Crime Oregon Decriminalized Hard Drugs. It Isn’t Working. - Majority of voters now want to undo a pioneering change as public drug use has become rampant

048d96589980615dba43ba7288e2c259.jpg
Officer Jose Alvarez of the Eugene Police Department recently visited an encampment for homeless people.

By Zusha Elinson | Photographs by Moriah Ratner for The Wall Street Journal
Nov. 11, 2023 9:00 pm ET

EUGENE, Ore.—Soon after Oregon became the first state to decriminalize all drugs in 2020, Officer Jose Alvarez stopped arresting people for possession and began giving out tickets with the number for a rehab helpline.

Most of the people smoking fentanyl or meth on this city’s streets balled them up and tossed them onto the ground.

“Those tickets frankly seemed like a waste of time,” said Alvarez, who stopped issuing them a few months after the law went into effect.

Nearly three years into an experiment that proponents hoped would spark a nationwide relaxation of drug laws, many in Oregon have turned against the decriminalization initiative known as Measure 110, which passed with 58% support in 2020.

People sprawled on sidewalks and using fentanyl with no fear of consequence have become a common sight in cities such as Eugene and Portland. Business owners and local leaders are upset, but so are liberal voters who hoped decriminalization would lead to more people getting help. In reality, few drug users are taking advantage of new state-funded rehabilitation programs.

Change appears likely. A coalition of city officials, police chiefs and district attorneys recently called on the State Legislature to recriminalize hard drugs. A measure to do so is in the works for next year’s ballot. A recent poll found the majority of Oregonians support the idea.

The fundamental problem, according to law-enforcement officers and researchers, is that the threat of jail time hasn’t been replaced with a new incentive for people struggling with addiction to seek treatment. Some 6,000 tickets have been issued for drug possession since decriminalization went into effect in 2021, but just 92 people have called and completed assessments needed to connect them to services, according to the nonprofit that operates the helpline.

a13401a0089b5d20f8e1099d1b11d413.jpg
Officer Jose Alvarez, who has stopped issuing tickets for drug possession, speaking with men in Eugene, Ore.

The only penalty for those who don’t call is a $100 fine, which is rarely enforced.

Before the law went into effect, people caught with small amounts of drugs were typically given a choice of court-mandated rehab or criminal sanctions such as jail time or probation.

“It was not a crazy thing to try at all, but I think they misunderstood addiction,” said Keith Humphreys, a Stanford professor who has studied the measure. “They really had the assumption that if you decriminalize, people would come rushing in saying, ‘Please, give me treatment,’ but addiction is not like cancer where people crawl through broken glass to get treatment.”

The number of fatal overdoses in Oregon during the 12 months that ended in May rose 23% from the same period a year earlier to 1,500, according to preliminary federal data. That is the third-highest increase in the nation, behind Washington and Nevada.

Advocates of drug decriminalization blame Oregon’s continued problems on nationwide trends, including the rise of deadly fentanyl and increased homelessness.

They say Measure 110 is already succeeding at one of its goals: keeping people out of the criminal-justice system for drug possession. About 4,000 people were arrested for drug offenses in Oregon in 2022, down from 11,000 in 2020.

Rather than using the threat of jail time, advocates for decriminalization say they are persuading people to get treatment by having them talk to former drug users.

“When people access services voluntarily…that’s really powerful and effective,” said Tera Hurst, executive director of the Health Justice Recovery Alliance, a nonprofit focused on implementing Measure 110.

85afa12f7a5d68d757607b0441992baa.jpg
Used needles are scattered at a homeless encampment near railroad tracks in Eugene.

Chris Wig, executive director of Emergence Addiction and Behavioral Therapies in Eugene, said though more people are getting peer support through programs funded by the measure, fewer are getting treatment. He said there has been a 25% drop in participation in Emergence’s programs.

“There are people who were getting treatment before who are not getting it now,” he said. “It’s people who were involved in the criminal justice system.”

A regretful pioneer​

Oregon was the first state to decriminalize possession of marijuana, in 1973. Taking the same pioneering approach to hard drugs in 2020 proved easy, as Measure 110 faced little organized opposition.

Michelle Loew, a 56-year-old bookstore clerk in Eugene, voted for it enthusiastically. A Grateful Dead fan who has experimented with mind-altering substances, Loew long supported liberalizing Oregon’s drug laws to be more like those of the Netherlands.

But as she watched public drug use flourish in this city of 175,000, she feared she had voted the wrong way.

“There is constant problems all over town—it doesn’t matter where you live—with people strung out on drugs,” said Loew, who described herself as a communist. “I pride myself on being a bit cynical, but obviously I was very naive.”

Overdose calls to Eugene police rose to 823 last year from 438 in 2020. So far this year, there have been 858. Though researchers attribute the rise in overdoses to the prevalence of fentanyl rather than the decriminalization measure, the drug problem has become more visible than ever.

f316770e15324ea20898ceddeda85df6.jpg
Volunteers in 2020 delivered boxes containing signed petitions in favor of the decriminalization initiative. PHOTO: YES ON MEASURE 110 CAMPAIGN/ASSOCIATED PRESS

On a recent morning, Janina Rager, a community-engagement specialist with the Eugene police, roused a man who was sprawled in front of Gardner Floor Covering, a family-run store downtown. She asked him to leave and clean up the garbage that surrounded him, including bits of aluminum foil that are typically used as wrappers for meth or fentanyl.

The shop’s owner, Matt Siegmund, said the number of people loitering and doing drugs in front of his store has doubled since the measure passed. Customers are scared to walk in now, he said. Each morning, his employees must clear the sidewalk of debris that often includes feces or needles.

“It just keeps getting worse,” said Siegmund. “I feel like these people on the streets have more rights than I do.”

e10bb91aaa438fc658f941a84d1f88e8.jpg
Matt Siegmund, owner of Gardner Floor Covering, says drug users who congregate in front of his store in Eugene leave garbage and scare off customers.

Rager swings by frequently to shoo people away, but the problem is unceasing. Eugene Police Chief Chris Skinner said most officers in his department, like Alvarez, have given up on issuing the drug-possession tickets.

“We don’t see people getting well as a result of issuing citations, and so it’s hard to get really excited about doing that work,” the chief said.

No reason to stay sober​

On a recent weekday in downtown Portland, a man explained the varieties of fentanyl to a tourist who wanted to know what everyone was smoking off of small squares of aluminum foil. There were dozens of people doing it in the area, some swaying like zombies, others crumpled on the sidewalk.

The man said getting arrested three years ago motivated him to get clean. He got a job at a gas station and stayed sober because it was required while he was on probation. But as soon as he finished probation last fall, he was back on drugs.

“I didn’t have a reason to keep clean and sober after that,” he said

Advocates for Measure 110 hope to have a more lasting effect by getting people into treatment voluntarily. Joe Bazeghi, the director of engagement for Recovery Works Northwest, said his organization, which is funded under the new measure, is now setting up rehab facilities for people addicted to fentanyl and making progress in persuading people to request treatment.

9dfc13187186d56b2ec832d52c949991.jpg
Joe Bazeghi, at his drug-rehab facility in Portland, says his organization is persuading more people to request treatment.

Bazeghi said he visits homeless encampments around Portland where he first tries to help people with basic needs such as health insurance, housing or food. Only later does he begin to talk to them about rehabilitation, based on his own experience with recovery.

“We go in as peers ourselves,” he said. “Everyone has been very welcoming to us.”

Changing course​

Other states that once seemed likely to follow Oregon’s lead are pumping the brakes. Earlier this year Washington’s Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee signed a law that boosts funding for treatment while maintaining criminal penalties for drug possession.

Oregon State Sen. Floyd Prozanski, a Democrat from the Eugene area who chairs a subcommittee focused on Measure 110, said he wants to see fixes to the law in next year’s legislative session. One idea on the table is taking people off the streets for 72 hours after they overdose.

Prozanski said he opposes bringing back criminal sanctions for drug possession.

Max Williams, former director of the Oregon state prison system, said he is skeptical the State Legislature will make adequate changes to the law. He heads a group preparing a measure for next year’s ballot that would again make it a crime to possess hard drugs such as fentanyl, while keeping in place the new funding for treatment, which comes from cannabis taxes.

“There is an old expression that states are the laboratories of democracy,” said Williams. “But that’s sort of distorted when you’re not the laboratory but you’re the lab rat.”

—Jon Kamp contributed to this article.

Source (Archive)
 
Stay the course, do not regress.

We need Trump to go out and say that if he becomes president he will personally send cops to Portland and arrest all the junkies and put a stop to the decriminalized hard drugs nonsense.
So that the Portlander's will amalgate around the opposite and make drugs even more legal, just to show Trump they resist him.

Heck, if the problem is that people OD due to impurities in the fentanyl then what they should do is to pput up vending machines all around the city where people can dispence clean pure fentanyl instead of using that impure shit that make people OD.
I know since Floyd that all experts said that it was literally impossible to OD from fentanyl, teh safest drug ever, so free pure fentanyl would be a great initiative to reduce harm.
 
They are not "struggling with addiction". They are leading the life they choose to lead. They have options, but choose not to take them.

Just let the fuckers die. After all, this guy has came to peace with knowing that he has nothing worth living for beyond staying high as often as he can.

Thats harsh, again every junkie is someones family member, My family all got happy when one of our own got arrested and put in jail the judge chose to keep her there, for awhile. The level of shit she was throwing because again as the detox started to happen they want their fix ASAP.

Its also not fair that a group of doctor and Pharma reps basically created millions of pill addicts, then cut them off. Fuck I have had medical issue where pretty sure if I had the brain chemstiry I would be an addict and Ive even had people tell which doctors to hit up for "pain management"

The addiction makes these people sooo fucking toxic that you have to dehumanize them because they will prey upon any and all angles to feed the addiction.

At the same time there is a honest human desire to bring these lost souls back into the fold and their families. But again saying its the legal systems fault ignores the ugly truth about addiction.
 
The problem with these decriminalization arguments is twofold.

1) They ignore that in places where it has been done successfully, that there is usually a rather comprehensive support system in place for these pieces of shit. EG, Portugal. Just decriminalizing things and calling it a day isn't what needs to be done.

2) A lot of these miraculous havens where they've managed to eradicate drug addiction or whatever have some creative bookkeeping going on for how offenses are recorded. I'd have to do some digging but there was some stuff with, IIRC, Norway, where the way they were defining things was very cheeky.
 
1) They ignore that in places where it has been done successfully, that there is usually a rather comprehensive support system in place for these pieces of shit. EG, Portugal. Just decriminalizing things and calling it a day isn't what needs to be done.
I hear Portugal is having trouble with this, too:


Sorry for the non archive link. The point is that it really seems like decriminalizing drugs is a bad idea. I think drugs should be criminalized, but the cops should get you and say "Either you get hard core, prison time, or you get help and stay off drugs for the duration of what your sentence would be. What's your choice?". Addicts need a hard option like that since anything less and they'll just stick to drugs.

I bet many would say "get me help". The ones who don't can rot in jail for all I care.
 
Just let the fuckers die. After all, this guy has came to peace with knowing that he has nothing worth living for beyond staying high as often as he can.

The problem would quickly sort itself out if it were limited to just the addicts.

However, just like transgenderism, it's a socially contagious mental illness and compulsion.

You have to quarantine the infected in order to stop the spread. Which means punishing any addict who refuses to stop. Take them off the streets.
 
having been around addicts in the family, these people are homeless because the addiction means they will burn steal, rob, lie, and manipulate the fuck out of you, the for your own fucking survivale you have to keep them out of your home, and even out of your live.

No fucking shit the addicts didnt give a shit
That's why so often you have to basically kidnap addicts and put them through fucking miniluv-tier detox to keep them from using. Addicts don't want to get better, that's the whole reason addiction is such a problem. I feel like this should be a no-brainer.
 
I’m with just withholding Narcan and letting the worthless fuckers kill themselves. One less group of subhumans sucking up resources that could be used for normal people.

Better idea would just be letting North Korea test their nukes on Portland because I swear it seemed like 95% of the assholes that live there are on meth as it is already. Clean slate and all that.
 
I’m with just withholding Narcan and letting the worthless fuckers kill themselves. One less group of subhumans sucking up resources that could be used for normal people.

Better idea would just be letting North Korea test their nukes on Portland because I swear it seemed like 95% of the assholes that live there are on meth as it is already. Clean slate and all that.
Wish not upon the monkey's paw, for even ye beyond the walls of Portland may end up with nuclear fallout.
 
That's why so often you have to basically kidnap addicts and put them through fucking miniluv-tier detox to keep them from using. Addicts don't want to get better, that's the whole reason addiction is such a problem. I feel like this should be a no-brainer.
yes that why I said my family was happy to hear a member was put in jail.

But most people have to experience the utter hell of dealing with these people to even begin to understand that they need to be shipped off to fucking alaska and kept away from their habbit for 6 months to even have a chance
 
I’m with just withholding Narcan and letting the worthless fuckers kill themselves. One less group of subhumans sucking up resources that could be used for normal people.
Based. This is how I feel as well. Fuck em. They fuck everyone else up.
Better idea would just be letting North Korea test their nukes on Portland because I swear it seemed like 95% of the assholes that live there are on meth as it is already. Clean slate and all that.
Amen to this as well.
 
These retards just looked at Portugal and said "hey let's do what they do but even dumber" with no thought about how vastly different the cultures are between the two countries, including drug culture.

American drug culture is, like all things we do, pants shittingly insane compared to a lot of other places. Our druggies always want to consoom the most potent products and the ones they hear being mentioned in rap songs. If you tell them "here ya go have at it do all the government inspected heroin you want, but you can only do them in these injection sites" they're just going to laugh in your face and continue shooting up fentanyl in the school parking lots.
 
Thats harsh, again every junkie is someones family member,
True. But...
The level of shit she was throwing because again as the detox started to happen they want their fix ASAP.
Exactly how much bullshit do you feel like dealing with? Like, your relative stealing money, chilling put because someone said "no," vandalizing shit and picking fights when they're high, the ever-present risk of them ODing, the legal fees, the variety of medical issues that pops up, your neighbors complaining about your pet junkie monkey,...
 
The communist hellscapes in America are pretty much how lolberts would run things if they got into power except it would be through pure retardation instead of malice. Anyone that agrees with these policies really think that junkies have a private place to shoot up, if they did they wouldn't be junkies and live action roleplaying as AMC's The Walking Dead.
 
Back