Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

Here is that grandiose sense of self importance again. LOL at "letting me report." Snaggle Tooth literally brings nothing of value to the table. Tons of pages have "risk maps" and "legislative trackers." Likewise, Tony's "reporting" is nothing ore than poorly cobbled together material that was scraped from actual news sites.

View attachment 5603214
Translation: thanks for giving me narc supply every day.
 
Tony does not intend to actually go through with his prison gay wedding with Zack. He just wants to "plan for it" into perpetutity. Once Zack stops being useful to Tony , he will skip out and move on to his next exploitation. Just like every other aspect of Tony's troon out, the "engagement" is purely performative.

Screenshot 2024-01-01 105148.png
 
200 articles is one every 1.8 days. No wonder he's such a shit journalist. No way can you churn out quality content at that rate. He strikes me as someone who posts first drafts of his articles, rather than going back through several times to edit them.
I think Tony Reed thinks a draft is what you get if someone leaves a window open.
His 'articles' are just stream of consciousness ramblings.
 
Tony does not intend to actually go through with his prison gay wedding with Zack. He just wants to "plan for it" into perpetutity. Once Zack stops being useful to Tony , he will skip out and move on to his next exploitation. Just like every other aspect of Tony's troon out, the "engagement" is purely performative.

View attachment 5604382
I love how none of his goals are about helping trans people.He literally stated in another tweet that he gets constant thank yous from TIPs about how much he's helped them and yet not one 2024 goal is fighting anti trans legislation.He could of added it to his 200 articles he wants to write, but i guess he just wants to write nonsense on all of them so feels like he accomplished something.
 
Two straight men in a marriage of convenience and politics, because they were both deranged enough to cut their cocks off and call themselves women. Neither of them wants another tranny. Straight men don't want to marry straight men.
zac was a gay twink before he became a troon, I'm sure he's pretty pleased. as for tony?
 
I love how none of his goals are about helping trans people.He literally stated in another tweet that he gets constant thank yous from TIPs about how much he's helped them and yet not one 2024 goal is fighting anti trans legislation.He could of added it to his 200 articles he wants to write, but i guess he just wants to write nonsense on all of them so feels like he accomplished something.
What a great catch. Just another sign that this is all about appearance and power rather than true activism.

At least Zac is trying to change things through the legislative process. As much as a retard as he is, he gets a couple of brownie points for trying to actually make a difference. Which is 100% why Tony "loves" him.
 
If so,then Zac went from being a power bottom gay dude,formerly craving cock,as for now he is a 'lesbian woman' eating out Tonys stinkditch? Something is off here..
I like to think Zac realized no actual man, gay or straight, would date him when his attempt to become a UwU girl failed, so he got forced into his own version of T4T and ended up falling hard for Tony.

IF I guessed the above correctly, between that and Dylan Mulvaney's failed attempts to find a man.... man, what is it with gay dudes not realizing trooning out is the worst thing you can do to get cock?
 
Zack's relection campaign has an interesting problem that he did not have the first time around. In election 1.0, most people just saw a name on the ballot with a D next to it and checked the box. Most people had enevr heard from him and most probably didn't know they were voting for a troon. The question now is, after Zack made troonery the central focus of his office, would the people who voted for him before and did not know he was a troon do so again?
 
Zack's relection campaign has an interesting problem that he did not have the first time around. In election 1.0, most people just saw a name on the ballot with a D next to it and checked the box. Most people had enevr heard from him and most probably didn't know they were voting for a troon. The question now is, after Zack made troonery the central focus of his office, would the people who voted for him before and did not know he was a troon do so again?
It really depends on how conservative the Democrats in his district are. Take the US Senate for example, Manchin has a reputation for being a blocker on anything the Democrats want. But when you look at his voting record he votes in line with the democrats something like 85% of the time.

What Manchin is really doing is considering the people in his state and voting accordingly. The Democrats in his state are fairly conservative, but largely support the things the party wants. Manchin's votes reflect this and as such he always wins when he runs.

If Zac's distract is like West Virginia (I think that's Manchin's state), then his antics will not make him friends. If his district is a little more ~progressive~ then they'll go for him even more.

It also depends on him being challenged in the primary, if he is than someone thinks he's not doing a good job as representative. If he isn't challenged then he'll probably win again. A lot of people just vote for the party, especially an incumbent no matter how objectively awful they are.
 
It really depends on how conservative the Democrats in his district are. Take the US Senate for example, Manchin has a reputation for being a blocker on anything the Democrats want. But when you look at his voting record he votes in line with the democrats something like 85% of the time.

What Manchin is really doing is considering the people in his state and voting accordingly. The Democrats in his state are fairly conservative, but largely support the things the party wants. Manchin's votes reflect this and as such he always wins when he runs.

If Zac's distract is like West Virginia (I think that's Manchin's state), then his antics will not make him friends. If his district is a little more ~progressive~ then they'll go for him even more.

It also depends on him being challenged in the primary, if he is than someone thinks he's not doing a good job as representative. If he isn't challenged then he'll probably win again. A lot of people just vote for the party, especially an incumbent no matter how objectively awful they are.
If Zac gets primaried, he's toast. Tony has put out so much deranged troonery on social media (with pictures!) that any opponent has a built-in tool set to run oppo with. Plus, 2024 is a presidential election. He can't depend on a tame ticket to coast on. I would be surprised if Zac did run unopposed.
 
If Zac gets primaried, he's toast. Tony has put out so much deranged troonery on social media (with pictures!) that any opponent has a built-in tool set to run oppo with. Plus, 2024 is a presidential election. He can't depend on a tame ticket to coast on. I would be surprised if Zac did run unopposed.
Just "Unlike my primary opponent, I promise not to be so pants-shittingly retarded that I get kicked to the door, and will actually get to participate in pork barrel politics to bring money for dem projects home" is a pretty solid campaign platform. How many vacations has he went on?

Zac is utterly fucking useless when all but thrown out of the legislature.
 
Just "Unlike my primary opponent, I promise not to be so pants-shittingly retarded that I get kicked to the door, and will actually get to participate in pork barrel politics to bring money for dem projects home" is a pretty solid campaign platform. How many vacations has he went on?

Zac is utterly fucking useless when all but thrown out of the legislature.
I was digging around and I have not found any candidates declared at all for Zack's district including Zack. My recollection is that he had to clear up the campaign finance boondogle before he could declare and then he never did, forcing local officals to threaten to sue.
 
If he did that, some of his mouth-breathing followers could possibly put everything together and realize that Tone Dawg is full of shit. Tony's entire identity is "that smart guy girl who disseminates information online about the looming trans genocide because he's smarter than literally everyone he meets". If he linked his sources, it would be providing too much evidence that he's misleading his followers, all in one place.
I rated this post agree but in truth I wanted to rate it optimistic. Nobody who reads Tony's stuff would check sources. You can list them while saying the opposite and people will claim they support your claims. Look at Jack Turban.

Tony does not intend to actually go through with his prison gay wedding with Zack. He just wants to "plan for it" into perpetutity. Once Zack stops being useful to Tony , he will skip out and move on to his next exploitation. Just like every other aspect of Tony's troon out, the "engagement" is purely performative.

View attachment 5604382
20 books? Pretty sure last time he did this on Goodreads he failed to get to eight or ten or something like that.

I'd suggest he change it to "20 political science books about how politics works" so that those "200 articles" might accidentally inform people but that kind of shit is for non-gifted children. (On Goodreads he listed a bunch of politics books as ones he's read but they clearly didn't take and were obviously assigned readings from old college courses.)
 
I was digging around and I have not found any candidates declared at all for Zack's district including Zack. My recollection is that he had to clear up the campaign finance boondogle before he could declare and then he never did, forcing local officals to threaten to sue.
Maybe he's decided he already has established himself as a "politician" so he'll just rest on his laurels.
 
I was digging around and I have not found any candidates declared at all for Zack's district including Zack. My recollection is that he had to clear up the campaign finance boondogle before he could declare and then he never did, forcing local officals to threaten to sue.
Forgive me as I am mobile fagging at the moment.
Zac has an active campaign registered for 2024 in HD 95. Montana redistricted some parts of Missoula so he is no longer HD 100.
He made some updates to his campaign registration end of November but still does not appear to be in total compliance. He updated the deputy treasurer as Abbey Cook but he still has himself as the main treasurer. He was told the treasurer needs an email they have direct access to but the same email for Abbey is listed as both the campaign treasurer and the deputy treasurer’s email. That is a violation. He also has shown no documentation of refunding the individual contributions that exceeded the limit, but he may file that with the Q4 statement. A final judgment is still pending.

IMG_7498.jpeg
IMG_7499.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back