US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Okay but how does that apply to the right/GOP

We ve talked about how the DNC machine and the GOP machine function differently and the DNC bad habbit of rising self promoting activists, and clipping the wings of upstart rivals

vs

The GOP factions having to use more self funding and favoring more of a meritocracy as compared to the DNC.

If anything I would think trump populism would be the easiest thing to co-op. Have some GOP leaders or jr members take trump points with their own spin. Hell they dont need to play the trump hilter card they can diss trump by saying shit like

"he truly and honestly wants solve this countries problems, but he s an old 1990 new york democrat, and tv personality he sadly didnt have the political skills to drain the swamp....but thats something I m committed to doing!!"

etc
They tried. DeSantis was one big try but also look at Haley and to some extent Ramaswamy. The problem is that Trumpian populism requires someone with charisma at this stage. This will stop being a requirement eventually as it becomes standard policy but right now... well, they are competing with Trump. Co=opting requires setting up a superficially better alternative to get people to flock to it, only to pull the rug out from under them when its too late. They cannot do so with policy without going too far and losing chunks of moderates so their only area to compete on... is sheer magnetism.

Political power isnt permanent and forever. Hillary at this point has no direct power and just blackmail and owed favors. Many of which shes already burned.

She probably has a few pieces still but her power grows weaker with each day and with each senior official that she had her hooks in retires or leaves for a cushy ngo.

Tldr. She can no longer "refill" the well of her political power and influence and has to expend what she already collected over the years.
I refer back to a post I made in 2021 where I explain the concept you are referring to her. Political capital.

All jokes aside, I think that Hillary Clinton can win against Kamela Harris. The race angle would be played for short term "gain," but Kamela is not a great curator or speaker.
A ham sandwich could win against Kamala Harris.
 
Correct, there is no law that requires presidential debates. The media point-and-sputter at losing hundreds of millions in advertising dollars and chapped asses make it completely worth it to skip it. Yet another media institution will shatter, which is all the more reason to not do it.

Not having debates is dangerous to our Democracy(tm)



As well he shouldn't. The United States was built under the idea that this nation would be a union of states but this union was to be maintained under the idea that if our government (state or federal) becomes incapable of governing then it's the right of the people to see change enacted.


They tried. DeSantis was one big try but also look at Haley and to some extent Ramaswamy. The problem is that Trumpian populism requires someone with charisma at this stage. This will stop being a requirement eventually as it becomes standard policy but right now... well, they are competing with Trump. Co=opting requires setting up a superficially better alternative to get people to flock to it, only to pull the rug out from under them when its too late. They cannot do so with policy without going too far and losing chunks of moderates so their only area to compete on... is sheer magnetism.

Trump also still plays kingmaker, assuming he overcomes all his legal challenges and wins 2024 he gets to have the final nod for who runs in 2028. A lot of the neocons have played their hand and sent out their snakes to try to nip and bite at Trump to slow him down and they've failed. Whoever can win him over after that will have an insane level of momentum compared to any other conservative challengers. It makes the idea of them simply coopting the MAGA movement a lot harder because actual believers will take Trump's word above anyone elses. The Tea Party never had a true central figure to rally around so the neocons were able to hijack it much easier. It doesn't mean it's impossible obviously as we've already had a few guys latch on to MAGA only to stab Trump in the back like Crenshaw who was just another McCain dick sucker but some have gotten better about sniffing out frauds.
 
At this point, ‘inclusion’ is simply code for ‘fuck white people.’
IMG_1027.jpeg

For those who don’t know, William Penn, a Quaker, was a pacifist. He did not militarily battle the Delaware (or the Leni Lenape) who laid claim to the lands for which he had received a charter in Pennsylvania. As a result, he worked out a treaty and bought lands through negotiations with the Delaware chiefs. Through negotiating these treaties, Penn was part of the natives' "chain of friendship." Penn upheld his end of the treaty and did not trick or otherwise renege on his commitment to the natives. He also paid a fair price for the land. His relationships with the indigenous tribes he counted as his neighbors were amicable. And, like it or not, he played a pivotal role in the founding of what we now call Pennsylvania. Therefore, taking down the statue is absolutely ludicrous- if they want to commemorate the indigenous tribes, it’d be better (and less divisive) to just add some commemorations to them within the same park. For chrissake…add instead of subtracting.

They hate you, repudiate your history and skin color, and want you dead and gone. But, hey, at least the National Parks Service is receptive to feedback! Per Fox:
IMG_1028.jpeg

Deb Fucking Haaland really needs a good old- [REDACTED FEDPOST].
 
At this point, ‘inclusion’ is simply code for ‘fuck white people.’
View attachment 5619659

For those who don’t know, William Penn, a Quaker, was a pacifist. He did not militarily battle the Delaware (or the Leni Lenape) who laid claim to the lands for which he had received a charter in Pennsylvania. As a result, he worked out a treaty and bought lands through negotiations with the Delaware chiefs. Through negotiating these treaties, Penn was part of the natives' "chain of friendship." Penn upheld his end of the treaty and did not trick or otherwise renege on his commitment to the natives. He also paid a fair price for the land. His relationships with the indigenous tribes he counted as his neighbors were amicable. And, like it or not, he played a pivotal role in the founding of what we now call Pennsylvania. Therefore, taking down the statue is absolutely ludicrous- if they want to commemorate the indigenous tribes, it’d be better (and less divisive) to just add some commemorations to them within the same park. For chrissake…add instead of subtracting.

They hate you, repudiate your history and skin color, and want you dead and gone. But, hey, at least the National Parks Service is receptive to feedback! Per Fox:
View attachment 5619685

Deb Fucking Haaland really needs a good old- [REDACTED FEDPOST].
Remove the statue of the guy that a state is named after. Great.
 
At this point, ‘inclusion’ is simply code for ‘fuck white people.’
View attachment 5619659

For those who don’t know, William Penn, a Quaker, was a pacifist. He did not militarily battle the Delaware (or the Leni Lenape) who laid claim to the lands for which he had received a charter in Pennsylvania. As a result, he worked out a treaty and bought lands through negotiations with the Delaware chiefs. Through negotiating these treaties, Penn was part of the natives' "chain of friendship." Penn upheld his end of the treaty and did not trick or otherwise renege on his commitment to the natives. He also paid a fair price for the land. His relationships with the indigenous tribes he counted as his neighbors were amicable. And, like it or not, he played a pivotal role in the founding of what we now call Pennsylvania. Therefore, taking down the statue is absolutely ludicrous- if they want to commemorate the indigenous tribes, it’d be better (and less divisive) to just add some commemorations to them within the same park. For chrissake…add instead of subtracting.

They hate you, repudiate your history and skin color, and want you dead and gone. But, hey, at least the National Parks Service is receptive to feedback! Per Fox:
View attachment 5619685

Deb Fucking Haaland really needs a good old- [REDACTED FEDPOST].

Elections have consequences.

Which is why the Taliban dindu nuffin wrong in preserving their way of like as it was during the time of when the British invaded in the 1800s and got booted out.
 
At this point, ‘inclusion’ is simply code for ‘fuck white people.’
View attachment 5619659

For those who don’t know, William Penn, a Quaker, was a pacifist. He did not militarily battle the Delaware (or the Leni Lenape) who laid claim to the lands for which he had received a charter in Pennsylvania. As a result, he worked out a treaty and bought lands through negotiations with the Delaware chiefs. Through negotiating these treaties, Penn was part of the natives' "chain of friendship." Penn upheld his end of the treaty and did not trick or otherwise renege on his commitment to the natives. He also paid a fair price for the land. His relationships with the indigenous tribes he counted as his neighbors were amicable. And, like it or not, he played a pivotal role in the founding of what we now call Pennsylvania. Therefore, taking down the statue is absolutely ludicrous- if they want to commemorate the indigenous tribes, it’d be better (and less divisive) to just add some commemorations to them within the same park. For chrissake…add instead of subtracting.

They hate you, repudiate your history and skin color, and want you dead and gone. But, hey, at least the National Parks Service is receptive to feedback! Per Fox:
View attachment 5619685

Deb Fucking Haaland really needs a good old- [REDACTED FEDPOST].
Self-hating white people are the worst.
 
All jokes aside, I think that Hillary Clinton can win against Kamela Harris. The race angle would be played for short term "gain," but Kamela is not a great curator or speaker.
See the difference between Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton is Hillary Clinton is at least an extremely intelligent and evil woman Kamala Harris is just a dumb Indian hoe
Gets on her knees for the black community
Just ask Willie Brown
 
Therefore, taking down the statue is absolutely ludicrous- if they want to commemorate the indigenous tribes, it’d be better (and less divisive) to just add some commemorations to them within the same park. For chrissake…add instead of subtracting.
The goal isn't to commemorate the indigenous tribes. The goal is disrupting American culture. Period. They don't care how they do it, just that it's disrupted, preferably in a long term manner that will give them opportunities for a future marxist revolution, power, or revenge.
 
People talk about the current crop and the dire straights both major parties are in for future leadership, but if you remember the 90s, the future leaders they'd picked out were borderline retards like Al Gore and Dan Quail.

That said, I don't see much hope in anyone running today. Vivek is the best of the bunch, and he's a yappy dog at best. Sure, he's yapping at something real, but I don't think he'd survive one swift kick.
 
Quakers? We're demonizing the quakers now, of all things?

Biden is actually retarded. It's beyond hope.
The only thing Biden has the power to do is tell his aides what flavor of ice cream to bring him.

It's the people with their hands up his ass making him talk. And they're not doing it because they're retards... I mean, yeah they're retards but that's besides the point. They're a malignant cancer deliberately killing America because they believe it's an irredeemably racist shithole founded on the bodies of Africans and Indians.
 
For better or for worse you know Hillary never let herself go down on anyone to gain her position. She's ruthless and vindictive, and she respects her body too much to sell it to anyone.
She already sold herself to Lucifer. You can't sell the same soul to different people.
The only thing Biden has the power to do is tell his aides what flavor of ice cream to bring him.

It's the people with their hands up his ass making him talk. And they're not doing it because they're retards... I mean, yeah they're retards but that's besides the point. They're a malignant cancer deliberately killing America because they believe it's an irredeemably racist shithole founded on the bodies of Africans and Indians.
Which is a bad long term trend for the West overall. I'm not a Jew, but the only way Jews can save themselves now is fully support Trump; the only president that actually likes them and their culture.
 
The goal isn't to commemorate the indigenous tribes. The goal is disrupting American culture. Period. They don't care how they do it, just that it's disrupted, preferably in a long term manner that will give them opportunities for a future marxist revolution, power, or revenge.
It’s about eliminating American identity entirely. America isn’t a country. It’s just a place you go to buy things. There’s no history in America, just stuff you need to buy NOW. They want to turn it into a brand like they did to Canada.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back