US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
1. They fucking murder Hunter Biden in public to permanently rid Biden of the albatross that is his son and blame it on MAGA to give Biden the dead child sympathy push to get re-elected and go full mask off tyrant to destroy Trump and his supporters and any opposition to him and the left.
Anybody in their right mind would think that Hunter Biden OD'd himself to death.
 
To be fair this is likly not 100% bullshit. If your war chest is fairly small to begin with it makes sense to wait until you see what areas are competitive for you then blitz ads in those specific areas.

This will be a double post but something I think might be interesting. We actually can pretty well math out how someone will vote. There are three factors that for purpose of simplicity we can say are weighted 4, 2, and 1. Sot he first criteria is multiplied by 4, the second 2, and the third taken as is. Those criteria are Recognizability, Respect, and Relation.

Recognizability is how well known someone is, how well known their platform is, etc. The more you feel you know a candidate, the more likely you are to vote for them. This is why Clinton bragged about having a 100% ratio of being known.

Respect is how much you feel they would do a good job at being president. how effective do you believe they will be.

Relation then is how much you personally like the candidate. How much you feel they are a good person.

Now, the important things to keep in mind when comparing two candidates is first that the value for this starts at 0 and second that the last two have an equal scale in negative value.

So, if I were to make a quiz for this I would first ask "How well on a scale of 0-10 would you say you know the candidate, and their policy platforms", get that number, and multiply it by 4. I would then ask four questions, a binary "do you like/dislike their skills/personality" and then a "How much on a scale of 0-10" and then multiple the answer by 2 for the respectability one. If they answered positively, the number is added to the total, and negatively subtracted.

From there one last question would be asked, seeking to know on a scale from Only Democrat to Only Republican with gradients of Likely, Lean, and Neutral. where would you say you land. If labeled as Neutral, the numbers stand as is. If Lean, Likely, or Only then apply a 33, 66, and 100% multiple to the side they support and against the side you oppose.

So, if Joe Schmo is looking at candidates Shit Sandwich (R) and Giant Douche (D), and he answers that for Sandwich he has an 8 in Recognizability, a 6 in Respectability and a 4 in Relation, where as Douche has a 4 in Recognizability, 6 in Respectability, and 8 in Relation, but that he is a Likely D voter we know Douche would get his vote because :

Shit Sandwich (R)
8 x 4 = 32
6 x 2 = 12
4 x 1 = 4
Total = 48

Giant Douche (D)
4 x 4 = 16
6 x 2 = 12
8 x 1 = 8
Total = 36

Likely D = R Down 66% & D Up 66%
R = 48 x 0.66 = 28.8
D = 36 x 1.66 = 59.76
R28.8 < D59.76, Democrat gets Vote

While the math is quite simple really, and it is possible to get a far more precise version, this simple math really does tell an individual person's vote and the weighting is universal. And it is applicable without the lean within primaries.
 
There'd be no protesting, they'd just call it "far right riots of domestic terrorism" and only a few pro-Palestine leftists would actually show up, the rest would stay home and reXeet the party line.
Pretty much. A protest is only a protest of those that need to be heard when it's sanctioned by those with power or can be used to push some sort of bullshit. In any other case, a protest is violent insurrection that must be squashed, never forget the yellowejackets in France or the honkening in Canada.
 
I don't think its up to us deciding if we go to war with Iran. Israel will be done. Damn the consequences.


I'm doubtful. I think they might off Hunter. Then give Joe an easy out to step down while the hoe takes over. But I don't think Dr. Jill wants to step down. There's several factions and while they agree on a few things,they probably don't agree on having Joe step down. Joe legit thinks he's the best president since FDR.

In either situation, I don't think the public is gonna take it lying down. I think their best move is to false-flag a massive internet outage to usher in their 2030 plans. Who knows what the deep state wants to do.

Biden won't step down. Especially if his wife has anything to say about it.

I can see Joe sanctioning the murder of Hunter ONLY if he is guaranteed a second term and the chance to straight up murder everyone who he blames for forcing him to do it, by refusing to go along with allowing Hunter to be a corrupt piece of shit in bed with his dad's own corruption schemes.

Hence my second scenario: kill Jill Biden but make it look like a freak accident THEN poison Biden to kill him under the often mention scenario where a spouse dies after the other spouse dies especially when the two are old (as Biden is). And depending on how fast on the uptick Hunter is, you let him go to the funeral and THEN vanish him with a note saying he's fucking off to a country with no extradition with the US or you vanish him BEFORE the funeral and leave the "screw you, I'm out of here" not but with both scenarios Hunter is murdered and corpse destroyed so the fucker doesn't even get a burial.
 
As for staged black swan events, it's got to be one of two things:

1. They fucking murder Hunter Biden in public to permanently rid Biden of the albatross that is his son and blame it on MAGA to give Biden the dead child sympathy push to get re-elected and go full mask off tyrant to destroy Trump and his supporters and any opposition to him and the left.

2. They kill Jill Biden in a freak accident THEN poison Biden, so they can pass Biden's poisoning off as "grief induced heart attack". Then go all in on Kamala, public hatred of her be damned, and make her President with rigging galore and Biden's intestines draped all over her so she can exploit the deaths of Jill and Joe to be immune to any criticism. And as an added bonus, they vanish Hunter under the guise that he's "gone into hiding to mourn his family" in a country that has no extradition treaty with the US but in truth, he's been killed with a bullet in the back of his head right after his dad's funeral and his corpse tossed into an incinerator.
Sometimes I wonder if the glowniggers reading this forum occasionally go "Goddamn, that's a good idea. Write that shit down!"
 
I may be getting my generations mixed up, but aren't boomers willing to go to their graves believing that we could have won Vietnam if we had just done X or Y and yadda yadda?

As mentioned, only the most militant right wing boomers think that and they are wrong. Vietnam was fucked from the start due to massive mistakes and fumbles by the French before the USA even got involved.
 
If you're pondering on what another Pandemic style shut down could be, it can't be:

  • American centric, or the rest of the world will ignore it.
  • Costly to the people at the top - pandemic made billions for the rich.
  • impact life in an obviously negative way
  • Blamed on a single person, group or country. It has to be ethereal blame or blaming nature.
  • Have an exit plan to return to 'normal' if it doesn't work out.
The most plausible event, in my opinion, would be for the internet to be turned off with help from Amazon and MS. Maybe even regulate the internet only to apps installed on your phones; FB, Tiktok, Insta, while search engines, Tor etc are turned off. All VPN's become illegal because that's where the breach started.

The insomniac and GTA leaks may just be the beginning
 
If you're pondering on what another Pandemic style shut down could be, it can't be:

  • American centric, or the rest of the world will ignore it.
  • Costly to the people at the top - pandemic made billions for the rich.
  • impact life in an obviously negative way
  • Blamed on a single person, group or country. It has to be ethereal blame or blaming nature.
  • Have an exit plan to return to 'normal' if it doesn't work out.
The most plausible event, in my opinion, would be for the internet to be turned off with help from Amazon and MS. Maybe even regulate the internet only to apps installed on your phones; FB, Tiktok, Insta, while search engines, Tor etc are turned off. All VPN's become illegal because that's where the breach started.

The insomniac and GTA leaks may just be the beginning
We might be assuming different premises re: why they are going to pull another magic show but how does a shutdown of the internet in a manner that doesn't really effect 90% of the niggercattle help get Biden re-elected? Or is this the shutdown of the non-controlled internet the premise in itself in this scenario?
 
Maybe even regulate the internet only to apps installed on your phones; FB, Tiktok, Insta, while search engines, Tor etc are turned off.
but then how will the feds/pedos get their cheese pizza? don't tell me that wrongthinkers get it planted on their phone.....
_____________________________________________________________________
In other news, NC will get a bunch of new laws put into effect on January 1st, but the most important one is this:
Initially vetoed by Gov. Roy Cooper but then overridden by Republicans in the General Assembly, Senate Bill 747 makes changes to the state’s voting system. Previously, the law allowed same-day voter applicants to be denied if two mailed notices to the registrant’s mailing address were returned as undeliverable. The new law makes applicants ineligible to vote if one notice is returned as undeliverable. The bill also makes 7:30 p.m. on Election Day the deadline for mail-in voting and gives more power to poll observers.
that's one battleground state taken care of.
 
Trump shitting on Nimrod, and then pointing out the obvious that Vivek was just a vehicle for him to attack people without doing it himself, and actual chess move:

00125.png

00126.png

If you need any more convincing Coulter is a fed plant, here's your sign:

00124.png


Pro tip, don't sit in a chair that makes you look even smaller than you are, but he has the best minds looking out for him because he never backs down:

 
We might be assuming different premises re: why they are going to pull another magic show but how does a shutdown of the internet in a manner that doesn't really effect 90% of the niggercattle help get Biden re-elected? Or is this the shutdown of the non-controlled internet the premise in itself in this scenario?
The idea is control information. Think back to covid and the censorship; facebook, gram, tiktok et al, all got the memo that covid came from bat soup, the lockdowns would be over in two weeks, the jab was one and done, oopsie i mean, 2 jabs, no no i mean, 2 jabs and a booster and it's totally safe and effective.

Fringe channels on Youtube, conspiracy sites and KWF played a big part in tearing down the wall of bullshit that being spread. Remember, talking in public was almost completely done away with; no work mates to chat to, no pubs or bars open.

If one controls the spread of information, they can freely spread the lies. Trump lost 2024, says the Ministry of Truth. How can we verify that did or did not happen if the internet is put back in a box?

but then how will the feds/pedos get their cheese pizza? don't tell me that wrongthinkers get it planted on their phone.....
The fed, the governments and the rich will be exempt of course. Just like when you weren't allowed to travel or fly, unless you had your own private jet, no travelling outside of your area, unless you're a member of government of course and finally, no eating in restaurants, unless you're the dems having a party after one of the members got a hair cut...
 
As mentioned, only the most militant right wing boomers think that and they are wrong. Vietnam was fucked from the start due to massive mistakes and fumbles by the French before the USA even got involved.
Yet under Nixon, South Vietnam and United States won the war as per the Paris Peace Accords. When the victory condition was South Vietnam exists as an independent nation*. Which the U.S. congressional democrats went and snatched defeat from the jaws of victory when they cut U.S. support to South Vietnam during the republican president Ford. Something the democrats forgot when they abandoned Afghanistan as that is something you do during a republican presidential administration not their own democrat run administration.

Nobody in the United States trusted Ho Chi Minh or the North Vietnamese communists after the bait and switch Castro pulled on Eisenhower when taking over Cuba.

*Same condition as South Korea which still relies on the United States to this day.
 
Why does Trump Capitalize Random Words and TALK IN ALL CAPS?
Because he's a Boomer, and unlike every other politician, he writes his own tweets.

We might be assuming different premises re: why they are going to pull another magic show but how does a shutdown of the internet in a manner that doesn't really effect 90% of the niggercattle help get Biden re-elected? Or is this the shutdown of the non-controlled internet the premise in itself in this scenario?

You shut down the internet so you can do the next steal without anyone being allowed to talk about it. They already learned in 2020 that the country will put up with nationwide house arrest if you can frame it as Believing in Soyence. We know they're flaiiling because Biden is so incompetent and unpopular that Trump might win outside the margin of fraud. Look at what they've already been willing to do, from attempting to frame a President as a Russian spy to shutting down the global economy for almost a year, killing countless people and permanetly crippling a whole generation's childhood development, and empowering a national terrorist network to destroy communities, all because they wanted to grift off proxy wars and get unlimited cheap labor.

I have no idea what they'll do in 2024 to stop Trump from winning, but what I do know is they'll stop at nothing.
 
I've sat through half of this video and all her arguments are made up of red herrings, suggesting she really doesn't understand the grievances of rightoid & centrist parents or she is in the know but deliberately obfuscating and misleading her own audience, or more likely, providing a source for leftoids to timestamp links on Meta. All of her conspiratard nonsense ultimately boils down to "Christian fundies big mad," as if no other kind of parent might see a problem with their children being shown porn, a problem she passes off as a "sex ed" controversy, when the issue of gay porn being stocked at public school libraries has nothing to do with sex ed and no place being accessible to children. If that same book were shelved at a gas station, you'd have to show ID to buy it, so why is it freely available at a school library? Should these same school libraries also have Hustler and Playboy magazines? It's all just sex ed, right?

It's also amusing how she blames this shitshow on Covid since parents could get a glimpse at what teachers are saying to students from home and found it unimpressive & wanting of an explanation. See, the problem isn't that teachers are teaching inappropriate things to their students, it's that the parents caught them doing a fucky wucky on Zoom UWU.
it warms my heart to know that even if these people were to win, much like the original bolsheviks they will be the first to be lined up against a wall in their fag commie utopia.
 
Yet under Nixon, South Vietnam and United States won the war as per the Paris Peace Accords. When the victory condition was South Vietnam exists as an independent nation*. Which the U.S. congressional democrats went and snatched defeat from the jaws of victory when they cut U.S. support to South Vietnam during the republican president Ford. Something the democrats forgot when they abandoned Afghanistan as that is something you do during a republican presidential administration not their own democrat run administration.

Nobody in the United States trusted Ho Chi Minh or the North Vietnamese communists after the bait and switch Castro pulled on Eisenhower when taking over Cuba.

*Same condition as South Korea which still relies on the United States to this day.

I disagree, South Vietnam was constantly at a razor's edge and couldn't manage itself without constant US babysitting to a degree that made it unnacceptable and unsustainable even compare to the South Korea counterpart that the US was trying to emulate there. The French administration and fuck ups made this happen. One good example is that the French didn't properly inform the US about the nature, doctrine, supplies and other such information on their local colonial troops of native Vietnamese who had served with them. There were entire villages which were quite peaceful and friendly to western interests that got shoved into the hands of the Viet Cong because of this as the US came around and saw a bunch of guns being stocked and assumed they were for the commies.

Also when it comes to fuck with Nixon's peace: That's nothing compared to the fact the US Government refused to honor Nixon's peace deal for the return of POWs (Just like France did, and they got their POWs back once they paid) because it required the US to pay ransom and they wouldn't agree to do it because "the USA does not lose wars" and so they left hundreds of men to die.
 
Didn’t Biden leave American citizens behind in Afghanistan as well.

Yes, but in his case it was incompetence due to the failure to evacuate as they assumed their fake Afghan government would somehow last. In the case of Vietnam they were POWs who were arranged for exchange and then abandoned deliberatly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back