Basic Blond Boy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2022
James Gunn really destroyed the IP long term. The live action films were raunchy parodies of Scooby Doo that ended up making the brand way to self-conscious. He played a big role in making Scrappy the joke character he is today by making him annoying and having him pee on Daphne after being revealed as the main villain of Scooby-Doo 1. He also went hard on many other elements such as strong girl Daphne and gay Velma.Scooby is such a mishandled property. One thing I dislike about modern installments (even before Velma, which I never bothered watching) is A) a tendency to reduce characters to flat archetypes, or in some cases try to force square pegs into round holes (as far back as the Cyber Chase they were trying to make Daphne kick ass), B) the tendency to, instead of trying to make controversial characters and eras work, instead reduce them to in-jokes (Scrappy is the biggest victim of this... I never even understood the hate for the puppy).....
Since his films, Scooby has drifted more and more into being a giant in-joke in a similar fashion to Disney needing to spell out every feminist criticism post Shrek. Outside of adaptations like Mystery Incorporated, the entire series seems to take pleasure in belittling itself.
WB makes 1 Scooby film a year and only seems to green light other properties if Scooby is attached. The same can be said for Batman and animated DC films, as there are examples like Justice League Dark where the writing team clearly wanted to just write the magic users, but had to shoehorn Batman into it. In saying this, it is clear the staff is burnt out and want to write other IPs such as Courage, so they shoehorn Scooby into it to gain approval.It doesn't help when crossovers like the one with Batman the Brave and the Bold (which is mostly a good movie BTW) tend to clearly favor the Batman side and make the Scooby Gang a third wheel.