Fat Acceptance Movement / Fat Girlcows

Jesus Christ, these people are acting like asking them to wipe their own asses is on par with training to be an Olympic gymnast.

It's not "internalized ableism" to want to keep my butthole clean, and it's a massive delusion on their part to think that one person losing weight to clean her own ass is a personal affront.
They are so fucking selfish. Imagine saying to someone with a REAL disability or condition like ALS or Parkinson’s, “Isn’t a relief that we can’t wipe our own assholes anymore?”

People with actual medical issues struggle with feeling of shame and loss of dignity when it comes to bodily functions. The FA crowd think they’re offering a remedy to shame, but instead it’s just insulting.
 
these people are acting like asking them to wipe their own asses is on par with training to be an Olympic gymnast.
To be fair, they do need to be more flexible to do so. I mean you imagine having a butt that big and having to somehow reach your asshole.

They are so fucking selfish. Imagine saying to someone with a REAL disability or condition like ALS or Parkinson’s, “Isn’t a relief that we can’t wipe our own assholes anymore?”

People with actual medical issues struggle with feeling of shame and loss of dignity when it comes to bodily functions. The FA crowd think they’re offering a remedy to shame, but instead it’s just insulting.
These faggots have no shame. If they did... they wouldn't be fat.

They have to reach a point in their weight gain journey that they just say, "fuck it" and just accept they're fat and can't change.
 
I've always said there is a tiny percent of the population that are unable to lose weight, where diets don't work and their bodies seem to actively sabotage any type of weight loss by going into some kind of crisis. But you're looking at maybe 1 - 2 %. This doesn't cover the legion of fatasses like Evie that crow about HAES and that it's okay she eats an entire box of Little Debbie cakes in one sitting because she only does this once a week. You know... moderation.
I feel like those people have always existed, but they're not deathfats. Even looking at old paintings you see the occasional larger women; things like short torsos, larger busts, thick thighs, etc.
1.jpg2.jpg
I can totally understand someone being naturally a bit heavier than others as a mutation or something, but someone like Evie is a freak of nature whose body is made by food and sloth.

What about a gunt-bra to support and shape the flab?
1704399953817.png
 
I feel like those people have always existed, but they're not deathfats. Even looking at old paintings you see the occasional larger women; things like short torsos, larger busts, thick thighs, etc.

The women in old paintings were men. Women were not allowed to model so painters slapped tits on dudes. That’s why they look big.
 
I feel like those people have always existed, but they're not deathfats. Even looking at old paintings you see the occasional larger women; things like short torsos, larger busts, thick thighs, etc.

By no means does history not have people who were rich enough to be fat, lol. Because it was rare it was sought after.

Now not being a land whale is.
 
The women in old paintings were men. Women were not allowed to model so painters slapped tits on dudes. That’s why they look big.
I think that was just some Michelangelo statues.
While you couldn't get nude female models, you could get female models.
The first painting is Woman with a Mirror by Titian and the model is either his lover or just the same woman who appears in a couple of his other paintings.
The second is Raphael's Saint Catherine of Alexandria, which I had to look up and you're right and I was wrong. That was indeed a male model, but apparently you could also pay prostitutes to stay female anatomy and then reference that against the male model.
Michelangelo also used male models with boobs tacked on:
1704402208529.png
 
The women in old paintings were men. Women were not allowed to model so painters slapped tits on dudes. That’s why they look big.
This portrait is called "The Little Fur".

The-Little-Fur-Helen-Fourment-the-Second-Wife-to-the-Artist-Rubens-Peter-Paul-c.-1638.jpg

It was painted in 1638 by Peter Paul Rubens. The model is his second wife.

As @Free the Pedos said, Michaelangelo was infamous for slapping tits on men and calling them women. This wasn't because he couldn't get female models. In his day and age, there were no end of desperately impoverished women who'd sell their body for less than the cost of a loaf of bread. He didn't paint women because he didn't like looking at them. He was both a raging homosexual and a gigantic miser, so in an era where the only self expression women were allowed to have were jewellery and pretty dresses, they would have offended him in every possible way.
 
This portrait is called "The Little Fur".

View attachment 5611859

It was painted in 1638 by Peter Paul Rubens. The model is his second wife.

As @Free the Pedos said, Michaelangelo was infamous for slapping tits on men and calling them women. This wasn't because he couldn't get female models. In his day and age, there were no end of desperately impoverished women who'd sell their body for less than the cost of a loaf of bread. He didn't paint women because he didn't like looking at them. He was both a raging homosexual and a gigantic miser, so in an era where the only self expression women were allowed to have were jewellery and pretty dresses, they would have offended him in every possible way.

Women were not regularly used as models until after the 17th century after being popularized by Rembrandt’s studio. If you read about the history this was a scandalous idea at the time.

Artist studios were also businesses passed down through families, more like accounting firms than bohemian outposts. They didn’t invite prostitutes to hang out for cheap shits and giggles.
 
Last edited:
While you couldn't get nude female models, you could get female models.
The first painting is Woman with a Mirror by Titian and the model is either his lover or just the same woman who appears in a couple of his other paintings.
The second is Raphael's Saint Catherine of Alexandria, which I had to look up and you're right and I was wrong. That was indeed a male model, but apparently you could also pay prostitutes to stay female anatomy and then reference that against the male model.
Michelangelo also used male models with boobs tacked on:
View attachment 5611868
Absolutely. Prostitutes were used as models as early (as can be confirmed through documentation) as the Renaissance (so likely way earlier). Michelangelo's tendency to paint/depict male bodies was probably due an autistic urge to try to depict the human body as realistically as possible - a result of studying male cadavers. Also, possibly lol gay; or, as the JSTOR article puts it, he just took advantage of "the use of masculinity to connote power" (androgyny divine blah blah blah). Either or.
 
As penance for the off-topic, I bring Aubrey:





And also Linds

 
As penance for the off-topic, I bring Aubrey
Her face is really, really freaking me out. At first, I thought it was just whatever is going on with her midface/glabellar area, but the more I look, the more I realize it's just...everything. Everything about her face is making me feel wrong inside, like some kind of ungodly uncanny valley effect. I can't tear my eyes away from it.

Also, pretty sure that she's grossly (heh heh) misunderstanding the relationship of BMI and survival in end stage renal disease (and also everything else). God, this bitch really thinks highly of herself, doesn't she?
 
Back