenitsyn was 100% correct about the Media.
Israelis dont want boots on the ground, they want the West to look away while they finish what needs to be done.
 
Is Blinken going to write the Israelis a blank check, Franz Ferdinand-style? Is the Roosevelt enough for Iran to keep from re-enacting the part of Russia? The anticipation is killing me
germany_and_AH_alliance.jpg
 
I'm surprised how easily everyone here is emotionally manipulated by both sides without question, and blindly accepting most news and images from social media. It's pretty easy to use AI images and clean them up, or just use unreleased photos from previous conflicts, maybe a combination of both. That's worth thinking about every time you see anything to do with this conflict. They're also both posting the most heinous shit to trigger your emotions and stop you from employing your prefrontal cortex for diplomacy.

40 babies is the new Ghost of Kiev and 6 gorillion. You can't question it or you're a terrible person and support terrorism.

I think this was allowed to happen as a gateway to finance another long war with how quickly the West has jumped to encourage genocide and engaging directly with Iran despite history between Israel and Palestine. Ukraine has petered out, now it's this war. Change the channel, let's go. Moral outrage serves as just a fraction of the keenness to enter for financial purposes. The West has donated shit and spare ammunition to Ukraine, financed the rebuild with Blackrock, and now has clearance to manufacture brand new stuff for this new front. Israel is champing at the bit to genocide with international assistance that it needs to even exist in the first place, and everyone who manufactures what's required will profit. I'm sure there will never be a two state solution to keep this hell going. If anyone says no to being involved, you can bet Mossad will fuck their shit up like the last time America tried rounding up their spies and was rewarded with 9/11.

You are being primed to support your taxpayer dollars being used for this war now in addition to Ukraine, and you'll do it, because 40 babies. Doesn't matter what the history of the region is, what the consequences are for another meat grinder, just moral outrage for social points (pick a side!!! PICK A SIDE!!!) and fuelling the war machine whose stocks are going through the roof right now. Happy World War III, hopefully nobody gets nuked this time.
 
That 40 babies thing is unverified. Bloody cribs are nasty enough, why peddle this nonsense uncritically?

0 obligations to save people who are not loyal to America. The waving around of American citizenship like a shield is the most slimy thing a dumb faggot can do.
It's uniquely an American thing too. As Null has said in the past (regarding Ethan Ralph), a lot of this behaviour is only acceptable in America. People will beat the shit out of the person elsewhere.
And this was proven too.

Everyone here at KF should hate those disgusting fucks also.
View attachment 5400692
https://twitter.com/ADL/status/1562490784188100608 (archive.ph)
I'm sure cloudflare is taking down all those sites that host snuff films of civilians and Telegram has taken action to disable the previewing of terrorist channels.
I'm sure Matthew Princess wrote a whingey blogpost about it.

Compare top and pants here (on the right)
Her top was also stripped, you can see the side of her breasts from the photo.
Her legs were mangled and her head was bloody, she's dead dead.
This isn't proof of rape, but why else would they do that? A photo opportunity in display of barbarism?
Either way, nasty. She was just some kid attending a music festival, she wasn't even an Israeli citizen.

Not one white person is that crowd.
You can't see any remotely Asian looking person in that crowd either. Go look at the other protests, plenty of Whitey simps among the crowd. Slants are missing because most of us doesn't even know what a Gaza is.
Those idiots simply used flags they deem "communist", hence the nonexistent USSR flag mixed with the nation flag of the PRC and the flag of the CPC, both completely out of place.

Trust me, opinions on Jews are mixed in China but only the ricecel Han fascists are supporting Hamas, simply because Israel is sort of cosy with the USA.
Enemy of my enemy is my friend, as I take breaks from lolicon jerkathon -- China Ricecel neet
 
That's my dilemma right now. Should I mount a 4x on the carry handle of the Colt AR-15 match target HB I inherited or pay a local gunsmith to remove the front sight and the carry handle so I can mount a red dot low enough to get a cheek weld while using it? Currently it is in this original config...View attachment 5401926

Is it in that exact configuration, or do you mean it has an A2 style fixed carry handle? Because that picture shows an A4 style removable carry handle which you could just take off with thumbscrews, and then mount an optic of your choosing on the rail. The front sight doesn't need to be removed to be used with many magnified optics- I have a carbine with both a front sight post and a 1-6x LVPO, and the post completely disappears as you zoom above 2x.

If it is an A2, DO NOT have it chopped just to kludge some rail onto it like it's 1984. People are paying crazy money for just an A2 upper receiver with rear sights right now because there's a resurgence in the popularity of retro builds. Here's a Colt A2 upper selling for $305 with 6 bids and a day left on the clock:


The carry handle mounted optics work fine, they're just a bit high for most people's liking. If you really want to modernize it for a good cheekweld and maximum versatility you can just pay like $70 for a railed upper:


and then any competent gunsmith could swap the barrel to that receiver quickly and fairly cheaply. It simply involves removing the gas tube and unbolting the barrel nut from the old receiver, then doing the same in reverse on the new receiver. Then you can flip the loose A2 receiver on gunbroker or whatever and use that money for the optic
 
Last edited:
Back