JFG / Jean-Francois Gariepy / jfgariepyneuro / The French Pervert / The Public Space - Warski's Abusive Ex-BF, Racist Streamer, Failed Academic, Potato Masher, Kristi Winter's BFF, Kero Defender

What happened to Momma JF?

  • Alive and enjoying life as a free spud.

    Votes: 149 6.9%
  • Murdered while hitchhiking.

    Votes: 162 7.5%
  • Lost in the woods.

    Votes: 196 9.0%
  • The potato was sliced and served... french fried.

    Votes: 1,667 76.7%

  • Total voters
    2,174
What I don't get is why is he being so blatant about it?
French-Canadian:
As arrogant as the French;
As retarded as the Canadians.

(Edit: This is on top of being a fucking psychopath who absolutely murdered his happy potato wife)
 
Last edited:
You might remember in 2016, people were bringing up that it is a breach of ethics for a psychiatrist to diagnose someone they have only seen video footage of, as leftards wanted psychiatrists to say that Trump was mentally unfit to hold the Office of the Presidency.
That is literally called the Goldwater Rule and is a rule dating back to 1964 when psychiatrists were improperly and unprofessionally opining on the mental health of Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater, never found to be mentally ill by any mental health professional, but merely declared mentally ill because they disagreed with his politics.

Despite this being an official rule of the APA (Section 7.3), various mental health professionals, who I diagnose as "quacks," continue to ignore it:

On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention or who has disclosed information about himself/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his or her expertise about psychiatric issues in general. However, it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement.
Blocking out her face like this is bizarre when she has had her own face on his show plenty of times.
seems more like he can’t bear to look at her…
Maybe he is haunted by what her face looked like after he smashed it with a hammer before he buried her in a shallow grave.
It’s scumbag behavior, even if you don’t think her murdered her. (He did.)
If he didn't actually murder her, it's like he somehow found a book somewhere called "A Manual on How to Look Like a Complete Murderer" and then followed every step in it.
 
Last edited:
The question is only whether he a) killed her or b) put her in a situation where she was killed or otherwise died as a result of his negligence.

how can you blame him if her parents didn't care either. He said he reported her missing to the parents. I mean he may have been negligent and he should never see her again not showing any concern for her safety. Maybe it led to her demise or maybe it didn't. But, I wonder if he actually told her parents and about that whole story. Some questions: did he text them really. and when; was it before or after the text/(fucked up) call on the 19th when she said she was getting rid of her phone. He supopsedly didnt' know she WOULDN'T come back until the 19th. So when did he report it to her parents? Also, the whole cleaning story. So she was going to go somewhere for a while. ok sure. Then he takes 3 days off from streaming when she left on the 17th. ok sure. But then renovates the home within 3 days. WHY do a whole wall repair for unless he KNOWS she is NOT coming back. Why fix walls when whatever caused that may have been her. His story for why was what he said on the stream after that I think the 20th about it, that he has room to walk, stick arms in the fridge etc. So, until he knew she wasn't coming back, why was he bothering to fix something she may have done in the first place until then? Why take 3 days off streaming when she goes somewhere? This then leads you to go logical conclusion that besides for whatever reason stop streaming for 3 days, since his statement was he had room to WALK that means he did the renovations because she wasn't coming back. Which means he did it because and that means he did it all in 1 day. Lot of work for one day, weird also he took 3 days off from streaming which seems disconnected from her leaving. So she went on a walk for a bit. so what. Was she really that much of a hassle he had to lay on the couch, with really young kids at the time too, for the next 3 days because of it? did he announce 3 days BEFORE he stopped streaming or just say after he had to take 3 days off.

I think there already is some contradictions and it should be probable cause and they should get him out and the kids to somewhere safe, then keep interogatting him since he was negligent, but not for her death until they can prove the death. They'd have to have evidence of something else connected to her death to have that charge.

I think his story about the gas station is something he plotted while he was plotting her death. An alibi he made up. He could have been coming up with an alibi for a while before that. Its just a clue about what happened after she I think probably died. and he probably played through some of it. I think the story he gives, about dropping her off at the gas station is a drummed up story that began with, stopping in that gas stations parking lot when he was taking her to drop her off somewhere. You cant believe the story at all about her being dropped off there. he could have switched the story or gave himself another alibi. Like he if the tapes existed, made sure he passed by them to be seen on camera there. Said he was in front of a camera, but just happened to get out of the line of sight of the camera when he stopped;(then she got out). And he would just be like "oops". Oh I thought for sure it was in front of it oh my bad.
To know all that is a lot of planning. to know which angles the cameras point in. To know where they pick up to and stop picking up at. I think he staked out this particular gas station for a while. Imagine trying to find cameras when somebody wants to randomnly get out somewhere before you let them out. All the things he says i take with like a grain of salt and just think of them as clues. Including the later sighting yea sure 2 days after it happened, 4 1/2m later in time. HER. THere that time. lots of details about it. They didn't give any. I think it was either a joke/or one of his buddies doing the call, or totally made up. Stupid Crucible interviewer told him that detail when he asked him what she took with her, like he would have connected that detail. Can't be a detective, may have been a set up interview. idk. :ow:
 
I think his viewpoints are almost certainly genuine, and formed by his inability to empathize with others or consider his own mistakes.
Those people tend to be the most dangerous unfortunately since there is no opportunity for pity or shame to moderate their behaviour. They 100% think they are in the right.

Well, it's not looking good and at this rate they won't need a body for a conviction.
 
How is “a camera def saw me dropping her off at a gas station alone on June 18” any sort of alibi, much less a detailed on that covers all suspicion?
Because it breaks the chain and shows that whatever else might have happened to her after that point she was alive when JF could last be proven to have had contact with her.

I never said it was a good alibi.

ETA: I also don't think any such video exists. I think JF came up with this 4D chess move because he has seen in all the crime shows/movies that gas station CCTV usually gets erased every 48 hours so even if there was a camera the footage would have been wiped months ago.
 
I'm new to the thread, have they come out and said that somewhere?

Or is that an ass-pull?
she moved out and ran around with different groups after she turned 18. it seems like that is the case. I was thinking it from something wrote in this thread, about her running around and she did roam or travelled for a while. Would intend to think she wasn't really cared about after she turned 18; and probably much before. Leading to doing that. Not that I say she is a druggy or anything but something normalish parents do so much. but 18, and then jet the fuck out as being caring responsible parents. Lends to the story that her parents were actually even told about her doing what the story is now(from JF) that she went to travel ze world etc. And that they then never bothered reporting her missing for 4 months.
But I think it was comments from videos that people were saying this from. The thing was she did travel, and roam (around with) other people. Doing some weed and alcohol basically dont know what else. She doesn't look to me like a hard drug user. They usually have some evil look to their eye. She doesn't. Its like to me her and her parents didnt care. but its a sort of alibi thats not been totally rooted out yet or checked on all the different things it bring up like is any of it even true? wondering why noone bothered checking on her now. it doesnt make sense, she's been with JF for what? 5 years? isn't like she upped and just walked out at 18 from her parents, she turned 18. doesn't seem like that matches with up and leaving JF and a kid and a house and everything else, and 100k a year spent on her. not to bring too much attention to that. do whatcha want. But the question is her parents attitude towards it. and who is responsible for her situation that she was put in.
 
she moved out and ran around with different groups after she turned 18. it seems like that is the case. I was thinking it from something wrote in this thread, about her running around and she did roam or travelled for a while. Would intend to think she wasn't really cared about after she turned 18; and probably much before. Leading to doing that. Not that I say she is a druggy or anything but something normalish parents do so much. but 18, and then jet the fuck out as being caring responsible parents. Lends to the story that her parents were actually even told about her doing what the story is now(from JF) that she went to travel ze world etc. And that they then never bothered reporting her missing for 4 months.
But I think it was comments from videos that people were saying this from. The thing was she did travel, and roam (around with) other people. Doing some weed and alcohol basically dont know what else. She doesn't look to me like a hard drug user. They usually have some evil look to their eye. She doesn't. Its like to me her and her parents didnt care. but its a sort of alibi thats not been totally rooted out yet or checked on all the different things it bring up like is any of it even true? wondering why noone bothered checking on her now. it doesnt make sense, she's been with JF for what? 5 years? isn't like she upped and just walked out at 18 from her parents, she turned 18. doesn't seem like that matches with up and leaving JF and a kid and a house and everything else, and 100k a year spent on her. not to bring too much attention to that. do whatcha want. But the question is her parents attitude towards it. and who is responsible for her situation that she was put in.
That's a lot of words to say "No. It's an ass-pull."

Seriously, it wasn't a hard question.
 
We know JF has made an 'electronic alibi' - probably a couple of fake texts using Elora's phone. Unless the RCMP have (or find) the sort of evidence to contradict his story (a body, blood, cameras, trace evidence), I think there won't be enough probable cause for an indictment, let alone enough evidence to secure a conviction.
Something I've seen on The First 48 is logs of how the phone is used, and this can be strong evidence.

For example, if Elora used her fingerprint to unlock her phone 99% of the time, and then when it was used in the days after she was thought to have left, the phone was unlocked via a passcode, this would point to, "people are creatures of habits and they don't easily break habits." This would be enough probable cause to get some search warrants.

I saw one episode where they knew the time of death, and then the killer used the victim's bloody fingerprint of their dead body to unlock the phone. Afterwards, the fingerprint scanner had some long presses with no fingerprint data present, implying the killer was wiping blood off of the phone with a cloth or something.

If she has an iPhone that he unlocked with the face ID scanner on, forget about it. The phone would log that it was unlocked by a person with a face that didn't match hers.
 
Nigger, you been here for a month, and only ever posted in this thread (starting 9 days ago).

Don't underestimate yourself, you're worth a speculative look.
you're right i did it. im jf's alt account. I'm just saying you're not going to hear from her again (probably). I heard it from someone quoting his videos about her. maybe i saved one. been reading this thread from when she disappeared. im assuming at 18-20, moving on from that I read this from the forum and that came from videos of JF talking about her, she moved out and her parents didnt care (enough to stop her) about her wandering. She did that, and whatever comes along with it for a while, maybe im elaborating but maybe she got a bf for a while, did that for a bit. but sometime she started working, someone posted a picture somewhere. I think she went to school. then she dropped out to go after jf. and thats been that way for the last 5 years I think.. and she is now (dead) 30.
 
you're right i did it. im jf's alt account. I'm just saying you're not going to hear from her again (probably). I heard it from someone quoting his videos about her. maybe i saved one. been reading this thread from when she disappeared. im assuming at 18-20, moving on from that I read this from the forum and that came from videos of JF talking about her, she moved out and her parents didnt care (enough to stop her) about her wandering. She did that, and whatever comes along with it for a while, maybe im elaborating but maybe she got a bf for a while, did that for a bit. but sometime she started working, someone posted a picture somewhere. I think she went to school. then she dropped out to go after jf. and thats been that way for the last 5 years I think.. and she is now (dead) 30.
At least take a break and read another thread. It will do you good.

But I'm very happy for you.
Or sad that happened.
 
you're right i did it. im jf's alt account. I'm just saying you're not going to hear from her again (probably). I heard it from someone quoting his videos about her. maybe i saved one. been reading this thread from when she disappeared. im assuming at 18-20, moving on from that I read this from the forum and that came from videos of JF talking about her, she moved out and her parents didnt care (enough to stop her) about her wandering. She did that, and whatever comes along with it for a while, maybe im elaborating but maybe she got a bf for a while, did that for a bit. but sometime she started working, someone posted a picture somewhere. I think she went to school. then she dropped out to go after jf. and thats been that way for the last 5 years I think.. and she is now (dead) 30.
Nigga I ain't reading all that. Keep it under 5 sentences or publish it in your memoirs.
 
The first 48 refers to the amount of time investigators have on average to find a missing person alive, not the amount of time they have to reasonably be expected to solve her murder.

(1) The phrase "The first 48" refers to the amount of time the police have to find a lead or make an arrest before a criminal investigation runs cold (and the probability of solving it is reduced by 50%.) It's not specific to missing persons. Maybe you are thinking about the statistic that the majority of missing persons are found within 48h.

(2) The A&E show The First 48 is exclusively about homicide investigations. Occasionally there are story lines with severe assaults where the person may or may not live. The show's title sequence says, "For homicide detectives, the clock starts ticking the moment they are called. Their chance of solving a murder is cut in half if they don't get a lead within the first 48 hours."
 
On 1/9/23, JFG covered the probable cause affidavit to arrest Brian Kohlberger. If you aren't familiar, Kohlberger is the grad student who killed 4 people with a knife in Idaho in a sorority house. odysse link

- He thinks Kohlberger chose a knife rather than a gun to avoid the 'rifling' forensic data that could connect the murders to a gun, but his mistake was leaving a witness alive.
View attachment 5415056
- Kohlberger made a mistake by leaving DNA on the scene, in 2023 murders should be done in a hazmat suit.
View attachment 5415058
- Kohlberger's vehicle was able to be tracked by surveillance cameras, JF thinks murders would need to be committed on foot to avoid this.
View attachment 5415060
- most importantly, Kohlberger turned his phone off once he had already started driving to the house and turned it back on while he was still close to the town of the murders. JF explains how in order to get away with murder in 2023, you would need to create a digital alibi through emulators or other programs to simulate human activity or send false location pings.
View attachment 5415062

He says that Kohlberger was low IQ and a fake, imposter autist because he made so many mistakes. (A real genius like JF would have foreseen all these issues of course.)
JF's "electronic alibi is retarded and would leave a digital trail of it's own. The local cookies etc... on his hard drive are probably gone, because mama jf "likes to play with water" and destroyed 2 of his laptops, but the ISP and servers would still have traces. The RCMP had better hurry though as many logs are only stored for 30-90 days.
 
well we all know as much as from what we've heard. and what i heard i think came from the sources such as JF's earlier shit. And were analyzing JF here not me
So your source that she didn't get on well with her family is JF, the current prime suspect in her possible (read: almost certain) death/murder? You'd have been better going with 'dude, trust me' tbh.
 
Back