- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
If you fuck a 14 year old, it doesn't matter if the correct adjective is pedophilic or ephebophilic. The only appropriate adjective should be shot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's two basic categories here: you might call them Joes and Hunters.I really want pedophile to remain a word that means fucking kids, not teenagers, because when you call someone a pedo, it should have force behind it.
I dont see the issue with this, as in, ephebophiles should get beaten too and it should be treated with force. The most famous in my mind onision as this was the first time hearing the term as in he said "im actually a ephebophile, not a pedophile" as if it made him better. In fact I think it made us more aware how socially reprehensible they are as his degeneracy and abuse is well documented here as im pretty sure they are all like him.But if you can make it stick - as in, people will take you seriously and beat up ephebophiles (new word to try to spell for today) with as much vigor as they should beat pedos - then you do you. I just don't think it'll work, it just makes pedo accusations less serious.
Can everyone please fucking kill themselves so we can go back to talking about the elite fuckers in the documents rather than how many months you have to wait to stick your cock in a whore who was happily bought and paid for and only became a victim when they were kicked off the island?I am one of these people, and really what I'm requesting is an ounce of consistency from radical feminists. A 30/40/50-something year old man is (understandably) attracted to 18-25 year old bombshells in their breeding prime, but is villified as predatory by the radfem community. Obviously, these 19/20/21/22 year old women are not in fact women, but merely tall female children that must be protected from droopy middle-aged dick.
Studies show our brains aren't done developing until we're 25 anyways, so let's just raise the "fuckin'" age if 18-25 year old gash is a fruit that should always remain forbidden and shameful to lust after. If radfems want to treat normal male urges as gross and immoral (dicking down young but 18+ adult women) then obviously 18 year old women aren't adults. So we need, as a society, a new standard of consent/adulthood, and it needs to be higher than it currently sits. Maybe we can try 21 for a bit and see how it feels.
Absolutely. Sorry for shitting up the thread, everyone. I saw you had brought up a view that I actually consider one of my hot takes and got drawn in.so we can go back to talking about the elite fuckers in the documents
Can everyone please fucking kill themselves so we can go back to talking about the elite fuckers in the documents rather than how many months you have to wait to stick your cock in a whore who was happily bought and paid for and only became a victim when they were kicked off the island?
I lmaoed hard at the signingTry and pay attention to the conversation you're butting in on, you simpleton. The filth I was replying to was thinking up ways to go and fuck people under the age of his local age of consent without getting in trouble with the law. The whole topic of the conversation is the legality vs illegality.
Also you don't need to sign your posts.
I am a prick who shits up threads when you see me do something please do the opposite.Absolutely. Sorry for shitting up the thread, everyone. I saw you had brought up a view that I actually consider one of my hot takes and got drawn in.
Let's talk about the depositions.
Anyone know where Trump is mentioned on the list. I saw his wife's name but I think I somehow missed his name somewhere
neither exoneration nor inculpation because, at least with these limited witnesses, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. And frankly, anyone hanging around this massive pedophile should be suspect- even before he was convicted the first time. Just like with weinstein, there's no way people didn't know what he was about. He doesn't seem to have been that careful.did you even read the epstein docs.
as far as we can see now, trump is only exonorated by the documents because every time he's mentioned it's "did you see him? did he do anything? how many kids did he throw into lava balls deep?" and every time the answer is "no, not that i ever saw, 0 that i know of."
The "victim's" role here is to poison the well. Disappearing may rid the accused of any wrongdoing, but it'll forever stain their reputation and brainwash hundreds of millions. You don't need to look far to see it.Entirely possible that this was a political hitjob on trump. It wouldn't have been the first. Devil's advocate, though: imagine that someone alleged that bill clinton and Epstein had abused her when she was underage, bringing a lawsuit to that effect. Then, just before going to a press conference, she dropped off the face of the earth. Would people assume that she must have been lying? Or that someone 'convinced' her to disappear?
Yeah, but who would be impaling them on the stake?If one of these rich faggots showed up impaled on a stake I suspect the rest of them would fall in line.
If you fuck a 14 year old, it doesn't matter if the correct adjective is pedophilic or ephebophilic. The only appropriate adjective should be shot.
Sorry for being a retard, but who were you refering to here specifically? A certain person or just the way they're being painted by the people behind this?who was happily bought and paid for and only became a victim when they were kicked off the island?
It's one thing to call for extermination but for you to immediately jump to that it sounds like something a pedo would say to make themselves sound more righteous in the fucked up shit they do. You belong on the wall with them for so much as thinking about sex acts with children.So chat, are Jewish children fair game now ?
Goyim children clearly are so what do you think ?