If we're going for the court of public opinion thing then maybe Null could do a stream or record a video on the history of the site and what really happened throughout all these events and what he's had to deal with. Retards do not read websites and they just consume content on youtube or whatever, the issue with this is that it wouldn't really be able to go around on youtube because the archive sites will get taken down before any of their videos spread around too much but I don't know if it's worth a shot, maybe if there's evidence for certain events it could be shown alongside audio clips and spread around on tiktok like Null suggested doing for his stream clips since the kinds of things that go viral on tiktok can be pretty out there. It would also probably need to be presented without the nigger/tranny words since it makes it harder to share with others for the nigger cattle but I'm sure that's manageable.
Are you serious? I read my little google news feed daily. Most of its garbage, but if im bored, its something to do. People like articles. You just have to present them properly
I think both of you misunderstand and undervalue the modern attention economy.
The kind of people who use Kiwi Farms, and older-skewing people in general, still read articles. But under-35 normies almost universally don't. They read
headlines, especially when they're posted to Reddit, Xitter, or establishment news, but I've seen more than ample evidence that most young people nowadays don't read the actual articles about shit they aren't already invested in. And while I agree with WelperHelper's argument that the 35-60 crowd is important, most people with
social influence are in the 20-35 crowd, and since we admittedly don't have a strong messaging infrastructure built, those people are going to be instrumental. They're the broad demographic that made DropKiwifarms happen
in the first place. And if we want to win those people over, we need to take advantage of the attention economy.
We need an organized collective of users to brainstorm the most innocuous yet attention-grabbing headlines possible for our articles - probably abstaining from referring to us by name at first (we do that in the first line of the article instead). Those same users spread that shit around Reddit, Xitter, everywhere. People see
"Internet Forum Stops Sadist's Plan To Crush Dog", get angry and fuzzy feelings at the same time, then word (gradually) spreads around, as a few people actually click on the article, that the unnamed "internet forum" in the headline was actually Kiwi Farms.
We also need to write scripts for videos, both short-form and long-form, and we need more people willing to give them voiceovers, edit them, and share them across platforms and accounts. They should grab people's attention in the first 10 seconds in the same way as headlines - bring up shocking shit that an internet forum stopped, then reveal that said forum was
us. The headlines on Reddit and Xitter
prime people to think "hey, this forum seems cool"/"hey, Kiwi Farms isn't all bad", then the videos grab their attention again then go into the extra detail that will actually endear people to us.
This
all needs to be decentralized across many users. If we just have a few accounts posting about us, they'll be banned before the message gets across. Eventually, as we do this for several weeks, it'll (hopefully) start to spread organically - established accounts and influencers will start talking about this impossible-to-frame-as-evil good deeds we've done - and from there the message stands on its own.
While a full on Null-narrated documentary could definitely be worth it eventually, it would come a lot later. We need to lead and frame ourselves with the inoccuous stuff, the objective wins. We only get into spinning the more subjective and controversial stuff after the majority of the public is endeared to us.
That's my 2 cents, at least.
