Now I've had a chance to absorb this, a few questions/observations.
If the 10th Circuit judges have punted this back to the District Court, can/will Russhole's pro bono lolyers represent him wrt the do-over?
If so, whilst we might not get as much milk as we would if Russhole was going back to being pro se, I like the idea that they may have not only created more work for themselves, but may now also be on the hook for travel expenses to Nevada (assuming the District Court doesn't allow Russhole's counsel to attend via Zoom or whatever).
Then there's Skordas. I wonder if he's beginning to regret taking this case on for a fixed price, or was this fixed price conditional on certain milestones being met? If it's the latter, then the meter could start running for Null.
As for the next MATI stream, don't expect Null to say much else other than the 10th Circuit dismissed the District Court's ruling and remanded the case, on account of legal action being still very much active.
I'm still not a lawyer, but could the 10th Circuit's failure to properly evaluate Null's fair use claim and reliance on dubious sources (such as ED) be used in Null's defense?
Finally, I don't think this is the big W Russhole thinks it is. It's a small w with an asterisk at best. The only big W here is for this thread, as this outcome will produce at least another couple hundred pages.
Wasnt this guy proclaimed a Vexatious litigator? Or am I thinking of someone else.
You're thinking of Melinda Scott, though the threat of future vexatious litigant status was raised during the AGT case IIRC.
