Culture MrBeast Is Hearing It From Critics After He Built 100 Wells In Africa…And That’s Completely Insane - CEO of an African water infrastructure improvement organization said “(O)vernight, this person comes along, who happens to be a white male figure with a huge platform, and all of a sudden, he gets all of the attention..."

YouTuber MrBeast is no stranger to critics, but those criticisms usually come in places you’d expect. Criticisms of his videos or his burger chain, stuff like that. What you wouldn’t expect is to see people pounce on the 25-year-old for providing drinking water to half a million people across Africa, but guess what? it happened.

Now, I’m not super familiar with this MrBeast, if that is his real name (it’s not, it’s Jimmy Donaldson). I basically knew him as the guy who made these extravagant YouTube videos where he bought an island or made people compete in a real-life version of Squid Game.

However, he has also done videos where he ponies up the money for more worthwhile causes. Like the time he paid for 1,000 people to get cataract surgery.

However, this past weekend, MrBeast posted a video that showed him providing 100 wells in nations like Cameroon, Kenya, Somalia, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. These are places where clean drinking water can be tough to come by. This is a problem since people need water to live.

The video with the very on-the-nose title “I Built 100 Wells In Africa” has since gotten a lot of attention.


So, by drilling these wells — and running a fundraiser that raised another $300,000 for local water organizations and charities — Donaldson drastically improved the quality of life for a lot of people.

What problem could people possibly have had with this? A problem that would have MrBeast concerned about getting canceled?

It’s 2023, folks. They found ways.

It Seems Tough To Get Upset About Digging Wells, But Where There’s A Willm There’s A Way​

Take Saran Kaba Jones, founder and CEO of FACE Africa, for instance. According to CNN, that’s an organization that aims to improve water infrastructure and sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa.

“I’ve been doing this for 15 years, but we’ve been struggling to continue the work because funding, awareness, and advocacy all take work,” Jones said.

That’s all true. So then she must have been pretty jazzed that MrBeast decided to use his gobs of money to help in this endeavor instead of buying another Island or filling a swimming pool with Fanta or whatever it is he does.

Nope. She told CNN this: “(O)vernight, this person comes along, who happens to be a white male figure with a huge platform, and all of a sudden, he gets all of the attention. It’s kind of frustrating, but it’s also understanding the nature of how the world is.”

Wait, wait, wait. Hold the phone here. Shouldn’t she be ecstatic that half a million people have access to water and now there’s way more attention brought to it?

First of all, claiming a guy shouldn’t dig wells for people in Africa because he’s white could be the hot take of the century. Possibly the millennium. That’s just unhinged.

Being upset that the guy who paid to dig all these wells is white is wild. If you’re in desperate need of a well, you wouldn’t care who dug it.

However, it was the next line that highlighted the real grudge as far as I see it.

“…all of a sudden, he gets all of the attention.”

If your true mission is to help people, you wouldn’t care who did it. If it was you, awesome, but if it was someone else, that’s also awesome because the result is the same. In this case, people got the water they so desperately needed.

So, being upset that someone else got the credit instead of you, sure gives off the vibe that maybe getting water for people isn’t priority numero uno in your book.

Did MrBeast Perpertuate Sterotypes Or Did He Simply Do What Governments Should Have Done Years Ago?​

CNN also highlighted a guy named Francis Gaitho who they referred to as an “aspiring Kenyan politician.” That use of the word “aspiring” should make alarm bells go off in your head. Alarm bells letting you know that what follows won’t exactly be the most sensical argument you’ve ever heard.

Gaitho argued that the video fueled the stereotype that Africa is “dependent on handouts…and philanthropic intervention.”

I mean… I get that sentiment, but who is going to dig these wells otherwise, Mr. “Aspiring” Politician? Not the government you’re aspiring to be part of, it seems.

Not everyone was delusional enough to get mad about the video, and in fact, some saw it as positive and not just because of that drinking water (which you need to live; can’t recall if I mentioned that or not).

According to CNN, some noted how MrBeast’s video highlighted just how poor of a job these nations’ governments are doing.

Freelance journalist Ferdinand Ormondi approved of MrBeast’s philanthropic endeavors. He pointed out what a bad look it is for the governments in these countries.

“(I)t’s embarrassing that a YouTuber jetted into Kenya on a charity tour to perform tasks our taxes should have completed ages ago,” he said.

Yeah, it is. It really is.

There’s a case to be made about MrBeast using his philanthropic pursuits as click-fodder. However, if it means helping 500,000 people, does it matter?

I’d argue it doesn’t. Sometimes the ends justify the means, and I think this is certainly one of those cases.

Article Link

Archive
 
Last edited:
My ancestors didn't have wells and just drank directly out of the river. Get on my level Africucks.

a-native-american-indian-woman-filling-pots-full-of-water-from-the-B6FKBM.jpg
 
Well, well, well… how many of the people whining have embezzled cash?
Ok can we get a hot take from one of the beneficiaries of these wells?
It’d be interesting to follow up with them. I bet they can’t or won’t maintain it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smar Mijou
Mr. Beast is a weirdo who associates himself with creeps but I do always admire the good things he does
View attachment 5483370
This Tweet I saw the other day perfectly explains the seething whenever he does a good deed.

This is partially correct. They hate charities because it's not an uniform type of help.

For a leftist, the problem isn't that some people don't have water: the problem is that others do have water.

Say a city has 100 people, 20 have water and the rest doesn't. A charity give 20 more people water and that's good, but for a leftist, the real problem is that now those 40 people are causing even more inequality.

Most NGOs don't exist to give solutions: they exist to talk about it. Instead of building one or two wells progressively, what they want is to find a solution to make every single person have the same thing at the same time, even if they need to remove the ones who have from their property so we are all the same.

Either way, we all know those wells are gonna last about five years or so before they are destroyed.
You are both overthinking it. The reason why the woke left hates Mr. Beast and throws a fit over him doing videos like this is he's a wealthy white man. Hatred of whites and capitalism are ar the core of modern leftist ideology. If a black woman went to Africa to build wells western leftists would hail her as a saint.
 
You are both overthinking it. The reason why the woke left hates Mr. Beast and throws a fit over him doing videos like this is he's a wealthy white man. Hatred of whites and capitalism are ar the core of modern leftist ideology. If a black woman went to Africa to build wells western leftists would hail her as a saint.
This is the reason they hate Mr Beast, but what I explained is the reason why they hate charities and why they always get together in NGOs to "solve problems".
 
Those wells are going to be plugged up, dry or fouled within a few years because they can throw money to dig a bunch of them, but they'll never create a fund to maintain them or train villagers in keeping them working. How many decades of this stupidity now so idiots in the first world can have savior feels for 15 minutes?
Exactly. If you dump a bunch of money on people and then take off, you're just forcing them to use whatever solution it was that you selected based on how good its optics are. It's not evil for him to do this, but something tells me that there won't be consequences if the pumps turn out to be poorly sited or break down in six months because some youtuber needed to say that he helped some huge number of people, so he chose ones that were the cheapest and not the most rugged or efficient.
 
He's sliding across the morality alignment chart like someone using cheat engine in a D&D game and that's where the suspicion comes from. Real humans don't slide across the chart this quickly. It's like the Palestine/ Israel thing with Jamie Lee Curtis. You can quickly deduce where a person truly stands and their morality or lack thereof, when you show them a picture of bloody bombed children or children locked in cages at a border crossing without telling them what country or conflict it is. She was all "This is awful and needs to stop, no excuse to ever target children" but then when they told her those were Gaza kids, she deleted all mentions of it.

It's hilarious a soulless Youtuber simply out for a public reputation boost is still doing more for Africa than the charities that I've seen on TV for decades.
 
I've never seen a person get attacked for doing good deeds like him before, it's bizarre. I'm not even a fan of him but getting shit for giving actual charity is insane.
The same people screamed at Trump for pardoning Jack Johnson

There's nothing to it other than "you are the WRONG kind of person, you aren't allowed to look good, EVER"
 
I don't think he's done anything wrong but I do still think he might be the antichrist.
Everyone has to like the AntiChrist and only the strongest willed would be able to see through his illusions. Right now, they're just afraid of enabling Jimmy Savile 2.0. Considering he has a troon in his entrouge, they're rightfully worried.
I can't stand the guy but he's done more genuine good in the world than I could ever dream of doing just for content creation. He's the only rich guy I kinda don't want to see hanging from a street lamp.

Jimmy Savile did a lot of good for the world, he also molested women and children with style - and even ratted on himself about it.

I've never seen a person get attacked for doing good deeds like him before, it's bizarre. I'm not even a fan of him but getting shit for giving actual charity is insane.

You can deduce someone's intentions. A person that starts off moral and remains moral, you don't bat an eye at versus a person who starts off immoral and becomes extremely moral, is something that people become cautious and wary of. There are still people that will do genuine good things for others without a catch, without a creepy fetish attached, without anything secretive or negative attached to it at all. - But rightfully so, reality has shown us that you can't trust every smiling face.

A Teresa will do good things their entire life, only to have people slander them because of the actions of other people.

An Epstein will do horrible things and hope their connections protect them. Dude simply got involved with so many people who can't afford to have their reputations tarnished. Even if they never had his services, he just made sure to take photos with everyone he could, invite everyone he could on his plane . Now don't take this the wrong way.

A free ride is a free ride. Don't act like you'd turn down a free jet flight if you were heading in that direction. and yes, there are people who didn't go to his island. who rode on his plane. If someone else is paying for it,you do it. That's it how it works in socialite circles.

A Savile will do wonderful, amazing things in public and hope that their good deeds will outweigh their bad deeds behind closed doors.

Everyone is afraid of another Savile. Except when it comes to trannies and faggots for some reason.
 
@Starved Artist because reply bug
That might be true but as far as I'm aware, Mr. Beast hasn't molested anyone. I really can't put "being annoying" on the same level of "molesting women and children." If you can find proof that Mr. Beast has done anything bad then I'd be more inclined to agree.
 
@Starved Artist because reply bug
That might be true but as far as I'm aware, Mr. Beast hasn't molested anyone. I really can't put "being annoying" on the same level of "molesting women and children." If you can find proof that Mr. Beast has done anything bad then I'd be more inclined to agree.
That requires his critics to be sane, they aren't, THEY put molestation on the same level as just being aligned with a different political party.

All crimes are equal to the leftist hive-mind, and only one punishment is available: total social death.
 
Mr. Beast is a creepy little leftard fuckwit and I dislike him but even I think this is a hilariously retarded case of niggers nigging. People have this idea that American blacks are an exception and not the rule but the truth is blacks around the world have the same sense of rootless entitlement and crabs in bucket mentality.
 
@Starved Artist because reply bug
That might be true but as far as I'm aware, Mr. Beast hasn't molested anyone. I really can't put "being annoying" on the same level of "molesting women and children." If you can find proof that Mr. Beast has done anything bad then I'd be more inclined to agree.

And this is exactly how wolves keep feeding on sheep. Pardon my rambling.

Savile for more than 30 years, had his way with women and children. And nobody would dare believe -any- accuser of the man that opened hospitals, funded doctors, even took care of patients himself, the man who asked for nothing but a thank you. The living saint that saved lives. That championed for the poor and downtrodden. The man who had the ear of the royal family, and so on and so on and so on. You can gush endlessly about all the positive Savile did for the world and then you get to the awful, amazingly sinster shit he did.

Side note: God fucking damn. Dude used his connections to film a fake show to trick women into sleeping with him to get on. Nobody asked questions because he had that much sway and power. If Jim said he wanted to shoot pilot for a show, people would trip over themselves to help him for free because that's how "good for it" he was. Nobody could comprehend his intentions behind doing it at the time, and yet they were all complicit. And then, the people who -knew- what he was up to, the people who truly knew the monster, not the man, would never speak against him until he was dead. Now if you ever wanted to be evil, you have to be Jimmy Savile Evil. That is the kind of evil people should study.

That was a black mark on the world and some people will never forget it.

So now, when someone comes along bringing joy and help, for no reason at all, asking for nothing at all, they have to step back and remember the last time - - or choose to ignore it. Is it better to hurt someone's feelings by not giving them 100% trust on their altruism or should you give a human 100% trust every single time?
 
@Starved Artist
Still can't reply.
So what you're saying is, I should assume the worst of everyone, all the time, for no reason, because sometimes people do heinous things? Should I assume you are a child molester then?
aig soylent.jpg
Those soy faced type of Youtube thumbnails make everyone look like a child predator. I have no idea what his output is usually like, but I assume its aimed at children. That's not a face man makes to another adult. That's grounds for an open hand slap.
 
Back