How is it reasonable that he always comes back to the exact same point he plateaued at on the left side of the chart? I know it does it in larger chunks now, not 1:1, but don't you still find it odd he always ALWAYS has bounced back to the same?
The exact same point you are talking about is 10k.
Game Grumps suffers the same plateau issue, but does not constantly go up and down. If it wasn't always happening, I wouldn't even post.
Jirard being a puppeteer to his own fans while not knowing how money or charity works is both depressing and hilarious at the same time. Even after attempting to make promises on donating, it just keeps getting worse the more these exposé videos keep coming out on him failing to deliver in the first place.
Yes, but the museum that was supposed to receive the games stated that unless they want the ire of Nintendo lawyers, they need to find a better solution than essentially piracy.
Family dynamics in Arab families, Christian or not, are very different from family dynamics in American families.
He could, but he won't, because he's anti-piracy and anti-emulation. His "every game ever list" is also missing games never released digitally, games that were removed from the eShop since and region exclusives.
The largest new clue we have is the Discord clip in the Mutahar video.
Seeing how she was a nutcase that left with half a million to fuck around before she was diagnosed, I'd say she would be very damn proud actually.
Well, that's how this drama usually works. But again, what makes this one fun is that it can come back from it's ashes like the retarded Phoenix and the form of an IRS audit that ends up finding shit.
That's the real reason they threw the "legal actions may be taken" threat. Too bad Mutahar and the other guy gave 0 shits about the threat and are still hammering at the situation. Your move fatman.
i have no doubt in my mind he just said that to make it seem like he was eventually going to donate
I'm willing to bet Jirard saw the money wasn't donated because of incompetence, asked a lawyer about how he could explain it away once Karl started looking into it, and the first thing that came to mind was a restricted donation.
His story about why they “switched” from a private foundation to a public charity makes no sense either. If anything, being a private foundation has more freedom than a public charity, but he said the opposite. But a public charity has a higher tax deductible percentage (60% to 30%). It also needs board of directors that are at least 50% representative of the public. So it’s clear why they “switched”, to pay way less taxes, and not even follow the rules. He did so much damage in that video to himself, almost worst than the discord call.
