- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
The notion that someone who has to donate away money in order to not become a billionaire on regular is going to do a reality show where they're forced to hang out with some idiot for a week is incredibly hilarious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Refusing to use someone's pronoun s and calling her "it" instead is literally genocide as JK's many detractors have stated time and again.Just a little snippet, but I found it amusing this is how Instagram is enticing people to use Threads.
It's the same as the various celebrity chasing Lolcows. There is no reason why she'd willing spend time with an relative unknown like India to say nothing of an entire wasted week of her life, let alone to do so for other people's entertainment.who the fuck would want to spend a week hanging out with a totally obnoxious dickhead like him?
Turns out he's told a different version of this little story before:View attachment 5428575
In his mind, he's thinking "so she'd rather do 2 years in prison than use my preferred pronouns, but she wouldn't spend a single week hanging out with a trans person", when really, who the fuck would want to spend a week hanging out with a totally obnoxious dickhead like him?
And she probably didn’t want to risk getting raped.The "production company" looks like an embellishment he's made up since. Rowling probably didn't so much refuse to do it, as never heard of the troon's daydream in the first place.
Turning terfs is probably one of his perverted tranny coomer fantasies. I wouldn't be surprised if he is lusting after milf JKussy.And she probably didn’t want to risk getting raped.
Probably a bit late, but I can't upload the video of this scumbag heckling women at a feminist gathering where JK Rowling attended and spoke but if any other user can, that would be great.
For image 1, when has Rowling created a safe space for”queer [retards]”? I mean, she’s a feminist, so I don’t doubt she’s pro gay, but I swear, I don’t recall her doing anything of the sort.
this doesn't even make sense anyways because regardless of whoever this person is, it's not even what she's talking about. This is some famous faggot who would be on their best behavior during the events of the show besides probably arguing with Joanna about whatever shit. What she's talking about is unhinged lunatic faggots in spaces for battered women or whatever. Obviously because this person would be trying to change her mind she wouldn't be an open sex pest. she's talking about bad apples not already famous lunatics. the only way this type of show would be what JK is talking about is if JK went undercover to a women's shelter for a month that was filled with trannies and somehow nobody noticed there was a camera crew and nobody tried to diddle a kid or an already traumatized sexual assault victim. however the show would backfire regardless because either A) a trans woman would in fact diddle a child or an already traumatized SA victim, or b) JK wouldn't change her mind and would just say something to the effect of well I'm sure glad the women here were so lucky because over at *insert any other place like this here* last week *insert any last week sex crime by a "woman" in a supposedly safe woman's space* this happened, here's some statistics I'm right just like I have been on this particular issue since day 1.Assuming that this is true and not exaggerated, what a stupid premise. It benefits JKR in zero ways. She'll have to spend a week trying to befriend a stranger male that hates her guts. She will have to be overtly polite or risk angering more TRAs. Clothes shopping, spa, gym, sports?!? To try and bait JKR into saying on tv that male shouldn't be in female spaces whenever that guy waddles around those places? Or get some soundbite moments where she barely tolerates that guy's presence, and be "ha gotch terfs see it ain't that bad!"?
These people will enjoy some form of media and go on to think it's bespoke, something intentionally made for them. They took one of the very simple messages within the series, "It's okay to be a little weird or unique," and interpreted it as a "queer neurodivergent" safe space.
However, the actual truth is that the franchise wasn't specially targeted at girls, if at all. JKR writes stories and characters that appeal more to boys than girls one of the reasons being she can't write romance to save her life. I don't care if this sounds sexist but the reality is that boys want to read adventure and girls want to read romance, and even in woke current year this remains true.
What attracted THAT sort of millenial girl towards Harry Potter though was, at first, that this precise lack of skill on the part of JKR and the general tone of the story was fucking fertile ground to shipping shit. Harry Potter arguably was the first IP to launch a thousand ships and it was known for the most deranged shippings and fanfiction that there was even in the pre-tumblr years. In the DeviantArt and fanfiction.net fucking years. So this is only natural that this would attract a woke crowd, which in turn would attract more millenial white girls and queers.
Also, JKR did everything she could to nurture such a fanbase.
Another thing that is noticeable, and woketards are using now against her, is how paternalistic her views are on minorities if we take the books as a source. More on this below.
I know this is true, but it still makes no sense. The only reason to play real-life Quidditch is larping Harry Potter. Without actual flying broomsticks and balls, it's just bumbling around with a stick between your legs.
An interesting video and while I 100% agree with the core sentiment the image of all 3 lead actors from the films at their youngest with "back stabbing scum" as the caption feels hilariously harsh.I am recommending the whole thing now that I watched it
The latest season of Hell's Kitchen features a contestant who described himself as a "professional Quidditch player," which went over about as well with the others and with Gordon Ramsay as you'd expect. (Yes, he was an early exit.)When I was in elementary school, when we played "Quidditch" we tied brooms, sticks, hockey sticks to the bottom of those square gym scooters. The golden snitch was a small yellow dodgeball that was being tossed over the "court" as fast as possible in every direction by people outside of it and you had to rise off the scooter to grab it. Scarlet quaffle= large red dodgeball. Bludgers= two kids in black shirts also rolling around to push players off. The Beaters had small plastic baseball bats covered in with felt foam. Pure chaos, many fingers a-crushed. It was a blast. Trannies and stupid manchildren BTFO'd by actual children.
Nah I'd say it's justified. Those little shits owe their entire careers to Rowling and they threw her under the bus just satisfy a few loud faggots on twitter. What's really funny is that not a single one of them has done anything of worth outside of Harry Potter, so they're still going to be associated with the franchise, and by extension Rowling, no matter how much they try distance themselves from her.An interesting video and while I 100% agree with the core sentiment the image of all 3 lead actors from the films at their youngest with "back stabbing scum" as the caption feels hilariously harsh.
Jewish Rapist that weaselled out of dozens of rape charges by claiming muh health conditions