Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
After some reconsideration I have concluded that Nick is actually smart and right about everything and that Null is cringe and gay. Nick Rekieta is much cooler than Null, he even owns a cool sports car while Null is bumming it on the bus. I bet Null would be really owned if Nick did a livestream from his car showing off how fast it can go. He could be screaming out the window "CAN YOU DO THIS NULL?!" as he zooms lightning fast through a winding road and does sick drifts in the bends.

Null is probably such an incel prude he can't even drive after having a couple of drinks, unlike Nick who is both an experienced driver and drinker and has total control over his vehicle even slightly inebriated. In fact he probably drives BETTER drunk. I think I would even give him some superchats if he did a cool driving stream.
I can see him on side of road in a Minnesotan winter, drunk as fuck and nose as red as Rudolph’s screaming “The kiwi farms crashed my car!”
 
Last edited:
I’d be very surprised if Nick didn’t get a referral fee as that’s par for the course in such matters. But he’ll never tell the truth about it if he did.

True. I had not thought of this before.

I wonder how long until he starts tweeting to #DropKiwifarms and about how stuñning and brave all those transwomen were that Null totally murdered?

He will not go that far. He will continue to make passive-aggressive obloquies, call things 'weird', and insist that he 'loves Josh' but that he just does not understand human interaction.

This makes it really really really really fucking moronic to decide you're going to sneak in random comments about Monty into your show in an attempt to force opposing counsel to watch the whole thing. They'll just wait and make you pay your much higher priced legal team to do it for them. I really hope Nick goes forward with this idea and we get the meltdown when he realizes he will be the one paying for his own attorneys to go through every one of his shows because the non-practicing attorney thought that he had a genius idea.

Sounds like something that the defendant would have ready access to and be expected to provide themselves in discovery. IANAL, but am fairly certain these are games and dirty lawyer tricks.

Yeah didn’t he say he read his own thread on a livestream within the past week? I don’t understand the need to lie about it. Personally, I don’t see what the big deal is.

No, he has claimed that he stopped reading it in February or shortly afterwards. Instead, he maintains that people send him things, and THAT is why he responds to things in this thread. How DARE you question his integrity!?!?!?!

These are similar semantica games to hwo his Twitter account is the 'business account' and how he had an 'intern' for when he was banned running the second account.

Edit to Add: It just occured to me that the 7 a.m. event is likely his eldest's soccer practice. That son is getting his Learners Permit. The son could possibly be the one who is supposed to drive while his drunk dad rides shotgun.

He has expressed that he wanted Kayla to teach him to drive.

Hold on, I said I was done taking screenshots of Rekieta's meltdown, but this one seems relevant.

View attachment 5451367
(Archive)

Now I'm done. Someone should count up how many tweets and how long this went on for, he hasn't tweeted about this in about half an hour though maybe he'll start again.

Holy shit! This is some lolcow behaviour. WHO is he going to sue?

If it is not Null (Bad PR move), if someone on here has insufficient OPSEC to avoid being identified, you are deserving to be sure.

Just a thought, this could be a passive manipulation on @elb . He knows who she is and some of her personal circumstance. He could try to screw her over.


Don't pozload my neghole.
 
If someone remembers the originator of this image let me know so they can get appropriate credit. I just felt like an edit based on him seething on Twitter and reading his thread.

Soccer Practice.png

Template.png
 
Rekieta is seemingly implying that you'd have to store the CSAM itself in a capacity where the person deploying this tool could then consume this CSAM under the guise of preventing the distribution of such materials.
How does one hash an image that they don’t actually have? It’s safe to say that Josh doesn’t have nor want any of that shit anywhere near him, so I’d assume there’s a simple solution I just don’t understand tech-wise.
 
How does one hash an image that they don’t actually have? It’s safe to say that Josh doesn’t have nor want any of that shit anywhere near him, so I’d assume there’s a simple solution I just don’t understand tech-wise.
You identify it, take it down, then hash it and add it to a filter list. If the image gets posted again, the hash catches it and stops it.

Hashes can be thought of as 'fuzzy digital fingerprints'--not identifiable or useful to the average pleb, but useful to machines for identification. It theory, it could eventually also detect edited versions of the image.
 
Hi Nick, stop reading this thread and get into rehab, for the love of God
Don't listen to him. He is a hater.

Pour yourself a cold one buddy. You've had a busy day on Twitter. You've earned it. Give the bottle a good lick to not waste any of that precious booze.

There's only one way to deal with the haters. You should read your thread on air refuting each and every post, drink in hand. Starting back at page 950. Set that record straight. Really stick it to those haters Nicky.
 
You identify it, take it down, then hash it and add it to a filter list. If the image gets posted again, the hash catches it and stops it.

Hashes can be thought of as 'fuzzy digital fingerprints'--not identifiable or useful to the average pleb, but useful to machines for identification. It theory, it could eventually also detect edited versions of the image.
Thanks, that actually makes a lot of sense.
Damn, Nick really do be a jilted cuck lmao.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gorton Colu
Hold on, I said I was done taking screenshots of Rekieta's meltdown, but this one seems relevant.

View attachment 5451367
(Archive)
Well there goes @anionfarflung's theory that he only "prefers" it not be uploaded anywhere else.

Rackets gets more scummy by the day.

Rekieta is seemingly implying that you'd have to store the CSAM itself in a capacity where the person deploying this tool could then consume this CSAM under the guise of preventing the distribution of such materials.
By his logic, police and prosecutors could be consumers of CSAM under the guise or building a criminal case against somebody. Presumably they have access to the uncensored images. I think they kinda have too. It's called evidence.

He's retarded.

Was Null's plan legally sound? I dunno. Maybe not. INAL (and Nick barely is). I'm also not not clear on the technical details here.

However, I'm doubtful there were any nefarious intent behind what he was trying to accomplish. Null has been a HELL of a lot more consistent about how he feels about CP/CSAM than Rekieta has. There's also no evidence Null hanged onto the uncensored images when hashing them, so Nick doesn't seem to have any point here at all other than trying to aggro Null.

Holy shit! This is some lolcow behaviour. WHO is he going to sue?

If it is not Null (Bad PR move), if someone on here has insufficient OPSEC to avoid being identified, you are deserving to be sure.

Just a thought, this could be a passive manipulation on @elb . He knows who she is and some of her personal circumstance. He could try to screw her over.
He could be trying to intimidate her into not posting it, but she didn't, so I think she's safe.

If someone remembers the originator of this image let me know so they can get appropriate credit. I just felt like an edit based on him seething on Twitter and reading his thread.

View attachment 5451749
It's @سلیمان عثمان.

I had to look it up to copy/paste because I don't know any Arabic. LOL.

EDIT: Elaboration.
 
Last edited:
What the fuck is hashing an image and why is that a supposedly bad thing to do to protect your website from CSAM?
I’m pretty sure I have the exact same amount of computer knowledge as Rackets, so it’s safe to say he’s just butthurt and doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
Hashing is basically an algorithm that converts a file to a string of text based on a very complex calculation. If you change the file at all then that file will return a different string when run through the same algorithm. The idea is to gather hashes for CSAM for automatic comparison to all files uploaded to a server. It's also commonly used to verify the authenticity of a specific file in higher security settings.
 
What the fuck is hashing an image and why is that a supposedly bad thing to do to protect your website from CSAM?
I’m pretty sure I have the exact same amount of computer knowledge as Rackets, so it’s safe to say he’s just butthurt and doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
I'm going to bet he was shown that image and was told "THIS LITERALLY MEANS NULL WILL HAVE A REPOSITORY OF CP!" by some illiterate idiot and Rackets didn't even bother looking it up.
 
Don't listen to him. He is a hater.

Pour yourself a cold one buddy. You've had a busy day on Twitter. You've earned it. Give the bottle a good lick to not waste any of that precious booze.

There's only one way to deal with the haters. You should read your thread on air refuting each and every post, drink in hand. Starting back at page 950. Set that record straight. Really stick it to those haters Nicky.
It's really no wonder he drinks so much. Poor guy just really hates drama, but he's constantly being forced to
  • Call a person in the shower in the middle of the night to complain
  • Drunkenly ramble on stream for 7 hours after being called a "whitebread ass nigga"
  • Cry about not being able to collab with a pink anime woman
  • Argue about the legality of defacing/pissing on a gravestone
  • Argue that person A isn't trying to ruin person B's business only to have person A say that he is trying to ruin person B's business right to his face
  • Tweet at the speed a terminally online teenager would blush at
  • And the myriad of other things he's forced to do by everyone around him because he totally hates drama and doesn't want any part of it.
So I agree. You deserve that drink, Nick. Pour yourself a nice one. But be sure to hover it around your face for at least 30 minutes while talking so you can really take in the aroma. Maybe while you explain your stance on Cuties to make it more in-line with Dick and Vito's stance.
 
I think Metokur might be onto something with the Balldo conspiracy theory. Which makes me ask Nick, are you a closet furry?
This is a fair question. It wasn’t that long ago that furries belonged up on the wall with people who like cuties. Now it seems cuties is OK, so…
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: P5Fever
Essentially, you can have "hashed" versions of the images where it's been distorted such that people wouldn't visually discern it as CSAM anymore
While you could TECHNICALLY consider the hashing a form of compression, it's just a code generated from the image. A thumbprint of it. There's no data that could be turned into an image of any kind in it.
 
While you could TECHNICALLY consider the hashing a form of compression, it's just a code generated from the image. A thumbprint of it. There's no data that could be turned into an image of any kind in it.
I think the compression being discussed here is deliberately destructive. It is designed to create an identical image from similar images thus avoiding the "one pixel changed" ofuscation of hashing. That identical image is then hashed and blacklisted as opposed to the many similar images.
 
What the fuck is hashing an image and why is that a supposedly bad thing to do to protect your website from CSAM?
I’m pretty sure I have the exact same amount of computer knowledge as Rackets, so it’s safe to say he’s just butthurt and doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
It's an algorithm that converts a file (in this case, an image or video) to a string and stores it, the actual file isn't stored just the string of alphanumerical text.
Then with future uploads, the file is compared to stored, known strings of nasty stuff and instantly rejected.

YouTube uses this with propaganda videos such as "The Greatest Story Never Told", try uploading that and watch it get instantly flagged.
China's Internet uses this with photos they don't like, such as the famous Tiananmen Square tank photo/video and propaganda material from Falungong.

Here Balldo, I made a handy guide.
hashfortards.jpg
 
What blow my mind in all this is that he thinks Monty is a pedo, and is apparently now making noises that Null is one.

But Vito isn't, despite the fact Vito has admitted being one.

I guess that's the power of Dick. It makes no sense whatsoever. Nick has completely abandoned basic logic and fairness at this point. He running on pure booze and emotions. He is fucked.
 
Back