Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

Another L video by Dev in which he tries to take a nuanced stance on the Ryan Carson stabbing and Alan Colie shooting, by pretending that neither situations called for violence. He does backtrack his statement towards the end by saying that Self-Defense is justified based on both experiences, but looks like his audience isn't having it.

Video in Question:

Backup:



Choice Comments:

Self Defence #1.PNG
Self Defence #2.PNG
Self Defence #3.PNG
Self Defence #4.PNG
Self Defence #5.PNG
Self Defence #6.PNG
Self Defence #7.PNG
 
Last edited:
Another L video by Dev in which he tries to take a nuanced stance on the Ryan Carson stabbing and Alan Colie shooting, by pretending that neither situations called for violence. He does backtrack his statement towards the by saying that Self-Defense is justified based on both experiences, but looks like his audience isn't having it.

Video in Question:

Backup:
View attachment 5431101


Choice Comments:

View attachment 5431091
View attachment 5431092
View attachment 5431093
View attachment 5431094
View attachment 5431095
View attachment 5431096
View attachment 5431097
That hyperdimentionbliss account nails it. Dev, if I'm being jumped by anyone, I'm not thinking "Proportional response". I'm thinking of surviving. Clearly something you've never known anything about.
 
Another L video by Dev in which he tries to take a nuanced stance on the Ryan Carson stabbing and Alan Colie shooting, by pretending that neither situations called for violence. He does backtrack his statement towards the end by saying that Self-Defense is justified based on both experiences, but looks like his audience isn't having it.
I just hate him so much bros
 
Vee is calling Dev out now on the Pikamee thing again, and Dev is playing defense in the comments once again. Anyone know what's going on to reopen this wound?
Video:
Choice Comments:
View attachment 5470419
View attachment 5470420
View attachment 5470421
View attachment 5470422
View attachment 5470423
View attachment 5470424
View attachment 5470425
View attachment 5470426
View attachment 5470427
View attachment 5470428
Holy fuck the comment section is brigading the fuck out of him. Best comment:
Dev: "when did I say nothing happened?"
Dude: when we asked about your sex life

My sides. We don't see this much because when it's in HIS comments, he prunes it. Also vee, fix your accent, speak English better

Edit: 5 minutes is when he digs into dev
 
Vee is calling Dev out now on the Pikamee thing again, and Dev is playing defense in the comments once again. Anyone know what's going on to reopen this wound?
Video:
Choice Comments:
View attachment 5470419
View attachment 5470420
View attachment 5470421
View attachment 5470422
View attachment 5470423
View attachment 5470424
View attachment 5470425
View attachment 5470426
View attachment 5470427
View attachment 5470428
Call me MATI because I probably am, but there are no words on God's green earth to describe how much contempt I have for this fucking faggot. If that fencepost was any further up his ass he'd be pulling splinters out of his aspartame-scented tonsils.

Where is the fucking Trucker video, Dev? I'm still waiting you fat slob.
 
Call me MATI because I probably am, but there are no words on God's green earth to describe how much contempt I have for this fucking faggot. If that fencepost was any further up his ass he'd be pulling splinters out of his aspartame-scented tonsils.

Where is the fucking Trucker video, Dev? I'm still waiting you fat slob.
We're all waiting for the trucker video. It's not happening. He would have no subs after committing seppiku on that fence post
 
I thought Naomi was Dev's GF. Do people here think he's only faking it and Lillith is his "GF"? Or is moreso that Dev is just willing to white-knight for Lillith more than anything regardless of any sexual/romantic interest?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 820㎌Cap
I thought Naomi was Dev's GF. Do people here think he's only faking it and Lillith is his "GF"? Or is moreso that Dev is just willing to white-knight for Lillith more than anything regardless of any sexual/romantic interest?
Dev has hit on Lillith several times during the Tubcast, and even has offered to fly him out to live with him as his employee. Francisco declined since they're were living with their (also troon) boyfriend. Every podcast with Francisco at least has one desperate attempt from Dev to get in his pants, and if you read the comments of any Tubcast it's painfully obvious the audience is aware.

However, it should be noted that it has been 4 months since the last Tubcast. Francisco got very assblasted on that one for being called out on wanting to fire people for their personal beliefs, and hasn't shown up on SFO's channel since. I can't confirm anything, but they might have had a private falling out which is why Dev shows up on the Archcast every other week.
 
Dev has hit on Lillith several times during the Tubcast, and even has offered to fly him out to live with him as his employee. Francisco declined since they're were living with their (also troon) boyfriend. Every podcast with Francisco at least has one desperate attempt from Dev to get in his pants, and if you read the comments of any Tubcast it's painfully obvious the audience is aware.

However, it should be noted that it has been 4 months since the last Tubcast. Francisco got very assblasted on that one for being called out on wanting to fire people for their personal beliefs, and hasn't shown up on SFO's channel since. I can't confirm anything, but they might have had a private falling out which is why Dev shows up on the Archcast every other week.
So on top of being a chaser and a whiteknight, he's also a cuck. That's just great.
madscout.png
 
"I've made a couple videos calling them on their bullshit"
and they were all toothless because he refused to ACKnowledge the bullshit of identifying as a tranny in the first place
go ahead and come back to the forum if you wanna debate us, shart fart otaku. you had no problem doing it when your beloved tranny needed whiteknighting.
lilith 41% soon inshallah
 
I decided to revisit his statements in light of this autism to form a concrete judgement. I don't think he actually did a video on it but he did comment, which as you will see, is actually just as good if not better than a video.


The pikamee vs trannies thing happened right after the dylan mulvaney bud light thing happened, so he did this video. I will now proceed to tear it apart, epic ben shapiro dunking style.

He defends the troon against "right wingers using her as a punching bag". At least he admits that dylan does not pass very well on day 1 because he is annoying. Later however he says that he is "much more feminine" on day 365. Yeah. Okay.

Then he brings up the satanic "barbie pouch" troon period video that everyone knows. He defends dylan by saying "yeah I don't think dylan ever said trans women have periods". No, sharty farty. He just popularized it. By saying "which one do I carry around?" in the video, thus enabling further mental illness. Like you have done.

He admits that the "girl" instead of "woman" thing is clearly moving into weird fetish material as dylan dresses up like a little girl.
YES, SHARTY MAN. WE HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS ABOUT TROONS FROM THE BEGINNING BUT YOU HAVE NOT LISTENED OR ADMITTED IT.

Then he comments that in the 2000s we were all okay with the whole live and let live thing. He says it's ridiculous that people are protesting it. He brings up gamergate of all things and says that was legitimate though, because the people were actually corrupt. As if to imply the cultural malaise the west has suffered over the last decade is completely natural. Not to mention the fact that troons are incapable of letting children live, without infecting them with poisonous ideas that deny the entire field of biology. Kill yourself, canadian.
Lol @ this comment. No doubt shartman lost some viewers this day.

brave_WijEKpGd86.png

He plays a matt walsh clip wherein matt says they're tired of the tranny bullshit from the left. Shartman says this is ridiculous and it sounds like a trans activist talking about hogwarts. He compares matt to when vaush said "you call it selling out your principles, I call it winning". I have no idea what the vaush context is and I do not care.

The point he is trying to make here is that a right winger saying bud light is tranny is equivalent to a left winger saying hogwarts is anti tranny. This point is completely defeated when you get to the pub in hogsmeade and you encounter an honest to god tranny character called sirona who is so badass and kewl and stronk and independynt because xhe defends you from the big bad guy. And further, the fact that it is a massive game funded by a massive company for one of the most massive franchises of all fucking time. It cannot afford to be anti tranny, and in fact, is pro tranny because no gendered pronouns are ever used to refer to the player created character, which itself can be a tranny! You can straight up mix and match female/male body types and voices! It couldn't be any more tranny if it tried!

So no, matt walsh saying "bud light is a degenerate, morally bankrupt corporation that will sell their customers out for a few more bucks by corrupting traditional western family values" is not the same as jim sterling saying "if you buy hogwarts legacy, you are not a trans ally and I cannot trust you". One of those statements is rooted in reality, the other is the delusional ranting of a fat troon who doesn't even like video games anymore. Maybe if matt had said "if you buy bud light you are an enemy of america and I will defend myself against you", sharter would have more of an argument.

He says "me personally, I don't care about this issue"
Then why did you make a 13 minute long video on it? Continually shitting on the right while playing defense for the left and attempting to appear neutral by saying "hurr there are radicals on both sides".

He caps it off with one last shot at the right wing conspiracy theorists because he's such a politically neutral fencesitter that totally has no deep seated sympathies with the left, and totally doesn't seethe at right wingers every day. He says that a decade ago if you implied all this is happening because the CEO of bud light was a CIA operative, you would be put in a padded room, but in 2023 you would be given a show on the daily wire. Yes, the CEO of budweiser was literally a CIA operative, and no it is not unreasonable to draw some conclusions from that fact. Shartman seems to disagree. That's fine, it's okay to be wrong (and a tranny cock sucker). Now please face the wall.

Checking the comments, it becomes apparent that almost every single top voted comment is against him, especially on the hogwarts question, which pertains to the pikamee drama the following month.

brave_BBJJuPHBv4.png

This is further compounded by the statement shartman made in this comment from this video.

brave_wCa2IsQNWZ.png

Wherein he claims you have the right to participate in consumer boycotts. If that is so, then it seems odd that he would still take enough issue with this right, that he would dedicate a not inconsiderable portion of his time to arguing against it and decrying it as foolish. Surely it's just the natural course of the free market, sharty? You surely don't feel a pressing and urgent need to run defense for trannies because they make themselves look like lunatics every single day.

brave_UXSxiKk50k.pngbrave_1Q104dSJTS.png
brave_2D1lb4EYW5.png
brave_OYRRBExCtn.png

I am reminded of a conversation this man had with another wannabe sargonite, one that I actually liked. His name was Louis Le Vau. He has since gone full DFE. I posted on the forum once asking if anyone knew anything, but literally nobody cared. Oh well. Random Rekieta stream I found that has Louis as a guest, if you want to get a sense of him.

Anyway, this conversation was regarding "public healthcare". I believe it also concerned trannies (shocking) because the inciting incident was whether or not we should put tampons in men's bathrooms. Louis, being a wagie in buffalo new york, who investigated people for things like welfare fraud, didn't really like the idea of his paycheck going to more and more ridiculous things, leaving him a smaller percentage. Shartman disagreed (I believe, on discord), saying that it was for the good of the "public health". Louis asked him when it stopped, when it would be enough. He advanced the idea of simply subsidizing hand soap and shampoo, things like that, since they also benefit "public health". Shart doubled down and said that would be fine. Louis' response was "oh man, I can feel my paycheck getting lighter". That is basically all you need to know about both Louis and sharty.

Shartman just keeps defending trannies every single time they are mentioned. I wonder why.

brave_roWZYF89m4.pngbrave_XAr45jc24Z.png

He says this dumb shit, then tries to pretend he's just being le based skeptic who looks at all information before coming to a conclusion.

brave_Cy8TuNWuNS.png

This argument is defeated by the fact that hogwarts is like a 30+ hour long game, why would you start it or say you're going to start it, and then immediately make comments like "I just wanted to play a video game, I didn't know I was hurting people", unless you are receiving harassment because of it.


So in conclusion, yes, SHART FART OTAKU, did in fact run defense for the trannies that harassed vtuber pikamee, as he always runs defense for trannies by pointing to examples of the most ludicrous trannies to imply that he is unbiased, while ignoring the more numerous ones that straight up say they are coming for your children to "protect trans kids", like keffals and his ilk.

firefox_CXd5yMlmEp.png
firefox_RwmiFEp7SM.png


These statements are utterly toothless when you consider the entire essay I have just provided on his reaction to two similar situations involving trannies and online twitter campaigns. The narrative is always focused on how pikamee is weak and shouldn't have capitulated, not that the bullies shouldn't be harassing her. Or how ridiculous the right wingers are for boycotting bud light legally. Vee was right. He is trying to rewrite history, and furthermore, he always, ALWAYS runs defense for trannies because he is a stupid faggot useful idiot for the left, and I just hate him so much, bros.

brave_z3CUQJkxsB.png
brave_qQDHfOcwcD.pngbrave_nwscCDrBFn.png
brave_Y0aMurm8hW.pngbrave_I6xkzg7Ye4.pngbrave_sy9A448Dsx.png
brave_gjFOEdiwe7.pngbrave_DgIGBatcGb.pngbrave_bC7IAZbIKn.png
brave_aqZv4579hV.pngbrave_rgOSvNAaXv.pngbrave_0BO9hxcHrN.pngbrave_LnQScHxQ3p.pngbrave_5GP8IYRBnW.pngbrave_2dZY2OOaIa.png
brave_3iz5ZKQVi9.pngbrave_NUq1fW0Nv5.pngbrave_BOHlHca1Z2.png

This guy is honestly one of the least likable faggots on this site that isn't literally raping children or murdering small animals. Every word he utters is just dripping in an unwarranted sense of self importance and smug superiority. I would call it masterful trolling if he hadn't been presenting it as his very serious political take for a decade. He is able to effortlessly capture my hatred and ire in a way that is usually not possible. What a magnificent beast of degeneracy.
 

Attachments

  • brave_XAr45jc24Z.png
    brave_XAr45jc24Z.png
    244.5 KB · Views: 37
  • brave_XAr45jc24Z.png
    brave_XAr45jc24Z.png
    244.5 KB · Views: 131
Holy semper fi man
Checking the comments, it becomes apparent that almost every single top voted comment is against him, especially on the hogwarts question, which pertains to the pikamee drama the following month.

brave_BBJJuPHBv4.png

This is further compounded by the statement shartman made in this comment from this video.

brave_wCa2IsQNWZ.png

Wherein he claims you have the right to participate in consumer boycotts. If that is so, then it seems odd that he would still take enough issue with this right, that he would dedicate a not inconsiderable portion of his time to arguing against it and decrying it as foolish. Surely it's just the natural course of the free market, sharty? You surely don't feel a pressing and urgent need to run defense for trannies because they make themselves look like lunatics every single day.
Dev honestly doesn't like that people have rights to not drink the beer, to say trannies are men, because in his autistic mind, he is ALWAYS Right. Specifically on the right side of history.

Not drinking the beer means you have something wrong with you, a flaw in the perfect liberal system of "free" health care and the government paying him to play vidya at home. Why do you think he's a youtuber? He gets to be lazy, even if in all honesty, just due to his view count, he makes a middling wage whereas if he was at a company, he could be making far more. His ego and nostalgia for the Wii and N64 is more important than actually making his life better. Why can't anyone just see he's a normal guy, he thinks.
 
It looks like Arch is doing a D&D game with other sceptic holdovers and naturally Dev's chosen to play as an androgyne. (A)

View attachment 5473635

Transition on the cards for 2024?
If Dev actually troons out, that would be the most hilariousingly tragic thing to ever happen to him. After all the GamerGate stuff, after calling out the LGBT, game journos, pr0gs, and Twitter for their bullcrap while also whiteknighting for Lillith and (to a lesser extent) Dylan...

To see him troon out would basically be him admitting that he's willing to sink to Lillith's level to "own both sides."
 
Back