US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Not when the clusterfuck means welding the gates open and letting millions of illegal aliens in.
That is occurring with or without the Speaker of the House position being filled. Both parties are tacitly agreeing that the flood of migrants is a good thing,the Republicans in the House have had a few moments where they could strong arm the Senate and Presidency into accepting a bill during the budget standoffs, they chose not to.
 
Wait, I thought the right disbanded their devoted loyalty of law enforcement after the COVID lockdowns, George Floyd, and January 6. Make up your minds.

Here's a compromise: erect a statue of Teresa Wright.
I hate the Reagan cult, but it would be funny we just build statues of Reagan everywhere, and renamed everything after him.
 
I hate the Reagan cult, but it would be funny we just build statues of Reagan everywhere, and renamed everything after him.

Statues of Hobbes.
Plackard reads:
"Fuck you, I was right, you idiots can't govern yourselves"
Make it a mobile project.
Park them like advertiser trucks in every major US city.
 
Not when the clusterfuck means welding the gates open and letting millions of illegal aliens in.



They didn't all used to be blue. Many cities had Republican mayors until recently. There are a few major things that happened. One demographic change. The Republicans voting base has always been and still is white, married, middle-class families. Well, the Republicans followed the pied piper of mass immigration & feminism, so now the cities are full of brown people and single women.

The next is that some time between the 1990s and today, the Republicans just like...stopped actually running for office. It's really weird. I've been an adult long enough to see the change. In the 1990s, a Republican mayoral candidate would run on things you'd expect a mayoral candidate to run on. He'd run on issues with the schools, the roads, crime, whatever the big urban issues were. Today? They're all these useless dorks who blather platitudes about limited government and low taxes, but are scared shitless when it comes to actually addressing issues that matter in the city. Why would anyone vote for someone who doesn't want to actually exercise the office he's nominally running for?
Another part of it was the rapid departure of upper middle-class from inner cities with the invention of the internet. Financial people didn’t actually need to work in the financial districts any more. It started with satellite offices and now it’s remote work.
 
That leads me to another point that I should have made clear. Because it's not enough that we haven't seen such gross corruption, incompetence, and just disgusting behavior by people currently in power, but that there are clearly not enough people out there who are not willing to tolerate any of this. That is what's most worrisome and also different from what came before.
You're forgetting the most troubling aspect of this is there's so many people who swore the oaths to defend the Constitution and country; and yet are happily defending the corrupt TPTB and more than willing to act as their enforcers. For what amounts to pennies that is retirement bennies and exemptions such as sovereign immunity to the rule of law.
 
The next is that some time between the 1990s and today, the Republicans just like...stopped actually running for office. It's really weird. I've been an adult long enough to see the change. In the 1990s, a Republican mayoral candidate would run on things you'd expect a mayoral candidate to run on. He'd run on issues with the schools, the roads, crime, whatever the big urban issues were. Today? They're all these useless dorks who blather platitudes about limited government and low taxes
The court system has made it ILLEGAL to enact the crime reformes Giullianni and his breed used to make NYC and other murder capitols safe after the hell that was the 1970's.

The current standard, thanks to "disparate impact" and "racial profiling" rulings compounding, is that if a crime is committed primarily by non-whites, it is literally illegal to enforce the law.

Nobody is re-litigating this, and until the supreme court overturns this dysfunction, there is zero point in running a "tough on crime" campaign that will just be blocked by court order.

It's fucking Lysenkoist levels of stupid to say you can't target policies against violent crime toward the demographic responsible for upwards of 70% of violent crime.
We don't demand exterminators look in the roof eaves for ant nests, or underground for avian vermin like pigeons.

Now, we add do that "disparate impact", which basically says that even if you do the above stupidity, and STILL end up arresting more niggers than white people, you're still liable for racism and must stop.

Gee, I wonder why anyone actually out to solve major crime issues in cities refuse to run?!
 
Last edited:
The next is that some time between the 1990s and today, the Republicans just like...stopped actually running for office. It's really weird.
The ultimate issue is the the major GOP donors agree with the social justice reforms from the left. The composition of major donors changed from wealthy industrialists and oilmen to financiers. The banks are the ones enforcing diversity and will consider your business a high risk if you don’t have a plan in place to have over 30% of your company’s management be women and niggers by 2030. So major donors also want low taxes, no regulations but maximum subsidies. The end result is a bunch of useless Republicans who prioritize ensuring that everyone knows Democrats are the real racists. They can figure out things like a platform once it’s known they love niggers most of all.
 
Dare I say this might be the Meatball campaign's biggest L so far.

ETA: this is a private group not to be confused with the Florida state government, but still not Ron!'s proudest moment.

View attachment 5449578
LOL, LMAO, we really need a "My sides" reaction. I have nothing else to add about this. Hope you had fun you retarded meatball.
 
Supposed+big+meeting+st+the+pentagon_f39d1b_11019665.jpg
Supposed+big+meeting+st+the+pentagon_51567c_11019665.jpg

One would assume that they would recognize that (((the ones))) pushing ESG and other strategies that sabotage government functions and the economy would be arrested, but unless they are cleaning house they are unlikely to be going after actual problems and are just going to purge dissidents and democracy.

That being said, the source doesn't really scream legitimate so it's probably nothing
 
Kinda reads like Q shit tbh. There may have been some weird gathering of these officials but it's more likely just routine shit briefing them on terrorist threats for the upcoming holiday seasons or something.
Yeah I figured. Millitary generals literally lied to Trump and did everything they could to get wars to continue, so if they intended to pull a coup it would not be in a way that makes things better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back