JFG / Jean-Francois Gariepy / jfgariepyneuro / The French Pervert / The Public Space - Warski's Abusive Ex-BF, Racist Streamer, Failed Academic, Potato Masher, Kristi Winter's BFF, Kero Defender

What happened to Momma JF?

  • Alive and enjoying life as a free spud.

    Votes: 149 6.9%
  • Murdered while hitchhiking.

    Votes: 162 7.5%
  • Lost in the woods.

    Votes: 196 9.0%
  • The potato was sliced and served... french fried.

    Votes: 1,667 76.7%

  • Total voters
    2,174
He mentions the first time they interviewed me as if he doesn't realize they wouldn't be interviewing him a second time unless they considered him an actual suspect
I mean he mentioned the RCMP watching his house for days so if he doesn’t realize he’s a suspect, he’s beyond stupid he suffering from delusions.

Notice how JP has fallen over himself to applaud and compliment the RCMP at every turn for being outstanding professionals. “Vould a merderah hav such nice tings to zay about zee Feds!?!” Obvious JF thinks appeal to ego will work as well on the cops as they work on him.

I'm pretty sure he got >130 which was the maximum score for that particular test.
Edit: He got 128
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z5cWt4vzPc9d/
Does anyone think online IQ tests have any validity? Even the arguments about “real” IQ measurements come from standardized WISC or WPPSI data sets. The two IQ tests mentioned above are the two considered the standard and they must be administered in a closed room by a proctor or psychologist and then scored.
View attachment 5410124
An entire ONE (1) IQ point higher than Joe Rogan. This is almost worse than being, say, 1 inch taller than Joe. It's over.
It’s cute they email certificates. Good money in making people feel smart.
 
So you are a cop you are dealing with this case. You have a common law marriage with children and the guy says "yeah you know I just dropped her off at a gas station then deep cleaned my house you know bitches" it might not be enough for a prosecution it's enough for an investigation that will lead to prosecution. He 100% killed her.
Re-read my post. I was responding to the comment that merely dropping her off at a gas station is premeditated murder (first degree murder).

Personally, I believe everything JF has said and done is sus af.
 
So you are a cop you are dealing with this case. You have a common law marriage with children and the guy says "yeah you know I just dropped her off at a gas station then deep cleaned my house you know bitches" it might not be enough for a prosecution it's enough for an investigation that will lead to prosecution. He 100% killed her.
They would never go for first degree murder unless they have serious proof which none of us are currently aware of. The burden of proof for that sort of charge is just too high.

There are some people here not even sure that she's been murdered. So convincing a jury he actually killed her as opposed to giving him a plea deal or going for a lesser charge where they only have to prove wilful endangerment, would be a dumb choice.
 
They would never go for first degree murder unless they have serious proof which none of us are currently aware of. The burden of proof for that sort of charge is just too high.

There are some people here not even sure that she's been murdered. So convincing a jury he actually killed her as opposed to giving him a plea deal or going for a lesser charge where they only have to prove wilful endangerment, would be a dumb choice.
any manslaughter charge will be a stretch as long as they have no body
how can you prove he killed her if you can't even prove that she's dead
 
IMG_0292.jpeg
Blocking out her face like this is bizarre when she has had her own face on his show plenty of times.
seems more like he can’t bear to look at her…
 
They would never go for first degree murder unless they have serious proof which none of us are currently aware of. The burden of proof for that sort of charge is just too high.

There are some people here not even sure that she's been murdered. So convincing a jury he actually killed her as opposed to giving him a plea deal or going for a lesser charge where they only have to prove wilful endangerment, would be a dumb choice.

If and when they charge him, we should get a better idea of what kind of evidence they have. If they charge him with First Degree, I would guess they have pretty incriminating evidence. If they charge him with criminal negligence or some lesser charge, it's likely just circumstantial bullshit. It is going to be hard to charge him with anything without actual proof that she is no longer alive.
 
This is great. I hope JF keeps talking and keeps getting slowly enraged about this low Iq culture. The media is going to eat it up, he’ll be a global story because he simply can’t help himself and shut up. Congrats JF you’re going to be a Netflix special!

Even if he didn’t kill her he sure is acting retarded enough and incriminating enough.
 
I may have just a-logged my humanity away because I'm actually hoping that he did kill her. That would make for some interesting internet fallout. Just imagine Andy going WOAAAAAAH ASHTON WOAAAAAAH HE KILLED HER. DING DING DING RETARD ALERT!!!!!! *insert low IQ captain obvious take from PPP.*

I can say I hope for her safe return, but at 4 months and this level of suss? I just don't see it.
 
You might remember in 2016, people were bringing up that it is a breach of ethics for a psychiatrist to diagnose someone they have only seen video footage of, as leftards wanted psychiatrists to say that Trump was mentally unfit to hold the Office of the Presidency.
You are 100% wrong.

1. This Canuckistan. Not Burgerland. The same laws do not apply.

2. Elora is not Trump. Elora has a life long anecdotes and testimony from herself about her antics. She has a paper trail. She likely has been to school in special Ed. She has likely a long history of therapy and psychiatric care as a child. She has a lifetime of being considered a special person. Trump does not.

3. Trump is alive. Elora is not. As far as the legal world is concerned, Elora is dead. When someone is dead, you can do pretty much whatever you want. If you want to declare someone mentally unfit, you can because it has no impact on their lives anymore.

These are entirely different cases. Comparing them is lunacy.
 
Don't worry about it JF, who cares if left-wing rags are calling you a white supremacist and misogynist. It's not like you live in a country where a left-wing feminist cuck is the Prime Minister and has already proven that he will do authoritarian shit, right? What's the worst that could happen?

By the way folks, got my IQ results back, seems I'm a smert boi too!
 

Attachments

  • 20231013_134653.jpg
    20231013_134653.jpg
    84.3 KB · Views: 23
Concerning the Daily Beast article, why is it not surprising the journoscum missed the important detail about common law marriage? That stated, as someone who likes some of JF's commentary, having his quotes transcribed on print demonstrate how bizarre some of his commentary is. In the interest of fairness the author should have emphasized to those unfamiliar with him that he is French Canadian and very often utters words or phrases that are peculiar to a native speaker or someone with a truly excellent command of English.

I know most people here have decided he is guilty or murder. Devon Stack addressed it during the hyper chat portion of his insomnia stream at about 2:22:00 in, and stated he was not sure but he doubts he killed her, noting that they are very strange people and she has done the same thing before.
 
I know most people here have decided he is guilty or murder. Devon Stack addressed it during the hyper chat portion of his insomnia stream at about 2:22:00 in, and stated he was not sure but he doubts he killed her, noting that they are very strange people and she has done the same thing before.
Dumping a potato who speaks like Lenny from Of Mice and Men on the side of a highway to never be seen again is considered murder in pretty much every civilized country. Just because you don't actually kill someone doesn't mean you didn't murder them through reckless endangerment and negligence.
 
any manslaughter charge will be a stretch as long as they have no body
how can you prove he killed her if you can't even prove that she's dead
Its easier than you might think and happens fairly often in canada. The whole 'no body no crime' idea hasn't been a thing for at least the last couple decades. They don't need to prove she's dead they only need to prove she hasn't been seen, heard from or provably done anything a normal, living person would be expected to do (which evidence so far is is heavily pointing in that direction) and the prosecutors and court can prosecute under the assumption that she's dead and treat the case as such. If he thinks he's going to avoid a conviction because nobody has found a body he's in for a big surprise

Norbert the Tiger said:
I know most people here have decided he is guilty or murder. Devon Stack addressed it during the hyper chat portion of his insomnia stream at about 2:22:00 in, and stated he was not sure but he doubts he killed her, noting that they are very strange people and she has done the same thing before.
Except she hasn't done anything like this before. When she left the last time everybody knew it, it was for only two weeks, she didn't leave everything she had, including her kids at home, she was in constant contact with family, JF mentioned her leaving and didn't get sketchy and suspicious about it and she didn't disappear off the face of the earth for several months. That isn't what happened here at all. There is a pretty big difference between the two situations

CowPox said:
I don't think he killed her anymore, am in in a gross minority with this opinion?
The RCMP certainly thinks he did and wouldn't have worded their official response to the media inquiries the way they did unless they were investigating with the intent to prosecute

That said lets all take a moment to realize how ironic it is that he uttered this statement some time ago, I found it on page 1 of the thread:

"I just hate criminals, I want to see them in prison and see them suffer, with very little amounts of human respect."

That stands a pretty good chance of coming back to haunt him at this point
 
Sorry, I don't have time to look it up right now, but he definitely claimed in the interview that it is common in French to refer to the living in the past tense, which French speakers in Null's chat immediately called out as false. He was saying this in English during the interview. so we don't need any translation, just a French speaker who knows whether or not this is a thing. He has referred to her in past tense probably a dozen times in the past week in various interviews and comments. While his accent is thick, his English is decent, and I doubt this was some "lost in translation" moment.
When I talk about my ex in french, I use the past tense, because it sounds weird to talk about someone who is not in my life anymore the present tense. 'didn't know it sounded weird in english.

Hearing JFG saying Moncton was so weird for me. Moncton is not a big city. I could possibly enter to a café where I am a regular and bump into the potato, unreal.
 
Last edited:
Dumping a potato who speaks like Lenny from Of Mice and Men on the side of a highway to never be seen again is considered murder in pretty much every civilized country. Just because you don't actually kill someone doesn't mean you didn't murder them through reckless endangerment and negligence.
That particular fact pattern would not be murder, but criminally negligent manslaughter (or whatever the equivalent is called in Prince Edward Island) arising from a custodial duty of care that a (common-law) spouse owes the other spouse, and as far as I can tell that would be a stretch if he can demonstrate she choose to do this. There is also potentially a causation problem if it turns out she was raped and killed while hitchhiking or slumming it in some homeless camp a month ago.
I have not researched the ins and outs of criminally negligent manslaughter in Prince Edward Island or Canadian law at large and I doubt you have either.
I would also like to pin down precisely what her impaired cognitive abilities actually are. I am pretty sure there is something wrong with her (based on how she speaks, her bizarre outbursts, the way she decided to become his broodmare) but I am not entirely sure what.
 
Devon Stack addressed it during the hyper chat portion of his insomnia stream at about 2:22:00 in, and stated he was not sure but he doubts he killed her, noting that they are very strange people and she has done the same thing before
define “the same thing” ? she left him for 2 weeks in 2021, stayed with family, and was in contact with him the whole time. she had apparently been out of contact with family in the past while traveling abroad, this was before having children and a house. when did she ever before abandon her children for 4 months without telling anyone in her family where she would be and apparently totally ditching her identity?

Edit - also consider the idea that she simply left JF and doesn't want to be a mother, or is relapsing on drugs or partying.
why would she leave all her money and her identifying documents, everything she would need to eventually start a new life, with the man she is choosing to leave?
what type of drug addicted deadbeat gives up all their money?
 
Last edited:
define “the same thing” ? she left him for 2 weeks in 2021, stayed with family, and was in contact with him the whole time. she had apparently been out of contact with family in the past while traveling abroad, this was before having children and a house. when did she ever before abandon her children for 4 months without telling anyone in her family where she would be and apparently totally ditching her identity?
tbh I think it's just wishful thinking on devin's part cause he does not want someone he's tangentially related to to be guilty of killing his wife. The AF pedo shit really made conservatives look like shit and we're all going to be eating shit for this one as well.
 
Back