Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

Parking lots are bad when they're empty and bad when they're full:
1700929341859.png
That analogy only works if the parking spaces are 50' x 50' or if you have 2 tiny drawers.
That’s why I get so pissed off when they advocate against wearing helmets because they’re more afraid of the friction of having to put on a helmet making someone decide not to bike than protecting that person’s life.
To be fair, those people are already brain damaged.
 
View attachment 5521396

Link to the post
Link to the archive

Need I say more? I'm gonna sue my apartment now for my action of putting on slippery socks and falling down the stairs which they have built!
I love that concept of suing a manufacturer for human misuse / error of their equipment, same with "Gonna sue Smith and Wesson cuz my kid got shot with a gun made by them" instead of just suing and pressing charges against the perp. Lol, lmao, even.
I've been waiting for their sub to gain public notoriety for a while, similar to antiwork on Fox News. It would be an interesting sight to see them publicly explain their ideas to other people outside of their group.
 
Or lock it up with your chain, I’ve never had my shitty old helmet taken, might have different results with a newer one though.
if it's locked up they'll just smash up your bike and/or set it on fire, and the insurance firm will still punish you for owning something worth stealing
either way, you will be paying more money for the privilege of letting other people vandalise, steal or destroy your property
 
if it's locked up they'll just smash up your bike and/or set it on fire, and the insurance firm will still punish you for owning something worth stealing
either way, you will be paying more money for the privilege of letting other people vandalise, steal or destroy your property
Who hurt you and your bicycle friend?
 
Found this on /r/urbanplanning.
One of them actually has a brain and realized exactly why normal people don't care about the "benefits" of "15 minute cities":
1700965255402.png
Full article:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Source (Archive)

1700965570784.png
1700965580552.png

Which one of you is this:
1700965635872.png
It always makes me laugh whenever an urbanist immediately cites Strong Towns instead of presenting their own argument.

Source (Archive)
 
if it's locked up they'll just smash up your bike and/or set it on fire, and the insurance firm will still punish you for owning something worth stealing
either way, you will be paying more money for the privilege of letting other people vandalise, steal or destroy your property
I hate to say this, but that could also be said of a car as well, where someone could vandalize or destroy it. Maybe I'm confused if you're talking about a bike as in motorcycle or bicycle, but I don't think people usually take out insurance on bicycles (unless you're one of the fuckcars people spending $2000 on them) or bicycle helmets.

Also thieves and vandals don't really share the same motives. A thief will go around methodically looking for easy targets for profit. Sure they may damage your property out of frustration if they can't steal it, but a bicycle also isn't really flammable by itself, so it's not likely the thief is also lugging around a jerry can along with him.

Which one of you is this:
1700965635872.png
If there was a semper fi for reddit that lost_in_life_34 guy deserves one for calling them out. I found it funny that the urbanist immediately jumped to the "it's in the video look it up on this subreddit" response and the other guy said he's aware of that video and it's wrong. These urbanists really don't know how to cite something that's not just a video created by a grifter.
 
Need I say more? I'm gonna sue my apartment now for my action of putting on slippery socks and falling down the stairs which they have built!

I was hoping that someone would have their head screwed on enough to point out that you need a lawyer for those sorts of things and the damages you want to claim.

Where are they going to get the lawyer? Only a crank would work for free, and they'll lose. A good lawyer costs money, but trying to "raise money to sue the car manufacturers" is a scam in the making, and there's no way someone like Jason would stick his neck out for such an idea.
 
about 8 years ago I had a crash on my motorbike; a driver had pulled out onto a major rural road into 50+ mph traffic without looking, I couldn't stop safely in time, I hit him right in the side and went sailing over the top, smashing up my thigh and several bones in my foot when I landed
because I had full motorbike-standard impact-absorbing gear on, they were my only injuries; by contrast, a bloke in the same ward as me had had a pedal-bike accident, in an area at the edge of the city and the countryside, at much lower speed, without any protection apart from a helmet, and had the most appalling injuries; broken ribs, a mangled arm, all sorts
really, if you're on two wheels, you need all the protection you can get
 
I was hoping that someone would have their head screwed on enough to point out that you need a lawyer for those sorts of things and the damages you want to claim.

Where are they going to get the lawyer? Only a crank would work for free, and they'll lose. A good lawyer costs money, but trying to "raise money to sue the car manufacturers" is a scam in the making, and there's no way someone like Jason would stick his neck out for such an idea.
I’m sure there are lawyers in the NJB / Strong Towns audiences that are willing and crazy enough to do such a lawsuit
 
View attachment 5521396

Link to the post
Link to the archive

Need I say more? I'm gonna sue my apartment now for my action of putting on slippery socks and falling down the stairs which they have built!
I love that concept of suing a manufacturer for human misuse / error of their equipment, same with "Gonna sue Smith and Wesson cuz my kid got shot with a gun made by them" instead of just suing and pressing charges against the perp. Lol, lmao, even.
Cigarette companies actually lied to the public about the dangers of cigarettes. This is by far the least egregious commercial with some even saying that doctors found no health issues with Chesterfield / Fatima smokers:

As to the car lawsuit and advertising:
1000000878.jpg

They have a disclaimer.
 
Someone on Musk Twitter has lowered the barriers that divided the echo chambers, and now my doomscrolling is a healthy mix of trad larpers, neo nazis, communists and a surprisingly large number of urbanists. In this mix I spotted some lefty infighting, urbanists who love red light cameras because they annoy the carbrains vs. race hustlers sperging out about them catching niggers.

1701036210329.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In this mix I spotted some lefty infighting, urbanists who love red light cameras because they annoy the carbrains vs. race hustlers sperging out about them catching niggers.
Red light cameras are a huge missed opportunity for urbanists to score favor by advocating against them. They could easily make the "incompetent/malicious traffic engineers are literally murdering people" argument here they do elsewhere, but they don't. They don't even have to do any of the work themselves, they can just link to redlightrobber.com and Road Guy Rob videos.

But they don't, they just want RLCs because they annoy drivers.
 
Red light cameras are a huge missed opportunity for urbanists to score favor by advocating against them. They could easily make the "incompetent/malicious traffic engineers are literally murdering people" argument here they do elsewhere, but they don't. They don't even have to do any of the work themselves, they can just link to redlightrobber.com and Road Guy Rob videos.

But they don't, they just want RLCs because they annoy drivers.
They also seem to believe that turning right on a red should be illegal even if you stop first because carbrains can't see the crossing pedestrians, so to them the biggest drawback of a red light camera (that it fines people who turn on yellow as if they had run straight through on a red) is a feature, not a bug.
 
They also seem to believe that turning right on a red should be illegal even if you stop first because carbrains can't see the crossing pedestrians, so to them the biggest drawback of a red light camera (that it fines people who turn on yellow as if they had run straight through on a red) is a feature, not a bug.
1701038413233.png
Carbrain  attempts to take down a No-Right-on-Red sign  with an axe.jpg
1701038530570.png
Source (Archive)
 
A bicycle is a lot more vulnerable to a lot of things. Even rails, which is "good" urbanism, can be catastrophic to a bicycle if it doesn't hit it a perpendicular angle.

Warning signs exist but you know most cyclists are too stupid or arrogant to use them.
2023-11-25 10_58_20-608 S Main St - Google Maps - Brave.png
1701047563938.png
My city is ejecting cyclists and stealing front wheels.jpg

1701047586174.png
1701047647046.png
1701047724302.png
Somehow, despite believing that every bike accident is due to cars, an awful lot of them have fallen off their bikes while crossing tracks:
1701047858425.png
1701047791896.png
1701047801406.png
1701047838872.png
1701047852236.png
1701047866479.png
1701048023636.png
1701048041925.png
1701047809727.png
Source (Archive)
 
Red light cameras are a huge missed opportunity for urbanists to score favor by advocating against them. They could easily make the "incompetent/malicious traffic engineers are literally murdering people" argument here they do elsewhere, but they don't. They don't even have to do any of the work themselves, they can just link to redlightrobber.com and Road Guy Rob videos.

But they don't, they just want RLCs because they annoy drivers.
This is another example of "it's not about being pro-pedestrian, it's about punishing drivers". And you know why they can't--bringing up Road Guy Rob would be an L because RGR isn't an anti-car urbanist, and they don't want anyone getting ideas. (Not to mention the economic costs of money leaving the community...but economic costs are only worthwhile if they can support their own ideas).
 
I get the point OP is making, but this is hilarious:
1701048995705.png
All these poor businesses in Tokyo are suffering without car parking (.jpgAll these poor businesses in Tokyo are suffering without car parking ( (1).jpgAll these poor businesses in Tokyo are suffering without car parking ( (2).jpg

There's literally three surface lots and a 4 story parking garage within a block of the restaurant:
1701048595600.png
Google Maps
A lot of the buildings nearby also have public underground garages. This is in Shibuya, one of Tokyo's largest train stations/shopping areas.

The second photo was taken a block away. The third photo was taken less than a block way from the second photo (the Takoyaki stand isn't visible in street view, but the cheese ball stand next door is and the yellow billboard is in both pictures).
There's a garage less than 200 ft walking distance away from the the location of the second photo.

This means that every single one of the businesses in the pictures has parking available.
A partial map of the parking available nearby:
1701050066368.png
Google Maps

OP picked some of the worst examples possible. Also, who goes to Japan and eats at Outback Steakhouse?

Source (Archive)
 
I get the point OP is making, but this is hilarious:
Textbook example of cherry-picking right here.
A lot of the buildings nearby also have public underground garages.
Don't worry, people like Jason Slaughter will still bitch and moan when street parking spaces are removed but replaced with underground parking spaces.
OP picked some of the worst examples possible.
I'm starting to think that it's because there aren't any "good" examples. I don't know of a single place on Earth that has reasonable (first world) standards of living, is clean, populated with lots of people, has thriving businesses, etc. that is also devoid of private vehicles. (There are places like Mackinac Island but they don't have much population, Mackinac has less than 600 people, also see this post.)
 
Also, who goes to Japan and eats at Outback Steakhouse?
Exactly, the Hooters in Ginza is much nicer and only 27 minutes away by train.

Just for fun, I started using street view from the Sony building and the massive parking lot there and almost all the nearby housing has at least one parking spot tucked away. And garages, and surface lots, and car rental places.

For reference, the US has 908 cars per 1000 people, Canada 790, Japan 661, UK 600, Netherlands 588, But the winner for best country in the world is North Korea... with 1 car per 1000 people. We can only hope to end up with that sort of car free utopia.
 
Back