Inactive Andrew Dobson / Tom Preston / CattyN - STOP DOING SEXIST CRAP

What part of any of this is canon?

Also, MORE LESBIANS!

View attachment 131876 View attachment 131877 View attachment 131878

Seeing a 33yo man without an intellectual disability orate about the sexual preferences of cartoon characters has ruined my day.

Remember this horrible piece of artwork?
Linkle.jpg


The castle in the background isn't even just traced, it's copypasted directly from official Zelda artworks without crediting the original creators.
When people pointed that out on Twitter, Dobson's reaction was essentially "lol, why is it a bad thing I copypaste art without pointing out where it originally came from?"
I know I'm late but jesus, her left upper arm/bicep has a length of 5cm and a circumference of 40cm. Escher would weep over that attempt at perspective
 
Just a reminder, that the 30-something-year old human male with the lesbian-fetish, needs to point out that two characters in a cartoon show, pretended to be married for the duration of an episode. He apparently knows no other form of entertainment. He just watches cartoons, or at best TV - doesn't he? I can't imagine any other reason why this would be worth pointing out to him otherwise.
if dobs had the power, he would force women to pretend to be lesbians
 
I can't imagine any other reason why this would be worth pointing out to him otherwise.

He's trying to hold up the show as being "progressive" to his audience, the same as he did for the Ghostbusters reboot. He thinks it makes him a good person when he points out a show being "progressive," just like how when he points out something as "problematic," but the problem is he doesn't really what what either of those two words mean.

Having two female-shaped characters pretend to be married doesn't make it progressive, it's a plot for an episode of a 90's sitcom. And the 90's had Gus and Wally from Mission Hill.
 
When isn't Dobson virtue signaling? And when was the last time he mentioned that cruddy Ghostbusters reboot?

...when he thought it was going to be a financial success. When it turned out to be a turd, he did what any feminazi does when confronted with the truth - he abandons ship and never speaks about it again in a vain attempt to save face.
 
What part of any of this is canon?

Also, MORE LESBIANS!

View attachment 131876 View attachment 131877 View attachment 131878
Uh, what canon? Last I checked, they only tolerated one another. Unless I'm missing something here (Aside from Dobby's Gemtism acting up again).

This shit will always be confusing to me. Aren't the things from that show rock aliens from outer space? Why would they conform perfectly to the gender/sexuality of humans?
Well, the show gets by it by referring to all of them as female and shit. The fans... eeeeeeeh.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Karen Riley
Uh, what canon? Last I checked, they only tolerated one another. Unless I'm missing something here (Aside from Dobby's Gemtism acting up again).


Well, the show gets by it by referring to all of them as female and shit. The fans... eeeeeeeh.
you'd think he (and the fans) would no care so much, because you know, they're not real. Its sad when Dobson cares more about fictional lesbians then his own life
 
you'd think he (and the fans) would no care so much, because you know, they're not real. Its sad when Dobson cares more about fictional lesbians then his own life
Well that's just it, Dobson doesn't want to worry about his real life. Just his so-called internet life.

With or without rock lesbians.
 
What part of any of this is canon?

Also, MORE LESBIANS!

View attachment 131876 View attachment 131877 View attachment 131878

Picard doublefacepalm.gif


That is not even the message of that comic. The characters are essentially mocking human patterns of behavior and needs precisely because of how alien they are to them and are highlighting how weak and high maintenance biological entities are. Gems don't need to eat nor have any use for the needs human consider vital, hence why it is funny to them. The whole point of the comic flew right over his damn thick head.

Dobson lesbian fetish is so overwhelming in his mind that he sees even the sightless signs of camaraderie between two female characters as sexual because of the bias filter of his obsession. Deeper meaning? well fuck that!
 
It's finally released to scores I actually expected. Not surprised by the positive review. The more I think about it, the more I see Dobson like the ad that came out for the game, Blur. Both made shallow parodies which backfired on them big time (in both of their cases, people wanted the things that were parodied than the actual comic or game).

Edit: I realized one of the positive reviews was a joke. Thanks @DerSandstrom.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Karen Riley
It's finally released to scores I actually expected. Not surprised by the two positive reviews. The more I think about it, the more I see Dobson like the ad that came out for the game, Blur. Both made shallow parodies which backfired on them big time (in both of their cases, people wanted the things that were parodied than the actual comic or game).

At least one of the positive reviews is a joke written by a YouTuber with a decent following. He's the guy that revealed that the debugger was still packaged in the vanilla release of the game.
 
At least one of the positive reviews is a joke written by a YouTuber with a decent following. He's the guy that revealed that the debugger was still packaged in the vanilla release of the game.
I just saw it. A mistake on my part. Still, it doesn't change the fact that it's a poorly made game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Karen Riley
I understand where Dobson is coming from. I had a cheap pinball machine as a kid in the 90s, and I've always wanted to own a real good one. The kind you'd see in arcades. But to call it a dream is a stretch. It's something I'd like to own someday, like an old 50's car with the tailfins, but not something that would make my life complete.
 
Back