Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Anticipointment]

How does Nick even say he stands by his claims because he has seen no evidence that Monty isn’t a pedophile? (As if he’s even looked) It can be shown that there is no evidence of it that was posted to the Kiwi Farms but as far as no evidence in the whole wide world? A negative can’t be proven. That is not the question though. Nick made very specific claims about Monty, so the onus is on him to show the proof that what he said is true. How does he manage to twist this & think it makes rational sense? Worse, how do his sycophants hear it & think what he is saying is reasonable?
Edit for clarity

 

[Captain Manning]

I'm kind of at a loss for why he just keeps lying about what he said. Is he trying to fool me, his audience, or himself?

Probably all three.

But more importantly, I think he's scared shitless that if Randazza's appeal doesn't work, and this goes to trial, he's fucked. I think the wheels in his head are turning right now, thinking how he's gonna blame somebody else for the mess that he... and he alone... got himself into.

Nick can never admit he's wrong. Never. It's simply not in his nature.

 

[IRC Moron]

I'm kind of at a loss for why he just keeps lying about what he said. Is he trying to fool me, his audience, or himself?

"I. Do not. Lie."
He used to say this all the time. Anytime any drama happened. He would go on about how everyone lies about him, and since he doesn't he is above it all. Total bullshit.

How does he manage to twist this & think it makes rational sense?

I think this is just the logical progression from the keffals thing and the ban. He did the same kinda shit then, but since it was pretty low stakes and he wasn't mask off yet, so while it was gay no one took it too seriously.

Maybe he thought the same thing would happen with Monty, however he underestimated that the local law community doesn't like him and he has everything to lose while Monty has everything to gain.

 

[Strix454]

How does Nick even say he stands by his claims because he has seen no evidence that Monty isn’t a pedophile?

He seems to think that if he absolutely believes that something is true, then it somehow is true and therefore he can't have defamed anyone. It seems to be another of his personal legal theories based on nothing at all.

 

[anionfarflung]

Shiet! @FROG just used "Pull Up!" on a stream with Nick and Nick didn't know how to react.

 

[Captain Manning]

He seems to think that if he absolutely believes that something is true, then it somehow is true and therefore he can't have defamed anyone. It seems to be another of his personal legal theories based on nothing at all.

He's an egotistical maniac. Complete narcissistic asshole. In the words of @AnOminous, "he's gay."

The other thing he's probably hoping for is that his current audience will believe whatever bullshit flows from his mouth, and they won't fact check anything.

Sadly, on that point, he's probably largely right. Nick's audience these days consists of some really stupid people.

That being said, there are cracks in the facade.

Kurt and Branca, for example, seem to be exasperated with how he's handling the Montagraph thing. Branca's thinly veiled lecture to him over falsely calling people pedophiles was quite the shock. I don't think Sean has commented on it, but it's my understanding he's trying not too because he might be called as a witness.

One additional thing: Nick might be looking to start a fight between Montagraph and Null, but I don't think that's gonna work because... unlike Rekieta... Null seems to have cordial communications with Montagraph.

 

[AnOminous]

When you take into account the $8 a month it takes to have a checkmark, Nick rakes in a whopping $1 a month for all his hard work.

He does it for free a dollar a month.

 

[Neetorino]

There is no evidence that's his account.

Then there's literally nothing left to strap this balldo to, Nick (and probably Jim, haven't seen those streams) made up all pedophile accusations out of the same cheesecloth as everyone else in Monty's long history online. Nick managed to double triple quadruple(?) down on Monty definitely being a pedophile who "has always been into sucking little boy cock" and "Sue me if you want you fucking faggot child molesting fucking faggot." At least that's what Nick said in this old clip Monty still has up, labeled {Evidence}. Am I missing anything else Nick had fact wise then? The facts pointing to "not a pedo" seem insurmountable.

 

[AnOminous]

Tbh, having heard the contents of the snack drawer (pop tart, mini cookies, cheese/ cracker sets, applesauce or yogurt pouches etc) plus the cost of the snack drawer ($2k per month) it seems like the type of thing for parents who are sleeping or otherwise indisposed at breakfast or dinner & its use to to stave off the whining of small children who are wanting whatever meal it is supposed to be.

She needs all those snacks for the snack tray Nick brings for the big Jamaican bull.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

I'm just tuning in to check his stream and he looks so fucking antsy listening to EVS talk so I scrolled thru the time line. No alcohol glass. Did he read the thread and is trying to stay off the alcohol to proof something?

 

[200MB]

God EVS's voice could put a methhead to sleep. The monotone drone of fake sincerity and thinly veiled sarcasm is nauseating. Contrast that with Nick's flamboyant jew squawking, and this stream truly is an assault on the senses.

I caught up on the thread using highlights and didn't really see anything about the ISOM ministry going ahead with their lawsuit. Kiwi law nerds, is there any merit to it?

 

[SargonF00t]

Shiet! @FROG just used "Pull Up!" on a stream with Nick and Nick didn't know how to react.

What was the context?

Did EVS say to Rekieta, you need to pull up?

 

[demicolon]

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

God EVS's voice could put a methhead to sleep. The monotone drone of fake sincerity and thinly veiled sarcasm is nauseating. Contrast that with Nick's flamboyant jew squawking, and this stream truly is an assault on the senses.

I caught up on the thread using highlights and didn't really see anything about the ISOM ministry going ahead with their lawsuit. Kiwi law nerds, is there any merit to it?

I'm not too familiar with CG but my suspicion is that EVS is giddy at the chance of taking down Eric July while keeping his hands relatively clean. From my understanding is that there were lots of popular figures in CG but EVS is always the top dog in that sektur despite him being very slow and having minimal output (comics wise, not streaming wise) because he keeps churning the drama to make sure nobody surpasses him in popularity. Eric July coming out the door surpassing EVS in multiples without ever kissing EVS's ring (as far as I know) would absolutely leave EVS seething in jealousy.

Am I wrong?

 

[anionfarflung]

Shiet! @FROG just used "Pull Up!" on a stream with Nick and Nick didn't know how to react.

What was the context?

Did EVS say to Rekieta, you need to pull up?

God I am Rekieta-drunk and this was more than 10 minutes ago so I forget, but I remember its being significant in context.

Plus, I think that Eric's genealogical claim to "Isom" (covered in Nick's stream) is pretty dumb.

 

[SargonF00t]

I'm not too familiar with CG but my suspicion is that EVS is giddy at the chance of taking down Eric July while keeping his hands relatively clean. From my understanding is that there were lots of popular figures in CG but EVS is always the top dog in that sektur despite him being very slow and having minimal output (comics wise, not streaming wise) because he keeps churning the drama to make sure nobody surpasses him in popularity. Eric July coming out the door surpassing EVS in multiples without ever kissing EVS's ring (as far as I know) would absolutely leave EVS seething in jealousy.

Am I wrong?

EVS is a good boy and despite the great start Eric July has had, I think his flagship ISOM comic is going to get weaker and weaker with every bland episode that comes out.

The art and story are pretty uninspiring, so once everyone gets over the warm and fuzzy feeling inside for supporting Based Black Man, I expect EVS will rule the independent comics scene again, in a few years time.

Please don't think I am siding with the Diddler or Vito, I don't begrudge Eric July 's success, I just don't think it will last.

 

[Kittenwaffen]

Mandy hates us now?

It's just her menopausal mood swing.

Since her tit pics were like 20 years old, it's not that much of an exaggeration to say she's approaching the early range for menopause.

EVS is a good boy and despite the great start Eric July has had, I think his flagship ISOM comic is going to get weaker and weaker with every bland episode that comes out.

Is it possible to get weaker? I would have thought that Eric proving he could actually do this will attract better talent.

 

[anionfarflung]

Here's the pull up timestamp. Someone else can archive:

https://www.youtube.com/live/OQSmqQJ9Y-w?si=Ds6xVD4qhKqBlz2S&t=2661

 

[Potatoherder]

From my understanding is that there were lots of popular figures in CG but EVS is always the top dog in that sektur despite him being very slow and having minimal output (comics wise, not streaming wise) because he keeps churning the drama to make sure nobody surpasses him in popularity.

I am agreeing for this. Eric July threw the comicsgate model into a bad light for being able to get a book out within a few months and not years. Currently there are book projects by EVS pimped creators who are nearly 4 years old and are still at pencils. Somehow they convinced themselves they are creating the sistine chapel of comic books and all will be forgiven.

Eric July coming out the door surpassing EVS in multiples without ever kissing EVS's ring (as far as I know) would absolutely leave EVS seething in jealousy.

July did stay on good terms with EVS even going so far as to promote him on FNT at the height of 'EVS bad.' I think they are good terms.

 

[Captain Manning]

Then there's literally nothing left to strap this balldo to, Nick (and probably Jim, haven't seen those streams) made up all pedophile accusations out of the same cheesecloth as everyone else in Monty's long history online. Nick managed to double triple quadruple(?) down on Monty definitely being a pedophile who "has always been into sucking little boy cock" and "Sue me if you want you fucking faggot child molesting fucking faggot." At least that's what Nick said in this old clip Monty still has up, labeled {Evidence}. Am I missing anything else Nick had fact wise then? The facts pointing to "not a pedo" seem insurmountable.

@Strix454 gave a good explanation of what likely happened with Jim. There's currently no evidence that Jim himself accused Monty of being a pedo either. I brought Jim up earlier because I think there is a non-zero chance that Nick might at some point claim he did, just like he's (falsely) claiming that the Farms has information that Monty is. It's also possible the Sweety Squad, which I presume Jim has little to no actual control over, might be running troll ops. Monty has lots of trolls. A fact which Null makes very clear in Monty's OP, and throughout the thread. In fact, it has been revealed there is so much stupid fake bullshit out there about Montagraph that it's caused even some otherwise relatively stone hearted farmers to express sympathy for him.

EVEN IF that DeviantArt page were Montagraph's, it's still not proof he "sucks little boy cock."

See, that's the thing Rekieta wants everybody to forget, and everyone should be careful not to fall into the trap. Nick did not just say that Monty is a pedophile. He said that Monty is a CHILD MOLESTER. He is intentionally obfuscating what he said. Those are legally and functionally two different things. Being a pedophile is not, in of itself, illegal. Child molestation is an actual criminal act.

The only other person I can think of that even attempted to peg Monty as a child molester or pedo is that at one point Spectre tried to ride to Nick's rescue waving around some bullshit about a prior conviction for soliciting an underage prostitute, but it (rather predictably) didn't stand up to scrutiny and he was basically forced to retract that claim and apologize. He also did not make that claim on Kiwifarms, as he was gone from here by then.

In all likelihood, Nick has jack shit as far as credible evidence Monty is a pedo, much less a child molester. Which I think is gonna prove problematic for him if Randazza's appeal doesn't work and this goes to trial. I think Nick could probably get the IIED shit tossed, but the defamation per se claim seems a bit tougher nut to crack.

EDIT: Elaboration.