Diseased Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

[LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]]

No remorse
No regrets
Nothing to say to the relative of the dead

Ultra based.

> bongs stalked the dude's house three whole days for this

 

[Jex]

The British upper class are masters of subversion, notice how he managed to twist his words even when he said nothing. My favourite example was after the 2001 general election which had unprecedented low voter participation, Tony Blair spun it that people didn’t vote because they trusted the democratic system.

 

[PPEcel]

https://twitter.com/SavilleMelanie/status/1717156623607562434

Love how these people think that they will somehow be able to extradite Master as if dual criminality isn't a requirement in every single U.S. extradition treaty. The U.S. fought (and won) a war over two centuries ago precisely so no one in the U.S. would have to answer to the U.K.

These people are truly insufferable.

 

[Dyn]

I slammed the door in his face.

Based, well done.

 

[Susanna]

I found sanctioned suicide a couple years ago and read up on some of the methods, read some threads, felt some feels. I don’t like suicide and I don’t like supporting suicidal ideation, but what I like even less is telling people what they’re allowed to do with their lives. Suicide is by definition victimless, otherwise it’s either a murder-suicide or terrorism. People are going to commit suicide regardless, the best we can do is try to dissuade them and when that fails, helping them do it effectively and painlessly. Better to help a miserable man hang himself than to let him fail to do it properly and make himself an even more miserable cripple.
I’m glad to find LeMarkus is so based. Fuck Anglos and fuck journos.

 

[Markass the Worst]

https://twitter.com/SavilleMelanie/status/1717156623607562434

View attachment 5444347

Love how these people think that they will somehow be able to extradite Master as if dual criminality isn't a requirement in every single U.S. extradition treaty. The U.S. fought (and won) a war over two centuries ago precisely so no one in the U.S. would have to answer to the U.K.

These people are truly insufferable.

What would this even accomplish when he doesn't run the forum anymore? It would do literally nothing to the site. He's already complied with the proposed law.

And punishing him for what would be violations of the law if it existed in the past is a violation of civil liberties. Then again I don't think anti-SSers are exactly concerned about civil liberties...

 

[Molesting the Decapitated]

When the state helps you commit suicide, its called "Medical Aid In Dying" but when you do it on your own, of your own volition, using methods big pharma doesn't directly profit off of, its a travesty and worthy of a scathing BBC documentary. Funny how that works... Journalists and medical "professionals" are both vermin.

I was just telling a family member about Sanctioned Suicide yesterday and some people on this website have it so fucking bad (even to the point of awful physical illness) that it's not even a suicide anymore, to me it's more like a mandatory self-euthanization.

Not long ago when I was on a flight I was actually reading that book published in 2006(?) I believe titled Guide to a Humane Self-Chosen Death on some Dutch website which had the whole e-book documented. I recall somewhere inside the book the authors said they weren't even allowed to widely publish it, and the guide's distribution had to be loopholed into some strange "alternative medicine" labeling just to be put on shelves. It just had me thinking: why does info like that have to be so hard to obtain, even back then?

 

[Sonic]

I was just telling a family member about Sanctioned Suicide yesterday and some people on this website have it so fucking bad (even to the point of awful physical illness) that it's not even a suicide anymore, to me it's more like a mandatory self-euthanization.

Not long ago when I was on a flight I was actually reading that book published in 2006(?) I believe titled Guide to a Humane Self-Chosen Death on some Dutch website which had the whole e-book documented. I recall somewhere inside the book the authors said they weren't even allowed to widely publish it, and the guide's distribution had to be loopholed into some strange "alternative medicine" labeling just to be put on shelves. It just had me thinking: why does info like that have to be so hard to obtain, even back then?

The small part of me that has faith in the system says this is for liability reasons. You don't want some teenager going through a hard time, with their whole life ahead of them, to decide to kill themselves instead of seeking help... But then again, it probably has more to do with the fact that big pharma isn't directly profiting off the drugs and methods used to commit suicide than life preservation.

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

I WILL NOT BE SODOMISED! YOU HEAR ME?!!

You try to sodomize something that is feline and has 5 out of 6 pointy termini, you are just asking to have your dick ripped to shreds.

 

[PHILLIP BANKS]

You try to sodomize something that is feline and has 5 out of 6 pointy termini, you are just asking to have your dick ripped to shreds.

TOTAL ZOOPHILE DEATH

 

[afounder]

Protect Marquis at all costs

No but seriously if you actually were reasonable about wanting a conversation with him and didn't just proceed to come running at him with guns blazing and immediate accusations and hostility, then maybe there's the slight possibility he'd actually be ok with talking to you. It's not that someone does or doesn't have any "remorse" about the matter, perhaps maybe he just chooses not to involve himself with some asshole who is clearly stalking/harassing him (waiting outside of his house for insane amounts of time) and then when the opportunity arises to speak to the subject they act like a douche-ass bitch about it like "WHY TF DID YOU THIS WHY WHY WHY DID YOU DO THIS? YOU INSENSITIVE PIECE OF SHIT ARE U ASHAMED??" pretty sure nobody in their right mind, in any context, would want to engage in conversation with someone like that.

I myself would love to see an actual interview with the man in the flesh, but only if you're not an overtly biased dickhead. This is horrible journalism. What kind of total fucking idiot do you need to actually be to just come running up to him being clearly passive-aggressive/belligerent and expect him to say something?... Fuckin retard....

Call me MATI if you want i'm mostly just very intolerant to this level of ignorance

Admittedly, I'm not some perfect person either. I'm not always right and we all make mistakes and have flaws, but chasing me down to the ends of the earth to harass me isn't going to solve the mental health crisis, nor would shutting down the site. As I would like to say, the site holds a mirror to society on the reasons why people want to commit suicide. Instead, the UK wants to block the site and pretend that this is going to help things, when it won't.

A few months ago, the BBC begged me to go on camera for a proper interview, which I never accepted. There's nothing to talk about. I have not been involved in the site for years and it seems to be running fine regardless. I wouldn't be able to give any useful input regarding anything on the site, nor do I want to go on camera with a biased news network that obviously won't tell the full story and will continuously demonize me no matter what I say or do. I guess they have decided to try to piecemeal a documentary, or some sort of investigative series based on me and the forum, when I haven't been involved for years.

It really just comes off as harassment, considering they tried to confront me at the bank today before I slammed my car door in their face and the driver confronted the reporter, which he gave a pretty stern warning to. I doubt they will be pulling this stunt again. It was made abundantly clear that myself or no one that I associate with should be approached again.

Even the people that don't agree with the sites content agree that this whole thing makes the BBC looks even worse than it already does. I made the mistake of talking to journos in the past and I will never be making that mistake again. If they want my opinion on something, they'll just have to pull it from past statements.

This pathetic stunt proves that they're desperate, and you can see it on all of their timelines. They can't stop posting my pictures and they continue to obsess over everything I say or post. They have nothing on me, so they hide behind news agencies which will happily do the harassment under the guise of "journalism".

It is quite sad and I really hope they find the peace that they really don't deserve.

 

[AnOminous]

This pathetic stunt proves that they're desperate, and you can see it on all of their timelines.

Never talk to journoscum. They not only don't tell the truth, they literally hate the truth.

 

[Sprate Header]

Has the BBC even brought any new information to the table? Any examples of the more explicit, behind-the-scenes grooming into suicide that anti-SaSu people have alleged the forum is involved in? Or is it really just more bitching and moaning that people are sharing information available on Wikipedia and being able to talk openly about their mental illness?

 

[Molesting the Decapitated]

Admittedly, I'm not some perfect person either. I'm not always right and we all make mistakes and have flaws, but chasing me down to the ends of the earth to harass me isn't going to solve the mental health crisis, nor would shutting down the site. As I would like to say, the site holds a mirror to society on the reasons why people want to commit suicide. Instead, the UK wants to block the site and pretend that this is going to help things, when it won't.

A few months ago, the BBC begged me to go on camera for a proper interview, which I never accepted. There's nothing to talk about. I have not been involved in the site for years and it seems to be running fine regardless. I wouldn't be able to give any useful input regarding anything on the site, nor do I want to go on camera with a biased news network that obviously won't tell the full story and will continuously demonize me no matter what I say or do. I guess they have decided to try to piecemeal a documentary, or some sort of investigative series based on me and the forum, when I haven't been involved for years.

It really just comes off as harassment, considering they tried to confront me at the bank today before I slammed my car door in their face and the driver confronted the reporter, which he gave a pretty stern warning to. I doubt they will be pulling this stunt again. It was made abundantly clear that myself or no one that I associate with should be approached again.

As much as the media loves to portray you as a massive piece of shit, and even though I despise incels (not sure if you still self-identify as such anymore and if you don't I'm sure you probably cringe at ever being associated with those people) I just want to say that I've always thought you're extremely wise/brilliant. I've felt this way ever since reading your blog threads/advice that you gave on SS forum from back when you were still the webmaster.

I hope eventually someone can conduct a proper interview with you. I'd love to see it (obviously not one from the media)

 

[Kiwiballs]

I thought advocating suicide was a big no-no on the internet.
How come the Canadian and Dutch governments can have a twitter account?

I found sanctioned suicide a couple years ago and read up on some of the methods, read some threads, felt some feels. I don’t like suicide and I don’t like supporting suicidal ideation, but what I like even less is telling people what they’re allowed to do with their lives. Suicide is by definition victimless, otherwise it’s either a murder-suicide or terrorism. People are going to commit suicide regardless, the best we can do is try to dissuade them and when that fails, helping them do it effectively and painlessly. Better to help a miserable man hang himself than to let him fail to do it properly and make himself an even more miserable cripple.
I’m glad to find LeMarkus is so based. Fuck Anglos and fuck journos.

I completely disagree but not really.
Suicide should be a struggle. It should be brutal.
It shouldn't be easy. Not for the person committing suicide and not for their relatives.
It's a last resort and the perfect type of thing that never should be legalized but perhaps shouldn't be criminalized.
"Do not go gentle into that good night"


Now yes,, I mean this mostly from the perspective of people who are depressed or struggling in various ways.
People who are dying should have the right to end their treatment and get pain medication .
There are very few cases where I would allow assisted suicide at tax payer expense or for profit and that's perhaps with diseases like Lou Gehrig disease that progressively makes you stop functioning in every possible way.

 

[Aztec Death Squad]

Suicide should be a struggle. It should be brutal.

Imagine telling people they should be in excruciating mental and physical anguish for as long as possible. Like saying they should throw themselves in front a train instead of dying peacefully at home.

"Do not go gentle into that good night"

Having seen the actual consequences of this statement taken literally, this phrase makes me want to vomit.

Of course there should be safegaruds, but let people die. Death is okay. The west in particular has a perverted relationship with death. There are many Archie Battersbees. Just look at the people making their pets endure fucking chemotherapy because they selfishly want an extra month with them instead of letting them die peacefully. There are many people living out their "lives" in "I have no mouth and I must scream" levels of torment because their families won't let them die.

Respice post te. Hominem te esse memento. Memento mori. In omnibus operibus tuis memorare novissima tua, et in aeternum non peccabis.

 

[Prince Vegeta]

The BBC are such scum.

I don't really have an additional contribution other than that. If they had any integrity they'd shed light on the fact that suicidal thoughts are stigmatised to such a degree they pretty much treat you like a criminal if you admit to it and have to flee online to an anonymous forum to discuss it. But they're the BBC.

 

[shawshank]

If they want my opinion on something, they'll just have to pull it from past statements.

Lamarcus Small, your only past statement with your voice were that your brother ran it, that your mom is not actually your mom, and that your life would be 'ruined' by putting your name in a news piece. That was the last time you were published speaking on the topic in anywhere that gets eyes.
source: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/09/podcasts/the-daily/suicide-investigation.html

Is that the statements you want pulled from? Because they sure as hell aren't reading this forum. They might be reading your incels.is forum, which is now larger than Kiwifarms in random traffic by miles. But you haven't put any statements there.

Also, latest news article

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12680517/Suicide-site-founder-Lamarcus-Small-cowers-car-Alabama.html

 

[afounder]

Ho

Lamarcus Small, your only past statement with your voice were that your brother ran it, that your mom is not actually your mom, and that your life would be 'ruined' by putting your name in a news piece. That was the last time you were published speaking on the topic in anywhere that gets eyes.
source: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/09/podcasts/the-daily/suicide-investigation.html

Is that the statements you want pulled from? Because they sure as hell aren't reading this forum. They might be reading your incels.is forum, which is now larger than Kiwifarms in random traffic by miles. But you haven't put any statements there.

Also, latest news article

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12680517/Suicide-site-founder-Lamarcus-Small-cowers-car-Alabama.html

View attachment 5454429

How about you choke on a fat one?

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

It may surprise you, but this site is not the bastion of pro-suicide ideation as many would have you believe. Rather, it is a pro-choice forum, as in if someone wants to kill themselves, they shouldn't be stopped from doing so. Nobody is ever pushed into doing it; at most they're simply not discouraged.

found this thread from the A&N article but this paragraph stuck out to me. I mean, it's a mix of emotions but I don't know. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. even removing emotion from this thread, it's still morally weird to want to run a site like this