Race superiority is fucking dumb

You clearly have never lived among the meth people. About 15% of white people are dumber than 50% of black people. That 15% is deeply unpleasant to be around. They don't take care of their homes. They don't know how to stop committing crimes. They don't finish school. They don't take care of their kids. The bottom of the white bell curve exists, and it sucks. It's just not nearly as large as the corresponding section of the black bell curve.

Statistics don't apply to individuals. Men are statistically taller than women. This doesn't mean 5'4" manlet is somehow metaphysically taller than a 6'0" WNBA dyke. It means there are a lot more men over 6'0" than women, and a lot more 5'4" women than 5'4" men, but our wee little leprechaun still needs a booster seat at Thanksgiving.

Same goes for race. A white with an IQ under 80 is as statistically rare as a black with IQ over 110, but both exist, and if you're the white who rolled a genetic snake eyes, nothing you can do will make you as smart as the rare negro who got lucky and developed a nice, big frontal cortex.

Visualization below. Note that every bracket has both races in it, it's just a matter of proportions.

View attachment 5428952

This is true, but it's worth pointing out that IQ is just one way we can measure differences between individuals and as a result, aggregate differences between races.

But IQ isn't the only predictor of behavior. For example, there are differences in extraversion between races. And that again is a broad trait to be measured. We know that people with red hair experience pain differently than others, and also respond differently to painkillers. Why wouldn't there be multiple dozens of subtle such differences between different biological groupings?
 
I believe in one race: the HUMAN race.
Espíritu de Dios, Padre, Hijo y Espíritu Santo, Santísima Trinidad, Virgen Inmaculada, ángeles, arcángeles y santos del paraíso, descended sobre mí. Fúndeme, Señor, lléname de ti. Expulsa de mi todas las fuerzas del mal, aniquílas, destrúyelas. Expulsa de mí los maleficos, la magia negra, el ogro de las tinieblas, el luz extinguido, el americano... Por favor, destruye la infestación diabólica; todo lo que es mal, pecado, envidia, celos y perfidia; la enfermedad física, psíquica, moral, espiritual y diabólica... destruye al monstruo, a la creatura... Quema a este mal en el infierno, para que nunca más me toquen a mí ni a ningun ser. Ordeno y mando con la fuerza de Dios omnipotente, en nombre de Jesucristo Salvador, por intermedio de la Virgen Inmaculada, a todos los espíritus inmundos, a inmediatamente, que me abandonen definitivamente y que se vayan al infierno eterno. El chupa-chupacabras no puede triunfar, el monstruo, el abominación... debe morir... Encadenado por San Miguel arcángel, por San Gabriel, por San Rafael, aplastado bajo el talón de la Virgen Santísima Inmaculada, aleja el aberración genetíca, al ogro de las Americas... Amén.
 
On choosing to live in a meth trailer park or a black ghetto- So catcalling is one of those areas where women KNOW it’s a thing with black and Hispanic men, but they can’t talk about it. It’s making the rounds again because it’s something Amy Schumer once included in her routine and now she’s being triple cancelled. So many timid women on Reddit trying to say “well, it’s just my personal experience that I don’t get harassed by white men, I’m NOT racist” and then of course they get rape threats as a result.
 
Once the discussion about biological difference is in the open and we can start proper studies and measurements, may it lead to wherever it leads.
I.e. never

It's already acceptable to discuss meaningless racial differences like penis size or "twitch muscle" or whatever makes groids sprint fast. Racial differences in intelligence will never be acceptable to discuss because mental faculties are what we consider to separate us from the other animals; it is at the very core of what it means to be a human being. A race that is less intelligent on the whole is therefore (effectively by proxy) automatically less human.

Admitting differences in racial intelligence is tantamount to admitting that groids are not human. And, already knowing this to be true, we are left with no alternative but to dogmatically forbid the premise from being considered in the first place.
 
Racial differences in intelligence will never be acceptable
Of course they will; history is working in cycles. Each progressive boundary trespassing brings us closer to reaction. Reactionaries will also exaggerate, and liberalism will make a return, and so on, forever, according to historical period.
Admitting differences in racial intelligence is tantamount to admitting that groids are not human.
No, that's not how it works. You cannot change the definition of a species based on intelligence alone. As long as reproduction works, it's the same species.
 
No, that's not how it works. You cannot change the definition of a species based on intelligence alone. As long as reproduction works, it's the same species.
First of all, the result that a race being less intelligent would cause them to be viewed as less human, has nothing to do with biological taxonomy.

Secondly, from a biological viewpoint, groids can already be considered to be a separate subspecies.

Thirdly, "can they reproduce" is not a valid definition of what a species is due to the many exceptions, although yes, we do teach to children that that is a way to tell species apart.
 
First of all, the result that a race being less intelligent would cause them to be viewed as less human, has nothing to do with biological taxonomy.

Secondly, from a biological viewpoint, groids can already be considered to be a separate subspecies.

Thirdly, "can they reproduce" is not a valid definition of what a species is due to the many exceptions, although yes, we do teach to children that that is a way to tell species apart.
Got any proof comparing the genetics of negroids (who BTW are two races, Congoids and Capoids) to Caucasoids or Mongoloids? I know Africans cluster apart from the other races, but it would be worth comparing the genetic diversity within the two African races to the diversity within chimpanzees (which has four recognized subspecies)? There's been so much gene flow between the different human races that I doubt there's much reason to call them different subspecies. About the only major distinction is the mixing we did with other hominins like how Papuans and Aboriginals have 3-5% Denisovan genes (other Australoids and Mongoloids have less), Caucasoids have Neanderthal genes, and Africans have genes from 1-2 extinct hominins whose fossil remains have never been found. Incidentally, Australian Aboriginals cluster closer to Caucasoids and Mongoloids than Capoids and Congoids.

I do think race and IQ are linked but the difference may not be as much as commonly stated, like the one book saying the average citizen of Equatorial Guinea has an IQ of 67 has garbage methodology since their Equatorial Guinean IQ came from a sample of refugee children, many of whom were literally mentally disabled and all of whom suffered from diseases of poverty and malnutrition (which stunts IQ). A lot of the obscenely low African IQs have that issue and it's probably closer to 80 on average. In any case, IQ can be manipulated through societal changes causing evolution, I mean just look at the Jews (especially Ashkenazi) or some Han Chinese subgroups (IIRC most of them speak Min languages and originate in the coastal south).
 
Got any proof comparing the genetics of negroids (who BTW are two races, Congoids and Capoids) to Caucasoids or Mongoloids? I know Africans cluster apart from the other races, but it would be worth comparing the genetic diversity within the two African races to the diversity within chimpanzees (which has four recognized subspecies)? There's been so much gene flow between the different human races that I doubt there's much reason to call them different subspecies. About the only major distinction is the mixing we did with other hominins like how Papuans and Aboriginals have 3-5% Denisovan genes (other Australoids and Mongoloids have less), Caucasoids have Neanderthal genes, and Africans have genes from 1-2 extinct hominins whose fossil remains have never been found. Incidentally, Australian Aboriginals cluster closer to Caucasoids and Mongoloids than Capoids and Congoids.

The current theory is the Sahara was the barrier for Africa.

main-qimg-69121d9a7a2cc416172db60e3a6a44ca-pjlq.jpg
 
The current theory is the Sahara was the barrier for Africa.

View attachment 5455195
The Sahara alternated between a desert and a savanna most of the past few thousand years, so the desert sometimes being there shouldn't affect genetics much. Migrations back into Africa occurred, like Afroasiatic speakers probably originated in the Middle East and migrated to Africa over 10,000 years ago and today are found as far south as Tanzania and Nigeria. Afroasiatic speakers and their neighbors are linked to haplogroup E1b1b (Hitler's haplogroup) which is found in the same region plus Greece, Sicily, etc.

That's why with my imperfect understanding of this issue, I think it's something to do with Africa's genetic diversity. The Bushmen/San people for instance are to my knowledge one of the earliest splits from the rest of humanity. They are pure Capoid, far different than the ancestors of the Bantu who were purely Congoid.
 
The Sahara alternated between a desert and a savanna most of the past few thousand years, so the desert sometimes being there shouldn't affect genetics much. Migrations back into Africa occurred, like Afroasiatic speakers probably originated in the Middle East and migrated to Africa over 10,000 years ago and today are found as far south as Tanzania and Nigeria. Afroasiatic speakers and their neighbors are linked to haplogroup E1b1b (Hitler's haplogroup) which is found in the same region plus Greece, Sicily, etc.

That's why with my imperfect understanding of this issue, I think it's something to do with Africa's genetic diversity. The Bushmen/San people for instance are to my knowledge one of the earliest splits from the rest of humanity. They are pure Capoid, far different than the ancestors of the Bantu who were purely Congoid.

Africa never got cold, there was never any pressure for co-operation in dire conditions or to leave the area. The only prime requisite was physical fitness to capture prey. Which in theory would mean the slight advantage today in many sports endeavours. This is perhaps more exemplified in the Australian Aboriginals, who have better vision than almost anyone on Earth. They adapted to their environment. And their primary weapon was spears and boomerangs.
 
News flash: white supremacy is still stupid and socially unacceptable!

Newsflash. The nations states of Europe belongs to the indigenous ethnic Europeans, and everybody else are either guests, invader, trespassers or colonizers. We have the right to kick the raping low IQ animals back to Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere. And we have the power to do so.
 
The Sahara alternated between a desert and a savanna most of the past few thousand years, so the desert sometimes being there shouldn't affect genetics much.
By the time the Bantu hauled their asses out of Central Africa it had become solid belt of scorching hot, sandy death.
Afroasiatic speakers and their neighbors are linked to haplogroup E1b1b (Hitler's haplogroup) which is found in the same region plus Greece, Sicily, etc.
The subgroup of E1b1b common in Europe is called E-V13 and arose in Europe during the Neolithic.
 
OP disagreed with me about some stuff from a video game. So the fact he’s a race-cuck is going to be used by me as validation.

But to cut through to the merits even applying the label of superiority is trying to frame the issue dishonestly— America is basically a black ethnostate committed to expanding the ethnocultural continuity of black americans no matter how dysfunctional it is, black americans oppress white americans by stealing their tax money and targeting them for crimes, and we’re headed for an African planet via the heavily subsidized African birth rate. But somehow the problem is that some white racists are cobbling together a political program they hope will reverse these trends? That’s what I would call “stupid” personally.
 
we’re headed for an African planet via the heavily subsidized African birth rate
As far as I'm aware the black birthrate is not significantly higher than the national average, still below replacement rate. A far more likely path is towards Brazilification through the steady flow through the southern border which is a fate worse than death in some regards.
 
As far as I'm aware the black birthrate is not significantly higher than the national average, still below replacement rate. A far more likely path is towards Brazilification through the steady flow through the southern border which is a fate worse than death in some regards.
I mean literally Africa.
 
Back