Community Tard Baby General (includes brain dead kids) - Fundies and their genetic Fuckups; Parents of corpses in denial

Texas is at it again

Reminder that trisomy 18 is usually fatal before the kids first birthday.
That's if the baby even survives to birth, whenever that is in the pregnancy.

I heard that in recent weeks, she'd had FOUR emergency room visits related to this pregnancy. What more do they want?

Baby Cox, you are loved and nobody, I mean NOBODY, wanted this to happen to you.
 
There is a thread on the Texas case and of course some retard claims life begins 7 weeks after conception:
When the heart beats, it's alive.
Viability is nonsense medical term invented by SCOTUS that afterwards no court in the state, including SCOTUS themselves, were sure how it works. At any rate, replace the 7 with 20 in my original question. Though, mind you, babies have survived at much earlier than 20.
I'm pretty sure viability is a scientific, not a political term but OK.
 
There is a thread on the Texas case and of course some retard claims life begins 7 weeks after conception:


I'm pretty sure viability is a scientific, not a political term but OK.
I can't read most stuff about abortion on the farms, because I'm here to laugh, not be mad.

I hate the news threads.
 
I can't read most stuff about abortion on the farms, because I'm here to laugh, not be mad.

I hate the news threads.
The whole idea of a non-sentient blob of cells somehow being equivalent to an actual human strikes me as so insane I can barely even believe anyone actually sincerely believes it. They have to be retarded or psychos. This is not a sane belief.
 
The whole idea of a non-sentient blob of cells somehow being equivalent to an actual human strikes me as so insane I can barely even believe anyone actually sincerely believes it.
Agreed but mod @Useful_Mistake thinks a 7 week old heavy period is the same as a living, breathing baby.
 
There is a thread on the Texas case and of course some retard claims life begins 7 weeks after conception:


I'm pretty sure viability is a scientific, not a political term but OK.
Plus in this case we're talking about fetuses that will never be viable. You can't get a healthy kid from a t18 fetus, if you could I doubt a single mom pregnant with one wouldn't choose that option.

Pretty sure there haven't been any babies that have survived at 20 weeks or before either. Even if there was, more than likely they'd go onto have serious lifelong health problems since as discussed ITT, most micropremies have serious issue for the rest of their lives (especially since there's usually some underlying disorder that caused them to be born so prematurely).

This thread has been eye-opening about all the different gestational anomalies there are. So much can go horrifically wrong.
 
The whole idea of a non-sentient blob of cells somehow being equivalent to an actual human strikes me as so insane I can barely even believe anyone actually sincerely believes it. They have to be retarded or psychos. This is not a sane belief.
I tend to believe so. I see it the same way as ripping a seed out of the ground is killing the plant. I don't believe life is so sacred that it has to be preserved... just that it should be treated with the gravity of what it is.

I believe a retarded, crippled , deformed, child should be put down before birth to save both it and its parents from suffering. I even think in cases of poverty it should be considered. The whole " clump of cells" idea comes off as coping for people not willing to admit to themselves that lives inherently are not priceless and you can make a value call on them.
 
I tend to believe so. I see it the same way as ripping a seed out of the ground is killing the plant. I don't believe life is so sacred that it has to be preserved... just that it should be treated with the gravity of what it is.

I believe a retarded, crippled , deformed, child should be put down before birth to save both it and its parents from suffering. I even think in cases of poverty it should be considered. The whole " clump of cells" idea comes off as coping for people not willing to admit to themselves that lives inherently are not priceless and you can make a value call on them.
No, before a certain point it really is just a clump of cells. A clump of cells with potential, certainly, but it's not yet a living human. More like how an acorn isn't an oak tree, but it could be.
 
No, before a certain point it really is just a clump of cells. A clump of cells with potential, certainly, but it's not yet a living human. More like how an acorn isn't an oak tree, but it could be.
I half agree but destroying the potential for life at the point where your inaction would allow life is well destroying life.

I think it is justified. I just find it obnoxious when people desperately try to not acknowledge what it is they are doing.
 
Back