US AP: Political violence threatens to intensify as the 2024 campaign heats up - Brianna Wu, one of GamerGate’s original targets, said she wasn’t surprised to hear it linked to a politically motivated attack nearly a decade later.

Political violence threatens to intensify as the 2024 campaign heats up
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Ali Swenson and Michael Kunzelman
2023-11-18 16:53:37GMT

The man who bludgeoned former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a hammer last year consumed a steady diet of right-wing conspiracy theories before an attack that took place with the midterm elections less than two weeks away.

As the 2024 presidential campaign heats up, experts on extremism fear the threat of politically motivated violence will intensify. From “Pizzagate” to QAnon and to “Stop the Steal,” conspiracy theories that demonized Donald Trump’s enemies are morphing and spreading as the front-runner for the 2024 Republican nomination aims for a return to the White House.

“No longer are these conspiracy theories and very divisive and vicious ideologies separated at the fringes,” said Jacob Ware, a research fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who focuses on domestic terrorism. “They’re now infiltrating American society on a massive scale.”

A federal jury on Thursday convicted David DePape of attacking Paul Pelosi at his San Francisco home on Oct. 28, 2022. Before the verdict, DePape testified that he had intended to hold Nancy Pelosi hostage and “break her kneecaps” if the Democratic lawmaker lied to him while he questioned her about what he viewed as government corruption. She was in Washington at the time of the assault.

In online rants before the attack, DePape echoed tenets of QAnon, a pro-Trump conspiracy theory that has been linked to killings and other crimes. A core belief for QAnon adherents is that Trump has tried to expose a Satan-worshipping, child sex trafficking cabal of prominent Democrats and Hollywood elites.

Trump has amplified social media accounts that promote QAnon, which grew from the far-right fringes of the internet to become a fixture of mainstream Republican politics.

Many rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, espoused QAnon’s apocalyptic beliefs online before traveling to the nation’s capital for Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally that day. A message board formerly known as TheDonald.win was buzzing with plans for violence days before the siege.

Before QAnon, many Trump supporters embraced the debunked “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory that prominent Democrats were running a child sex trafficking ring out of a Washington pizzeria’s (nonexistent) basement. In 2017, a North Carolina man was sentenced to prison for firing a rifle inside the restaurant.

In his 2024 campaign, Trump has ramped up his combative rhetoric with talk of retribution against his enemies. He recently joked about the hammer attack on Paul Pelosi and suggested that retired Gen. Mark Milley, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, should be executed for treason.

Threats against lawmakers and election officials are rampant, with targets spanning the nation’s political divide: A California man awaits trial on charges that he plotted to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump nominee, at his Maryland home.

Trump’s loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 election did not end the spread of QAnon-influenced conspiracy theories or its unrealized prophecies. The leaderless movement’s ever-changing ideology often adopts beliefs from other conspiracy theories.

“It’s been really good at evolving with the times and current events,” said Sheehan Kane, data collection manager for the University of Maryland-based Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, or START.

In a 2021 article, Kane and START senior researcher Michael Jensen examined QAnon-inspired crimes committed by 125 adherents since the conspiracy theory originated on the 4chan imageboard in 2017. They found that more “extremist offenders” were connected to QAnon than any other extremist group or movement in the United States.

“In 2020, millions of people were radicalized on behalf of this conspiracy theory. It’s really hard to tell who is going to mobilize on behalf of a conspiracy theory,” Kane said.

DePape, the Paul Pelosi attacker, testified that his interest in right-wing conspiracy theories started with GamerGate, an online harassment campaign against feminists in the video game industry. Beginning in 2014, misogynistic gamers terrorized female game developers and other women in the industry with rape and death threats.

Brianna Wu, one of GamerGate’s original targets, said she wasn’t surprised to hear it linked to a politically motivated attack nearly a decade later. Wu said GamerGate emerged from the same online recesses that spawned far-right conspiracy theories such as Pizzagate and QAnon.

“This is a pattern of radicalization that we’re seeing over and over and over in every single bit of politics,” Wu said. “This is not a right-versus-left issue. This is a radicalization issue that is happening online. We need a policy response.”

DePape testified that he went to Nancy Pelosi’s home with plans to interrogate her about Russian interference in the 2016 election. He said he intended to wear an inflatable unicorn costume while recording it and then upload the video to the internet.

DePape allegedly told authorities that his other targets included a women’s and queer studies professor at the University of Michigan. He told jurors that he heard about the professor while listening to a conservative commentator.

DePape’s spiral into conspiracy theories is a textbook tale of radicalization, according to experts on extremism who say that the mainstreaming of false, bigoted and harmful ideas on radio shows, cable news, social media websites and other public online forums has made them far more accessible.

The problem is exacerbated by lax content moderation on social media and a growing “conspiracy-creating cottage industry” looking to use extreme rhetoric to cash in or widen their audience, said American University professor Brian Hughes, associate director of the Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab.

“Some of the people in that wide audience are going to be people like DePape, who are intentionally going to commit an act of violence based on this false and harmful information that they’ve been served,” Hughes said.

Conspiracy theories are alluring by design, driving some who are susceptible to them to completely immerse themselves, said Amarnath Amarasingam, an extremism researcher and professor at Queen’s University in Canada. DePape testified that before the attack, he frequently played video games for hours on end while listening to political podcasts.

Repeatedly hearing that the political opponents or government leaders are responsible for evil acts give believers a scapegoat for their troubles and a “moral mission” to do something about it, Amarasingam said.

American election years are often characterized by violence, said Ware, of the Council on Foreign Relations, whether it’s hate crimes in response to a particular candidate’s identity or violent reactions to unfavorable results. “So we should absolutely expect such incidents in 2024,” he said.

Trump’s return to the ballot next year, as well as his current legal battles, are sure to amplify politicized rhetoric and could drive more extremist violence, experts said.

“Donald Trump has a knack for tacitly endorsing violence without saying anything that’s really a clear endorsement of it, necessarily,” Hughes said.

To combat potential violence, Americans should try to turn down the temperature of political rhetoric and look out for loved ones who may be spiraling down a path toward radicalization, experts said.

“Spending hours and hours consuming conspiracy theory material is intoxicating,” Hughes said. “It anesthetizes you from the worries of your day to day life in the same way that certain drugs do. And I think that we need to reorient our thinking a little bit in that direction, so that we can begin to view this as the public health problem that it really is.”
___
Associated Press writer Olga R. Rodriguez in San Francisco contributed to this report.
___
The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
 
“Spending hours and hours consuming conspiracy theory material is intoxicating,” Hughes said. “It anesthetizes you from the worries of your day to day life in the same way that certain drugs do. And I think that we need to reorient our thinking a little bit in that direction, so that we can begin to view this as the public health problem that it really is.”
You know, it's funny. In context this is about Trump supporters, but are you really any different reading about how Trump supporters will rise up and commit violence en masse over the election, and it isn't somehow just as doom-spiraly?

I keep telling people that anyone who tut-tuts Trump supporters almost invariably sounds like the kind of person they're saying Trump supporters are.

But it's different, you see, because my side is the right one.
 
To combat potential violence, Americans should try to turn down the temperature of political rhetoric and look out for loved ones who may be spiraling down a path toward radicalization, experts said.

To combat potential violence, Americans should preemptively beat the living shit out of Antifa faggots wherever they show up.
 
Last edited:
“This is a pattern of radicalization that we’re seeing over and over and over in every single bit of politics,” Wu said. “This is not a right-versus-left issue. This is a radicalization issue that is happening online. We need a policy response.”
If radicalization isn't a left vs right issue why do we only hear about right-wing internet radicalization? (rhetorical question it's because the bulk of MSM is controlled by the left and Fox is run by boomers who know fuckall about the internet) I can't think of a single mainstream news article that covers forums on places like Reddit which played a huge role in 2020 left-wing extremism. It's nonstop Qanon, /pol/ and conspiracy theories. Nothing on the left is even mentioned.
 
Last edited:
his interest in right-wing conspiracy theories started with GamerGate, an online harassment campaign against feminists in the video game industry. Beginning in 2014, misogynistic gamers terrorized female game developers and other women in the industry with rape and death threats.
And what preceded all of this harassment? Could it be these feminists trying to take over? Could it be the co-ordinated "gamers shouldn't be your audience" articles from corrupt journalists?

They refuse to acknowledge gamergate spawned precisely as a result of their own actions, trying to shove their ideology into the industry.
 
If radicalization isn't a left vs right issue why do we only hear about right-wing internet radicalization? I can't think of a single mainstream news article that covers forums on places like Reddit which played a huge role in 2020 left-wing extremism. It's nonstop Qanon, /pol/ and conspiracy theories. Nothing on the left is even mentioned.
Left wing radicalization doesnt exist chud. It only looks that way because youre such a crazed paranoid radical. And when youre used to privilege, equity looks like oppression
 
headline: "POLITICAL VIOLENCE THREATENS TO INTENSIFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

the article: namens 3 incidents. Hammerguy smacking Pelosi's husband, Jan 6th and this one
A California man awaits trial on charges that he plotted to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump nominee, at his Maryland home.


I hate journos so much it's unreal.
 
The last thing I have to worry about is a right-winger with a gun blowing my head off, because I am not trying to break into his house or groom his kids in school. If someone is concerned about right-wing conspiracy theories, maybe they should stop being a subversive fuck who wants to turn the West into a toilet bowl.
That's the thing that's never acknowledged.

Oh sure, the left will poke at the right, screaming and crying when they don't get their way, but the second the right takes some indignity over always being portrayed as the villain, suddenly it's the right that's causing the problem.

I don't see anything on the right that hasn't been a reaction to the left being dipshits crying about "respect" over heinous and batshit insane demands, but that's the world we live in.

headline: "POLITICAL VIOLENCE THREATENS TO INTENSIFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

the article: namens 3 incidents. Hammerguy smacking Pelosi's husband, Jan 6th and this one


I hate journos so much it's unreal.
Funny how the threats against Kavanaugh were never portrayed in the press as attempts to subvert political process (not to mention the widespread misunderstanding about the role of SCOTUS in legislation). As if Biden undermining the SCOTUS shouldn't have been yet another impeachable offense.

We live in the dankest fucking timeline.
 
They must be super desperate trying to attach relevance to GamerGate 10 fucking years later.
The only thing saving them from total electoral annihilation and 40 years in the desert is the sheer back-stabbing corruption of the GOP's hatred of their own voterbase.
 
They must be super desperate trying to attach relevance to GamerGate 10 fucking years later.
The only thing saving them from total electoral annihilation and 40 years in the desert is the sheer back-stabbing corruption of the GOP's hatred of their own voterbase.
I mean, they're not wrong, they're just misguided on why.

Male-oriented pop culture was a testing ground for their philosophical takeover. You take people that are already considered societal rejects and play upon the public's propensities for indulging their worst biases and, because of those, doing no research.

From there, they claimed the moral high ground and therefore, when chasing bigger fish, used their moral standing in previous skirmishes to hide their turpitude. It was only after people accepted the takeover, begrudgingly or willingly, that they started to ask questions, but it was already too late. The white whale was caught and they were now at the mercy of a mob that either relished in their perceived moral superiority, or were proven so wrong that they became ashamed to admit it.

Basically, Gamergate was the canary in a coalmine. All based on a nothingburger that would have remained a nothingburger if people could be bothered to actually look at what was actually happening rather than falling back on their own prejudices.
 
From there, they claimed the moral high ground
Their "moral high ground" was evidently electing Trump, pushing out moderates, and radicalizing the GOP's base to the point the only way they could "win" was electoral fraud on a massive scale and top-down censorship previously only seen in Communist China.

Let's not pretend this "moral high ground" exists outside their corrupt and very tiny circle of vocal minorities.

At the time they attacked all gamers, "all gamers" as a demographic exceeded "all moviegoers" and constituted a numerical vast majority of the anglosphere.
Their attack on gamers can be traced as the direct cause of over 9 million Obama voters leaving the reservation for Trump in 2016, and they ain't coming back.
 
Last edited:
GamerGate never ended for them. It was their 9/11 . GamerGate raped their mothers and killed their fathers.
And the funny thing is, it was a bunch of guys who complained about the pozzed garbage in video games that still runs rampant today. Mannish women, marxist messaging, tumblr art and emsaculated men.

But years later, said practices are still being done despite companies taking it up the ass repeatedly out of sheer stubbornness, the playing field has expanded from video games to IRL. In fact, part of the reason Trump got elected was because there was a hope that all the pozzed shit would go away as soon as he came to power. That wasn't the case.

Won't surprised if this turns into armed conflict in the future. And Tumblr is to blame.
 
Back