- Joined
- May 25, 2013
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is only an exception for if the woman's life is in immediate danger and no exceptions for fetal anomalies at all, afaik.
Correct.There is only an exception for if the woman's life is in immediate danger and no exceptions for fetal anomalies at all, afaik.
The way I see it, the accounts all had a breath holding spell.Paisley's mom has DFE-d all her accounts now and shut down her etsy.
That's if the baby even survives to birth, whenever that is in the pregnancy.
I hope Zurawski v. Texas goes somewhere.
When the heart beats, it's alive.
I'm pretty sure viability is a scientific, not a political term but OK.Viability is nonsense medical term invented by SCOTUS that afterwards no court in the state, including SCOTUS themselves, were sure how it works. At any rate, replace the 7 with 20 in my original question. Though, mind you, babies have survived at much earlier than 20.
I can't read most stuff about abortion on the farms, because I'm here to laugh, not be mad.There is a thread on the Texas case and of course some retard claims life begins 7 weeks after conception:
I'm pretty sure viability is a scientific, not a political term but OK.
I can't read most stuff about abortion on the farms, because I'm here to laugh, not be mad.
I hate the news threads.
I heard that in recent weeks, she'd had FOUR emergency room visits related to this pregnancy. What more do they want
The whole idea of a non-sentient blob of cells somehow being equivalent to an actual human strikes me as so insane I can barely even believe anyone actually sincerely believes it. They have to be retarded or psychos. This is not a sane belief.I can't read most stuff about abortion on the farms, because I'm here to laugh, not be mad.
I hate the news threads.
Agreed but mod @Useful_Mistake thinks a 7 week old heavy period is the same as a living, breathing baby.The whole idea of a non-sentient blob of cells somehow being equivalent to an actual human strikes me as so insane I can barely even believe anyone actually sincerely believes it.
Plus in this case we're talking about fetuses that will never be viable. You can't get a healthy kid from a t18 fetus, if you could I doubt a single mom pregnant with one wouldn't choose that option.There is a thread on the Texas case and of course some retard claims life begins 7 weeks after conception:
I'm pretty sure viability is a scientific, not a political term but OK.
Interesting, I knew it was around 20.Right now, the absolute earliest a baby could possibly survive outside the womb is about 22 weeks.
I tend to believe so. I see it the same way as ripping a seed out of the ground is killing the plant. I don't believe life is so sacred that it has to be preserved... just that it should be treated with the gravity of what it is.The whole idea of a non-sentient blob of cells somehow being equivalent to an actual human strikes me as so insane I can barely even believe anyone actually sincerely believes it. They have to be retarded or psychos. This is not a sane belief.
No, before a certain point it really is just a clump of cells. A clump of cells with potential, certainly, but it's not yet a living human. More like how an acorn isn't an oak tree, but it could be.I tend to believe so. I see it the same way as ripping a seed out of the ground is killing the plant. I don't believe life is so sacred that it has to be preserved... just that it should be treated with the gravity of what it is.
I believe a retarded, crippled , deformed, child should be put down before birth to save both it and its parents from suffering. I even think in cases of poverty it should be considered. The whole " clump of cells" idea comes off as coping for people not willing to admit to themselves that lives inherently are not priceless and you can make a value call on them.
I half agree but destroying the potential for life at the point where your inaction would allow life is well destroying life.No, before a certain point it really is just a clump of cells. A clump of cells with potential, certainly, but it's not yet a living human. More like how an acorn isn't an oak tree, but it could be.
We are all clumps of cells, and I can't say I have potential with a straight face.No, before a certain point it really is just a clump of cells. A clump of cells with potential, certainly, but it's not yet a living human. More like how an acorn isn't an oak tree, but it could be.
I half agree but destroying the potential for life at the point where your inaction would allow life is well destroying life.
I think it is justified. I just find it obnoxious when people desperately try to not acknowledge what it is they are doing.