hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

[Mega Black]

I take solace in the fact that, at some point, Harris will be walking down the street in his shitty Euro town and a Muslim is going to stab him for some sort of perceived slight.

 

[Anti Snigger]

People on 4chan appear to be talking about metokur.org. How aware are people of this phase in Harris' life?

On a side note, the IH stuff does actually frustrate me. Had he just properly credited the original article, no issue would have arisen. His video would have still been seen as valuable given the narration and animation, and the original work would have been given more exposure. There was zero reason not to have done it, and it is a misstep on his part.

 

[Chainsaw Juggler]

He's trending on twitter alongside Internet Historian. I've only watched about an hour so far. I wasn't familiar with this particular breadtuber but I sort of regret giving him the click and am sure to regret seeing his face in my recommended for the rest of eternity. Something about pompous, smarmy brit youtubers that I'm just over with.

Constant quipping aside, there's some stuff in the video that I just can't take at face value from him. He takes a swing at Cinemassacre, and mentions the CinemassacreTruth subreddit, which is full of guys who have been tearing apart Cinemassacre for the better part of 10 years. He shows a thorough post on the sub complete with sources about how one of the guys was stealing jokes in the Rolfe roast. But he just has to mention how he didn't lift his sources from this guy, and only discovered this post during his own independent sourcing, and just has to throw in there how he did a more thorough and better job than the guy on the sub and pat himself on the back for it. Now admittedly he would have looked like a real asshole if he hadn't mentioned this post that just happened to outline a lot of his own findings and it was later found when people checked him, as 10-15 minutes earlier in the video he mocks a journalist who lifted from a forum post wholesale. But why should I believe that he didn't find this guy's post first and then build and improve upon it with additional sourcing?

Anyway, haven't gotten to the IH part yet. I've been a bit disappointed in Internet Historian lately. IH should have stuck with internet stories that wouldn't be headline news by most measures, like failed conventions, and people projecting memes onto business meeting computers. The minute he started branching out and trying to do more "regular trending Youtube stories" is when I think he lost me a bit. People have been getting trapped in caves for as long as people have existed. There is a wealth of videos on the subject and the story that IH chose is a particularly well-documented one. I've stumbled down the Youtube rabbit hole multiple times to watch videos of cave spelunking gone wrong, cave diver incidents etc. It's topics like this and boats capsizing that I'm not sure I ever watched his channel for.

 

[Fresh Meat]

I want a method to watch it without giving him views.

Use an Invidious instance or install something like MPV and drag the video link on it

 

[Null]

I'm watching the video and after 27;00 he refers to the guy he's criticizing as "the most fuckable twink he's ever seen". I don't know why homosexual men are allowed to sexually harass men with impunity. If a man referred to a woman as "the dumbest slut he's ever seen" in response to her video, he would seem creepy to almost all audiences. But being a fag lets you get away with this shit.

 

[Anti Snigger]

I'm watching the video and after 27;00 he refers to the guy he's criticizing as "the most fuckable twink he's ever seen". I don't know why homosexual men are allowed to sexually harass men with impunity. If a man referred to a woman as "the dumbest slut he's ever seen" in response to her video, he would seem creepy to almost all audiences. But being a fag lets you get away with this shit.

Dude if you think gay men are bad, you should hear the shit lesbians say about women. The rapiest shit I've ever heard has come from lesbians talking about straight women.
A really common line they love is "They're straight? So is spaghetti until it gets wet "

 

[Georgio Cocklord]

People on 4chan appear to be talking about metokur.org. How aware are people of this phase in Harris' life?

On a side note, the IH stuff does actually frustrate me. Had he just properly credited the original article, no issue would have arisen. His video would have still been seen as valuable given the narration and animation, and the original work would have been given more exposure. There was zero reason not to have done it, and it is a misstep on his part.

Im starting to notice a pattern with so called "breadtube criticism", they never do it with a level of professionalism and ethics cause they almost always do it with an intent to attack who theyre criticizing, not really provide an opportunity to point out a misstep which can be corrected. Its a very Jew MSM Journo thing to do cause those people do it with the intent to tear down the other source in an attempt to build up their own reputation and audience. And they do this to targets who they dont like so they can destroy the career of the target by indirectly slandering them as untrustworthy or intentionally malicious without saying it explicitly so they cant be sued for slander cause theyre just "reporting" verifiable facts. Say someone else like Jacksfilms found the IH incident, he wouldve privately told IH or put out a video saying IH did this and he should correct it but you guys shouldnt hate him for it. Harry adds a lot of spice to that fact to slander IH as disreputable bordering on malicious but doesnt directly attack him. In a way its a very capitalistic predatory thing to do, elimination of competition and using their remains to boost yourself and despite me being very pro capitalist I would call this unethical behavior cause I criticize with the intent to improve, not to destroy unless Im criticizing greedy lying communists. And its not just Harry who does this, all of them do, from Shaun to Dan Olson to FD Signigger everybody, its partially how they were able to polarize audiences across the internet onto their side cause theyre operating with intangible malicious intent to use legitimate criticism to slander selected sections of society.

 

[Dr George Whitebread]

"Breadtube Criticism" is snarky and accusational because Brewis's target audience are edgy teenagers and people in their 20's-30's who never grew out of certain phases of high school. It was never meant to be a video to improve YouTube, it was always a video meant to attack YouTubers. The video does make valid points but they have to be wrapped under thousands of layers of smugness, irony and transparent statements about his political beliefs for his audience to actually give a shit without questioning if he's the "right kind of guy". It just furthers the belief that he knows how his audience will stamp his face in the moment he falls off the rightthink tracks.

 

[Musashi's Son]

POV: Smug Brit Breadtuber will explain to you how plagiarism is bad and how he does better rEsEaRcH than you.

 

[Solid Hyrax]

If a man referred to a woman as "the dumbest slut he's ever seen" in response to her video, he would seem creepy to almost all audiences.

I don't know. Seems like a normal response to a retarded woman. I'd give it a pass if I'd hear that.

 

[linchan]

Does anyone have an archive of the original Man In Cave upload? I want to see how much he plagiarized.

 

[Musashi's Son]

If you guys want to learn how Hbomb is behind the scenes here you go:

https://archive.is/RijHf

https://archive.ph/eR8F9

 

[Gorgar]

Does anyone have an archive of the original Man In Cave upload? I want to see how much he plagiarized.

Here you go chief:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ue0dkClC7ILFPyLjj1lfJkRlNhB-ysRI/view?usp=sharing

Update:
Also, I think Internet Historian stole from Mental Floss twice...

https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/stede-bonnet-gentleman-pirate-real-history-our-flag-means-death

Update update:
Turns out another video he created on his second channel is repeatedly quoting the same source.
If anyone has the time, could someone compare The Swedish Job and Stealing Rembrandts: The Untold Stories of Notorious Art Heists?

 

[RedGermaine]

Here you go chief:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ue0dkClC7ILFPyLjj1lfJkRlNhB-ysRI/view?usp=sharing

Honestly even during Hbomberguys video, I feel like IH through the side tangents, acting, and animation was a transformative work. Was he basically reading the article word for word? Yes, should he have listed the article he was "adapting" as his source? Obviously, but there's only so many ways you can reword something that actually happened. It's not a creative writing class, it's not personal philosophy, it's a retelling of real events so there's only so much leeway you can use. You can take creative liberties by saying "people tried using lubricant" instead of TNT because that's not what happened

 

[linchan]

I did feel like most of the new video was just him trying to take down others so he can be seen as a "good guy", even if most of the cases legit deserved the negative exposure
BUT
As a fan of IH i found his section to be overly-brutal and even got the impression that he is genuinely pissed over some ranking he got from JACKSFILMS
I mean yes, this was a very shitty thing from IH to do, but as far as im aware he didn't tried to make a shitty faked apology/responce video,and after the original video was taken down he actually DID something about it,changing as much as he could
And for fucks sake what if the general formating was stolen?, many of the exemples shown by bomber was i think were changed enough to be considered original(or at least more original then the other people's work in this video) and even then he still made high quailty visuals and voice acting to the entire thing which again the others in the video didn't really do.

It kinda rubbed me the wrong way when he deliberately depicts IH's silence in the worst way possible. For example, his silence when tweeting about the copyright notice is taken as an admittance of guilt of willful plagiarism. When in reality, he's not obligated to tweet about anything at all.

He claims that in the re-upload at the start of addressing the copyright, IH pulled a sleight of hand by making it seem like he was deliberately hiding the real reason for the warning when it could just be explained that he doesn't want to give the people who flagged him any more grief. Hbomber pointed out that there are racists in the comment section, I don't think IH would want to risk inflaming them by putting their name on blast.

Like, I think he has a solid case for plagiarism, whether maliciously, or by naivety, but Hbomb depicts the case as if there is no question that he was doing it willingly, giving circumstantial evidence, and only considering the worst-case scenario as the reality. It feels like a hit job.

 

[Shek$il]

Aside from the usual cocktail of smugness and seethy-politisperging I think the newest video was pretty solid. Especially because the main target of the video is another butt pirate in a stupid turtleneck. It's enjoyable if you tune out his "YOU STOLE FROM THE QUEEEYAAAH COMMUNITY!" motivator.

If you guys want to learn how Hbomb is behind the scenes here you go:

https://archive.is/RijHf

https://archive.ph/eR8F9

Honestly at this point I'd have to do an entire refresher to see if this is deeper than usual troon nonsense. Some straight woman pretending to be a homosexual dude claiming rape from some dude pretending to be a girl pretending to be a lesbian pretending to be a dude because they did a colonialism or something is all so opaque morally.

Devil's advocate I'd totally forget about this as HBomb, what a headache dealing with tranny drama when you can just take their programmer bux.

 

[BestFriendsAnimalSociety]

IH plagiarizing is disappointing but honestly who cares. His presentation (delivery and animation) makes his videos, the information is pretty much secondary to that.

I am, however, looking forward to the collapse of that fat faggot James Somerton's channel. Anyone who hate watches breadtube shit has probably come across his videos and he is truly insufferable, his videos are typically 'queer analysis' of various media. For anyone who didn't watch the hbomb video, two hours (i.e. the vast majority of the video) are dedicated to how he ripped the scripts of his videos from various other faggots and passed the work off as his own. Truly heinous considering his videos are just him reading his script with the occasional clip played (unlike IH who puts a lot of effort into his presentation) and a lot of people thought that the scripts were his own original thoughts. And it wasn't just one or two videos that he plagiarized, but pretty much all of them. He was essentially exposed to have been running an illuminaughti style content farm parading as a an academic media criticism channel.

The funniest part was when he plaigerized an entire script with his only contributions being to interject constantly about how much he hates white women. I think Hbomber and Somerton had a decent viewer overlap so a lot of his fans have seen the video and know that he is a lazy thief as well as a fat faggot. I think the only way this could be funnier would be if he was just pretending to be gay.

I know there is a thread on the farms about grifting the left, well this is how you do it.


Small edit with some stuff I forgot to mention re Somerton:

He grifted 60k in a gofundme to make movies for SPLGTQIA+ folk but never produced anything but a few movie posters using stock images. That money is now 100% gone.

He deleted his twitter and patreon, with the latter resulting in a significant reduction in his income. He disabled comments on all of his videos and community posts and is down by at least 10k subs since the Hbomb video dropped.

archive of r/breadtube thread where many express their dissapointment of Somerton's plaigerism

Patreon post he made after the video dropped


He made another post after this with a much more apologetic tone but I was not able to get a screenshot

 

[Musashi's Son]

Honestly at this point I'd have to do an entire refresher to see if this is deeper than usual troon nonsense. Some straight woman pretending to be a homosexual dude claiming rape from some dude pretending to be a girl pretending to be a lesbian pretending to be a dude because they did a colonialism or something is all so opaque morally.

Devil's advocate I'd totally forget about this as HBomb, what a headache dealing with tranny drama when you can just take their programmer bux.

Fair enough, I'm just bringing this up because Le Smug Brit Video Essay Breadtuber likes to play the image of "I'M SO FOR WOMAN'S RIGHTS" in public but in private he says to protect of his friends "hey hey are you sure this is the right guy? Because akschually he may be one of those other terrible internet people you've met.

 

[Anti Snigger]

Am I crazy or is the first half of the video only there so that it doesn't look like he's targeting a gay youtuber?

 

[gohi_trout]

Alright video, didn't like it that much although I want a method to watch it without giving him views.

If you watch it in vlc or potplayer, I think it doesn't give the video a views, plus no ads.