US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
Vyse Inglebard said:
The beaner bitch tells me "you're welcome" in perfect English, with a smug smile on her face.
Click to expand...
The basic sin of illegal immigration is entitlement. Every wetback thinks that they are entitled to come into a place they weren't invited, take what hasn't been offered, and act like a victim when people are upset about it. No one who does that is worth having around. They have to go back.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: DEBIRU MAN, John.Doe, wopirish and 25 others
The Hardest R said:
It’s been deeply ingrained in western white women that the most important thing to be seen doing is supporting the social consensus that is cultivated by the usual suspects. Whoever has more melanin content is the victim and there are few status symbols white women in current year plus eight value more than the victim. Thats why every thot is for Hamas and Nigger Lives Matter. You realize then why coverture existed.
Click to expand...

I am saddened that these thots didn't support the Talichads, but support Hummus.

It seems like the usual suspects fucked up super hard in trying to promote "white guilt" while also trying to show themselves off as white, when pictures on the ground in Gaza of the IDF shows most of those kike niggers look shades darker than the muds running through the border.

Now would be the time for the IDF to show off pictures of their actual soldiers to reclaim ground on "poor brown people" thing.

All of this doodoo could have been avoided for zionists if Hart Cellar at minimum was never made into law.

pwnest injun said:
The basic sin of illegal immigration is entitlement. Every wetback thinks that they are entitled to come into a place they weren't invited, take what hasn't been offered, and act like a victim when people are upset about it. No one who does that is worth having around. They have to go back.
Click to expand...

None of these people coming over anyways, are going to be the next Wright Brothers or disclose the cure of cancer as well.

So it doesn't even make sense from a "brain drain" pov if they all they are importing is literal shit worth nothing of value.

Makes more sense to destabilize first world nations in Europe and .....

OMG.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Backpack Knight, Chuckwagon, AnotherPleb and 5 others
Betonhaus said:
At this point I'm not quite sure if I want Trump to win, if he's just going to get stalled and sabotaged the whole time. Best to rip off the bandaid and balkanize.
Click to expand...
That’s what would happen. Just remember that the for the last several months, the Department of Defense lied to Trump and did whatever they felt like. The Commander in Chief was not the President during that time, which is one of those things that was a huge deal but doesn’t get discussed much. At the very best, you’d get Bill Barr and John Bolton-tier people who can’t wait to sell Trump out for asspats. Hell, wouldn’t surprise me if they brought them back.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance, DEBIRU MAN, Sexy Peach Emoji and 9 others

As jarring as it's been to witness the anti-democratic, one-two punch in which a court in Colorado and an unelected bureaucrat in Maine decided Donald Trump cannot appear on primary election ballots, there are many more states where litigation is underway to ban the candidate who's currently leading the national race.

In addition to Colorado and Maine, there are currently active lawsuits challenging Trump's eligibility in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, according to a New York Times survey of the situation.

Together, the states where Trump's status is under active challenge account for 269 electoral votes -- in a game where you need 270 to win.
Click to expand...

In this distinctly Orwellian age we're living in, it's only suitable that multiple challenges are being led by a group called Free Speech for People; their website invites you to "join the fight for free and fair elections."
Click to expand...

The group who's helping trying to block Trump from the ballot is named "Free Speech For People". You can't make this shit up. It smells of commie shit. Like the people's democratic republic of north korea.

And when you click on the donate button, it takes you to an actblue page. Lovely.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Irrational Exuberance, Pig Cups and 14 others
AnotherPleb said:
Don't forget that you thought the midterms wouldn't be filled with RINO backstabbing meant to smother Trump. In a regular world you'd be right. We live in clownworld.
Click to expand...
The courts are just about the only institution operating as expected. The fact I started with an incredibly low opinion of them might have something to do with that.

Judges. Are. Cowards.

I have said this often and when you keep in mind the whys and hows the courts, yes even for them rejecting the 2020 state lawsuit, is... actually expected. Anyone who thought they would swoop in and save them were idiots. A judge will, with near 100% certainty, punt a case as soon as he has a legally viable reason if it has even the slightest wiff of controversy on it. They will use one of a thousand ways to justify to themselves how this was the right thing to do. The only time they act on these things is when precedent and requirement force their hand and practically put them at gunpoint to do something.

SCOTUS is only very mildly an exception to this. In that as the highest court of the land no one can come down and slap them for fucking up so they occasionally grow balls and do something proper.

In the end though this will be one of those gun to the head cases. Two state supreme courts setting opposing precedent on national constitutional law absolutely does force SCOTUS hand on the matter. The real question on this point is will this be an exception or the rule of desperately trying to avoid actually doing anything. That I am much less certain on.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: John.Doe, Confused Doggo, Rainbow Idiot and 12 others
ToroidalBoat said:
Why don't the Democrats just allow Trump to be elected fairly? At worst to them it'd only be 4 more years, then he can never be president again because of 2-term limit.

:thinking:
Click to expand...
I think its a combination that they got high on their own supply and genuinely believe he's the boogeyman, and that they know that he will rip apart their shady networks and expose their corruption.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: AnitaSarsleezian, Super Hans v2, tehpope and 5 others
The Ugly One said:
States deciding on their own whether or not an insurrection has happened and who is responsible without any due process seems like a ripe occasion for a SCOTUS smackdown, but it seems like Roberts really, really dislikes Trump, so who knows? In clown world, anything is possible.
Click to expand...

It shouldn't even need a SCOTUS smackdown. Colorado state court convicted Trump in civil court of "insurrection" against the Federal Government, the United States itself as an entity. Colorado did not convict Trump of insurrection against Colorado.

Our laws are quite specific about shit like this. Only the federal government can try and convict someone of having committed some crime against the federal government . On top of that the bar for culpability is much lower in civil court in the first place. It is straight up kangaroo bullshit. Even worse that it was all done in absentia.

This is by design using the strategy that the Biden administration has employed the past several years. Knowing it will take time to work its way up to SCOUTS. Get a friendly court to justify whatever action. Act as if that is fine for years while it works through the court knowing whole well it will get shot down. When it does raise you hands and go "whelp we didn't know did we!" It is again an intentional subversion of the system. A system which only works when most people within it operate in good faith, at least to some degree.

The whole game here is to use this as a basis to strike Trump from the ballot wherever they can get away with it. Once the tight ballot deadlines for the physical printing of ballots passes and they produce the Trump-free ballots they will just say sorry not sorry. No can do boss we don't have the time or money to reprint ballots and we already mailed them out anyway. Maybe they halfass and send out a Trump included batch but you don't even need to steal an election when millions of people can't even vote for the candidate they want anyway.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance, John.Doe, dark night and 16 others
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Marsh Rabbit, Another Char Clone, Chuckwagon and 6 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back