- Joined
- Jul 16, 2023
Any twat with a Twitter poll is as much a "data analyst" as she is. These interviews are a real "scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" deal. Some pissant interviewer gets to posture as a real broadcaster by asking fluff questions to some pretentious cunt who wants to play psychologist despite having zero qualifications or credentials. They don't question one another too deeply and then go off to do the same dance again with other interviewers/interviewees.describe her as a ""data analyst.""
A "data analyst" whose data cannot be analyzed in any meaningful capacity is worthless. You cannot meaningfully analyze anonymous Twitter polls. You don't know anything about the demographics you're polling, you have no idea where they're from or who they are or if they're answering honestly or only answering once instead of stuffing the polls.
Her cope that "well, doing data analysis completely fucking wrong is better than not analyzing data at all!" is peak grifter. You don't publish lies and falsehoods just because "well, I feel like it's better than publishing nothing at all!" I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir but the stark discrepancy between the legitimacy of what she does and how she postures herself as a valuable expert is really disgusting. That's not even considering she's using that position to advocate for flooding the internet with "AI CP" and grift people with $19,000 mouth fungus.