Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.8%

  • Total voters
    337
It's the quickest way to determine which ones are the bigger donors/paypigs to keep and plead for them to stay and which ones that he can tell to go fuck themselves without having to try to keep them around if they aren't donating as much in comparison. Just my guess.
I'd imagine it's his way of guiding the subject to a private channel rather than being forced to address it much in public.
 
I'd imagine it's his way of guiding the subject to a private channel rather than being forced to address it much in public.
Correct. It's how he divides and sub-divides with those he thinks he can convince with whatever narrative he can pull out of his ass because he still believes he's the skilled fast-talking lawyer who can win people with his words regardless of the truth.
 
Why would they need to message him? What is it with him trying to get people in his DMs?
Gaslighting.

He did it to Perception Check (as she shared). He did it to Null. He allegedly did it to Warski and/or PPP. He did it to me back in 2020. He probably has done it to many others, and people I'm forgetting atm.

What he'll likely do when if you accept his invitation to message him about his drinking is try and convince you that you are completely wrong about him being an alcoholic, and you need to stop "being gay" for thinking otherwise.

Which, of course, makes the whole thing completely pointless. It's not a conversation. A conversation is two way. Give and take. Listening. It's him trying to get you to accept his twisted substitution of reality over actual reality.
 
Why would they need to message him? What is it with him trying to get people in his DMs?
Nick is like the customer service plebs running brands’ Twitter accounts. Whenever some disgruntled airline passenger or Taco Bell shitbag starts rage tweeting and tagging the company, the CS minions move them to DM ASAP.

TL;DR: It’s called a tardy attempt at damage control.
 
Ah, the asking people to DM him has already begun. "Just message me if you're concerned with my drinking".
This is a faggy thing lots of cows do because they think they can manipulate you more easily if it's one on one.
You can tell his pasty ass hasn't been south of Minnesota, let alone south of the Mason Dixon line. The classic NYE/New Year's meal is collards, black eyed peas, rice, and some form of pork, be it ham or pork chops. Cornbread on the side.
He grew up in Texas.
 
Why would they need to message him? What is it with him trying to get people in his DMs? That's a strong tell how high in neuroticism someone is... "Oh no! You think I'm an alcoholic!? Let me message you in private and fix this somehow..." ... wouldn't not being an alcoholic be easier?
He is trying to control the narrative. If you have 100 people calling you out every day on social media others outside take note and investigate.
Can't persuade those who are laughing at him, but those normie bucks are at stake. He knows the MANdy situation looks terrible.

So his plan is 2 fold.
1. Attempt to look professional for 1 month to get a Rumble contract renewal.
2. Increase revenue from normie or boomer conservatives by talking about Trump again.

To achieve this he is going to avoid talking about MANdy or going on a depressing drunken rant later of which his current audience has been giving him pushback on.
 
I remember the times when Nick was a funny lawyer, explaining shit like DSP's bankruptcy process, streaming with Josh and the Depp-Heard-Trial. By then he was already drinking a lot tbh in retrospective, but nothing out of the order and only at the end of streams if I remember it correctly. The decline was slow, but steady. And then the Balldo happened and the speed of the downfall escalated. Or maybe it always was that way, but because of YouTube's ToS he could not show the full extent of his degeneracy.
It's times like this and reading comments like this that get me curious as to if his old stuff actually does hold up as well as it's remembered. I believe someone earlier in this thread was comparing and contrasting old content to modern content and finding it was clearly better "back in the good ol' days," but we've also gotta remember that the whole Drexel grooming thing was also old content and that was just sort of glossed over at the time because the thread liked Nick and wasn't very critical or attentive to detail. Don't know if I'll actually bother checking, given how long the dude's streams are, but I do wonder.
 
It's times like this and reading comments like this that get me curious as to if his old stuff actually does hold up as well as it's remembered. I believe someone earlier in this thread was comparing and contrasting old content to modern content and finding it was clearly better "back in the good ol' days," but we've also gotta remember that the whole Drexel grooming thing was also old content and that was just sort of glossed over at the time because the thread liked Nick and wasn't very critical or attentive to detail. Don't know if I'll actually bother checking, given how long the dude's streams are, but I do wonder.
Just my personal opinion, but I was never a Rickieta viewer because I found him to be too boring. I was aware of him only through his association with others that I did watch (Metokur and Ralph, around the IBS era). As far as YouTube lawyers, I'm a Law Talk with Mike enjoyer. Way more energy and entertainment than Rickieta (though admittedly it has been a long time since I watched any, so if he's recently nosedived I'm unaware).
 
It's times like this and reading comments like this that get me curious as to if his old stuff actually does hold up as well as it's remembered. I believe someone earlier in this thread was comparing and contrasting old content to modern content and finding it was clearly better "back in the good ol' days," but we've also gotta remember that the whole Drexel grooming thing was also old content and that was just sort of glossed over at the time because the thread liked Nick and wasn't very critical or attentive to detail. Don't know if I'll actually bother checking, given how long the dude's streams are, but I do wonder.
I think the issue with Nick's old content is it was good at the time. It's difficult to watch something like his Weebwars stuff now knowing what a hash Ty would eventually make of Vic's case

There's some "evergreen" moments, I'm sure, but not many.

I wouldn't bother, honestly. It was very much a "you had to be there" sort of thing.
 
Last edited:
Just my personal opinion, but I was never a Rickieta viewer because I found him to be too boring. I was aware of him only through his association with others that I did watch (Metokur and Ralph, around the IBS era). As far as YouTube lawyers, I'm a Law Talk with Mike enjoyer. Way more energy and entertainment than Rickieta (though admittedly it has been a long time since I watched any, so if he's recently nosedived I'm unaware).
Law Talk with Mike is the anti-Rekieta in this regard. He's marginally smoother than he was in the very beginning, but it's very much the same thing as always. Also he's obviously practicing and extremely consistent with streaming nonetheless.

But Law Talk with Mike isn't about Mike. He picks interesting cases with amusing judges and defendants and one watches for that. Any commentary he adds is extra.

Runkle of the Bailey may have gone more mainstream in Canada, since two boomers who aren't terminally online autists have mentioned him to me.

I liked Nick's old content when it was on something that interested me.
 
I remember liking some of the stuff I'd listen to in the background at the time, but because I'm probably way less conservative than the majority of this website the boomercon stuff I'd give a skip. (Paradoxically I liked the Josh streams and his solo streams, but he's just a more entertaining guy regardless imo.) At the time I do remember that I was generally looking more for an interesting guest or topic rather than being the type of viewer who'd sit through anything to watch just for Nick himself, so my experience with the old stuff might just be different from that perspective (which seems to be more common in this thread) regardless.
 
I liked Nick's old content when it was on something that interested me.
Pretty much this. Instead of reading some relatively boring legal document for an hour, you could have Nick on in the background while doing something else and tune in for the interesting parts. They don't really have re-watch/listenability though.
 
Back